DAQ Considerations For Increased Rep. Rate J. Leaver 01/12/2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RF Specification discussion MICE RF workshop 16 th April 2012.
Advertisements

MICE TARGET OPERATION C. Booth, P. Hodgson, R. Nicholson, P. J. Smith, Dept. of Physics & Astronomy University of Sheffield, England.
MICE Fiber Tracker Electronics AFEII for MICE (Front end readout board) Recall: AFEs mount on ether side of the VLPC cass, with fibers going to the VLPCs.
ISIS Related Issues for MICE Adam Dobbs Proton Accelerator Development Meeting, RAL 24 th March /03/20111A. Dobbs.
LHCb Upgrade Overview ALICE, ATLAS, CMS & LHCb joint workshop on DAQ Château de Bossey 13 March 2013 Beat Jost / Cern.
28 February 2003Paul Dauncey - HCAL Readout1 HCAL Readout and DAQ using the ECAL Readout Boards Paul Dauncey Imperial College London, UK.
Daresbury Aug 2005Jean-Sébastien Graulich Detector DAQ Overview and Needs Jean-Sebastien Graulich, Univ. Genève o Introduction o Detector Systems Overview.
Tracker DAQ Makoto Yoshida (Osaka Univ.) MICE Frascati 2005/6/27.
MICE Tracker Readout Overview channel AFE II-t boards - 8 Visible Light Photon Counter (VLPC) cassettes - 4 cryostats.
SciFi Tracker DAQ M. Yoshida (Osaka Univ.) MICE Tracker KEK Mar. 30, 2005.
MICE Tracker Front End Progress Tracker Data Readout Basics Progress in Increasing Fraction of Muons Tracker Can Record Determination of Recordable Muons.
28 August 2002Paul Dauncey1 Readout electronics for the CALICE ECAL and tile HCAL Paul Dauncey Imperial College, University of London, UK For the CALICE-UK.
CHEP04 - Interlaken - Sep. 27th - Oct. 1st 2004T. M. Steinbeck for the Alice Collaboration1/20 New Experiences with the ALICE High Level Trigger Data Transport.
DAQ WS02 Feb 2006Jean-Sébastien GraulichSlide 1 Does IPM System Matches MICE needs ? Personal Understanding and Remarks o General Considerations o Front.
9 Sep 2005DAQ - Paul Dauncey1 DAQ/Online Status Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
February 8 th, 2001 Status Report: SciFi for MICE Edward McKigney Imperial College London.
5 Feb 2002Electronics changes1 Possible changes to electronics Paul Dauncey Imperial College Some ideas on iterations to the design: Reduce number of uplinks?
A Brief Overview of LabVIEW Data Acquisition (DAQ)
Target Monitoring and Control Current status DAQ card – NI 6254 Analog/Digital card Problems with Linux version drivers Currently reading up to 12 channels.
Target Online Software J. Leaver 01/12/ /06/2015Imperial College 2 Target Controller Software Software for Stage 1 upgrade nearing completion –Hardware.
Luminosity Monitors MICE Video Conference 7 May 2009 Paul Soler.
The Belle SVD Trigger  Tom Ziegler  Vertex 2002  Kailua-Kona, Hawaii, 4-8 th nov The Belle SVD Trigger Tom Ziegler on behalf of the Belle SVD.
ISIS Beam Protection System and MICE operation. Dean Adams 29 Nov 07 Presented by Chris Rogers.
DAQ WS03 Sept 2006Jean-Sébastien GraulichSlide 1 DDAQ Trigger o Reminder: DAQ Trigger vs Particle Trigger o DAQ Trigger o Particle Trigger 1) Possible.
M. Bonesini DAQ Meeting1 M. Bonesini INFN Milano Some Considerations for MICE TOF Stations FE electronics (mainly TOF0)
Target Controller Electronics Upgrade Status P. Smith J. Leaver.
14/1/20097 January 2009MICE CM23 - Harbin - Beamline Session1 MICE Beamloss Data Adam Dobbs.
2 April 2003Paul Dauncey - CALICE DAQ1 First Ideas For CALICE Beam Test DAQ Paul Dauncey Imperial College London, UK for IC, Manchester, RAL, UCL.
MICE CM25 Nov 2009Jean-Sebastien GraulichSlide 1 Online Summary o Detector DAQ o Controls And Monitoring o Online Data Base o Bottom Lines Jean-Sebastien.
Feb. 19, 2015 David Lawrence JLab Counting House Operations.
May. 11, 2015 David Lawrence JLab Counting House Operations.
Grob Systems, Inc., the customer, requires an industrial computer system that will have a function of acquiring raw data, processing the data, presenting.
MR (7/7/05) T2K electronics Beam structure ~ 8 (9?) bunches / spill bunch width ~ 60 nsec bunch separation ~ 600 nsec spill duration ~ 5  sec Time between.
14 Sep 2005DAQ - Paul Dauncey1 Tech Board: DAQ/Online Status Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
David Abbott - JLAB DAQ group Embedded-Linux Readout Controllers (Hardware Evaluation)
1 Network Performance Optimisation and Load Balancing Wulf Thannhaeuser.
Mice CM Oct 2005Jean-Sébastien GraulichSlide 1 MICE Collaboration Meeting Oct05 Review of DAQ Workshop and DAQ Issues Jean-Sebastien Graulich, Univ. Genève.
MICE TARGET OPERATION C. Booth, P. Hodgson, P. J. Smith, Dept. of Physics & Astronomy University of Sheffield, England. 1 – The MICE Experiment2 - The.
25 Feb 2005Paul Dauncey1 TB Review: DAQ Paul Dauncey Imperial College London For Imperial, RAL, UCL.
DEPARTEMENT DE PHYSIQUE NUCLEAIRE ET CORPUSCULAIRE JRA1 Parallel - DAQ Status, Emlyn Corrin, 8 Oct 2007 EUDET Annual Meeting, Palaiseau, Paris DAQ Status.
January 31, MICE DAQ MICE and ISIS Introduction MICE Detector Front End Electronics Software and MICE DAQ Architecture MICE Triggers Status and Schedule.
Online Reconstruction 1M.Ellis - CM th October 2008.
IPHC - DRS Gilles CLAUS 04/04/20061/20 EUDET JRA1 Meeting, April 2006 MAPS Test & DAQ Strasbourg OUTLINE Summary of MimoStar 2 Workshop CCMOS DAQ Status.
A simple Desktop DAQ for U2F readout Ulf jörnmark Physics Dept. Lund Status and plans.
Sep. 17, 2002BESIII Review Meeting BESIII DAQ System BESIII Review Meeting IHEP · Beijing · China Sep , 2002.
P09311: FPGA Based Multi-Purpose Driver / Data Acquisition System Sponsor: Dr. Marcin Lukowiak Team MemberDisciplineRole Adam Van FleetEEProject Manager/Documentation.
Controls & Monitoring Overview J. Leaver 03/06/2009.
SoLiD/PVDIS DAQ Alexandre Camsonne. DAQ limitations Electronics Data transfer.
1ICALEPCS, October 15-19, 2007, Knoxville, Tennessee Association Euratom-Cea Ph. Moreau Association EURATOM-CEA Département de Recherches sur la Fusion.
Controls & Monitoring Status Update J. Leaver 05/11/2009.
Data Acquisition, Trigger and Control
11 October 2002Paul Dauncey - CDR Introduction1 CDR Introduction and Overview Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
Tracker Cosmic Ray Test 2011 Linda R. Coney UC Riverside CM 29 - February 16, 2011.
Luminosity Monitor Design MICE Collaboration Meeting 31 May 2009 Paul Soler.
CLIC NI Acquisition and Control Module update CLIC Module Working group meeting Adriaan Rijllart EN-ICE-MTA.
LHCbComputing Computing for the LHCb Upgrade. 2 LHCb Upgrade: goal and timescale m LHCb upgrade will be operational after LS2 (~2020) m Increase significantly.
5 May 2006Paul Dauncey1 The ILC, CALICE and the ECAL Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
BLM Meeting 10/18/2010 Drennan 1 Booster BLM Upgrade Specification Development September 2010 Craig Drennan.
András László KFKI Research Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics New Read-out System of the NA61 Experiment at CERN SPS Zimányi Winter School ‑ 25.
DAQ and Trigger for HPS run Sergey Boyarinov JLAB July 11, Requirements and available test results 2. DAQ status 3. Trigger system status and upgrades.
Straw readout status Run 2016 Cover FW SRB FW.
Slow Control and Run Initialization Byte-wise Environment
Slow Control and Run Initialization Byte-wise Environment
Online – Data Storage and Processing
RF acceleration and transverse damper systems
AFE II Status First board under test!!.
ProtoDUNE SP DAQ assumptions, interfaces & constraints
Computing Infrastructure for DAQ, DM and SC
Example of DAQ Trigger issues for the SoLID experiment
The LHCb Front-end Electronics System Status and Future Development
Presentation transcript:

DAQ Considerations For Increased Rep. Rate J. Leaver 01/12/2009

27/06/2015Imperial College 2 Target DAQ Considerations Raw data rates: –Potentially 9 channels Beam Intensity, Target Position, Total Beam Loss, Sector 7 Beam Loss, Sector 8 Beam Loss + 4 Beam Position Signals (2 each for Sector 7 Horiz. & Vert.) –16 bit resolution (may be able to cope with less…) –5k samples per event –100 kHz sample rate (may want more…?)  ~ 88 kB per event Instantaneous data rate: ~8.6 MB/s For 10 Hz operation, need to read out ~880 kB per second –Trivial… –May need additional buffer memory on custom DAQ board (Stage 3 upgrade) to cope with instantaneous data rate (but this is independent of rep. rate)

27/06/2015Imperial College 3 Target DAQ Considerations Maximum event rate with current Target DAQ: –Time to read out an event:~50 ms –Time to analyse an event:~4 ms (New ‘integral’ method) –Time to write an event to disk:~100 ms (Archiving to.gz files) –GUI overheads:~100 ms Time to read an event file:~180 ms Time for Event Viewer to display an event:~280 ms  Maximum event rate: ~4 Hz Target PCs are surprisingly slow (e.g. MICETrackerSoftware package takes 2-3 times longer to compile than on all other control PCs!) Would need to reduce write time + GUI overheads to < 50 ms for 10 Hz readout – could be possible with a high spec PC –‘Headless’ DAQ should achieve 10 Hz on a fast PC

27/06/2015Imperial College 4 MICE DAQ Considerations Time to transfer a 1000 muon event: 1 s RF duty factor: 1/1000  To run at 10 Hz, need: –100  s spills (i.e. efficiency is reduced) –100 muons per spill To run at 10 Hz with 1 ms spills, need to worry about RF amplifier cooling –Cooling power, water plant, etc. → potentially expensive!