How are we doing with assessment? Update from the Information Services Assessment Council March 8, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cedarville University Accreditation Self-Study Plan Presented by Dr. Thomas Mach.
Advertisements

Using the New CAS Standards to Assess Your Transfer Student Programs and Services Janet Marling, Executive Director National Institute for the Study of.
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
The Library Assessment Journey at Emory For MLAW Meeting ALA Midwinter January 20, 2006 Susan B. Bailey Library Assessment Coordinator.
1994 and 1862 Land Grant Institutions Working Together to Address IPM Issues on Tribal Lands Virgil Dupuis, George Godfrey, John Phillips and Susan Ratcliffe.
Performance Assessment Process: The Employee’s Perspective May 2014.
CTE Credential Program For IHE and District Representatives Meetings held March & April 2010.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
Creating a Unified PLA Policy Recommendation for the State University of New York Ross Garmil Empire State College PLA with a Purpose Symposium April 29,
Reporting to Senior Staff FY13 Planning Task Force User Services Task Force November
The Survey as an Assessment Method: Why, when and how surveys provide evidence to inform decision-making Carrie Towns, Office of Institutional Research.
How to use Student Voice Training Session Gary Ratcliff, AVC - Student Life.
Usability as an Assessment Method: An introduction that examines how usability studies can provide useful evidence to inform decision-making Information.
Strategic Planning Steering Committee Where Are We Now? UNO has been involved in strategic planning since its doors opened in Chancellor.
Conducting Focus Groups: Talk Informing Action Information Services Assessment Council June 8, 2006.
Creating a User-Centered Culture of Assessment Stella Bentley and Bill Myers University of Kansas EDUCAUSE Southwest Regional Conference 2005.
Assessment: What it means What we’ve done What’s ahead Update from the Information Services Assessment Council March 30, 2006.
ACTION PLANNING. Session Objectives By the end of the session, participants will be able to: List the goals of Action Planning Explain the Action Planning.
Healthy North Carolina 2020 and EBS/EBI 101 Joanne Rinker MS, RD, CDE, LDN Center for Healthy North Carolina Director of Training and Technical Assistance.
Presented by Margaret Shandorf
The person or persons who have associated work with this document (the "Dedicator" or "Certifier") hereby either (a) certifies that, to the best of his.
LibQUAL + Surveying the Library’s Users Supervisor’s Meeting March 17, 2004.
February 8, 2012 Session 3: Performance Management Systems 1.
State of Maine: Quality Management and National Core Indicators.
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 3 of 3.
Atlanta Public Schools Project Management Framework Proposed to the Atlanta Board of Education to Complete AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” January 24,
Library Assessment in North America Stephanie Wright, University of Washington Lynda S. White, University of Virginia American Library Association Mid-Winter.
The Assessment Environment in North American Research Libraries Stephanie Wright, University of Washington Lynda S. White, University of Virginia 7th Northumbria.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
2010 Results. Today’s Agenda Results Summary 2010 CQS Strengths and Opportunities CQS Benchmarks Demographics Next Steps.
TRANSITION PLAN STAKEHOLDER GROUP CENTER FOR DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING EDUCATION.
Module IV: Implementing and Monitoring the LEA Plan Systemic Local Educational Agency (LEA) Plan Development.
22C:082:001 Human-Computer Interaction. Fall Copyright © 2013 Juan Pablo Hourcade. 1 Group Project Phase 1.
NC STATE UNIVERSITY Campus Systems and Calendar Systems: a self assessment Sarah Noell, ITD, Project Coordinator Harry Nicholos, ITD, Technical co-chair.
Strategic Academic Visioning and Empowerment (SAVE) Final Report to UWF BOT December 2011.
Rhona Sharpe, Head of OCSLD Liz Turner, Head of APQO 11 th April 2013 CHAIRING VALIDATION PANELS.
Implementing QI Projects Title I HIV Quality Management Program Case Management Providers Meeting May 26, 2005 Presented by Lynda A. O’Hanlon Title I HIV.
Federal Advisory Committee on Juvenile Justice (FACJJ) 2007 Annual Request for Information (ARI) Presented by CSR Incorporated October 2007.
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Deck 3 of 3.
LibQUAL+™ Process Management: Using the Web as a Management Tool Amy Hoseth Massachusetts LSTA Orientation Meeting Boston, MA October 21, 2005 old.libqual.org.
When the Evidence Isn’t Enough: Organizational Factors That Influence Effective and Sustainable Library Assessment Steve Hiller University of Washington.
Take Charge of Change MASBO Strategic Roadmap Update November 15th, 2013.
UWF SACS REAFFIRMATION OF ACCREDITATION PROJECT Presentation to UWF Board of Trustees November 7, 2003.
Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.
Re-Visioning the Future of University Libraries and Archives through LIBQUAL+ Cynthia Akers Associate Professor and Assessment Coordinator ESU Libraries.
Middle States Reaccreditation Process at The Catholic University of America.
Assessment for Student Learning Kick-Off: Assessment Fellows Assessment Coordinators Pat Hulsebosch Ex. Director-Office of Academic Quality August 28,
Report on Canvas, Online Education Initiative Participation and COOL Wednesday, November 04, 2015 Planning and Resource Council (PaRC)
Water Plan Update 2013 Wrap-Up Session Pre-work Survey Recap March 26, 2014.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
Master Plan Process FY Proposed Draft. October - February Cluster Groups and Units Identify Initiatives These are general goals or outcomes that.
LibQUAL Survey Results Customer Satisfaction Survey Spring 2005 Sidney Silverman Library Bergen Community College Analysis and Presentation by Mark Thompson,
Strategic Planning Forum: What has the Core Committee been doing? March 11 & 12, 2009.
August 2, Welcome Who is the TSD Continuous Improvement Team ? What is the work of the TSD Continuous Improvement Team? What is.
Terminology Standards (TS) Certification Project Overview.
ClimateQUAL™: Organizational Climate and Diversity Assessment Sue Baughman Texas Library Association April 2009.
LibQual+ Spring 2008 results and recommendations Library Assessment Working Group 11/19/2008 Library Faculty Meeting.
Unit 8: Implementation, Part II Seminar Wednesday pm ET.
Library Role in Global Health Survey Global Health Vision Task Force April
Assessment Kirstin Dougan/Tina Chrzastowski Strategic Planning Task Force Open Meeting July 14, 2011.
Copyright © 2011 American Institutes for Research All rights reserved Washington 21st CCLC Evaluation March 1 Webinar Neil Naftzger and Samantha.
Cañada College Professional Development Committee Determining Participants.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
RTI/MTSS Self-Assessment. RTI Session Objectives -An increase in the understanding of the necessary components of RTI/MTSS -An awareness that each school.
Virgil Dupuis, George Godfrey, John Phillips and Susan Ratcliffe
UPDATE Continuous Improvement in Educator Preparation:  A Data-Informed Approach to State Program Review Presentation to the Alabama State Board of Education.
Library Assessment Tools & Technology
ARMA PM2.5 Testing & Emissions Rate Sampling
Building on our tradition of excellence – planning for the future.
Presentation transcript:

How are we doing with assessment? Update from the Information Services Assessment Council March 8, 2006

Information Services Assessment Council members Susanne Clement, Libraries Jill Glaser, IT Ryan Papesh, NTS Thelma Simons, IT John Stratton, Libraries Bill Myers, IS

Some recent history August 2002 – Libraries Assessment Task Force formed February 2003 – Task Force report submitted; recommendations adopted; Libraries Assessment Council formed July 2004 – Libraries Assessment Council began second term (member rotation) July 2005 – Information Services Assessment Council formed

assessment an ongoing process in which services, resources and performance are measured against the expectations of users, and improvements are made to satisfy user needs effectively and efficiently.

Evidence in action

What do we need to know?

Who can tell us?

How can we get the information?

What will it enable us to do?

How much will it cost?

ARL “Making Library Assessment Work” suggestions: 1. Clarify the role of the IS Assessment Council and Coordinator

IS Assessment Council Charge [Draft] Specifically, ISAC is charged to:  Collaborate with and advise Information Services leadership and staff to identify priority assessment activities.  Develop, coordinate and/or conduct staff development activities related to assessment.  Report and communicate to the IS community on assessment activities.

In fulfilling this charge, ISAC will work with staff throughout IS to:  Develop an assessment plan with clearly defined goals, objectives, support and benchmarks.  Identify skills necessary to conducting and understanding effective assessment, and avail appropriate training.  Support assessment activities that address priorities and can be accomplished in a timely fashion.  Participate in appropriate professional venues and maintain awareness of assessment practices in similar institutions.

ISAC charge, cont. Evaluate assessment program success and identify resources needed for program advancement. Communicate results to staff, stakeholders, users and the broader University community.

ARL suggestions, cont. 2. Help library staff understand their role in the assessment process 3. Prioritize assessment goals and activities that focus on how and where the library adds value to the academic community 4. Use assessment as part of an integrated, objective method of planning and evaluation 5. Review how and why internal data are collected and used

Some current and recent assessment activities Libraries Web site comments and suggestions Libraries service desk comment cards KU ScholarWorks faculty focus groups Libraries service desk referral survey IS environmental scan of data gathering IS communication/newsletter focus groups

Upcoming staff development sessions March 30 - Overview of Information Services Assessment April 13 – Surveys as an assessment method May 11 – Usability as an assessment method Each session will be held in the Computer Center Auditorium, 10:30-noon

Some things we’d like to ask you…

Develop, coordinate and/or conduct staff development activities related to assessment.

Report and communicate to the IS community on assessment activities.

Identify skills necessary to conducting and understanding effective assessment, and avail appropriate training.

Evaluate assessment program success and identify resources needed for program advancement.

Communicate results to staff, stakeholders, users and the broader University community.

LibQUAL+ Conducted previously in 2000 (as SERVQUAL) and 2003 URL for our population open from March 27-April 21 Anticipate sending to all faculty and grad students, and random samples of undergrads and staff