Native American Removal Policy and the 'Trail of Tears'

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Warm Up Look on pgs Study map and answer Learning from Geography, questions 1 & 2.
Advertisements

Indian Removal. Background Near the end of the 18 th century, Georgia was home to European settlers, as well as Cherokee and Creek Indians. Many settlers.
#bellwork 9/4 #bellwork 9/4 Get out 2 sheets of paper for notes. Get out 2 sheets of paper for notes. In your bellwork section work on the question below:
INDIAN REMOVAL IN THE UNITED STATES. As the population grew, the colonists pushed farther west into the territories occupied by the American Indians.
THE TRAIL OF TEARS Westward Expansion, at the expense of the innocent.
Chapter 10, Section 3 Indian Removal.
Indian Removal Act (IRA). Objectives: 1. Identify the reasons for Indian removal. 2. Explain why the trip became known as the "Trail of Tears" for the.
Indian Removal And the Trail of Tears. Goals for Today Today we will understand: The different perspectives about Indian Removal How & why the Cherokees.
INDIAN REMOVAL IN THE UNITED STATES. As the population grew, the colonists pushed farther west into the territories occupied by the American Indians.
The Trail of Tears In 1838 the Cherokee People were forced to leave their homeland of what is now Georgia to live in the “Indian Territory” in what is.
Indian Removal The Big Idea President Jackson supported a policy of Indian removal. Main Ideas The Indian Removal Act authorized the relocation of Native.
Mr. Clifford US 1. MAIN IDEA  Andrew Jackson’s policies spoke for the common people but violated Native American rights. WHY IT MATTERS NOW  The effects.
By Stephanie Cran. In the 1820s and 1830s, Georgia conducted a relentless campaign to remove Cherokees who held territory within the boundaries of Georgia,
Chapter 10, Section 3 Pages 332 – 335. President Andrew Jackson had become famous as an American Indian fighter. He had no sympathy with Native Americans’
1 Native American Removal Policy and the 'Trail of Tears'
Andrew Jackson 7th President.
Indian Removal. Cherokee Nation  Some whites hoped Natives would adapt (assimilate) Way to avoid conflict  The Cherokee adapted well to white society.
Sec. 3: INDIAN REMOVAL. By 1829, the native population east of the Mississippi River had dwindled to 125,000. Growing population (risen to 13 million)
Trail of Tears & Indian Removal Forced Removal of Native Americans Under the Jackson Administration.
In the United States of America, are all men created equal?
Supreme Court Cases Jackson and the Native Americans.
Native American Policy Under Andrew Jackson. “ How do we solve the “Indian Problem”?
INDIAN REMOVAL IN THE UNITED STATES. Americans wanted to move west into Native American land.
TEKS 8C: Calculate percent composition and empirical and molecular formulas. Indian Removal Essential Question: Why did Jackson use force to remove Indians.
Chapter 11, Sec. 2 Conflicts Over Land. Moving Native Americans  1830’s—U.S. expanding westward.  Many Native Americans stilled lived in eastern part.
Moving the Native Americans Native American Resistance
Cherokee Removal. A little background 2 approaches to the Native American Issue --Assimilation OR Removal In the 1790s the federal government recognized.
Andrew Jackson and Indian Removal
Objectives Describe the culture of Native Americans in the Southeast.
Conflicts Over Land Chapter 10, Section 4. Questions ► Why did many Americans want the Cherokee removed from Georgia? What was Andrew Jackson’s response?
Georgia Studies Unit 3: Revolution, Statehood, and Westward Expansion
Dealing with Other Nations Chapter 10 A Changing Nation.
Aim #26: To what extent was Jackson responsible for the Trail of Tears? Do now! Read “The Cherokee Nation’s Appeal to the American people” and the excerpt.
Terms and People Sequoyah – Cherokee leader and creator of the Cherokee alphabet Quote - to repeat the exact words spoken or written Voluntary - done willingly;
The Native American Experience Some info from
The Native American Experience Some info from
Indian Removal Jackson’s Goal? 1830  Indian Removal Act
INDIAN REMOVAL ACT & INDIAN WARS. ANDREW JACKSON VS. THE NATIVES By the time Andrew Jackson became President in 1829, the native population east of the.
Georgia Studies Unit 3: Revolution, Statehood, and Westward Expansion Lesson 5: Indian Removal Study Presentation.
TWO SCHOOLS OF THOUGHT Civilization Means Native Americans would become farmers Would convert to Christianity Own individual land Learn to read and write.
Native American Removal. Native Removal many supported removing Native Americans  For years, many supported removing Native Americans  About 100,000.
Reading Like a Historian: Indian Removal
Indian Removal. Cherokee Nation  The Cherokee adapted well to white society  Sequoya’s invention of a system of written language  Drew up a constitution.
Andrew Jackson and Indian Removal. England established colonies in North America. As the population grew, colonists pushed further west into the territories.
“We hold these truths to be self- evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that.
Indians in America.  Since 1600, white settlers had pushed Native Americans westward as they took more and more of their land.  By the 1820s, about.
Native American Policy
Indian Removal Act.
The Age of Jackson Chapter 7.3.
Bell Ringer Make sure your yellow sheet is complete. If you have questions please ask. The test will December 10 That is next Thursday.
Andrew Jackson and Native Americans
Chapter 9 Section 3 Indian Removal.
11/10 I can explain whether Andrew Jackson was a Democratic President for the people, or an Authoritative President who did whatever he wanted.
Conflicts Over Land Section Two.
Indian Removal and the Treaty of New Echota
Creek & Cherokee INDIAN REMOVAL.
Creek & Cherokee INDIAN REMOVAL © Brain Wrinkles.
Choctaw, Creek, Chickasaw,
Cherokee speaking U.S. states
The Age of Jackson, : Indian Removal
Reading Like a Historian: Indian Removal
The Indian Removal Act of 1830
Sponge If something is not written in the Constitution, Congress can use the e______ c_______ to get it approved. Provide a situation when the government.
Thinking Question Describe your “home”.
Conflicts Over Land Section Two.
What was so controversial about Jackson’s decision?
Georgia Studies Unit 3: Revolution, Statehood, and Westward Expansion
Creek & Cherokee INDIAN REMOVAL © Brain Wrinkles.
Reading Like a Historian: Indian Removal
INDIAN REMOVAL IN THE UNITED STATES
Presentation transcript:

Native American Removal Policy and the 'Trail of Tears'

Early American Views of Native American Land Rights From the beginning of European settlement on the East Coast of what would become the United States, American colonists looked for justification to displace Native American populations. This piece written by John Cotton, a Puritan leader, who helped establish the groundwork for colonization and property rights as the measure for “possession” of the land. The placing of a people in this or that country is from the appointment of the Lord. . . Quest. Wherein doth this work of God stand in appointing a place for a people? Answ. First, when God espies or discovers a land for a people, as in Ezek. 20:6: "He brought them into a land that He had espied for them." And, that is, when either He gives them to discover it themselves, or hears of it discovered by others, and fitting them. “

This is an excerpt of a letter written in Boston four years after its founding, with future Connecticut governor John Winthrop explaining the difficulties of establishing a self-sustaining, self-governing settlement. Most notably, Winthrop described the colonists' mounting conflict with the Indians and the death of many Native Americans from smallpox as a sign of providence and good fortune. “Our Churches are governed by Pastors, Teachers ruling Elders and Deacons, yet the power lies in the whole Congregation and not in the Presbytery [not in a larger council of churches] further than for order and precedence. For the natives, they are near all dead of the smallpox, so the Lord hath cleared our title to what we possess.”

Hopewell Treaty with the Cherokee (1785) Beginning shortly after the founding of the United States, Georgia officials initiated agreements with the Cherokee Indians of the area that eventually eroded the Cherokees' claims to the land. The opening act in the dispossession of Cherokee lands was concluded at Hopewell, Georgia in 1785. Specifically, the treaty established boundaries for Cherokee hunting grounds, erecting limitations on culturally significant land. Although, in the treaty's conclusion, “the hatchet,” is said to be “forever buried” and peace and friendship re-established, the post-Hopewell realities proved far different.

Holston Treaty with the Cherokee (1791) Six years after the Hopewell Treaty, another landmark US/Cherokee treaty was concluded at Holston manufacturing further boundaries and “extinguishing forever all claims of the Cherokee nation" to land in the stipulated areas. Expanding upon the dispossession guaranteed at Hopewell, the Holston treaty began the progressive erosion of Cherokee land rights on non-hunting grounds. Marked by its aggressive rhetoric, the Cherokees “agreed” to “relinquish and cede” all lands residing outside the established demarcation line and permitted citizens of the United States access to a road running through Cherokee lands, as well as navigation of the Tennessee River.

Treaty of Cherokee Agency (1817) This treaty marked the beginnings of a new campaign designed to divide the Cherokee nation with an ever-present eye on the ultimate goal of mass removal. Although extensive land seizure was included as part of the treaty, the nature of the government’s grand strategy could be seen by 1817. "The United States, my children, are the friends of both parties, and, as far as can be reasonably asked, they are willing to satisfy the wishes of both. Those who remain may be assured of our patronage, our aid, and good neighborhood. Those who wish to remove, are permitted to send an exploring party to reconnoitre the country on the waters of the Arkansas and White rivers, and the higher up the better, as they will be the longer unapproached by our settlements, which will begin at the mouths of those rivers.”

Treaty of Washington (1828) This treaty addressed members of the Cherokee nation west of the Mississippi, guaranteeing them seven million acres of land and a “perpetual outlet” west as far “as the sovereignty of the United States,” extends. Such agreements set the stage for the justification of mass removal. ART. 7. The Chiefs and Head Men of the Cherokee Nation, aforesaid, for and in consideration of the foregoing stipulations and provisions, do hereby agree, in the name and behalf of their Nation, to give up, and they do hereby surrender, to the United States, and agree to leave the same within fourteen months, as herein before stipulated, all the lands to which they are entitled in Arkansas,

Andrew Jackson’s First Annual Message to Congress (1829) While denying the sovereign right to Native American tribes within state limits, threatening extinction as a consequence for remaining east of the Mississippi, and combining the language of paternalism, Jackson lays out his policy of voluntary removal to areas west of the Mississippi.

The Indian Removal Act (1830) Passed during Andrew Jackson’s second year in office, the Indian Removal Act set the stage for his administration’s handling of Native American affairs during the remainder of Jackson’s presidency. Removal of eastern tribes to lands west of the Mississippi became the hallmark of Jacksonian Indian policy including, most notably, the 'Trail of Tears,' (which actually transpired shortly after Jackson had left office.) “Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, That it shall and may be lawful for the President of the United States to cause so much of any territory belonging to the United States, west of the river Mississippi, not included in any state or organized territory, and to which the Indian title has been extinguished,”

Worcester v. Georgia (1832) In this landmark decision, the Supreme Court ruled the State of Georgia had no power to pass any law affecting the Cherokee Nation, maintaining the exclusivity of federal jurisdiction. As a distinct political community bound by territorial boundaries and established rights, Worcester, in principle, guaranteed the sovereign claims of the Cherokee nation and the lands within their boundaries. Although a potential watershed moment, the decision sparked intense disagreement between the three branches and crumbled under the weight of Jackson’s objection. Responding to Chief Justice John Marshall’s written decision it was rumored Jackson remarked, “The Chief Justice has made his decision, now let him enforce it.” Unfortunately for the Cherokee Nation the social principles outlined in Worcester never became a political reality because of later developments.

Treaty of New Echota (1835) After a winding trail of treaties designed to dispossess the Cherokee Nation of various parts of their land, the Treaty of New Echota represented the final blow to traditional Cherokee land rights. Dripping with paternalism, New Echota ceded all land possessed by the Cherokee Nation east of the Mississippi to the United States and reaffirmed the seven million acre and perpetual outlet commitments. “The United States shall always have the right to make and establish such post and military roads and forts in any part of the Cherokee country, as they may deem proper for the interest and protection of the same and the free use of as much land, timber, fuel and materials of all kinds for the construction and support of the same as may be necessary…”

In an impassioned letter to Congress, Chief John Ross exposed the illegitimacy of the Treaty of New Echota and described its consequences on the people of the Cherokee Nation. His words echo through the history of treaty negotiations between Native Americans and the government of the United States. “We are overwhelmed! Our hearts are sickened, our utterance is paralyzed, when we reflect on the condition in which we are placed, by the audacious practices of unprincipled men, who have managed their stratagems with so much dexterity as to impose on the Government of the United States, in the face of our earnest, solemn, and reiterated protestations. The instrument in question is not the act of our Nation; we are not parties to its covenants; it has not received the sanction of our people. “

The 'Trail of Tears' In 1838, General Winfield Scott arrived in Georgia with approximately 7,000 men to enforce the provisions of the Treaty of New Echota, which prescribed the relocation of the Cherokees in Georgia to what is now Oklahoma. Somewhere between 3,000-5,000 Cherokees died en route in what became known as the 'Trail of Tears.'