IASCE Conference Athlone October 7 th & 8 th 2004 Responsive Evaluation. Working with Stakeholders: A review of the Open Training College Quality Assurance.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Welcome to Site Management Amy Thompson. Agenda I.Foundation Introductions Setting the Session Agenda II.Site Management Principles III.Site Management.
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Pursuing Effective Governance in Canada’s National Sport Community June 2011.
Delivering Planning Education Now and in the Future Ruth Richards London South Bank University.
Head of Learning: Job description
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
A Balancing of Responsibilities Tom Evershed Higher Education Manager, Warwickshire College.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Special Meeting on ICT Education in Tertiary Institutions Towards a Regional Perspective on Quality and Academic Standards in ICT Education and Training.
Selected Items from a Report of the Higher Learning Commission Comprehensive Evaluation Visit to OSU Pam Bowers Director, University Assessment & Testing.
ECVET WORKSHOP 2 22/23/24 November The European Quality Assurance Reference Framework.
MOOCs and the Quality Code Ian G. Giles PFHEA Medical Education
Tomorrow’s Ireland...Today Quality Standards in Youth Work A work in progress.
Evaluation of a Staff Development Programme for Online Teaching – A Case Study Catherine Gerrard University of Paisley.
President’s Cabinet April 12,  Process review  The “why” for the plan  The draft plan  Q & A  Implementation.
EMERSION Industry Oriented Education Model - QA System Requirements Overview Dave Carroll EMERSION Local Leader for QA, DIT Project Team School of Computing.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Bayard Public Schools November 8, 2011.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
European Quality Assurance Register for Higher Education Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area Colin Tück 26/27 May 2008, Baku Council.
CHANGES TO THE LEVEL 4 CERTIFICATE
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
Administrator Checklist Research and Training Center on Service Coordination.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
SPEAK: Strategic Planning, Evaluation and Knowledge Networking Right Here Workshop, London October 2009.
Professional Certificate – Managing Public Accounts Committees Ian “Ren” Rennie.
Prof. György BAZSA, former president Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC) CUBRIK Workshop IV Beograd, 13 March, 2012 European Standards and Guidelines.
Allied Health Professions Learning Needs Analysis and Workforce Planning Workshop 7 th May 2010 Lesley Barrowman Senior Professional Officer.
POLICY ON THE SOUTH AFRICAN STANDARD FOR PRINCIPALSHIP EMASA CONFERENCE PRESENTATION JAMES NDLEBE 1.
Vaal University of Technology (formerly Vaal Triangle Technikon ) Ms A.J. GOZO Senior Director: Library and Information Services.
Foundation Degrees Foundation Degree Forward Lichfield Centre The Friary Lichfield Staffs WS13 6QG — Tel: Fax: —
IEN Inaugural Annual Conference September 24 th 2004 Evaluation: A tool for meaning-making in a Higher Education Quality Assurance culture.
Basic Workshop For Reviewers NQAAC Recognize the developmental engagements Ensure that they operate smoothly and effectively” Ensure that all team members.
Quality Assurance – European Standards and Guidelines.
Strategic Plan th October Management and Governance “GeSCI’s corporate structures and management arrangements were appropriate for.
A Principled Approach to Accountability Assessments for Students with Disabilities CCSSO National Conference on Student Assessment Detroit, Michigan June.
FOURTH EUROPEAN QUALITY ASSURANCE FORUM "CREATIVITY AND DIVERSITY: CHALLENGES FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE BEYOND 2010", COPENHAGEN, NOVEMBER IV FORUM-
External Review Exit Report Springfield Platteview Community Schools March 2-4, 2015.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT ON AREA 1, 2 AND 3 Prepared By: Nor Aizar Abu Bakar Quality Academic Assurance Department.
Governance and Commissioning Natalie White DCSF Consultant
Professional Certificate in Electoral Processes Understanding and Demonstrating Assessment Criteria Facilitator: Tony Cash.
What, Why and How? IPSCAN Master Class September 2013.
The Ferl Practitioners’ Programme Transforming Teaching and Learning with ILT O4.3 ILT Implementation.
The European Students’ Union REPRESENTING STUDENTS SINCE 1982 Cristi Popescu – Executive Committe Member European context of QA ESPAQ Training Yerevan,
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Center Grove High School 10 November 2010.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Becoming a Trainer/Teacher
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Fundamentals of Governance: Parliament and Government Understanding and Demonstrating Assessment Criteria Facilitator: Tony Cash.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
AIUA STRATEGI PLAN GUIDELINES : Quality Assurance Prepared by Kolej Universiti Islam Sultan Azlan Shah (KUISAS), Perak, Malaysia.
Authentic service-learning experiences, while almost endlessly diverse, have some common characteristics: Positive, meaningful and real to the participants.
Reorganisation of Gloucestershire Adult Education Service Initial Meeting 21 st April 2016.
Scrutiny Workshop 6 Effective Tenant Scrutiny Conference: 15 th July 2011.
Principles of Good Governance
DEVELOPMENT OF STUDY PROGRAMS IN UNIVERSITY OF PRISHTINA/KOSOVO
MARTHA, NKECHINYERE AMADI (Ph.D)
Country Director, Czechia
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
NTNU’s quality system for education
Thursday 2nd of February 2017 College Development Network
Achieving the Dream Mark A. Smith.
Single Equality Scheme Headline summary
The view from the ‘regulator’
Governance and leadership roles for equality and diversity in Colleges
European TRAINING FOUNDATION
A COMPETENCY FRAMEWORK FOR GOVERNANCE GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING LANGLEY HALL PRIMARY ACADEMY 14 JULY 2017 Clive Haines & Rebecca Walker.
Revalidating using the CILIP Virtual Learning Environment
Presentation transcript:

IASCE Conference Athlone October 7 th & 8 th 2004 Responsive Evaluation. Working with Stakeholders: A review of the Open Training College Quality Assurance Policies and Procedures

Content The Open Training College micro-culture The Open Training College Quality Assurance Model – evaluation procedures Who are the Stakeholders and what is their role? Responsive evaluation? Reflections on the first year of implementation

The Open Training College micro- culture

Pedagogical Practice Shared understanding of the adult learning process Course designed to provide and stimulate diverse learning experiences, building of the skills and knowledge that learners bring to their learning Clearly articulated learning outcomes and related assessment procedures

College Ethos and Values – embodied in Mission/Vision statement Enhancing the status of people with a disability Valuing students as colleagues Close working relationships Cost effectiveness and value for money Strategic planning Guiding principles

Guiding Principles Inclusiveness Openness Relevance Student centeredness Accountability Accessibility

Course evaluation process External Examiners – Review and report on assessment procedures and results Programme Boards – Review of data generated from the ongoing monitoring of open learning materials, workshops, assessment procedures and other related college activities

Academic Council To advise and review new Programme development To review, approve and ratify procedures relating to the assessment of learners To review and ratify action points related to the findings from the Programme Boards To ratify the recommendations made in the Five Year Formal Evaluation Reports

Stakeholders? Students College staff team Workshop presenters External Examiners Programme Board members Academic Council members Funding organisation (s) Agencies Service users

‘Responsive’ evaluation? Role of the evaluator Significance of Stakeholders Relevance for the Open Training College

Reflections on the first year: Areas for improvement Areas of success Summary