The Rat Pack Kirk Acklin Scott Carpenter Douglas Johnson Mike Li The motorized, super-cool lab rat.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A-Team Home Central Control Unit Kevin Cooke Peter Larson Ben Verstegen Andreas Rugloski Aden Abdillahi.
Advertisements

DARSI 2 CDR Adrienne Baile Preston Schipper Matt Hulse Project Overview Components: Design Status Administrative Data Acquisition & Real-time System Integration.
Autonomous Sensor and Control Platform Rover Tae Lee Josh Reitsema Scott Zhong Mike Chao Mark Winter.
Blake Davis: Electrical Engineering Luke Haberkern: Electrical and Computer Engineering Brian Hacsi: Electrical and Computer Engineering Chris Kircher:
Project Overview- Strong Arm ECEN 4160, Spring 2005 Thaine Hock Matt Corne Sammit Adhya Luz Quiñónez.
Player Guitar Preliminary Design Review Lucas Gilbride Rick Denney Dan Forrester Randy Hood Lucas Gilbride Rick Denney Dan Forrester Randy Hood.
Autonomous Quadrocopter Proposal Brad Bergerhouse, Nelson Gaske, Austin Wenzel Dr. Malinowski.
Team Flying Camels Nawar Chaker Pete Dokter Tim Jacobs Adam Swartley Paul Savage Capstone Project February 24, 2005.
R.F.N.T. ( Radio Frequency Navigational Tracker ) Josh Bingaman Ryan Hitchler John Maitin Fabien Nervais Matt Sharp Capstone Fall 2004.
Loran-C Receiver Team Deathstar September 7, 2004 Capstone Fall 2004.
Proposal Presentation EE 396 – Micromouse Spring 2008 Saturday, February 9, 2008 Donald Kim Lab - POST 214.
S.W.A.T (Security Watching All the Time) Jeff Shin Tyler Stubbs Paul Kasemir Pavel Mayyak.
Team Monte Cristo Joseph Carrafa Sharon Clark Scott Hassett Alex Mason The Deep Fried Game Station.
PDR – GPS Rover Travis Gruber Matthew Kennedy Marcin Skirucha Phill Treddenick.
Wireless Ethernet AT-Rover Group 1 Beau Cook, Barry Greenwood, Danny Martin, Matt Patella, Ian Petrie.
Globex Proprietary Competition Sensitive Ubiquitous - MP3 Player Ian BrattJohn Pratt Eric LeeWei-Shin Wang David Lindstone ECEN 4573 Capstone Lab Spring.
EE396 Project Micromouse Team: Ocha. Team Members Kanoa Jou (Programmer) Ryan Sato (Hardware) KiWoon Ahn (Recorder) Alan Do (Programmer)
Critical Design Review VST Vigilant Sensing Technologies Joel Keesecker, Mark Kien, Pat Hauser.
Group Members Ikechukwu Mogbana Adewuyi Kupolati Frederick Tyson Advisor Prof. Mahmood February, Senior Project 2005/06 Undergraduate Project Proposal.
A simpler way to shop!. Tuesday, January 31 st 2oo6 Capstone, Spring 2oo6 The system is made up of three different modules: Product Two different types.
Micromouse 296 Final Presentation Fall 2008 Group: Rabbitwagon.
Zach Allen Chris Chan Ben Wolpoff Shane Zinner Project Z: Stereo Range Finding Based on Motorola Dragonball Processor.
Preliminary Design Review
Team Monte Cristo Joseph Carrafa Sharon Clark Scott Hassett Alex Mason The Deep Fried Game Station.
Team GPS Rover Critical Design Review Alex Waskiewicz Andrew Bousky Baird McKevitt Dan Regelson Zach Hornback.
EE Capstone Spring 2008 Team RFID Mike Gauthiere Mike Loptien Chris Reid Kirk Spowart Vincent Wu.
KTD Micromouse Overview Team Goals Approach Outstanding Problems Future Solutions Final Status.
Preliminary Design Report GPS Location System. Introduction GPS COMM Group Team Members Adam Preeo Adrian Migacz Andy Merritt Taylor Hughes.
Mars Rover TEAM CPNE Crossen Davis Peter Ramer Nancy Robinson Eric Rodriguez.
2004 CAPSTONE CDR Team SAFE Members Anders Fornberg Alejandro Henriquez Shannon Lahr Aaron Lyons Sean Groves Shannon.
Team GPS Rover Alex Waskiewicz Andrew Bousky Baird McKevitt Dan Regelson Zach Hornback.
M & M EE 296 Final Presentation Spring 2004 Presentation Overview Team Member Introduction Project Overview Overall Design Description Final Project.
Capstone CDR Fall 2005 Team Doki Doki: Paintball Gun IR Sensing and Tracking Team Members: Matt Freeman James Kirby Juan Rivera.
Coordinate Based Tracking System
Micromouse Spring 2006 K A L The Pied Pipers. The Pied Pipers: Joanne – Programming Ken – Hardware Alyssa – Hardware Introduction of Team and Roles.
Micromouse Team:. Team Members Kanoa Jou Ryan Sato KiWoon Ahn Brett Ikei.
Critical Design Review Colorado State University - Pueblo April 15, 2005.
SmartThink Remote System Team Cyclops Justin Bewley Winter Jojola Florence Manega Paul Roberts Denknesh Temesgen.
RAVE Remote-Controlled Assault Vehicle Andy Knutsen Scott Helgeson Susan Jordan Johnny Lam Matt McBurney.
KTD Micromouse OverviewApproach Potential problems Personal Expectations Team Goals.
Team P.A.C.K men EE 296 Project. Chris Mcleod Hardware specialist.
Loran-C Receiver Team Deathstar: Christopher Birschbach Matthew Hayman Matthew Anderson Christina Corner Erin Mowbray October 5, 2004 ECEN 4610 Capstone.
Tracking Rover Team Rubber Ducky Alex Chi Joshua Rubin Alexander Starick Ryan Ramos.
TEAM SOLBOT CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW Martin Carbajal Mike Mellman Curtis Porter Erik Zurinskas.
PIC Evaluation & Development Board Project Team Chad Berg – CprE Luke Bishop – CprE Tyson Stichka – EE Nick Veys - CprE Financial Budget Abstract/Background.
Easy on the Tini Bill Barker Carey Davis Ben Irwin Travis Majors Cell phone detector.
Wireless Automated News Display (W.A.N.D.) Daniel Karnik, Eric Scott, David Thompson, Ted Wilcox.
Jordan Wagner Justin Spencer Mark Sears John Jachna.
ECE 477 FINAL PRESENTATION TEAM 7  SPRING 2013 COST ROBOT ERIC OSBORNE, BRYAN DALLAS, ANDREW LOVELESS, CAROLINE TRIPPEL.
Concept Design Review THE DUKES OF HAZARD CAMILLE LEGAULT, NEIL KENNEDY, OMAR ROJAS, FERNANDO QUIJANO, AND JIMMY BUFFI April 24, 2008.
Autonomous Tracking Robot Andy Duong Chris Gurley Nate Klein Wink Barnes Georgia Institute of Technology School of Electrical and Computer Engineering.
Team 4 Shane Sunada – Project Leader Malcolm Menor – Project Manager Nathan Umeda – Technical Supervisor Joseph Longhi – Documentation Final Presentation.
Administrative Introduction Our goals for this project are for the three robots to work together intelligently to complete a maze faster than an individual.
Phong Le (EE) Josh Haley (CPE) Brandon Reeves (EE) Jerard Jose (EE)
O.S.C.A.R. Office Surveillance via Covert Audio/Visual Rover Critical Design Review.
Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Team Amaze Me. EE 296 Project (MicroMouse) Members –Brandon Gibu –Ah Ram Kim –John-Kalani Miyajima –Justin Ogata Website.
Proposed Changes to RosCoe: Robot of the School of Engineering Project Team: Travis McKenna Project Advisor: Dr. Wang.
1 SDP09 Team Siqueira Rohan Balakrishnan (CSE) Conan Jen (EE) Andrew Lok (EE) Jonathan Tang (EE) MAPPER: A Perfectly Portable Exploration Robot.
Spring CS-EE 481 Project Eagle 3/25/03 Project Eagle Emergency Personnel Tracking System Alison Hawkins Scott Davis Anthony Waliser.
Control System Design Process Planning Documentation.
Introduction ProjectRequirements Project Requirements In a previous senior design project, a wireless front-end was added to Iowa State University’s Teradyne.
Niket Sheth Chris Karman Erik Scherbenske Peter van der Hoop.
ECEN 4610 Capstone University of Colorado Boulder, CO January 29, 2009 School of Rock PDR Cheyenne Aberle Drew Veldhuizen Swain Brooks Dan Reed.
VEHICLE BACK UP ALARM DESIGN Student: Qi Zhou Mentor: Dr. Stanislaw Legowski.
The Surveyor By: Randy Direen, David Cox, Ali Abali, Leonardo Carrasco, Lisa Prince Preliminary Design Review January 25, 2005.
DEPARTMENT OF EEE IFET COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING VILLUPURAM,TAMIL NADU,INDIA Project proposal For IEEE CS 70 th Anniversary Student Challenge On PATHLINE.
Chopper John Michael Mariano
Kirk Acklin Scott Carpenter Douglas Johnson Mike Li
ECE 477 Design Review Group 10  Spring 2005 I, Robotic Waitress
Project Grey Wolf Digital CMOS “Memory” Game
Presentation transcript:

The Rat Pack Kirk Acklin Scott Carpenter Douglas Johnson Mike Li The motorized, super-cool lab rat

Overview ► The Project/Objectives ► Component Layout ► Cost ► Marketability ► Play by Play progress ► Division of Labor ► Risk/Contingency Plans ► Wrap up

Project/Objectives Essentials Description: The Lab Rat is a micro-controller motorized maze navigating machine. The rat will be able to traverse a maze either using an built-in algorithm or following IR checkpoints within the maze. The Lab Rat will also follow a user. ► Lab rat will traverse mazes using the following methods  “Left hand” algorithm  Infrared Tracking of checkpoints within maze ► Lab rat will store its path within onboard memory ► Lab rat will follow a user wearing IR Transmitter

Project/Objectives Upgrades ► Possible “upgrades”  Audio Tracking  Return path stored in memory via RF Transmitter  Some sort of cool “gun-like” attachment for shooting things  Rat could return through maze and reactivate checkpoints

Project/Objectives Applicaitons As is: ► Educational Applications Future Generations: ► Civilian Applications  Surveying / Exploration ► Military Applications  Scouting / Reconnaissance  Unmanned Operations

Vehicle/Sensor Control

Retrieving Maze Layout

Overall System Diagram

Cost ► ► Board Development ► ► Prototype ► ► Transmitters ► ► Presentation/Expo NOTE: total cost determined from low-end and high-end estimates. *Indicates possible costs contribute to high-end cost.

Cost Board Development($22/$72):  Circuit Board = $22  Circuit Components – chips, socket and wires ~ free from Capstone within reason (*contigent $50)

Cost Prototype($98/$278):  Manufactured Board – must buy in quantity 4 = ~$40 = ~$160  Sensors / Transimitters & Receivers($2/$53) o Collision / Object Detection Sensors ~ $1 - $52 o Collision / Object Detection Sensors ~ $1 - $52 Bumper sensor $1 Bumper sensor $1 *IR rangefinder $23 - $26 *IR rangefinder $23 - $26 *Flex - $18 *Flex - $18 *Ultrasonic rangefinder $30 - $52 *Ultrasonic rangefinder $30 - $ o IR receivers ~ $1 o IR receivers ~ $1 IR receivers and transmitters are both $1 IR receivers and transmitters are both $ o Serial RF Link ~ free from Capstone (*contingent $30) o Serial RF Link ~ free from Capstone (*contingent $30)

Cost Prototype($98/$278) contd.:  Materials($68/$78) o Lexan Sheet - (1/8”-1/4”) stock dependent on thickness ~$5 - $10 o Lexan Sheet - (1/8”-1/4”) stock dependent on thickness ~$5 - $10 o Stepper Motors ~ $50 o Stepper Motors ~ $50 Motor ~ ??, Controller implemented in logic Motor ~ ??, Controller implemented in logic o Wheel – 2 simple, 1 universal ~ + = ~$13 model o Wheel – 2 simple, 1 universal ~ + = ~$13 model wheels 1 3/8 ” to 2 3/4 $3.95 to $4.95 internet wheels 1 3/8 ” to 2 3/4 $3.95 to $4.95 internet casters vary greatly small simple caster $2.10 on internet casters vary greatly small simple caster $2.10 on internet

Cost Prototype($98/$278) contd.:  Power($8/$50) o Solar Panels ~ $20 o Solar Panels ~ $20 *3 flexible panels *3 flexible panels -AND/OR- o Batteries ~ $8 - $30 o Batteries ~ $8 - $30 battery packs starting at $7.99 to ~$30, phone battery $19.99 battery packs starting at $7.99 to ~$30, phone battery $  Fasteners / Hardware ~ $20  *Specialty Tools ~ $20  Googley Eyes ~ $1

Cost Transmitters ($48):  Belt/Beacons ~ ~ $48 o IR transmitters ~ $1 o Power source ~ $2 o Hardware – wiring, fasteners, etc. $5 Presentation/Expo ($55):  Maze – foamboard ~ $15  User Manuel / Technical Data – printing and binding ~ $40

Cost Wrap-up

Marketability Current Generation ► Educational  High School  College Future Generations ► Civilian Uses ► Military Uses

► Price per unit -- $ ► Expect to sell ► Selling price -- $ ► Net Profit -- $250, ► Money would be made with future generations Return on Investment

Play by Play ► CDR  Thursday, 9 October ► Milestone 1  Thursday, 30 October  Each subsystem running independently  Processor fully running code beyond NOP ► Milestone 2  Thursday, 20 November  Layout finished  Build maze  Test final code ► Expo  Thursday, 4 December  All done

Play by Play (cont)

Division of Labor ► Kirk Acklin  Sensor Design and Floating Construction ► Scott Carpenter  Tech Writer and Programmer ► Douglas Johnson  Locomotion System and Floating Construction ► Mike Li  Processor Implementation

Risk/Contingency Plans ► ► Fall behind on schedule   Descope non-critical project functions   Keep all designs at simplest level and add difficulty only upon completion ► ► Much of the technology is unfamiliar   If we fall behind on one, keep pushing the rest ahead   If we’re unable to figure it out one way, try other methods ► ► Issues with RF link   Permanent tether ► ► Issues with recording the path   Send data over RF link to store on laptop ► ► Unable to achieve battery power source   Use tethered power source ► ► Fail PDR   Staple a nice bribe to the user’s manual

Wrap Up ► The Project/Objectives ► Component Layout ► Cost ► Marketability ► Play by Play progress ► Division of Labor ► Risk/Contingency Plans

QUESTIONS???