Flow Rate Control System

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dynamic Behavior of Ideal Systems
Advertisements

Chapter 10 Stability Analysis and Controller Tuning
CHE 185 – PROCESS CONTROL AND DYNAMICS
Transforming C(s) into c(t): Negative Feedback Control with Proportional Only Controller Jigsaw Team Estrogen Stephanie Wilson Amanda Newman Jessica Raymond.
Green Team Dustin Fraley DeAndre Strong Stephanie Wilson September 14, 2005 UTC ENGR 329 Speed System.
Voltage Control System: Proportional Integral (PI) Controllers Team Purple: John Pangle Jessica Raymond Justin Whitt ENGR 329 November 30, 2005.
-Pressure System- Root Locus Cory Richardson Dennis To Jamison Linden 6/14/2015, UTC, ENGR-329.
Flow Rate Control System “Step Response Modeling” February 15, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329.
Flow Control System Steady State Operation & Step Response February 1 st, 2006 U.T.C. ENGR 329.
FLOW RATE CONTROL SYSTEM
Level Team Team Members Note by Dr. Henry: List your team members’ names on this slide.
LEVEL-1 Frequency Response –Experiments –Modeling Jim Henry.
Marshal Stout Michael Brooks Nathan Wilson ENGR 329 Team Green February 11, 2009.
Pressure System Amanda Newman Andy Patel Bryan Cuervo September 28 th 2005 ENGR. 329 UTC Engineering.
Team Flow Eric Parker Jason Gunn Nathan Funk. Outline zBackground zPrevious Work zModeling zResults and Conclusions zQuestions.
Lecture 17. System Response II
Team Green Speed Control - Steady State Performance and Step Response John Barker John Beverly Keith Skiles ENGR 329 UTC 2/1/06.
Red Team Amanda Newman Ankit Patel Bryan Cuervo UTC ENGR 329 Sept. 14, 2005.
Red Team -Pressure- Steady State Operating And Step Response Dennis To Cory Richardson Jamison Linden 6/26/2015, UTC, ENGR-329.
-Pressure System- Frequency Response Cory Richardson Dennis To Jamison Linden 6/27/2015, UTC, ENGR-329.
Transient & Steady State Response Analysis
Pressure Control System: Root Locus Plotting Team Green: X Y Z.
Flow Rate Control System “Frequency Response” By: Taylor Murphy March 1, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329.
Team Green John Barker John Beverly Keith Skiles UTC ENGR Steady State and Step Response Performance Speed Control System.
Root Locus Plotting Red Squad Flow System Ben Gordon, Ben Klingler, Dianah Dugan October 31, 2007 University of Tennessee Chattanooga ENGR 329.
Green Team Speed System Proportional Only Controller Design and Experimental Dustin Fraley DeAndre Strong Stephanie Wilson.
B Note from Dr. Henry These slides are suggested to be ADDED to your previous presentation that included system description, diagrams, SSOC, operating.
Flow Rate Control System Proportional Only Controller April 2, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329.
What does Kc do?. What is Kc? Kc is the Controller Gain of a control system. It can be adjusted to obtain a variety of system responses.
Lect16EEE 2021 System Responses Dr. Holbert March 24, 2008.
Yellow Team Spray-Booth Pressure Station Steady, Step Behavior and Step Modeling Jamie West Jay Baker Joel Wood 10/10/11 UTC ENGR 3280L.
Out response, Poles, and Zeros
Lecture 22 Second order system natural response Review Mathematical form of solutions Qualitative interpretation Second order system step response Related.
SECOND-ORDER CIRCUITS THE BASIC CIRCUIT EQUATION Single Node-pair: Use KCL Differentiating Single Loop: Use KVL.
6. RLC CIRCUITS CIRCUITS by Ulaby & Maharbiz. Overview.
Automatic control by meiling CHEN1 Lesson 9 Root locus Automatic control 2. Analysis.
Automatic Control Theory-
DNT Control Principle Root Locus Techniques DNT Control Principle.
Unit 5: Feedback and control theory An Introduction to Mechanical Engineering: Part Two Feedback and control theory Learning summary By the end of this.
Chapter 13 1 Frequency Response Analysis Sinusoidal Forcing of a First-Order Process For a first-order transfer function with gain K and time constant,
Properties of Root Locus Lesson Objectives : After finish this lesson, students will be able to  be aware of the control system problem  be aware of.
Distributed Laboratories: Control System Experiments with LabVIEW and the LEGO NXT Platform Greg Droge, Dr. Bonnie Heck Ferri, Jill Auerbach.
Basic Concepts  Block diagram representation of control systems  Transfer functions  Analysis of block diagrams  P, PI and PID controllers ( Continuous.
Chapter 5 Transient and Steady State Response “I will study and get ready and someday my chance will come” Abraham Lincoln.
1 Lecture D32 : Damped Free Vibration Spring-Dashpot-Mass System Spring Force k > 0 Dashpot c > 0 Newton’s Second Law (Define) Natural Frequency and Period.
LCR circuit R V0 L I(t)=0 for t<0 V(t) C + trial solution
Chapter 4 Dynamic Systems: Higher Order Processes Prof. Shi-Shang Jang National Tsing-Hua University Chemical Engineering Dept. Hsin Chu, Taiwan April,
Modal Theory of Single Degree of Freedom System Dept. of Mechanical Engineering Yungpeng Wang 南臺科技大學 STUST.
CS-EE 481 Spring Founder’s Day, 2004 University of Portland School of Engineering In-Line Headphone Amplifier Authors Jim Bosak Casey Hughes Jeff.
Chapter 6 Analysis of Feedback Control Systems Prof. Shi-Shang Jang Chemical Engineering Department National Tsing-Hua University Hsin Chu, Taiwan June,
Lec 6. Second Order Systems
ABL Tracking System PRESENTED BY: SIDNEY JONES AND AJ MARIN.
Lecture 13: Second-Order Systems Time Response Lecture 12: First-order systems Lecture 13: Second-order systems Lecture 14: Non-canonical systems ME 431,
SKEE 3143 Control Systems Design Chapter 2 – PID Controllers Design
Plot Diagram.
EENG 2610: Circuit Analysis Class 13: Second-Order Circuits
Figure A circuit used to illustrate the step response of a parallel RLC circuit.
Unit-Ramp Response System & Control Engineering Lab.
Frequency Response Analysis
Jamie West Jay Baker Joel Wood 11/2/11 UTC ENGR 3280L
Nyquist Stability Criterion
* 07/16/96 What is Second Order?
Response of Higher Order Systems
Jamie West Jay Baker Joel Wood 10/10/11 UTC ENGR 3280L
Unit-Impulse Response
General Force Response
Example Combination of Systems Transfer Function:
Second-Order Systems Chapter 5 Standard form:
Frequency Response Analysis
Jigsaw Team Estrogen Stephanie Wilson Amanda Newman Jessica Raymond
Presentation transcript:

Flow Rate Control System “Root Locus Plotting” March 22, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329

Yellow Team Jimy George Jeff Lawrence Taylor Murphy Jennifer Potter

Outline Flow System Background Previous Work Root Locus Theory Modeling Results Conclusions First, I will provide a brief background in the Level II System Followed by FOPDT Theory & Model Theory Then I will discuss our results and colclude the presentation

Flow System Setup

Block Diagram

Steady State Operation

SSOC

Experimental and Model Results K (lb/min/%) = 0.26 Tau (sec) = 0.46 t0 (sec) = 0.42

Frequency Response Experiment

Bode Plots Kcu (%*min/lb) = 10.00 K (lb/min/%) = 0.24 Tau (sec) = 0.27 t0 (sec) = 0.35 m (order) = 1.14 fu (Hz) = 0.95 Bode Plots

Model Bode Plot K (lb/min/%) = 0.22 t0 (sec) = 0.35 Tau (sec)= 0.25

Model Bode Plot K (lb/min/%) = 0.22 t0 (sec) = 0.35 Tau (sec)= 0.25

FOPDT Parameters K = 0.24 lb/min/% Tau = 0.28 sec t0 = 0.4 sec

Closed Loop Transfer Function

Root Locus Theory Use Pade’s Approximation Find Roots of Denominator

Root Locus Parameters KCD KQD KCU

Response to Step Change in Set Point Symbol Average Critical Damping KCD 0.08 1/500th Decay KC500 1.8 1/10 Decay KC10 4.8 Quarter Decay KQD 6.6 Ultimate KCU 10 ζ Locations

Results From Root Locus Ultimate Quarter Decay Critically Damped Underdamped Overdamped Kc = 10 Kc = 6.6 Kc = 0.08 0.08 < Kc < 10 0 < Kc < 0.08 *all units are %*min / lb

Conclusions (cont.) For: Overdamped Kc needed: 0 < Kc < 0.08 For: Critically Damped Kc needed: Kc = 0.08 *all units are %*min / lb

Conclusions (cont.) For: Underdamped Kc needed: 0.08 < Kc < 10 For: Quarter Decay Kc needed: Kc = 6.6 *all units are %*min / lb

Response to Step Change in Set Point Conclusions (cont.) Response to Step Change in Set Point KC (%*min/lb) Offset (lb/min) Critical Damping 0.08 4.9 1/500th Decay 1.8 3.5 1/10 Decay 4.8 2.3 Quarter Decay 6.6 1.9 Ultimate 10 1.5