CRCD Intelligent Systems Curriculum Impact Assessment and Evaluation of YEAR 1 OUTCOMES (Implemented 1 and/or Projected ) 1 Levels at which Implemented.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Impact Assessment of “Smart Materials” CRCD Curriculum on Student Perceptions Sophomore Materials Course, Spring 2002 Courtney Svec & Rita Caso.

Advertisements

C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST

Assessment of Undergraduate Programs Neeraj Mittal Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas.

Determining the Validity and Reliability of Key Assessments and Other Questions Regarding Key Assessments.

Good Afternoon Program Assessment Committee (PAC) Data Assessment Records and Analysis For the first three year Cycle Semesters Dr. Hussain Al-Zaher.

Measuring Student Learning March 10, 2015 Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment.

Assessing Student Learning in EPICS

Caso 1 A Sampler of Various Assessment Projects Aero CRCD “Smart Materials Project” Rita Caso August 22, 2003 Extract from.

Diana Chan, HKUST Enhancing Learning Experiences in Higher Education: International Conference 2 -3 December 2010.

Assessing ABET outcomes Dr. Bob Hurt Faculty Associate for Assessment and Academic Program Review Cal Poly Pomona Building 98-T7-13 x. 3472

CAEP 101: A Culture of Evidence

Lindsey Wilson College October, In 2010, the LWC faculty adopted new institutional student learning outcomes including: Lindsey Wilson students.

1. What is it we want our students to learn?

Physics I MOOC – Educational Outcomes David Lieberman*, Michael Dubson ¶, Katherine Goodman ¶, Ed Johnsen ¶, Jack Olsen ¶ and Noah Finkelstein ¶ * Department.

Assessment Assessment Planning Assessment Improvements Assessment Data Dialogue & Reflection.

Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.

Making the Link Between Teaching, Learning, and Assessment

The AERO CRCD “Smart Materials” Project 1 Preparation for Evaluation Adaptation, Evolution and Application of The TAMU-TIDEE Design Knowledge Test Rita.

Continual Improvement Process Oregon Department of Education April, 2012.

1 Learning and Educational Outcomes: Assessing Resiliency in Life and Career Learning and Educational Outcomes: Assessing Resiliency in Life and Career.

Dept. of Computing and Technology (CaT) School of Science and Technology B.S. in Computer Science (CS) CIP Code: Program Code: Program Quality.

Susan Agre-Kippenhan, Portland State University Professor, Art Department Evaluating the Effectiveness of Service Learning.

Division of Emergency Medicine Cincinnati Children’s Hospital

Elizabeth Godfrey 1.  Periodic assessment of results Appropriateness, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, sustainability  Identifies intended and unintended.

Research Problem UF sciences faculty complain that students lack adequate computer, math/statistics, and writing skills Biology faculty have embraced undergraduate.

Development of a Multidisciplinary Curriculum for Intelligent Systems (MCIS)  Dimitris C. Lagoudas  Jeffery E. Froyd  Othon K. Rediniotis  Thomas W.

BME Longitudinal Design Teams Freshmen to Senior BME students working together in teams to solve problems involving biomedical engineering design, culminating.

Assess the effectiveness of strategies Analyze that evidence/data Identify the most powerful teaching strategies Identify and gather evidence/data of student.

March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.

Student Learning Objectives: Approval Criteria and Data Tracking September 17, 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material used under the educational.

 Integrate the Bacc Core category learning outcomes into the course.  Clarify for students how they will achieve and demonstrate the learning outcomes.

Pilot Training for Volunteers General Education Assessment Committee.

Full-Time Faculty In-Service: Program and Student Learning Outcomes Fall 2005.

Technology Use Plan Beta Group Collaboration Sarah Miller, Erin Okazaki, Dann Mosteller.

Colton High School OACTE Conference Sunriver, Oregon April 18, 2008 Extended Application.

Southern University At New Orleans 6400 Press Drive New Orleans, LA

Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research 2010 Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research Assessment Review Committee Report College of Technology.

Progress in Graduate Attribute Assessment in Mechanical Engineering at McMaster University M.F. Lightstone February 2012.

AN INTEGRATED APPROACH TO ENGINEERING AND DESIGN School of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering (SMAE) Dr Linda Lee, Peter Lo and Lim Siew Kuan June.

Research Problem In one sentence, describe the problem that is the focus of your classroom research project about student learning: The traditional approach.

Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.

Advancing Assessment of Quantitative and Scientific Reasoning Donna L. Sundre Amy D. Thelk Center for Assessment and Research Studies (CARS) James Madison.

Improvement of MECH 2410 – Machine Design A Capstone Course in MET’s AAS Program  Andy S. Zhang Mechanical Engineering Technology 186 Jay Street Brooklyn,

INTEGRATING “SMART” MATERIALS INTO A FIRST-YEAR ENGINEERING CURRICULUM: A CASE STUDY  Luke Penrod  Diana Talley  Jeff Froyd  Rita Caso  Dimitris Lagoudas.

MT ENGAGE Student Learning Outcomes and Assessment April 27, 2015.

Quality Review Updates for Presented by Mary Barton, SATIF CFN 204 Assistant Principals’ Conference September 2, 2011.

Assessment of Industrial Internships Karyn Biasca.

Assessment Plans Council of Deans, March 22, 2007.

1 Teacher Evaluation Institute July 23, 2013 Roanoke Virginia Department of Education Division of Teacher Education and Licensure.

Industry Advisory Board May 30 th, 2014

Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Montgomery College Fall 2011 Orientation.

+ Montgomery College Program Assessment Orientation Spring 2013.

Somers Public Schools Building and Departmental Goals

CaMSP Science Assessment Webinar Public Works, Inc. Sharing Lessons Learned in the Development and Use of Science Assessments for CaMSP Teachers and Students.

Somers Public Schools Building and Departmental Goals

Office of Planning & Development

Is what you say you teach, what your students learn?

Consider Your Audience

CURRICULUM DESIGN Part 2 of 2 PROGRAM EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES PROGRAM OUTCOMES COURSE OUTCOMES.

Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”

Testing Process and Data Collection

C On-Track Unit Plan Engaging Students in On-Track Conversations

Designing a Course for Evaluation:

Fall 2002 Freshman Profile September 6, 2002.

Communication Assessment Results

Electrical Engineering Tech. (A. A. S

Assessment Day Strategy

Comprehensive evaluation of data and assessment plan

The Impact of Peer Learning on Assessment Literacy and Feedback Orientation

Student Learning Outcomes Assessment

Presentation transcript:

CRCD Intelligent Systems Curriculum Impact Assessment and Evaluation of YEAR 1 OUTCOMES (Implemented 1 and/or Projected ) 1 Levels at which Implemented ( i.e., F=Freshman, S=Senior)

CRCD Intelligent Systems Curriculum Impact on Design Knowledge To be able to measure CRCD Intelligent Systems project curriculum impact, over time, on students’ Design Knowledge, benchmark measures were taken for: Beginning Freshmen Freshmen Ending 1 st yr and also for Seniors Beginning 1 st semester of Aero Design Seniors Ending 2 nd semester of Aero Design An adapted version of the TIDEE Team-Based Design Knowledge Assessment Test and Scoring Rubric was used to measure Engineering Design Process Teamwork Communication.

CRCD Intelligent Systems Curriculum Impact on Design Knowledge: Team Design Process, Teamwork & Communication 1 Freshman vs. Senior Baselines ( Early Fall 2001) AERO CRCD Students 0—5.5 Scale Design Process Team Work Communication* Freshmen 2 (n=88) Mean Scores Std. Dev Seniors 3 (n=23) Mean Scores Std. Dev TAMU AERO CRCD Adapted TIDEE Project Mid Program Assessment Instrument #1, Design knowledge * Validity in question. Question universally misinterpreted. Scores Scaled 0 – 5.5, with 0=no knowledge & 5.5=exceptional knowledge

CRCD Intelligent Systems Curriculum Impact on Design Knowledge : Freshman Benchmarks. ** Post Test was given to a different set of Freshman * Validity in question. Question universally misinterpreted. Scores Scaled 0 – 5.5, with 0=no knowledge & 5.5=exceptional knowledge *

CRCD Intelligent Systems Curriculum Impact on Design Knowledge : Senior Benchmarks * Validity in question. Question universally misinterpreted. * Scores Scaled 0 – 5.5, with 0=no knowledge & 5.5=exceptional knowledge

CRCD Intelligent Systems Curriculum Impact on Design Knowledge Gained in a First Semester Freshman Engineering Course The TIDEE Team-Based Design Knowledge Assessment Test was given at the beginning of the first semester in a Freshman Engineering Class which incorporated a CRCD Intelligent Systems project. The TIDEE Team-Based Design Reflective Essay was given at the end of that same first semester Freshman class. Both measured knowledge of: Engineering Design Process Teamwork Communication First semester Freshman knowledge about engineering team- based design increased after completing their Intelligent Systems team projects (e.g. “Stiquito Projects”)

CRCD Intelligent Systems Curriculum Impact on Design Knowledge Gained in a First Semester Freshman Engineering Course Scores Scaled 0 – 5.5, with 0=no knowledge & 5.5=exceptional knowledge * Validity in question. Question universally misinterpreted. * Pre- Test

CRCD Intelligent Systems Class Design Projects Increased Freshmen’s knowledge about Engineering Team-Design Scores Scaled 0 – 5.5, with 0=no knowledge & 5.5=exceptional knowledge * * Validity in question. Question universally misinterpreted. Pre- Test