Day: Friday 11 th November Session: Coordinators: Warwick Watkins & Holger Magel Topic:Generic Lessons Learnt- break out groups

Day 1 – Wednesday Nov 9 th Welcome & Research Vision Presentations - European Perspective of Paradigm European Group Coordinator: Ian Williamson Rapporteur: Paul van der Molen Report Back - Discussion European Lessons Learnt Australian Group Coordinator: Stig Enemark Rapporteur: Steve Jacoby Evaluate – Components of the vision

Presentations - Australian Perspective of Paradigm European Group Coordinator: Ian Williamson Rapporteur: Daniel Steudler Report Back - Discussion Australian Lessons Learnt Australian Group Coordinator: Stig Enemark Rapporteur: Grahame Searle Evaluate – Components of the vision Day 2 – Thursday Nov 10 th

Report Back - Discussion Group 1 (based on Australian & European Perspectives) Rapporteur: Warwick Watkins Evaluate – Issues in Designing a New Generation of LAS Day 3 – Friday Nov 11 th Presentation – Spatially Enabling Government Final Presentation Next Generation of LAS Ian Williamson, Stig Enemark, Jude Wallace Group 2 (based on Australian & European Perspectives) Rapporteur: Holger Magel

Friday Discussion 1.Key lessons learned from the workshop 2.Use of comparisons between Europe and Australia 3.Future steps…

Key lessons learned from the workshop Eminent people are still capable ICT based LAS does not automatically lead to sustainability –Historical issues impede –Cultural issues impede –Sustainability is brought about by a mix of factors, LAS is only one The model/paradigm is technically driven NOT driven by sustainability –Other discipline need to be included Lack of interoperability/common understanding impedes debate – legal, inter-community, technical, semantics Branding/Marketing issues of the term “land administration”- politically appealing language is required A connection to people is missing- dehumanized The model does not have enough focus on economic benefits of the individuals Active partners are required in the community e.g. farmers, Grossly over legislated (523 Victorian statutes) in Australia More visionary model is required- proactive vs. reflecting what is

Key lessons learned from the workshop Local government and local communities should play a larger role Rural areas are a greater problem (in Australia)? Regulatory voids Does this approach help in daily activities? Need for definition of responsibilities –Are they cultural rather than legislated Can we have a conceptual model that resonates across cultures The role of the private sector? –How can they be embedded into the model/paradigm –Do they have a role if they’re only economically driven The role of surveying in delivering sustainable development –Leading role vs. Supporting role Model is primarily for understanding the process and therefore marketing

Use of comparison between Europe and Australia Very useful for understanding differences exist and why the exist European approach to land is much closer to indigenous people of Australia A global approach is required if we’re to achieve real sustainability Demonstrates what is possible for Australia- provides leadership in some areas. Can Europe learn from Australia? –Strong focus on economic tools- good/bad? –Unbundling rights –Australia’s strength is ICT enablement INCLUDING rural areas In Australia the governing parties dominate, whereas, in European countries parliament is more important –Different process for achieving funding and policy direction In Europe the cadastre plays a far more important role Buildings and land use are included in European models- this tends to bring people into focus

Further steps… Hold next meeting in Netherlands 2007, Bavaria 2009 –Politicians and other stakeholders involved? Would another meeting be of value further into the project? Do we need to extend the project? Better marketing of the model is required A final discussion/white paper is required as a potential future policy paper Core problem cases (RRRs) need identification to build funding argument for ministers National approach- COAG? Or International approach? Sustainability is understood- What about Cadastre? SDI? Consideration of the marine dimension? Marine cadastral datamodels? What can Europe offer?