FLOW RATE CONTROL SYSTEM

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 3 Matching and Tuning
Advertisements

Chapter 4 Modelling and Analysis for Process Control
Chapter 10 Stability Analysis and Controller Tuning
Controller Design, Tuning. Must be stable. Provide good disturbance rejection---minimizing the effects of disturbance. Have good set-point tracking---Rapid,
Nyquist Stability Criterion
Nyquist Plot – First Order Lag
Response Of Linear SDOF Systems To Harmonic Excitation
Lecture 8B Frequency Response
Review
CHE 185 – PROCESS CONTROL AND DYNAMICS
Transforming C(s) into c(t): Negative Feedback Control with Proportional Only Controller Jigsaw Team Estrogen Stephanie Wilson Amanda Newman Jessica Raymond.
Jigsaw Puzzle 3 rd Team Angela Purkey Jason Powell Mena Aziz Engr
Voltage Control System: Proportional Integral (PI) Controllers Team Purple: John Pangle Jessica Raymond Justin Whitt ENGR 329 November 30, 2005.
-Pressure System- Root Locus Cory Richardson Dennis To Jamison Linden 6/14/2015, UTC, ENGR-329.
Flow Rate Control System “Step Response Modeling” February 15, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329.
Control System Design Based on Frequency Response Analysis
Flow Control System Steady State Operation & Step Response February 1 st, 2006 U.T.C. ENGR 329.
Pressure System Amanda Newman Andy Patel Bryan Cuervo September 28 th 2005 ENGR. 329 UTC Engineering.
Flow Rate Control System
Team Green Speed Control - Steady State Performance and Step Response John Barker John Beverly Keith Skiles ENGR 329 UTC 2/1/06.
Red Team Amanda Newman Ankit Patel Bryan Cuervo UTC ENGR 329 Sept. 14, 2005.
-Pressure System- Frequency Response Cory Richardson Dennis To Jamison Linden 6/27/2015, UTC, ENGR-329.
Transient & Steady State Response Analysis
Pressure Control System: Root Locus Plotting Team Green: X Y Z.
Flow Rate Control System “Frequency Response” By: Taylor Murphy March 1, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329.
Team Green John Barker John Beverly Keith Skiles UTC ENGR Steady State and Step Response Performance Speed Control System.
Root Locus Plotting Red Squad Flow System Ben Gordon, Ben Klingler, Dianah Dugan October 31, 2007 University of Tennessee Chattanooga ENGR 329.
Green Team Speed System Proportional Only Controller Design and Experimental Dustin Fraley DeAndre Strong Stephanie Wilson.
Modern Control Systems (MCS) Dr. Imtiaz Hussain Assistant Professor URL :
ECE 201 Circuit Theory I1 Sinusoidal response of circuits The switch is closed at t = 0. Determine the current i(t) for t >= 0. i(t)
Flow Rate Control System Proportional Only Controller April 2, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329.
What does Kc do?. What is Kc? Kc is the Controller Gain of a control system. It can be adjusted to obtain a variety of system responses.
Yellow Team Spray-Booth Pressure Station Steady, Step Behavior and Step Modeling Jamie West Jay Baker Joel Wood 10/10/11 UTC ENGR 3280L.
3.7 Graphs of Rational Functions
Solving Quadratic Equations – The Discriminant The Discriminant is the expression found under the radical symbol in the quadratic formula. Discriminant.
Automatic Control Theory-
Unit 5: Feedback and control theory An Introduction to Mechanical Engineering: Part Two Feedback and control theory Learning summary By the end of this.
2-1 (a),(b) (pp.50) Problem: Prove that the systems shown in Fig. (a) and Fig. (b) are similar.(that is, the format of differential equation is similar).
Automatic Control Theory School of Automation NWPU Teaching Group of Automatic Control Theory.
Basic Concepts  Block diagram representation of control systems  Transfer functions  Analysis of block diagrams  P, PI and PID controllers ( Continuous.
Prof. Wahied Gharieb Ali Abdelaal CSE 502: Control Systems (1) Topic# 3 Representation and Sensitivity Analysis Faculty of Engineering Computer and Systems.
Chapter 3 Dynamic Response The Block Diagram Block diagram is a graphical tool to visualize the model of a system and evaluate the mathematical relationships.
Pre-Calculus Lesson 5: Solving Quadratic Equations Factoring, quadratic formula, and discriminant.
Chapter 6 Analysis of Feedback Control Systems Prof. Shi-Shang Jang Chemical Engineering Department National Tsing-Hua University Hsin Chu, Taiwan June,
Subsea Control and Communications Systems
ChE 182 Chemical Process Dynamics and Control
Chapter 5: Root Locus Nov , Two Conditions for Plotting Root Locus Given open-loop transfer function G k (s) Characteristic equation Magnitude.
G(s) Input (sinusoid) Time Output Ti me InputOutput A linear, time-invariant single input and single output (SISO) system. The input to this system is.
Dr. Tamer Samy Gaafar Automatic Control Theory CSE 322 Lec. 11 Root Locus.
Prof. Wahied Gharieb Ali Abdelaal
Negative Feedback Control Heat Exchanger Transfer Function.
Lecture 11/12 Analysis and design in the time domain using root locus North China Electric Power University Sun Hairong.
Lecture 7/8 Analysis in the time domain (II) North China Electric Power University Sun Hairong.
Chap2. Modeling in the Frequency Domain
Nyguist criterion Assist. Professor. Dr. Mohammed Abdulrazzaq.
Solving Linear Equations and Inequalities
Sinusoidal response of circuits
Modeling in the Time Domain
Jamie West Jay Baker Joel Wood 11/2/11 UTC ENGR 3280L
Nyquist Stability Criterion
complex numbers: Review 1
Figure Contributions of characteristic equation roots to closed-loop response.
Warmup Open Loop System Closed Loop System
Jamie West Jay Baker Joel Wood 10/10/11 UTC ENGR 3280L
Root-Locus Analysis (2)
Example 1: Find the magnitude and phase angle of
PROPORTIONS.
CH. 6 Root Locus Chapter6. Root Locus.
Jigsaw Team Estrogen Stephanie Wilson Amanda Newman Jessica Raymond
Sinusoidal response of circuits
Presentation transcript:

FLOW RATE CONTROL SYSTEM SECOND ORDER PLUS DEAD TIME MODEL April 20, 2006 U.T.C Engineering 329

Yellow Team Jimy George Jeff Lawrence Taylor Murphy Jennifer Potter

Outline Flow System Background SOPDT System Theory Model Results

Outline Proportional Controller Comparison of FOPDT & SOPDT results Conclusion

Flow System Setup

Block Diagram

Laplace Domain R(s) C(s)

Time Domain

Modeling Observations

Parameters involved

Modeling Observations Recap

Negative Feedback Loop

Closed Loop Transfer Function

Characteristic Equation

Characteristic Equation For

Solving CE for Kc Direct Substitution Set s = iωU Set like terms equal to zero Imaginary part: [0.0079 ωU3-(0.6 +0.048Kcu) ωU]i=0i

Direct Substitution (cont’d) Real part: 0.24Kcu - 0.12 ωU2 + 1 = 0 ωU = 5 => fu = 0.8 Kcu = 8.3 %/(lb/min)

Corresponding Frequency Experiment

Observations Phase Angle = -1800 Amplitude Ratio = 0.12 Kcu calculated = 8.3

Comparison of fu

Comparison of Kc

Conclusion Kc = 8.3 %/(lb/min) SOPDT more accurate than FOPDT Always scope for improved results