1 Applying Research from How People Learn to Engineering Classrooms INFORMS November 2007 Cynthia J. Atman Jim Borgford-Parnell Center for Engineering.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Best Practices Engaged Learning How to Teach Instruction.
Advertisements

How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School John D. Bransford, Ann L. Brown, and Rodney R. Cocking, editors.
How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School John D. Bransford, Ann L. Brown, and Rodney R. Cocking, editors.
Economic Education and How People Learn Scott Simkins, Interim Director Academy for Teaching and Learning (ATL) North Carolina A&T State University Acknowledgements:
Assessing student learning from Public Engagement David Owen National Co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement Funded by the UK Funding Councils, Research.
PORTFOLIO.
1 Problem Scoping in Design: Some Research Results Dr. Cynthia J. Atman, Dr. Ken Yasuhara, Dr. Deborah Kilgore Center for Engineering Learning and Teaching.
TWSSP Summer Academy June 24-28, Celebrations.
Applying How People Learn (HPL) Key Findings to Higher Education National Research Council MSP Workshop How People Learn June 28, 2004 Bonnie J. Brunkhorst.
January 2009RMC Research Corp. 1 Effective Science Instruction: What Does Research Tell Us? Dave Weaver RMC Research Corporation.
1 Faculty Leadership Development Programs at Virginia Tech Peggy Layne, P.E., Director, AdvanceVT.
Welcome!. Looking at Student Notebooks, Goals: Deepen understanding of the nature and purpose of science notebook entry types Deepen understanding of.
PROM/SE Science Associates Welcome Back! Please sit at tables by grade bands K-2, 3-5, 6-8, 9-12.
July 2001Mara Alagic: Teaching for Effective Learning 1 Teaching for Effective Learning: Teaching for Understanding.
By Paula Jacobsen Chapter 12
DME Collaborative for Active Learning in Medicine 1 Designing Independent Learning Assignments (Formerly known as “homework”) Janet M. Riddle, MD Director.
Planning, Instruction, and Technology
Interactive Science Notebooks: Putting the Next Generation Practices into Action
Key Understandings for Learning and Teaching in the Early Years
CENTER FOR THE INTEGRATION OF RESEARCH, TEACHING, AND LEARNING A national network of 25 research universities committed to using graduate education to.
How does engaging metacognitive strategies help students? I can create a plan for helping students become aware of the importance of engaging in metacognitive.
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
Science in the School Curriculum Chapter 4 Science in the School Curriculum
Project-Based Learning ITECH 711 Summer 2007 Trena Noval, Instructor.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
1 CENTER for the ADVANCEMENT of ENGINEERING EDUCATION Lorraine N. Fleming, Ph.D. Co- Principal Investigator Howard University Kimarie Engerman, Ph.D. Senior.
Math & Science Collaborative, © MSC Algebraic Reasoning Day 5 How Students Learn Mathematics.
Presented by: Joseph Ginotti PLN Director
Illinois MSP Program Goals  To increase the content expertise of mathematics and science teachers; 4 To increase teaching skills through access to the.
PLMLC Leadership Series Thunder Bay Region Day 2 Brian Harrison, YRDSB Connie Quadrini, YCDSB Friday February 4 th, 2011.
SEISMIC Whole School and PLC Planning Day Tuesday, August 13th, 2013.
Learning Theory Dianne Peck A/General Manager, Student Learning Programs Division, OGSE.
Welcome to the 2010 OMSP Summer Experience!. Who is in the Room? Bremerton Cape Flattery Chimacum North Mason Port Angeles Quillayute Valley Our Lady.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
National Science Foundation PD Led Workshops – Session B: Transforming Undergraduate Education in Engineering Louis Everett Susan Finger Don Millard Russ.
Physical Education Standards Toolkit (4 hours) OCISS Instructional Services Branch.
Learning Initiatives to Improve Undergraduate Education at a Research-Oriented Institution Robin R. Rastani * and Michel A. Wattiaux Department of Dairy.
Chapter 1 Defining Social Studies. Chapter 1: Defining Social Studies Thinking Ahead What do you associate with or think of when you hear the words social.
Implementing Inquiry Based Science Teaching Through Teacher Networks The SINUS model for educational development in Germany Matthias Stadler, Kiel (Germany)
Teaching to the Standard in Science Education By: Jennifer Grzelak & Bonnie Middleton.
Evaluating the Conceptual Coherence and Rigor of Instructional Materials Florida Association of Science Supervisors 5 May 2005 Jody Bintz, BSCS Center.
1 What Are We Doing Here Anyway? Vision for our Work: Effective Science Learning Experiences Dave Weaver RMC Research Corp.
Supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. EHR Before we begin….. Take a few minutes to reflect on impacts of the NCOSP project.
Teaching for Understanding Appalachian Math Science Partnership
How People Learn – Brain, Mind, Experience, and School (Bransford, Brown, & Cocking, 1999) Three core principles 1: If their (students) initial understanding.
LEARNER CENTERED APPROACH
Introduction to STEM Integrating Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math.
Differentiated Instruction: Getting in Synch with Our Students Presenter: Bill Rich Charlotte Central School February 1, 2011.
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
October 2008RMC Research Corp.1 Effective Science Instruction: What does Research Tell Us? Horizon Research, Inc. Center on Instruction, RMC Research.
How does engaging in metacognitive strategies help students own their own learning? I can create a plan for helping students become aware of the importance.
Instructional Leadership: Planning Rigorous Curriculum (What is Rigorous Curriculum?)
The Cabin This weekend’s archaeological dig. Assessing Your Own Assessment Practices Step #1: Collecting Data Task: Identify the “things”/assignments.
Chapter 8 Putting It All Together DEVELOPING A TEACHING PHILOSOPHY © 2015 Etta R. Hollins.
Fostering Sustained Impact: Lessons Learned from Geoscience Faculty Workshops Ellen Roscoe Iverson, Cathryn A. Manduca, Science Education Resource Center,
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
Description of a Process for Enhancing Pre-service Programs to Better Prepare General Education Teachers to Teach Students with Disabilities 2016 CEEDAR.
Session Outcome Review the benefits & rationale for using notebooks as sense-making tools for students. Review the 4 “essences” of science notebooks Explore.
Using Cognitive Science To Inform Instructional Design
Quarterly Meeting Focus
University of Minnesota – Duluth
2016 CEEDAR Cross-State Convening
Formative Assessment Classroom Techniques (FACTs)
Reflecting on Practice: Making Connections that Support Learning
Presented by: Joseph Ginotti PLN Director
Reflecting on Practice: Making Connections that Support Learning
Finding research questions: Topics and areas
Selecting & Developing Cases and Clinical Problems
LEARNER-CENTERED PSYCHOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES. The American Psychological Association put together the Leaner-Centered Psychological Principles. These psychological.
Presentation transcript:

1 Applying Research from How People Learn to Engineering Classrooms INFORMS November 2007 Cynthia J. Atman Jim Borgford-Parnell Center for Engineering Learning and Teaching University of Washington Co-Designed with Jennifer Turns, University of Washington Lorraine Fleming, Howard University

2 “How People Learn” Source: National Resource Council (2000)

3 Why use “How People Learn” to inform teaching? Important to understand how our students think and what they bring to the classroom (experiences, skills, prior knowledge, etc.) How People Learn gives a valuable framework

4 Who are our students? Emerging findings from the Academic Pathways Study (APS) –Part of the NSF-funded Center for Advancement of Engineering Education (CAEE) –Large scale, multi-method, longitudinal study of undergraduate engineering students –Three cohorts of students from four very different undergraduate engineering programs and a group of early career engineers Sheppard (lead), Atman, Fleming, Miller, Smith, Stevens, Streveler

5 APS Research Questions Skills How do students’ engineering skills and knowledge develop and/or change over time? Identity How do these students come to identify themselves as engineers? Education How do pre/engineering students navigate their educations?

6 Emerging Findings Across the Study: From the student perspective Large variation in student pathways.... Reasons for choice of major –Financial security –Contribution to society –Influence of family or mentors Curriculum and skill development issues –Heavy workloads, competition, stress –First two years give little “vision” of engineering (design and teamwork come late) –Understanding context vs. detail (a “systems” view) Perspectives on diversity –What it means to students’ views of becoming an engineer

7 Emerging Findings Across the Study: From the student perspective (cont.) Large variation in student pathways.... Commitment to field of engineering –Affected by personal situation, learning experiences, institutional procedures –Decision to be an engineer re-examined often Reasons for leaving –Lack of confidence in math/science skills –Fear of losing scholarships –Perception that engineering is too narrow (often little understanding of the contributions of engineering to social good) –Factors affect men and women differently

8 “How People Learn” Source: National Resource Council (2000)

9 Workshop Goals: 1.Explore research results from How People Learn 2.Think about ways these results might be applied in the context of your own classroom

10 Main Workshop Activity: Think / Pair / Share Think:Individually think about an assigned topic Pair: Discuss your thoughts with a colleague Share:Group discussion

11 Describe a topic you teach Think: Think of a brief description of a topic you teach that you would like to focus on today (2 min) Pair: Discuss with a colleague (4 mins)

12 “How People Learn” Three main findings: Students have preconceptions Knowledge organization matters Students benefit from a “metacognitive” approach to instruction Source: National Resource Council, How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School, (2000)

13 1. Preconceptions “Students come to the classroom with preconceptions about how the world works.” If their initial understanding is not engaged, they may fail to grasp the new concepts and information that are taught, or they may learn them for purposes of a test, revert to their preconceptions outside the classrooms.” Source: National Resource Council, How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. (2000). Chapter 1, p

14 Student Preconceptions Source: Chi, M.T.H., & Roscoe, R.D. In Limon, M. & Mason, L. (Eds.), (2002).

15 Student Preconceptions Source: Clement, J. (1982).

16 Student preconceptions: Applying to your teaching Think: In what ways could your teaching take into account student preconceptions? (2 min) Pair: Discuss with a colleague (4 mins) Share: Discuss as a group (4 mins)

17 Student preconceptions: Applying to your teaching Ideas from workshop participants Ideas….

18 2. Organization of Knowledge “To develop competence in an area of inquiry, students must: a)have a deep foundation of factual knowledge, b)understand facts and ideas in the context of a conceptual framework, and c)organize knowledge in ways that facilitate retrieval and application” -> Draws on research on expert/novice differences Source: National Resource Council, How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. (2000). Chapter 1, p. 16.

19 Expert/Novice differences in physics SCANNED from: National Resource Council, How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School (2000). Source: Chi, M.T.H., P.J. Feltovich, and R. Glaser (1981).

20 Engineering Student Knowledge Networks

21 Engineering Student Knowledge Networks

22 Student Two: Student One: Source: Turns, Jennifer, Cynthia J. Atman, and Robin Adams (2000). "Concept Maps for Engineering Education: A Cognitively Motivated Tool Supporting Varied Assessment Functions," IEEE Transactions on Education Special Issue on Assessment 43 (2), pp , May 2000 Engineering Student Knowledge Networks

23 Knowledge Organization: Applied to your teaching Think: In what ways could your teaching take into account knowledge organization? (2 min) Pair: Discuss with a colleague (4 mins) Share: Discuss as a group (4 mins)

24 Knowledge Organization: Applying to your teaching Ideas from workshop participants Ideas…

25 3. Metacognition “A ‘metacognitive’ approach to instruction can help students take control of their own learning by defining learning goals and monitoring their progress in achieving them” Source: National Resource Council, How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. (2000). Chapter 1, p. 18.

26 Metacognition Source: Schoenfeld, A.H. (1992). Learning to Think Mathematically: Problem-Solving, Metacognition, and Sense-Making in Mathematics.

27 Senior/Freshmen differences in design processes Source: Atman, Cynthia J., Justin R. Chimka, Karen M. Bursic, and H. L. Nachtmann (1999).

28 Metacognition: Applied to your teaching Think: In what ways could your teaching take into account metacognition? (2 min) Pair: Discuss with a colleague (4 mins) Share: Discuss as a group (4 mins)

29 Metacognition: Applying to your teaching Ideas from workshop participants Ideas….

30 Recap: Three main findings from “How People Learn” Students have preconceptions Knowledge organization matters Students benefit from a “metacognitive” approach to instruction Source: National Resource Council, How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School, (2000)

31 Going Forward: Think: Think about the topic you will teach with respect to the research findings from “How People Learn” Think about one research result you may try to implement (2 min) Pair: Discuss with a colleague (4 mins) Share: Discuss as a group (4 mins)

32 What result could you implement? Ideas from workshop participants Ideas…

33 Revisiting Workshop Goals: 1.Explore research results on how people learn 2.Think about ways these results might be applied in the context or your own classroom

34 Good Luck! “How People Learn”

35 Acknowledgment This material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. ESI , which funds the Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education (CAEE). Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. CAEE is a collaboration of five partner universities: Colorado School of Mines, Howard University, Stanford University, University of Minnesota, and University of Washington. CELT is an engineering education research and faculty development center at the University of Washington. The following are funding partners with CELT: The Mitchell T. Bowie and Lella Blanche Bowie Fund, The Boeing Company,, Ford Motor Company, GE Fund, Mark and Carolyn Guidry, Jim and Sue Hewitt