Student Equity Plan Presented on Flex Day by Shauna Hagemann Faculty Co-Chair, Student Success Committee Counselor, DSPS Karen Rothstein Student Equity Coordinator Associate Dean, Student Success March 10, 2015

Who is Involved? Student Equity Plan Steering Group Vice President of Academic Affairs Vice President of Student Support Services President of the Academic Senate Co-chairs of the Student Success Committee (one faculty and one administrator) Student Equity Coordinator Writing Workgroup 16 faculty 7 classified employees Student Success Committee Plans for Student Equity Subcommittee

Student Equity Plan Approval Process Vetted in October and November, 2014 Student Success Committee Curriculum Committee Academic Senate Approved by Board of Trustees on December 9, 2014 Submitted to Chancellor’s Office on December 17, 2014

A Very Big THANK YOU! Access Debra Hamm Tasha Hunter Henry Mansfield Deatrice Shernell Shamika Simpson Course Completion Lee Douglas Erainia Freeman Mary Hegarty Matt Lawrence Basic Skills Diep Burbridge Iris Chao Robert DeFrance Tim Mount Trisha Wilging Gloria Williams Christiane Woerner Certificates/Degrees Kenna Hillman Marie Monaus Kashara Moore Transfer Sofia Beas Yvette Moss Darya Myers Sonia Verduzco We want to acknowledge the hard work, dedication, and passion of our Writing Workgroup members.

Disproportionate Impact

Subgroups and Indicators Student Equity Subgroups Ethnic Groups Gender Age Groups Students with Disabilities Economically Disadvantaged Students Veterans Foster Youth Student Equity Indicators Access Course Completion Basic Skills Progress (English, Math, ESL) Certificate Completion Degrees Completion Transfer

Disproportionate Impact: 80 % Rule Compares access or outcome/achievement rates of all other groups to that of the reference group (e.g., highest performing group) Rate below 80% of the reference group rate indicates evidence of disproportionate impact Example: = 91.6% Group A: 79.2% Group C: 86.5% (reference group) 79.2% 86.5% No disproportionate impact Group D: 58.7% Group C: 86.5% (reference group) 58.7% 86.5% Disproportionate impact = 67.9%

Disproportionate Impact: 80 % Rule A sub-group performs at less than 80% of the highest performing group

Access Course Completion Basic Skills: English Basic Skills: Reading Basic Skills: ESL Reading Basic Skills: ESL Writing Basic Skills: Math DegreeCertificateTransfer African-Am./Black Asian/Filipino/PI Hispanic Nat. Am./Alask. Nat. White Unknown Female Male 19 years or younger 20 to 24 years 25 to 29 years 40 or years older DSPS Non-DSPS Disproportionate Impact Impacted group Non-impacted group Reference group (i.e., highest performing group) Subgroup not present in cohort or sample size too small Please see “Proposal Submission” (pp. 7-8)

Have a great idea? Does it address disproportionately impacted groups? Does it address the student equity indicators? Does it align with one or more of the goals of the Student Equity Plan? Please see “Call for Proposals” (p. 3) Is it a new project or the scaling up of an existing one?

Did you answer yes? Then Student Equity may be the funding source for you!

Proposal Process 1.Proposal Submission to Antoinette Summerville by Thursday, March 26 No more than four pages 2.Proposals rated by Student Success Committee Approved Revise and resubmit Rejected 3.Notification sent to individuals regarding status of project 4.Approved proposals reviewed by Student Equity Steering Committee for funding allocation

Contents of Proposal Submission 1.Project Description 2.Measure of Success/Evaluation Plan 3.Number of Students/Staff/Faculty Served 4.Scale of Project 5.Preliminary Budget 6.Duration Please see “Proposal Submission” (pp. 1 – 4)

Rating of Proposals 4 = Exceeds Expectations 3 = Meets Expectations 1 = Somewhat Meets Expectations 0 = Does Not Meet Expectations Please see “Proposal Submission” (pp )

Questions

References Long Beach City College Student Equity Plan: _to_Chancellor_Office_ pdf _to_Chancellor_Office_ pdf Chancellor’s Office Student Equity Plan website: