Applying for a STARTALK Grant: Designing a Winning Proposal November 22, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Advertisements

PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
State Center Community College District Willow International Community College Center State of the Center Report Deborah J. Ikeda, Campus President January.
Unified Education Strategy Grant Program. UES Participants Anderson Valley Unified School District Belmont-Redwood Shores School District Beverly Hills.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
Introduction to STARTALK Language Teacher E-Library Catherine Ingold, PhD Shuhan Wang, PhD 2010 ACTFL Conference November 19, 2010.
Do Now: Matching Game  Match the numbers from Column A to the clues in Column B to learn fun facts about Title IIA Massachusetts Department of Elementary.
An Overview of the Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP) January 25, 2014 FREMONT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Educate Challenge Inspire.
February 9, 2012 Session 1: Observing Lessons NYSED Principal Evaluation Training Program.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
CAL Survey of Program Directors Margaret E. Malone Julie Sugarman October 16, 2009.
Expanding Resources for Continuous Improvement Atlanta, GA April 16-17, 2010.
Applying for a STARTALK Grant: Designing a Winning Proposal November 21, 2010.
Program Directors: Updates, Evaluations, and Reports.
Life Cycle of a Teacher: A STARTALK Perspective. Catherine Ingold, Ph.D. Director Shuhan C. Wang, Ph.D. Deputy Director National Foreign Language Center.
How to Use STARTALK Online Resources STARTALK Spring Conference April 17, 2010.
Using STARTALK Resources to Inform World Language Discussions & Decisions STARTALK Spring Conference April 16, 2010.
SUNY Cortland Conceptual Framework … our shared vision for preparing candidates to work in P-12 schools.
NECTFL Workshop: Making Data-Driven Decisions Based on STARTALK 2007.
Building a Gateway for Language and Culture: Lessons from STARTALK ACTFL November 20, 2010.
Perspectives of Hindi, Urdu, and Persian Programs.
Myriam Met National Foreign Language Center Enhancing the Fields of Arabic and Chinese.
STARTALK & Heritage Languages in the United States 2010 ACTFL Shuhan Wang, PhD Co-Principal Investigator, STARTALK November 20, 2010.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
A Big Picture about the 2008 STARTALK Shuhan Wang.
What should be the basis of
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
1 Ohio’s Entry Year Teacher Program Review Ohio Confederation of Teacher Education Organizations Fall Conference: October 23, 2008 Presenter: Lori Lofton.
Grantwriting. Types of Grants Foundation Grants HancockREADS Grants Hancock Education Fund Grants.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Building Capacity in Chinese and Arabic Pam Delfosse World Languages Education Consultant Claire Kotenbeutel Critical Language Fellows Project Consultant.
EL-Civics Application Remember! If in a consortium: –Must complete Budget Detail page for each consortium member EL-Civics Application.
 NSF Merit Review Criteria Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts  Additional Considerations Integration of Research & Education Integrating Diversity into.
Oregon Reading First Orientation Holiday Inn Portland Airport November 12, 2002 Oregon Department of Education.
1 Building District Capacity through State Monitoring of SIG The Massachusetts Model March 22, 2011 Presented by Karla Brooks Baehr, Deputy Commissioner.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Lynn Thompson Center for Applied Linguistics Startalk Network for Program Excellence Chicago, Illinois October 16-18, 2009 Formative and Summative Assessment.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Kenmore – Tonawanda Universal Pre-Kindergarten (UPK)
RESPRO Area 1C Area 1C RESPRO Meeting RESPRO Area 1C November 24, 2009.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Biennial Report October 2008.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
- 0 - Collaborative Inquiry via Professional Learning Communities MSDF Impact Assessment.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
Dynamic Learning in 21 st Century Chinese Classrooms: Achieving Proficiency Oriented and Learner-Centered Instruction Monday, 12 July George Mason University.
STARTALK: Our mission, accomplishments and direction ILR November 12, 2010.
 NSF Merit Review Criteria Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts  Additional Considerations Integration of Research & Education Broadening Participation.
Program Improvement Unit Collaborating to increase student achievement and fundamentally improve the interaction between the teacher and the students to.
Oct. 13, 2015 Flagstaff Oct. 14, 2015 Phoenix Oct. 15, 2015 Tucson Arizona Charter Schools Program: Getting Ready for the 2016 Grant Cycle 1.
Los Angeles Unified School District Local District G Principals Meeting.
Welcome to todays session!  Please take a moment to check your connection and audio settings.  If this is your first time using LYNC please see the resources.
Certification Learning Network February 2,
Transforming the Learning, Teaching, and Leadership Environment Summer Institutes 2001 Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction/Association of Washington.
Why Community-University Partnerships? Partnerships Enhance quality of life in the region Increase relevance of academic programs Add public purposes to.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
PIIC/PLN UPDATES AIU3 Coaches’ Workshop September 11, 2014.
Professional Development
Project Title: Supported Reading in English (SuRE) Project Code: NT0513 Section: NET Section, CDI 2 March 2013 Officers In-charge: Alice Wong Kathryn Davis.
NH Professional Development Center Network Task Force Report to State Board of Education on August 21, 2002.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Planning for the Future of Spring Branch ISD Spring Branch Plan, Task Force Organizational Meeting – January 28, 2011.
Welcome Katherine Cox Print Download Help Exit View Notification from TA Choose Document : Proposal Report Proposal Approved Proposals/Reports.
QAA COLLABORATIVE PROVISION AUDIT DRAFT REPORT. QAA CPA Process Submission by the University of Self Evaluation Document (SED) (December 2005) Selection.
District of Innovation Update: International School Development
Teaching and Learning with Technology
Dr. Laura K. Murray National Security Agency
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
Presentation transcript:

Applying for a STARTALK Grant: Designing a Winning Proposal November 22, 2009

Overview of the Workshop Introduction to STARTALK Describe STARTALK process and cycle Focus on the planning process Discuss how to design an effective STARTALK/world language program Share lessons learned from previous STARTALK programs

Expected Outcomes— I will understand: the STARTALK program and its requirements the conceptual planning process the essential characteristics of an effective STARTALK/world language program

Introductions Participants STARTALK Central Staff

What is STARTALK? National Security Language Initiative Critical Languages: Arabic, Chinese, Dari, Hindi, Persian, Russian, Swahili, Turkish, Urdu Commitment: 5-year contract through 2013 Impact in 2007, 2008, and 2009

STUDENT Programs Students are highly motivated, self- selected language learners 77% plan to continue study of the STARTALK language 96% believe that learning another language will help them better understand people who are different from them

Teacher Programs 19% list English as their native language; 9% were born in the US 86% are female 48% have a master’s degree 73% are currently teaching the STARTALK language 20% certified to teach the language; 54% plan to become certified

Combination and Collaborative Programs Teacher trainers conduct mini lessons under the mentorship of lead teacher Students benefit from small group activities Teachers reflect daily on their classroom experiences

2009 STARTALK Programs

Program Growth

2009 Enrollments

2009 STARTALK States

STARTALK 2009 Video

BREAK

STARTALK Transformation

STARTALK System

STARTALK Process & Cycle Request for Proposals (October) Proposal Review (November/December) Award Notification (January) Award Start Date (March) Orientation Conference (April) Program Curriculum Development and Approval (May-June) Program Implementation (June, July, & August) Site Visit (June, July, & August) Final Report Post-program Conference (October)

Who Can Get STARTALK Funding? Eligibility Capacity to offer a STARTALK program Languages, states, ages, levels of instruction Prior experience Evidence of participant safety and insurance

Who Can Get STARTALK Funding? Post secondary institutions State and regional educational agencies School districts Public and private schools Community organizations Language associations Corporations

Why Plan? Target participants Goals: where are we going? Outcomes: what will the participants be able to do as a result of this program? Activities and timeline: how will we get there?

Planning Process Conduct needs assessment Identify goals and outcomes Design assessment Identify specific knowledge and skills Develop activities Select personnel Develop timeline Work out a budget

Designing an Effective Program (1 of 2) START with the End in Mind Goals Rationale/Needs analysis Program Description Assessment Indicators of success/outcomes for participants

Designing an Effective Program (2 of 2) Main activities and timeline Key personnel Evaluation of program outcomes Relevant previous experience Opportunities for continued learning Lessons learned incorporated into plan

Planning Discussion

BREAK

Characteristics of an Effective Language Program (1 of 4) Alignment of Assessment, Curriculum, and Instruction Realistic and measurable outcomes Performance-based assessment Evaluation plan for participant growth and program effectiveness

Characteristics of an Effective Language Program (2 of 4) Curriculum and Instruction Standards-based and thematically organized curriculum Student-centered classrooms Developmentally appropriate instruction Use of target language for instruction Integration of culture into language instruction Use of authentic materials Differentiated Instruction

Administration (3 of 4) Administrative Resources Adequately staffed Clear roles Appropriate location Ability to attract sufficient enrollment Institutional support

Budget (4 of 4) Financial Resources Cost effectiveness Number of participants served Duration and intensity of program Quality of instruction

Lessons Learned Cynthia Ning: University of Hawaii Christy Lao: San Francisco State University

Q & A