Museum Assessment Program: Public Dimension Assessment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
By Jim Martz, Associate Superintendent of Schools, Illinois Conference of SDA By Jim Martz, Associate Superintendent of Schools, Illinois Conference.
Advertisements

Overview of the Study Protocol
Excellence in Corps Operations CNCS Executive Directors Meeting September 23, 2008.
Evaluator 101: An Introduction to Serving as a MSCHE Evaluator Dr. Luis G. Pedraja MSCHE Vice President.
Entry Requirements for U.S. Accreditation Hellenic American Union, Athens, Greece October, 2007 Jean Avnet Morse President Middle States Commission.
1 Responding to Extreme Changes between Self-Study and the Evaluation Visit Dr. Andrew Thompson, Provost Dr. Richard Resch, Provost (Retired) The American.
Association of Collegiate Business Schools and Programs (ACBSP) 2008 Annual Seminar Accounting Programs Leadership Group Federation of Schools of Accountancy.
Public Health Accreditation Board September 2008 [Insert your name here] National Accreditation Update.
Assessing Your Organization: Gauging Your Land Trusts Progress Maryland Land Conservation Conference 2009 Sylvia Bates, Land Trust Alliance Beki Howey,
IMPLEMENTING EABS MODERNIZATION Patrick J. Sweeney School Administration Consultant Educational Approval Board November 15, 2007.
Lessons Learned: How to Survive the Development of Outcome Measures Cherie McCraw, M.L.S., Library Consultant, Division of Library and Information Services.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Forsyth County Schools February 15, 2012.
How to Apply for an Interlibrary Cooperation Grant from the Alaska State Library March 23, 2013 Alaska Library Association Conference Valdez.
Harrison County Schools Professional Learning Community (PLC) Implementation Plan.
NCTA Grants Brian Endicott – The Ohio State University Mike Davis – Austin Community College Lea Brown – East Tennessee State University Roberto Voci –
Town Hall Presentation January 9-10, 2002 Curtis Powell Vice President for Human Resources The Division of Human Resources and William M. Mercer, Incorporated.
Phase 0 Pilot Program Jay Robinson Manager, Capital Programs (407)
Highland Park, Illinois Affordable Housing Trust Fund.
Program Evaluation Committees (PEC), Annual Evaluations, and the 10 year Self Study and Visit in the Next Accreditation System Cuc Mai MD FACP August.
Orientation to the Planning 10 IRP  How does Planning 10 fit into the 2004 Graduation Program?  How was Planning 10 developed?  What’s the difference.
As presented to the Global Colloquium on Engineering Education Deborah Wolfe, P.Eng. October 2008 The Canadian Process for Incorporating Outcomes Assessment.
2015 (SFY 2014) Ohio CDC Microbusiness Development Program Application Webinar August 8, 2014.
Program Review: The Foundation for Institutional Planning and Improvement.
A specialized accrediting agency for English language programs and institutions Accreditation Presentation ABLA conference 2012.
Why Institutional Assessment is Important for Middle States Adapted (with permission) From Andrea Lex, Who Presented at Stockton September 20, 2010 Facilitated.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
Columbia-Greene Community College The following presentation is a chronology of the College strategic planning process, plan and committee progress The.
PHAB Accreditation: What it means for Public Health April 8, 2015 CPHA Health Education Committee.
Creative Initiatives Workshops NOTICE: Proprietary and Confidential This material is proprietary to the Creative Initiatives Foundation. This material.
Cultural Grants 2016 Workshop June 29, 2015 Building Blocks: Applying for a Cultural Grant The Town of Oakville and the Oakville Arts Council continue.
Do it pro bono. Key Messages & Brand Strategy Service Grant.
Webinar on the OSEP Self Assessment and Site Review Process for State and Multi-State Deaf-Blind Projects October 29, 2004.
January 11, 2014 ● Facilitator: Clyde W. Kunz, CFRE.
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP
Continuing Accreditation The Higher Learning Commission provides institutional accreditation through the evaluation of the entire university organization.
Roles and Responsibilities Of the library trustee NJLTA New Jersey Library Association.
Outcome Based Evaluation for Digital Library Projects and Services
Matching Grants. Address humanitarian conditions that benefit a community in need Direct Rotarian involvement Match at least two countries (host and international)
1 Becoming an Effective Board Member The Heartland Conference April 9, 2008.
WELCOME Strategic Directions Finale May 1, SETTING THE STAGE Planning for BC’s Future 2015—2018.
Budget Forum Charles W. Sorensen Chancellor UW-Stout.
Post-Secondary Education Program Joint AFN/INAC PSE Program Review with representation from NAIIHL and the Labrador Inuit Regional Information Process.
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
CEEMAN AccreditationCape Town, CEEMAN Accreditation IQA Dr.Virginijus Kundrotas.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
Continuing the work of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Presented by: Jeff Stauffer WebJunction Service Manager Date: 3 February 2005.
Military Family Services Program Participant Survey Briefing Notes.
Middle States Reaccreditation Process at The Catholic University of America.
September 17, 2015 Strategic Preparation …Ready Your Business For 2016.
Asset Management Overview …. What is Asset Management? Answers: What do we own? What is it worth? Where is it? What kind of shape is it in? What are the.
Intro to Outcomes. What is “Outcomes”? A. a statewide initiative aimed at improving learning and accountability in education B. a standing SFCC committee.
Community Investment Reviewer Training United Way of Greater New Haven March 2010.
Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
1 Board of Early Education and Care EEC Annual Legislative Report: Update March 10, 2009.
Local Station Grant Program Goals and Requirements.
CAREER PATHWAYS THE NEW WAY OF DOING BUSINESS. Agenda for our Discussion Today we’ll discuss: Career Pathways Systems and Programs Where we’ve been and.
Strategic and Business Planning for Ensuring of Cooperatives Sustainability Dr. Hakkı Çetin TARIS Union of Olive and Olive Oil Agricultural Sale Cooperatives.
HSM 220 MART Teaching Effectively/hsm220mart.com FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
Principals & Self Study Coordinators. School Improvement Concepts Collaboration Data –Collect –Analyze –Use!!! Questions What? So What? Now What?
CHB Conference 2007 Planning for and Promoting Healthy Communities Roles and Responsibilities of Community Health Boards Presented by Carla Anglehart Director,
DEVELOPMENT OF STUDY PROGRAMS IN UNIVERSITY OF PRISHTINA/KOSOVO
Applying for a Cultural Grant
COE Assessment The “Then” and “Now”.
2 Selecting a Healthcare Information System.
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update
Sam Houston State University
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study)
Sam Houston State University
What is Planning? Start at 9:15—10 minutes to do this. Finish at 9:25.
Presentation transcript:

Museum Assessment Program: Public Dimension Assessment Presentation given by Laura Ryan, Assistant Director, Museum Advancement & Excellence, Accreditation. BC Museums Association Conference 2002 Rend Lake, IL October 16-18, 2002

Today’s Objectives To answer the questions: What is AAM’s Public Dimension Assessment? “What’s in it for my museum?” Why do it? “How can my museum start the process?”

MAP Stats MAP is 21 years old MAP has served over 3,800 museums MAP has done over 5,000 assessments 49% of museums in 2001 had budgets under $250,000

MAP is: a process of Self-Study Peer Review Comparing museum operations to standards and best practices Implementing recommendations

Characteristics of MAP Collegial consultation Not pass/fail Tailored to meet the goals of each participating museum

nnn

Some Uses of MAP Preparation for institutional planning Evaluation of the museum by an incoming director Preparation for AAM Accreditation Response to major changes in the museum: expansion, move to a new building, loss of traditional income, desire to serve new audiences Leverage support

MAP Assessments Four Assessments are currently available: Institutional Assessment Collections Management Assessment Public Dimension Assessment Governance Assessment (New in 2001!)

Public Dimension Assessment Reviews the entire operations of the museum and how they serve the museum’s audience; looks at the organization from the outside in, while focusing on the public’s perception of, experience with, and involvement with the museum

Public Dimension Assessment Results Understanding of the museum's image in the community Improved service to the museum's current audience Develop new markets or improving marketing Increased community support for and participation in public activities Better communication and cooperation with and between staff and board Improved public programs

Elements of the MAP Process Application Self-Study Peer Review Implementation

Public Dimension Assessment Readiness issues: Museum must have Mission statement approved by the governing authority Previous experience with self-study process (e.g. MAP, Accreditation, GOS application) Institutional planning document approved by governing authority

The Process Find the Partners The Museum The Peer Reviewer The MAP Staff

Forming the Assessment Team You form an Assessment Team - a group of people who all have a vested interest in the success of the museum Paid Staff Board members Volunteers Community members

Participant Quote “We thank you for MAP…It forced us to look at ourselves as we see us; and to see ourselves as you saw us.” Kathy Fisher, Director, Furnace Town Historic Site

Self-Study Workbook Questionnaire Activities helps you explore the operations of your organization, and compare them to standards and best practices in the field Activities designed to produce a different kind of learning than the Questionnaire. Enable you to assess your institution’s knowledge about its operations in action Activities include: Public Perception Activity Public Experience Activity Public Involvement Activities* Focus Group Community Meeting Community Questionnaire * Participants choose one of the three.

Time Allocation The Self-Study Workbook will take the majority of your time during the assessment process. Over 57% of museums participating in Public Dimension Assessment report dedicating five months or more to complete the Workbook

Phase 3: Peer Review MAP staff help match you with two Peer Reviewers (MAP Surveyors); Surveyors make a site visit; Meet with the Assessment Team and other staff and members of the governing authority Prepare an Assessment Report with recommendations and resources

Phase 4: Implementation Form an Implementation Team Review the self-study material and the Assessment Report Integrate assessment results into your planning for the next one to three years Set goals and measure progress

Revision of Public Dimension In the fall of 2002, MAP staff, former MAP museums, peer reviewers, and members of the Museums & Community initiative at AAM will be working together to revise the Public Dimension Assessment Self-Study Workbook. * Revision will incorporate findings from the Museums & Community Initiative * New version will be available in 2003 (December 1, 2002 grant deadline)

MAP Availability: IMLS Can be funded by grants available from the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS.) Grant deadline is December 1 Grants are non-competitive Museums must meet IMLS eligibility criteria and satisfy MAP readiness issues There is a small museum cost share ($300-980)

MAP Availability: Once is not Enough New for previous grant recipients: Museums can get IMLS funding to do a MAP assessment a second time Applicants must: have received their previous award on or before September 1996 report on what actions have been taken to implement planning based on the previous assessment

MAP Availability: Fee-for-Service Museums may pay for MAP with non-IMLS funds IMLS eligibility criteria do not apply MAP readiness issues do apply Museums may start the program at any time

Participant Quote “The Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural History is a "poster-child" for the MAP. We took advantage of it and used the outcomes as steps on a ladder to success. MAP helped us redefine and reposition the museum...The cumulative findings and recommendations from these activities were essential in creating strategic, long-range plans and instrumental in the decision-making process for planning, designing, developing and building a new museum facility. I have 28 years of experience in the museum field, and I think that MAP is one of the best programs that exists anywhere.” Peter Tirrell, Associate Director, SNOMNH

www.aam-us.org AAM’s Web site