©2010 John Wiley and Sons www.wileyeurope.com/college/lazar Chapter 14 Research Methods in Human-Computer Interaction Chapter 14- Working with Human Subjects.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Allyn & Bacon 2003 Social Work Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches Topic 5: Ethics and Politics in Social Work Research.
Advertisements

The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
1 © 2009 University of Wisconsin-Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation Human Subjects Protection (HSP)
University Research Ethics Committee Workshop on procedure and data protection issues 30th May 2008.
Tri-Council Policy Statement 2010 Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans.
CONDUCTING INTERVIEWS Preparing for your documentary.
Making Sense of the Social World 4th Edition
Conducting Ethical Research Slides Prepared by Alison L. O’Malley Passer Chapter 3.
Vicki Hammen, Vice Chair, IRB IRB Brown Bag February 9, 2009.
Evaluating Risk 1 IRB CELT Presentation Colleen Donaldson – IRB Administrator Julie Wilkens – IRB Coordinator.
DO NO HARM IRRB Presentation Purposes Responsibilities Processes NLU IRRB Home page.
PPA 501 – Research Methods in Administration Lecture 2b - Ethics.
Protecting Human Participants in Research syr
Ethical Guidelines for Research with Human Participants
Ethics People should be treated as ends not means.
8 Criteria for IRB Approval of Research 45 CFR (a)
Ethics in Research The Ethical Standards of the American Psychological Association (2002 Ethics code, to be effective June 1,
Ethics in Research Stangor Chapter 3.
FOUNDATIONS OF NURSING RESEARCH Sixth Edition CHAPTER Copyright ©2012 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Nursing Research,
THE ETHICAL CONDUCT OF RESEARCH Chapter 4. HISTORY OF ETHICAL PROTECTIONS The Nuremberg Code The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), United.
ETHICAL RESEARCH © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Chapter 3 Ethics in research.
Research Methods for the Social Sciences: Ethics Ryan J. Martin, Ph.D. Thomas N. Cummings Research Fellow March 9, 2010.
Ethical Issues in Research
Ethics in Business Research
1 Psychology 2020 Unit 1 cont’d Ethics. 2 Evolution of ethics Historic Studies Tuskegee Syphilis Study ( ) Milgram’s Obedience Study (1960s)
METHODS IN BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH NINTH EDITION PAUL C. COZBY Copyright © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Human Research Ethics and Obtaining Ethics Approval
15 September Development of Nursing Research.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) for Human Subject Protections: Working with the IRB Erin McClure, PhD Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.
Selecting, recruiting and informing users Alfred Kobsa University of California, Irvine.
May I have your permission please? The consent process: What, Where, When, Who and Why Valerie Smith OHRP IRB Program Manager
©2010 John Wiley and Sons Chapter 6 Research Methods in Human-Computer Interaction Chapter 6- Diaries.
SUNY Oswego Human Subjects Committee Last Revised 10/28/2011.
Chapter 18 Ethical Precautions in Music Therapy Research.
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
Human Subjects Protections Research Ethics. Basic Assumptions about How Research Should be Conducted Subjects should be protected from harm. Subjects.
Making Sense of the Social World 4th Edition
Ethics Ethics Applied to Research. Ethics in Nursing Research Scientific Misconduct – a fabrication, falsification, plagiarism or other practice that.
©2010 John Wiley and Sons Chapter 3 Research Methods in Human-Computer Interaction Chapter 3- Experimental Design.
Selecting, recruiting and informing users Alfred Kobsa University of California, Irvine.
Ethics and Research. Ethics is Educational Research Committee on Scientific and Professional Ethics of American Psychological Association -- Ethical Principals.
Research Ethics. Ethics From the Greek word, “Ethos” meaning character From the Greek word, “Ethos” meaning character Implies a judgment of character.
Deception in Human Research Learning Objectives Define Deception and Incomplete Disclosure Understand when Deception or Incomplete Disclosure are allowable.
Research Strategies. Why is Research Important? Answer in complete sentences in your bell work spiral. Discuss the consequences of good or poor research.
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
©2010 John Wiley and Sons Chapter 2 Research Methods in Human-Computer Interaction Chapter 2- Experimental Research.
TUN IRB: The Basics February 26, IRB Function Review human-subject research Ensure the rights & welfare of human subjects are adequately protected.
What Institutional Researchers Should Know about the IRB Susan Thompson Senior Research Analyst Office of Institutional Research Presented at the Texas.
Ethics in Psychological Research. Connections with last day..... Psychologists strive for research which: Gathers empirical data and results Empirical.
Ethics in Evaluation Why ethics? What you have to do Slide deck by Saul Greenberg. Permission is granted to use this for non-commercial purposes as long.
5-6-1 Unit 6: Ethical considerations After completing this unit, you should be able to: Understand the basic ethical principles of working with.
Donna B. Konradi, DNS, RN, CNE GERO 586 Understanding the Ethics of Research.
Chapter 5 Ethical Concerns in Research. Historical Perspective on Ethics Nazi Experimentation in WWII –“medical experiments” –Nuremberg War Crime Trials.
Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 7 Ethics in Nursing Research.
Chapter 2: Ethical Issues in Program Evaluation. Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) Federal mandate for IRBs –Concern during 1970s about unethical research.
Copyright c 2001 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.1 Chapter 5 Research Ethics All researchers, even students, have a responsibility to conduct ethical research.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) for Human Subject Protections: Working with the IRB Erin A McClure, PhD Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.
Susan Sonne, PharmD, BCPP Chair, MUSC IRB II
Back to Basics – Approval Criteria
Chapter 3: Ethical guidelines for psychological research.
Chapter 6 Negotiating access and research ethics
Chapter 5 Research Ethics
Chapter 15: Working with human subjects
Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D. Associate Dean,
Ethics Review Morals: Rules that define what is right and wrong Ethics: process of examining moral standards and looking at how we should interpret and.
Office of Research Integrity and Protections
RESEARCH METHODS Lecture 14
RESEARCH METHODS Lecture 14
Presentation transcript:

©2010 John Wiley and Sons Chapter 14 Research Methods in Human-Computer Interaction Chapter 14- Working with Human Subjects

©2010 John Wiley and Sons Chapter 14 Working with human subjects Finding them – who, how many? Treating them right Doing it online

©2010 John Wiley and Sons Chapter 14 Identifying Potential Participants Find participants who meet your goals –If the tool is for professionals, should you use students as your participants? –If your tool should be useful for people of a broad ranges of age, socio-economic status, and education, should you rely solely on undergraduates?

©2010 John Wiley and Sons Chapter 14 Factors influencing suitability Goals Background Motivation Expertise Gender Age Many differences may not be important for many studies, but it’s important to ask the questions.

©2010 John Wiley and Sons Chapter 14 How Many? More is better, right? –Increased statistical power helps find subtle effects, but –Large studies are expensive and long

©2010 John Wiley and Sons Chapter 14 Controlled Experiments and Empirical Studies Need enough participants to produce statistically significant results Between-subjects -> more participants Use statistical methods to determine how many Usually, try for 20 or more.

©2010 John Wiley and Sons Chapter 14 Fewer Participants for… Case Studies Ethnographies –1-3 participants Usability studies – 5 users for heuristic evaluation? (Nielsen,1994)

©2010 John Wiley and Sons Chapter 14 Other Factors Difficulty of finding participants –Some can be hard to find Experts Users with disabilities – see chapter 15 Time – can’t do large subjects if each one takes too long Need more participants for pilot studies

©2010 John Wiley and Sons Chapter 14 Recruiting Participants Experiments, empirical work… –Advertisements, community groups, professional organizations – lists, online groups, social networks Ethnographies & long-term case studies –Build relationships Incentives: cash, pizza, etc.. Build a database for future consideration –With consent

©2010 John Wiley and Sons Chapter 14 Care and Handling Research studies should be designed to protect participants Informed consent: –Research participants must be provided with the information needed to make an informed consent as to whether or not they will participants

©2010 John Wiley and Sons Chapter 14 Risks Some scientific research can have substantial risk –Drug trials, medical devices Famous medical and psychological experiments led to current models Most HCI experiments are low risk –Fatigue? Eye or muscle strain?

©2010 John Wiley and Sons Chapter 14 Protecting Participants Respect for persons –Allow individuals to make independent and autonomous decisions –Provide necessary information Beneficence –minimize possible harm –maximize potential benefits Justice –Neither burden nor benefits should limited to certain populations.

©2010 John Wiley and Sons Chapter 14 Privacy Protection Obtain consent for the collection and storage of personally identifying information (PII) Limit information collected – only what is necessary Identify uses of information Limit use, disclosure, and retention Securely protect information Disclose policies and procedures Provide means of addressing concerns Be accountable. Be careful with photography, audio, and video recording

©2010 John Wiley and Sons Chapter 14 Informed Consent Informed: Participants should understand –Reason for conducting study –Procedures involved –Potential Risks –How they can get more information Present this information clearly, accessibly, and without jargon

©2010 John Wiley and Sons Chapter 14 Informed Consent Consent - Participation should be –Voluntary –Free from any implied or implicit coercion Decision not to participate should not lead to repercussions or retaliation –Withholding of medication –Disapproval of researcher –Punishment by employer

©2010 John Wiley and Sons Chapter 14 Participant Rights Participation is voluntary Participants can choose to stop participating at any time, without penalty Participants have the right to be informed of any new information that will affect their participation in the study

©2010 John Wiley and Sons Chapter 14 Informed Consent Disclosure Title and Purpose of study Description of Procedures Duration Risks Benefits Alternatives to Participation Confidentiality Costs/Additional Expenses Participant’s Rights Contact Information Supplemental Information

©2010 John Wiley and Sons Chapter 14 Procedures Participants read disclosure (or have it read to them) Discuss and answer questions Participant (or representative) signs statement

©2010 John Wiley and Sons Chapter 14 Participant Statement Participant states that they –Have volunteered to participate –Have been informed about tasks and procedures –Have had a chance to ask questions and had questions answered –Are aware that they can withdraw at any time –Consented prior to participation in the study Provide copy (with contact information) to participants.

©2010 John Wiley and Sons Chapter 14 Writing Informed Consent Forms Write clearly and carefully Pilot test Consent must be given by an individual who is capable of understanding –Parents, guardians Be aware of local or national regulations or laws

©2010 John Wiley and Sons Chapter 14 IRBS: Institutional Review Boards Committees that examine human subjects research for appropriateness Protect –Participants –Researchers –Institutions You may need to educate IRBs about how HCI research is done

©2010 John Wiley and Sons Chapter 14 Deceptive Research What if informing subjects about your study may bias them? Online banking: do people pay attention to security images? (Shechter, et al., 2007) –If you tell participants what you’re looking at, they’ll be sensitized, and results will be biased –Instead, use deceit – tell them that your study is intended to “help make online banking better” Use this technique carefully and sparingly Harder to get IRB approval Debrief afterwards

©2010 John Wiley and Sons Chapter 14 Online Research Well-suited for web applications or online tools Recruiting –May get access to broader pool of participants –But, anonymity may make demographics and skills hard to verify Surveys, usability evaluations, ethnographies have all been done online

©2010 John Wiley and Sons Chapter 14 Ethical Concerns Studies of online communities – what is the expectation of privacy? Informed consent and debriefing are tricky

©2010 John Wiley and Sons Chapter 14 Closing Thoughts Participants are crucial – treat them well Allow plenty of time Food and drink Breaks as needed Make participation fun!

©2010 John Wiley and Sons Chapter 14 End-of-chapter Summary Discussion questions Research design exercise