The Significance of Inspection Reforms for the Improvement of the Business Environment in Serbia Slavica Penev Andreja Marušić 27.09.2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ministry of Labor and Social Policy SOCIAL POLICY COUNCILS Dragica Vlaović-VasiljevićSophia, 2-6th July 2007 Dragica Vlaović-VasiljevićSophia, 2-6th July.
Advertisements

Government of the Republic of Serbia Ministry of Labor and Social Policy GENERAL AND SPECIAL PROTOCOL ON CHILD PROTECTION FROM ABUSE AND NEGLECT.
WTO - TBT Committee Ana Maria Vallina, PhD Coordination Among Regulatory Bodies: The Chilean Experience Ana Maria Vallina PhD Head of Foreign Trade Department.
REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA PUBLIC PROCUREMENT AGENCY Introduction to the Albanian Public Procurement System Central Asia Regional Public Procurement.
Non-Tariff Barriers in the Trade of Transport Services – Final Report TPT 02/2002T Steering Committee on More Competitive Transportation (including infrastructure)
IS 700.a NIMS An Introduction. The NIMS Mandate HSPD-5 requires all Federal departments and agencies to: Adopt and use NIMS in incident management programs.
AGENCY FOR PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION AND COORDINATION OF FIGHT AGAINST CORRUPTION mr.sci. Vladica Babić - Assisstent.
“Strengthening of the Serbian system of Market Surveillance for non-food and food products” Project funded by the EU Project implemented by a consortium.
Scoping study for Improving Transparency through Citizen Charters in Serbia Transparency Serbia Presentation September 27 th 2010.
EEB’s Environmental Fiscal Reform Campaign Budapest European Environmental Bureau Stefan Scheuer, Policy Director.
The Italian Institutional Design for Administrative Simplification HIGH LEVEL REGIONAL SEMINAR ON “STRATEGIES, TOOLS AND CAPACITIES FOR ADMINISTRATIVE.
The case of Saint Lucia IFC/World Bank Conference on Trade Logistics Washington DC - June 7, 2010 By Senator the Hon. Charlotte Tessa Mangal Minister for.
Session 3 - Plenary on implementing Principle 1 on an Explicit Policy on Regulatory Quality, Principle 3 on Regulatory Oversight, and Principle 6 on Reviewing.
Simple, Effective, Transparent Regulation: Best Practices in OECD countries Cesar Cordova-Novion Deputy Head of Programme Regulatory Reform, OECD.
Commission for the Prevention of Corruption Republic of Slovenia INTEGRITY I ACCOUNTABILITY I RULE OF LAW.
ICT-enabled Investment Climate Reform: Leveraging Technology to Improve Regulatory Governance in the ECA region A Peer-to-Peer Workshop for Reform Practitioners.
Institutional arrangements and legal framework for energy statistics United Nations Statistics Division International Workshop on Energy Statistics
A Common Immigration Policy for Europe Principles, actions and tools June 2008.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU BUDGETING EU FUNDS IN LITHUANIA Rimantas Veckys Lithuanian.
1 THE THIRD ENERGY PACKAGE – THE ENERGY COMMUNITY APPROACH Energy Community Secretariat 20 th Forum of the Croatian Energy Association and WEC National.
Technical Regulations – U.S. Procedures and Practices U.S.-Brazil Commercial Dialogue Digital Video Conference Series August 22, 2006 Mary Saunders Chief,
Vidosava Džagić, Vice-President Serbian Chamber of Commerce Septembar 27, 2011.
Report on the current legal structure and resources available to the environmental protection agencies and inspectorates in Croatia 1st BERCEN Exchange.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Reviewing Management System and the Interface with Nuclear Security (IRRS Modules 4 and 12) BASIC IRRS TRAINING.
Croatian Report on new Environmental Protection Law Josipa Blažević-Perušić, B.Sc. Arch. State Secretary Anita Pokrovac-Patekar, B.Sc. Pharm. Senior Environmental.
Batyr Ballyev, Head, Environment Protection Department, the Ministry of Nature Protection of Turkmenistan Climate Change-Related Priorities & Needs.
JOINT PROJECT Towards the more effective implementation of reforms: improving planning, budgeting, monitoring & reporting Creating preconditions for improving.
Regulatory Impact Analysis – Lebanon Working Group IV: Focus Group on Public Service Delivery, Public-Private Partnership and Regulatory Reform Amman,
Building Sustainable Inspection Reforms Jordan Coordination Model Wafa’a M. Aranki June 2014 Amman – Jordan.
Third BERCEN Plenary Meeting December 16-17, 2004 Brussels, Belgium Key Achievements in Environmental Enforcement and Compliance in the Republic of Montenegro.
Assessing The Development Needs of the Statistical System NSDS Workshop, Trinidad and Tobago, July 27-29, 2009 Presented by Barbados.
1 BORDER SECURITY AND MANAGEMENT Intra-service co-operation Inter-agency co-operation Presented by: Visiting expert Goran Krsteski Geneva.
Environmental Management System Definitions
Recommendation 2001/331/EC: Review and relation to sectoral inspection requirements Miroslav Angelov European Commission DG Environment, Unit A 1 Enforcement,
Capacity Building for the Kosovo Anti- Corruption Agency Constantine Palicarsky.
Legal and institutional foundation of economic statistics Overview of international experience Regional Workshop for African Countries on Compilation of.
Enhancing Market Integrity Taxation 17 May 2006MENA/OECD Investment Programme Cairo, Egypt.
PUBLIC INTERNAL CONTROL (PIC) SYSTEM OF HUNGARY Ms. Edit NÉMETH CENTRAL HARMONISATION UNIT FOR PUBLIC INTERNAL CONTROL, HUNGARY BUDAPEST, 25 TH OF JUNE,
Consumer protection in Macedonia 10 march, Zagreb.
Permitting and Inspection. 1. When is decentralization effective? Delegate most permit writing and inspection functions to lowest possible level to effectively.
CHAPTER V Health Information. Updates on new legislation (1)  Decision No.1605/2010/QĐ-TTg approving the National Program for Application of information.
Stabilisation & Association Process: the EU Policy for South East Europe Brussels December 2004.
C.H. Montin, Hsin Chu, August Hsin Chu, August 2012 The OECD experience of Regulatory Policy Charles-Henri Montin, Senior Regulatory Expert, Ministry.
Towards More Efficient Construction Permitting
How to start with the implementation of IPPC Directive Czech Republic Czech Environmetal Inspectorate.
1 Priority objectives for development of “Public Administration Reform, Local Government Decentralisation” sector UPGRADING THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR CIVIL.
Publicity and Transparency in Local Government – the Role of NAMRB Guinka Tchavdarova Executive Director of the National Association of Municipalities.
PROGRAMMING OF INTERNATIOAL ASSISTANCE Donor Sectoral Meeting Ministry of Justice 25 th September, 2007.
UNEP EIA Training Resource ManualTopic 14Slide 1 What is SEA? F systematic, transparent process F instrument for decision-making F addresses environmental.
Procurement & Fiduciary services Department Development Bank African The 1 THE HIGH LEVEL FORUM ON PUBLIC PROCUREMENT REFORMS IN AFRICA Progress, Challenges,
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT TEMPLATE Svilena Simeonova, Director of Internal Control Directorate, Ministry of Finance, Bulgaria.
Pilot Project on implementation of SEA for regional planning in Ukraine Prof. Dr. Michael Schmidt Dmitry Palekhov Brandenburg University of Technology.
SEVESO II transposition and implementation: Possible approaches and lessons learned from member states and new member states SEVESO II transposition and.
Governance in Central and Eastern Europe Cheryl W. Gray Europe and Central Asia Region World Bank.
1 Benefits and Challenges of the Regulatory Reforms in Georgia Zaal Lomtadze, Deputy Minister of Environment 11 October 2007, Belgrade.
Current risk and compliance priorities for law firms PETER SCOTT CONSULTING.
New approach in EU Accession Negotiations: Rule of Law Brussels, May 2013 Sandra Pernar Government of the Republic of Croatia Office for Cooperation.
REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA PUBLIC PROCUREMENT AGENCY Eighth Regional Public Procurement Forum May, 22-25, 2012 Tirana
Reforms in the Albanian Public Procurement System 7 th Regional Public Procurement Forum Tbilisi, Georgia May 16-19, 2011 PUBLIC PROCUREMENT AGENCY 1.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 6 – Company Law Bilateral screening:
Module 3: Civic Initiatives for Judicial Reform and Countering Corruption September 16, 2005.
The activities of the state tax authorities
Cesar Cordova-Novion Deputy Head of Programme Regulatory Reform, OECD
Session 2: Institutional arrangements for energy statistics
Business in Partnership Against Corruption
World Health Organization
Towards a Better Regulatory Environment in Serbia
Ad hoc Group of Experts on Better Regulation
Transparency Serbia Presentation September 27th 2010
PUBLIC PROCUREMENTS IN THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
Presentation transcript:

The Significance of Inspection Reforms for the Improvement of the Business Environment in Serbia Slavica Penev Andreja Marušić

The nature of inspections Inspections are a key enforcement mechanism within regulatory reform Purpose of inspections is to ensure compliance with regulations and governmental requirements They are important for enforcing regulations to protect public health, safety, and the environment and to carry out economic functions

Inspections and competitiveness In a broader perspective effective inspections are important for an overall improvement of competitiveness Many inspections are creating heavy burden Increase of the competitiveness of the private sector can be achieved by decreasing the administrative burdens businesses face

Minimum criteria of a well designed inspection system Clear compliance rules and a clear mandate for the inspections; Reduction of regulatory risks for businesses; Instruments for fighting corruption; The system does not create unnecessary burdens and costs to businesses Transparency – businesses can access all relevant information about inspections easily Cost-effectiveness - limited enforcement budget is maximized through risk based controls

Promoting compliance – spectrum of measures

Models of inspections reforms Institutional Framework Legislative FrameworkIT solutions Reforming individual inspections – ad hoc approach Ad hoc reforms of laws and regulations related to specific inspections Ad hoc IT solutions for particular inspections creating a coordinating body Common legal framework IT communication between inspections Creating a centralized inspectorate Common legal framework + strategic approach in reforming particular laws Joint software for all inspections

Examples of comprehensive inspections reforms implemented Start date Single law Inst’l reform Policy areaMain approachNew inst.ICT Bosnia & Herzeg. (Rep.Srp) Yes All inspections except tax Centralized/ unified inspectorate General Inspectorate Yes Croatia Yes Most of inspections Centralized/ unified inspectorate General Inspectorate Yes Latvia1999Yes Most of inspections Coordination Inspectorate Coordination Council Yes Poland Yes Selected inspections Coordination General Trade Inspectorate Yes Slovenia2002Yes Most inspections CoordinationInspection Council -

Inspection Reforms - where is Serbia so far? Regulatory Reform in Serbia was one of the transition priorities during the previous decade The only area in regulatory reform which was neglected was the area of inspections The last comprehensive diagnostic study related to inspections in Serbia was in 2003 – World Bank Admin. Barriers Study

Inspection Reforms - where is Serbia so far? Inspections in Serbia are numerous and decentralized - 31 different inspections within the competence of 10 different ministries Inspections reforms are ad hoc implemented as individual reforms of specific inspections There is no framework inspections law There is no coordination body guiding inspection reforms There is no formal communication and coordination between inspections

Institutional Framework - where is Serbia so far? Reforming individual inspections – ad hoc approach In progress Comprehensive reform underway in the area of Environmental Protection, driven by the EU agenda Creating a coordinating body In progress The Government adopted the recommendation for the establishment of an inter-ministerial coordination body for the reform of inspections Creating a centralized inspectorate Under consideration/discussion Coordinating body should analyze the possibility of merger or centralization of inspections

Legislative Framework - where is Serbia so far? Ad hoc reforms of laws and regulations related to specific inspections In progress -Package of “green laws” adopted in Draft Market Surveillance Law Common legal frameworkIn progress The Ministry of Public Administration and Local Self Government established a working group for drafting a framework inspections law Common legal framework + strategic approach in reforming particular laws None - app laws and regulations identified in legal databases which contain the word inspector or inspection in the title or content - app. 90 laws and regulations identified by regulatory authorities in the guillotine process as regulations which contain inspection procedures

IT solutions- where is Serbia so far? Ad hoc IT solutions for particular inspections Limited adequate software solutions for inspections is precondition for transparency and accountability IT communication between inspections Need is recognized but not yet established Joint software for all inspections None However, a joint software or interphases connecting inspections software would enable the cooperation of inspections and the elimination of overlapping of inspections

Example of EU Driven Reform of Inspection - Environmental Inspection Reform initiated in parallel with the EU accession process of Serbia (early 2000’s) Cover one of the priority EU harmonization areas Significant and intensive cooperation with the international community (EU, OEBS, EAR, SIDA, BERCEN, IMPEL) Intensive legislative activities – adoption of “green package” of laws (17) and related by-laws (207) Procedures governed by check lists based on the EU regulations Continuous training and building capacities activities supported by international community

Improvement of Accountability in the work of Market Inspection - Internally driven reform Software for the improvement of the statistics of work of market inspectors enables the heads of departments to monitor inspectors Internal procedures for specific inspection controls have been defined Professional exam for market inspectors in addition to the State Exam Call center for complaints against inspectors

Public availability of information on inspections Annual reports of environmental, urban planning, construction and market inspection are comprehensive and available on-line; Legislation related to the inspection area are available on-line; Procedures and check lists are used internally and are not available on-line the on-line availability of clear and comprehensive procedures and check lists would facilitate compliance of inspected subjects

Jointly recognized areas for improvement in the work of inspections Framework inspections law Need for data sharing and coordination among inspection Coordination body for inspections to initiate and implement joint reform efforts More intensive external support in capacity building and EU harmonization process

Areas of opposition to the reform of inspections Reluctance to consider the idea of merging inspections and reducing their number (31 inspections within 10 ministries) Opposition among inspectors to introducing new procedures which ensure accountability Resistance to reforms limiting certain authorities and powers of inspectors Unwillingness to operate transparently and share information with businesses

How businesses perceive inspections Frequent legislative changes: “not even experienced accountants can manage the forest of regulations “ Regulations are unclear and require interpretations. Interpretations issued by ministries are not mandatory, they are often inconsistent and conflicting. In performing inspection controls, inspectors often invoke regulations or internal rules which have not been published As a rule, inspection controls are unannounced Inspections are uncoordinated and lenghty and often differnet inspections request from businesses the same data and documents The informal economy is practically not controlled, while only the legal businesses which have the capacity to pay penalties are controlled – i.e. Potentially the most vital part of the conomy suffers The focus of inspections is on penalizing businesses and not supervision and prevention

Conclusions? That’s our job today! we are looking forward to your discussion