1 Issues in Forestry Carbon Crediting IEA Bioenergy Task 38 Workshop Canberra, Australia March 28-30, 2001 Doug Bradley Domtar Inc.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dr. Tony Richardson Director, TreeSmart Australia & TreePower Australia Your Farm Your Future Forum, Dookie, 6 May 2009.
Advertisements

Effect of Climate Change on Canada’s Forests and Rural Communities Senate Standing Committee on Agriculture & Forestry Avrim Lazar President & CEO Forest.
Copernicus Institute Sustainable Development and Innovation GHG balances (and costs); integrating energy, products and forests IEA Bio-energy Task 38 Conference.
Maine Forestry Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Options Thomas D. Peterson PSU James E. Smith USFS Jack D. Kartez USM.
Can climate benefits be reconciled with revenues for land management? Annette Freibauer 1, Hannes Böttcher 1, Yvonne Scholz 2, Vincent Gitz 3, Philippe.
Expanding Participation by the Forest Sector in Greenhouse Gas Registries and Markets Richard Birdsey USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station Presented.
An Introduction to Carbon Modelling Developing Forestry and Bioenergy Projects within CDM Quito, Ecuador March, 2004.
DG CLIMA Resource Efficiency Policies for Land Use related Climate Mitigation Adrian R. Tan BIO Intelligence Service, France November 2013.
Bioenergy: GHG balances ‘Carbon lean’, not ‘carbon neutral’
Yuji MIZUNO Institute for Global Environmental Strategies Baseline for Waste Management Project Regional Workshop in Asia on Capacity Development for the.
Forestry and Climate Change - issues and potential indicators For UNECE/FAO Team of Specialists, Edinburgh, May 2007 Simon Gillam, UK.
Carbon Offsets – Agriculture & Forestry Neil Sampson June 25, 2004.
Renewable Energy Directive Øyvind Vessia Policy Officer European Commission, DG Energy – Renewables and CCS Policy.
Opportunities to Increase Carbon Sequestration Through Forestry Richard A. Birdsey USDA Forest Service Global Change Research Program Senate Agriculture.
ENFA European Non-Food Agriculture – WP 32 Energy and Greenhouse Gas Balances Hannes Schwaiger, Gerfried Jungmeier Kick-Off Meeting 10 th May 2005 Geomatikum,
The LULUCF sector: land use, land-use change and forestry
Managing forests for carbon storage Bill Keeton Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources University of Vermont.
Bio-economics of Climate Change Payments for Carbon Sequestration in Michigan This poster shows how strategies to mitigate global warming can also help.
Biomass Carbon Neutrality in the Context of Forest-based Fuels and Products Al Lucier, NCASI Reid Miner, NCASI
Slide 1 Task 38 Australia New Zealand Participating Countries USA Canada Croatia Austria The Netherlands Denmark UK Sweden Norway Finland Ireland Task.
Forest Inventory Methods and Carbon Analysis Linda S. Heath Richard A. Birdsey USDA Forest Service Northeastern Research Station In Support of the United.
Fossil C emissions associated with C flows of wood products Kim Pingoud VTT Energy P.O.Box 1606 FIN VTT IEA Bioenergy Task.
Biomass “Struggling to make it work”- the Canadian Experience IEA Task 38 Meeting Doug Bradley- Domtar Edinburgh, Nov 12, 2001.
Wood Bioenergy Carbon Accounting – Beyond Carbon Neutrality Ken Skog, Project Leader USDA Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory Madison, Wisconsin.
1 Methodologies of Carbon Estimation By Zahabu, E & Malimbwi, R.E Department of Forest Mensuration and Management (SUA)
Carbon Emissions from Harvesting Wood Products and Bioenergy Justin Ford-Robertson.
AN INTERNATIONAL FOREST CARBON ACCOUNTING FRAMEWORK By Zoe Harkin and Gary Bull Task 25/38 Workshop, Canberra, Australia - 29th March, A system for.
ENERGY Success factors of bioenergy for CHG mitigation in Scandinavia Satu Helynen VTT Energy 1. Use of biomass based fuels in Europe 2. Role of forest.
Fire Prevention as a GHG Mitigation Strategy Presented by Robert Beach, RTI International Brent Sohngen, The Ohio State University Presented at Forestry.
Relationship between the EU ETS and the Kyoto Protocol Flexible Mechanisms, from the Perspective of Bioenergy and C Sequestration Relationship between.
Challenges and Opportunities in Developing Forest Carbon Accounting Approaches for Use in Regulatory and Financial Trading Schemes Biometrics Working Group.
Latest on Bioenergy in the EU Emissions Trading System and in the CDM Latest on Bioenergy in the EU Emissions Trading System and in the CDM B. Schlamadinger.
A Review of Forest Carbon Sequestration Cost Studies Q: What is Carbon Sequestration? A: Capture and Storage of Carbon in Sinks Terrestrial (forest, agriculture)
Carbon Sequestration in Farm and Forest Ecosystems Sarah Hines April 2009
Estimation, Reporting and Accounting of Harvested Wood Products - Overview of the Technical Paper (FCCC/TP/2003/7 and Corr.1) UNFCCC Secretariat Lillehammer,
Implementation of the Kyoto Protocol: what does it mean for bioenergy and C sequestration? Implementation of the Kyoto Protocol: what does it mean for.
Forestry and Agriculture Greenhouse Gas Modeling Forum Workshop #5: Meeting the Challenges of a Rapidly Changing Climate Policy Environment April 6-9,
Climate Change and Energy Impacts on Water and Food Scarcity Mark W. Rosegrant Director Environment and Production Technology Division High-level Panel.
Exploring Solutions Activity 2: Clearing the Air.
Presented at: Saskatchewan Agriculture and Food Agriculture and Greenhouse Gas/Climate Change Workshop Saskatoon December 11, 2000 Llewellyn Matthews and.
FOREST SECTOR MITIGATION IN INDIA Ravindranath, Sudha & Sandhya Indian Institute of Science Bangalore.
Forestry Projects: Measurement and Monitoring Werner A. Kurz Natural Resources Canada Canadian Forest Service Victoria, BC, Canada Biological Sequestration.
Carbon sequestration and trading: Implications for agriculture François FALLOUX Eco-Carbone Presentation to International Policy Council Stratford, October.
Carbon Sequestration: Michigan Forestry Carbon Project Presentation to: The USDA Forest Service Landowner Assistance Meeting Charleston, SC October 5,
Climate Change Mitigation through Forestry: Approaches, Methods and Issues Doris Capistrano Ford Foundation 24 Sept 2002.
Inventory Approaches to Forest Baselines: MAV Bottomland Hardwoods Case Study James E. Smith and Linda S. Heath Northeastern Research Station Durham, NH.
Tatsushi HEMMI Institute for Global Environmental Strategies COP 9 Decisions related to CDM in forestry sector – An update on implications for Asia IGES-URC.
Seite 1 Stand: Article 3.4 and CDM outcomes: implications for wood based industries / bioenergy Bernhard Schlamadinger IEA Bioenergy Task 38,
Summary of the Harvested Wood Products Workshop Rotorua, New Zealand, February 2001 Justin Ford-Robertson and Angela Duignan.
Overview of a model to estimate the GHG balance of the New Zealand forest industry 22 March 2004 Isabel Loza-Balbuena PhD candidate School of Forestry.
Climate Change Mitigation: Some inputs for group discussion Hanoi, 10 June 2009 Nguyen Quang Tan RECOFTC – The Center for People and Forest.
SAF 3/3/09 1 Potential Biomass Demand Impact on Forest Markets and Resources Bob Abt NC State University
Forest management, forest products & the climate.
Page 1 Task 38 Australia New Zealand Participating Countries USA Canada Croatia Austria The Netherlands Denmark UK Sweden Norway Finland Ireland Highlights.
Climate Change Mitigation and Complexity Agus P Sari Country Director, Indonesia EcoSecurities.
Sustainable Aviation Biofuels Workshop Georgia Tech: H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial Systems & Engineering, December 3, 2015.
IEA Bioenergy Task 38 Case Study on the Greenhouse Gas Budgets of Peat Use for Energy in Ireland Kenneth Byrne and Sari Lappi Forest Ecosystem Research.
Doris Hamill October 14, 2013 Doris Hamill October 14, 2013.
FOUR KEY SCIENTIFIC INSIGHTS ON THE IMPACTS OF USING FOREST BIOMASS FOR ENERGY An Analysis by the Society of American Foresters’ Biogenic Carbon Accounting.
Biomass and Bioenergy Approaches to Assessing Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Potential Carly Green 20 November 2003IEA Bioenergy Task 38 National Meeting -
The Cliff Notes on Biomass Fuels and Greenhouse Gas Levels Clean Air Task Force 18 Tremont Street Suite 530 Boston, MA Prepared for 2016 Northeast.
Tomas Lundmark SLU Sweden
ENHANCING CARBON RETENTION THROUGH IMPROVED FOREST MANAGEMENT
Climate neutrality and forests
Taking Action to Limit Climate Change
IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES FOR THE CREATION OF OFFSETS IN THE AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY SECTORS FOR USE IN A POTENTIAL CANADIAN DOMESTIC EMISSION TRADING.
Can managed forest land provide effective strategies for climate change mitigation ? - examples from Sweden IEA Bioenergy Canberra, March 26-30, 2001.
Global Forest Carbon Budget (tons of C/y)
Massachusetts Forest Biomass Sustainability and Carbon Policy Study
Modeling current and projected carbon storage in wood and paper
Presentation transcript:

1 Issues in Forestry Carbon Crediting IEA Bioenergy Task 38 Workshop Canberra, Australia March 28-30, 2001 Doug Bradley Domtar Inc.

2 Issues in Forestry Carbon Trading New Zealand workshop What is in/not in Kyoto Who is buying what credits Trading Issues Amortization Example projects Harvested Wood products What need to move forward

3 To Tai Toko Workshop- Feb 16-18

4 To Tai Toko Workshop

5 A sunny day in indigenous forest

6 Dinner at “Lodge Ford-Robertson”

7 Accommodation in “Garage Villa”

8 Delegates watch river rise

9 Raging To Tai Toko River

10 A minor “slip”

11 Escape to Freedom

12 Kyoto- In vs Not yet in IN KYOTO NOT YET IN KYOTO _________Fossil Fuel Reduction_ ____Carbon Sequestration_____________ Energy EfficiencyFuel Switching Afforest., ReforestOther Forestry, Agricultural (Biomass for fossil fuel)DeforestationActivities Reduce fossil fuelReduces fossil fuel Sequesters carbonSequesters carbon (defn. - Article 3.3)(negotiated- Article 3.4) Examples: -Fuel efficient motors -Wood waste cogen -Planting on poor agric. landForestry: -Waste heat capture -Black liquor -Reducing deforestation-Pest and disease control -Prod’n enhancemt integrated gasific.-Fire control -Improved Maint. and combined cycle cogen-Commercial thinning -Juvenile Spacing -Tree Improvment - Reduc. impact logging Agricultural: -Reduced tillage -Manure management -Shelterbelts

13 Who is buying what? Ontario Power Gen BC Hydro Seattle City Light TransAlta Gemco All sinks- if thru PERT No sequestration, no business as usual Sequestration- Kyoto only Sequestration- Kyoto- no conservation or forest mgt (1.Can 2.Aus, 3.NZ 4.US…) Sinks including agriculture

14 Trading Issues Lack of clear guidelines is holding up action In Kyoto vs not “Business as Usual” Discounting Harvested wood products First commitment period

15 Implications of Commitment Period

Time (years) Cumulative carbon stock changes (tons C/ha) Carbon in trees Cumulative credits Hypothetical Managed Forest Stand Possible Accounting Method Use of Amortization

17 Carbon Impacts of Sequestration Activities InitialLong Term Forestry: Afforestation sequestr.sequestr Pest spray sequestr.sequestr. Tree Improvementsequestr.sequestr. Juvenile spacing emissionsequestr. Commercial thinningemissionsequestr. Fertilizationemissionsequestr. Other: Landfill Incinerationemissionsequestr.

18 Pre-commercial Thinning (Juvenile Spacing) Unthinned Thinned

19 Yield Curve Natural vs Spaced

20 Impact of forest management

21 Natural Jack Pine Forest (Baseline) Forest and Products Carbon Pools Gorcam model

22 Juvenile Spaced Stand Forest and Products Carbon Pools Gorcam Model

23 Net Emissions Control vs Spaced Gorcam Model

24 Stand Sequestration Annual Crediting Gorcam Model

25 Actual vs Amortized Sequestration Cumulative (tonnes CO 2 e/ha) Kyoto Period

26 New Concept- Phases of Acceptance Concept- “Give credit for long term benefit even if short term emission” Utterly ridiculous! Violently opposed! Accepted and felt to be always self- evident

27 Jack Pine Bud Worm Spray Program Epidemics cycle 5-7 years Result in tree mortality, growth loss Assumptions –17% outright mortality- years 2-4 –10% less growth p.a. – years 2-6 –10% mortality due to top kill- year 7

28 Bud Worm Spray Program Stand Level Biomass Gorcam Model

29 Biomass with JPBW Attack

30 Biomass with JPBW Suppression

31 Bud Worm Spray Program Gorcam Model Stand Level

32 Bud Worm Spray Program Gorcam Model

33 Pest Control Carbon Balance Kyoto Period

34 Combined Spray-Spacing in Carbon “Pool”

35 Domtar Wood Products Parameters Harvest (Domtar operations) –Biofuel 26%, short-lived 19%, long-lived 30%, landfill <1%, on-site waste 25% Wood Products –Short-lived Avg lifetime 5 years Biofuel 25%, compost 15%, landfill 10%, recycled 50% –Long-lived Avg lifetime 30 years Biofuels 25%, landfill 10%, recycled 65% Landfill –Average lifetime- 42 years

36 Wood Products Carbon 5 yr decay

37 Wood Products Carbon 10 yr decay

38 Wood Products- Ken Skog- USDA Forestry- decay estimates

39 European Forest Institute Carbon Balance Implications of ….Wood Products

40 Life Cycle- NZ Plantation Forest

41 Existing Forest Intensively Managed

42 Carbon Credit Market

43 Current Pricing LowHighDeal Cantor Fitzgerald$0.77$3.09 Gemco$1.00$1.50 SaskPower$0.83

44 What do we want to happen? Increase use of biomass –biofuel, biochemicals…. Increase amount of biomass –Eg. through intensive forest management Increase demand for wood How can this happen?

45 Incentives to promote forest carbon sequestration Forest management in Kyoto Standard accounting system Acceptance of forest measurement methods (periodic sample plots) Amortization methodologies Include all carbon pools Recognition of activities