New Teacher Induction Program (NTIP) Orientation and Overview.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TEACHER PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM IN KOSOVO
Advertisements

ProfessionalValues and Practice Look for differentiation. Monitor lesson plans (planning links). IEPs used Short evaluations should be encouraged (and.
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Educational Specialists Performance Evaluation System
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Competencies for beginning teachers
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
PORTFOLIO.
Assessment Assessment should be an integral part of a unit of work and should support student learning. Assessment is the process of identifying, gathering.
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
December 3, Performance Appraisal for Experienced Teachers WCDSBandOECTA.
Briefing: NYU Education Policy Breakfast on Teacher Quality November 4, 2011 Dennis M. Walcott Chancellor NYC Department of Education.
Teacher Evaluation Model
NEW STATUTORY REGULATIONS FOR TEACHER APPRAISAL AND CAPABILITY 2012 Mary Higgins, Advisor.
International Federation of Accountants International Education Standards for Professional Accountants Mark Allison, Executive Director Institute of Chartered.
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
Slides originally developed by NJDOE A New Vision For Professional Development.
Realities. Registration Provisional Registration (PRT) Valid for 5 years Subject to Confirmation (STC) Valid for 3 years Full Registration Valid for 5.
Consistency of Assessment
1 Core Module Three – The Summative Report Core Module Three: The Role of Professional Dialogue and Collaboration in the Summative Report.
Performance management guidance
Introducing the New College Scheme Seevic Performance Appraisal.
Principal Leadership Academy Basic Leadership Training November 2012.
Learning Centers Some Best (Promising?) Practices for Some Best (Promising?) Practices for Learning Support Centers in Higher Education 1.
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
TEACHER PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL IN ONTARIO AND NEW TEACHER INDUCTION * All teachers are to be evaluated every 5 years, except for teachers new to the profession,
Implementing the Revised TPA Process for Experienced Teachers
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
The New Teacher Induction Program (NTIP) Setting the Direction.
Maintenance and Renewal of Full Registration Current as at November 2014.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Seevic Performance Appraisal
Implementation & Evaluation Regional Seminar ‘04 School Development Planning Initiative “An initiative for schools by schools”
ADEPT Framework
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
The New Scottish Teacher Education Professional Standards and the Development of the Professional Update System Tom Hamilton Director of Education and.
Prof. György BAZSA, former president Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC) CUBRIK Workshop IV Beograd, 13 March, 2012 European Standards and Guidelines.
Why principal evaluation? Because Leadership Matters!
EDUC 4464 – Class 26 Today’s topics: The New Teacher Induction Program
SMHC Talent Development around Instruction To Increase Student Learning Carl Cohn.
Marco Ferro, Director of Public Policy Larry Nielsen, Field Consultant With Special Guest Stars: Tammy Pilcher, President Helena Education Association.
Accreditation at Professional Accomplishment and Leadership.
Cindy Wenrich Principal Noname Elementary School Anytown, VA.
WSD’s Committee Structure Steering Committee Superintendent, 4 Administrators, 3 Teachers Teacher CommitteePrincipal Committee 5 Administrators, 6 Teachers6.
Educator Growth and Professional Development. Objectives for this session The SLT will…  Have a thorough understanding of High Quality Standard 5: Educator.
Workshops to support the implementation of the new languages syllabuses in Years 7-10.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.
Performance and Development Teacher Librarian Network
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.
Student Name Student Number ePortfolio Demonstrating my achievement of the NSW Institute of Teachers Graduate Teacher Stage of the Professional Teacher.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
CPD- Continuous Professional Development & GUIDELINES FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF CONTRACTUAL STAFF.
What Are the Characteristics of an Effective Portfolio? By Jay Barrett.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
New Teacher Induction Program (NTIP). New Teachers in Ontario 2009 / / / st Year Permanent Hires st Year Long Term.
Activity 1 Stickies on the board Any unanswered questions so far Issues or challenges What do I want to know before the end of this session?
Office of Service Quality
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
School practice Dragica Trivic. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM TEMPUS MASTS CONFERENCE in Novi Sad Practice should be seen as an integral part of the.
Raising standards improving lives The revised Learning and Skills Common Inspection Framework: AELP 2011.
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
Professional Review Process for Heads / Principals
Dissemination Training
TEACHING PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FRAMEWORK
Presentation transcript:

New Teacher Induction Program (NTIP) Orientation and Overview

On line resource  er/induction.html

PURPOSE  By helping new teachers achieve their full potential, the New Teacher Induction Program (NTIP) represents one aspect of Ontario’s vision of achieving high levels of student performance.  To provide fair, effective and consistent teacher evaluation in every school  To promote professional growth

LEGAL CONTEXT  Reg.98/02 Teacher Learning Plans  Reg. 99/02 (amended 2006)Teacher Performance appraisal  Ed Act s 265 Duties of Principal  Reg. 298 Duties of the Principal  OTC Act 1996 Reg. 437/438

Context for the NTIP: Streamlined Teacher Performance Appraisal Process for New Teachers  On June 1 st, 2006, the “Student Performance Bill” was passed by the Legislature which included provisions for NTIP  NTIP focuses on providing a wide range of supports for new teachers, including on-the-job training in areas such as classroom management and effective parent communication skills, mentoring, and orientation by the school and school board  Successful completion of NTIP requires two satisfactory ratings on teacher performance appraisals

Context  Teachers graduating from Faculties of Education will automatically receive their teaching certificate so long as they meet the OCT requirements  The NTIP, including the streamlined performance appraisal for new teachers, will assess actual teaching practices focussing on student success through feedback on performance and growth  Upon successful completion of the NTIP, the College will place a notation on the teacher’s certificate of qualification and the public register

WHO WILL APPRAISE  Principals/ vice principals  Supervisory officers if requested by the principal  SO must be involved if an unsatisfactory rating has been given to a teacher

NTIP: Streamlined Appraisal Process for New Teachers, Frequency Streamlined TPA process for new teachers  Two appraisals in the first 12 months of employment which, if both satisfactory, signify the successful completion of NTIP  If it is found during the first year that the teacher needs more support (i.e. one or more ratings is not satisfactory) the teacher has a second chance to complete the program in the second year of employment  At any time that the teacher accumulates two satisfactory appraisals during the first 24 months of employment the new teacher has successfully completed NTIP

FRAMEWORK  Standards for the teaching profession  Competencies  “Look fors”  Level of performance  Rating scale

FRAMEWORK

Standards for the teaching profession Based on 5 identified standards developed from the Standards of Practice for the Teaching Profession  Commitment to students and student learning  Professional knowledge  Teaching practice  Leadership and community  Ongoing professional learning

Competencies  A set of competencies statements that define and describe the skills, knowledge and attitudes that teachers are required to meet as identified by the Standards of practice for the Teaching Profession

Performance Indicators “Look fors”  Statements that provide concrete examples of observable behaviours that are characteristic of a particular competency

NTIP: Streamlined Appraisal Process for New Teachers: Competencies and Look-fors Streamlined TPA process for new teachers  Eight competencies most relevant for new teachers highlighted as the minimum requirement for principals to comment on in the summative report. The eight competencies are a subset of the 16 competencies required for experienced teachers  In accordance with board policies, principals may comment on additional competencies  Forty-five look-fors highlighted for new teachers as examples of effective teaching practice and clarification that look-fors are a resource for principals and teachers

NTIP: Streamlined Appraisal Process for New Teachers Rating Scale Streamlined TPA process for new teachers Two-point rating scale in each appraisal for new teachers:  Satisfactory  Development Needed For a teacher who receives a Development Needed performance rating, the rating scale in subsequent appraisals is:  Satisfactory  Unsatisfactory

NTIP: Streamlined Appraisal Process for New Teachers Streamlined TPA process for new teachers  After a Development Needed rating an Enrichment Plan is developed by the principal with input from the teacher and in accordance with the board’s policy. The Enrichment Plan identifies the elements of NTIP offered by the board that are appropriate for the teacher to participate in to improve performance. The Induction Program is extended into Year Two  After an Unsatisfactory rating, the teacher is placed On Review status and an Improvement Plan is developed  No change to On Review process Process Following a Performance Rating That is Not Satisfactory

A rubric  describing evidence of teaching performance at each of three levels of performance for each competency

Enrichment Plan

Evidence Log  Regularly kept record of demonstrations of teaching  Entries restricted to facts so that the data is objective  Statements are samples only

Food For Thought New teachers want more than a job… They want hope. They want to contribute to a group. They want to make a difference. - Harry K. Wong

Food For Thought How we teach is ultimately a reflection of why we teach. - Elliot Eisner, 2006

What does NTIP mean to me as 1. A Pre service teacher? 2. An Occasional teacher ? 3. A Full time teacher ?

Questions??????????

Entry Plan A plan to get me started in my new job

What should be in my plan?  A clear communication strategy for contacting parents  Who are the key staff members that I can consult if I have questions?  How will I “connect” with both secretaries and janitorial staff  Knowledgeable about a student tracking computer program (preferably mark book)

What should be in my plan?  Ability to publish on the web i.e. maintain a web site  Knowledge of the IEP process and what it means for identified students  Well organized timelines for the courses you are going to teach  Know how to use a variety of assessment strategies