Freight Data - A Transportation Perspective September 2010 Michael Sprung – FHWA, Office of Freight Management and Operations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Provisional Estimates of FAF O-D Freight Flows by Highway Charlie Han MacroSys Research and Technology May 15, 2007.
Advertisements

1 International Travel Survey (ITS) Lotfi Chahdi Tourism Statistics Program Statistics Canada June 2008.
Bureau of Transportation Statistics Key Improvements and Initial Findings in 2007 Commodity Flow Survey Steven Beningo Adapted from a presentation that.
Freight Facilities and their Intermodal Connections BTS Webinar Series Olu Ajayi Michael Sprung Bureau of Transportation Statistics Research and Innovative.
Developing Freight Performance Measures At U.S. Canadian Border Crossings Bruce Lambert.
Disaggregate State Level Freight Data to County Level October 2013 Shih-Miao Chin, Ph.D. Ho-Ling Hwang, Ph.D. Francisco Moraes Oliveira Neto, Ph.D. Center.
State Freight Transportation Data Needs Rolf R. Schmitt Office of Freight Management and Operations September, 2006.
Designated by US DOT Publication of Draft PFN for Comments - Spring 2013 Initial Designation of the PFN – Fall 2013 National Freight Network Primary Freight.
International Trade Presented to the DLI/ACCOLEDS by Sharon Nevins, Nadine Lacroix LET US BRING YOU THE WORLD! Import the facts. Export your knowledge.
The Freight Analysis Framework – Overview and Uses Bruce Lambert Office of Freight Management and Operations.
RITA/BTS International Data Improvements Steven Beningo International Transportation Specialist USDOT/RITA/BTS Telephone Presentation to the Texas Border.
The Importance of Economic Census Data for Federal Policy Katharine G. Abraham Member, Council of Economic Advisers Hi-Beams for the Economic Road Ahead.
Overview of the Freight Analysis Framework Rolf R. Schmitt January, 2008.
Freight Performance Measures Crystal Jones FHWA Office of Freight Management and Operations.
Texas Freight Forecasting Rob Bostrom Monisha Khurana Liza Amar Planning Applications Conference 2015.
Business Statistics and Registers
Bureau of Transportation Statistics Office of Transportation Analysis Maritime Program November 19, 2009.
World Economic and Trade Outlook The World of Trade Data IMSF 2009 Annual Meeting May 4-6, 2009 New Orleans, LA Elizabeth Rouhani Consultant Global Commerce.
TRANSEARCH Data for Planning in Tennessee By Jerry Everett The University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
Overview of Project Main objective of study is to assess the impact of delay at border crossings and resulting changes in user benefits and broad macroeconomic.
U.S. Foreign Waterborne Commerce and Vessels. OMB Assigns Responsibility for the FWTSP to the Corps FWTSP -- Foreign Waterborne Transportation Statistics.
Freight Analysis Framework version 3 (FAF3) __________ Talking Freight Webinar October 2010.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
Craig O’Riley & Adam Shell Office of Systems Planning Wednesday, December 1,
Florida Multimodal Statewide Freight Model
D/TTAS - Transport policy data needs Transport Statistics Liaison Group 19 th September 2013.
How We Estimated The CFS Out-of-Scope Sectors Felix Ammah-Tagoe, Ph.D. Senior Research Consultant/Project Manager MacroSys Research and Technology.
1 Freight Performance Measurement Presented to Transportation Border Working Group on 7 June 2006.
National Multimodal Freight Trends/Issues/Forecasts/ Policy Implications.
Bureau of Transportation Statistics: Freight Data and Decision-Making Tools Talking Freight Seminar Series September 17, 2003 Felix Ammah-Tagoe,
1 Bureau of Transportation Statistics International Transportation Data Program July 28, 2011.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA “Talking Freight” Seminar Series presented by Daniel Beagan Cambridge Systematics, Inc. February.
Freight Performance Measures Unit 4: Performance Measures.
5 th Bi-Annual Border to Border Conference Performance Measures at Commercial Ports of Entry Juan Carlos Villa.
The U.S. Department of Transportation and the International Trade Data System Steven Beningo Transportation Border Working Group Border Data Workshop June.
Transportation and the State of Arkansas. Arkansas and Transportation Arkansas’s infrastructure supports businesses by supporting transportation:  Within.
Estimating Economic Impacts of Border Wait Times in the San Diego-Baja California Region February 24, 2006.
2007 Commodity Flow Survey (CFS) John Fowler Chief, Commodity Flow Branch Service Sector Statistics Division (SSSD) Talking Freight Webinar December 10,
Special Committee on Intermodal Transportation and Economic Expansion Workshop October 23, 2009 Patrick E. Quinn Co-Chairman & President U.S. Xpress Enterprises.
Freight Impacts on Ohio ’ s Roadways presented by Suzann S. Gad, AICP The Ohio Depart Of Transportation Office of Urban & Corridor Planning.
1Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy Talking Freight Seminar Freight Analysis Framework, version 3 Diane Davidson Center for Transportation.
Technology and the National Freight Action Agenda U.S. Department of Transportation Richard M. Biter Deputy Director US DOT, Office of Intermodalism November.
Commodity Origin-Destination Provisional Estimates Edward Fekpe, Ph.D., PEng. Research Leader Transportation Market Sector.
FAF 2 The Second Generation of Freight Analysis Framework Office of Freight Management and Operations Federal Highway Administration Tianjia Tang, PE,
Economic Significance of the Border: A Perspective at the Regional and National Levels for both Passenger and Freight Movements Bruno Penet HDR | Decision.
Competitive and Efficient Freight Transportation
Innovation for a Nation on the Move U.S. Department of Transportation Research and Innovative Technology Administration 2007 Commodity Flow Survey Purpose,
1 Sources of Transportation Statistics September 23, 2009 Rosalyn Alleman National Transportation Library Bureau of Transportation Statistics Research.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Canada/U.S. Transportation Border Working Group presented by Stephen Fitzroy & Brian Alstadt, Economic.
Tiffany Julien Office of Freight Management and Operations Implementation of the National Freight Network 1.
National Modeling TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 5, 2013.
Company LOGO Georgia Truck Lane Needs Identification Study Talking Freight Seminar March 19, 2008 Matthew Fowler, P.T.P Assistant State Planning Administrator.
Transportation and the State of Alabama. Source: Freight Analysis Framework, FHWA Total Freight Transportation in Alabama ,512 Current Millions$
Transportation and the State of Missouri. Missouri and Transportation Missouri’s infrastructure supports businesses by supporting transportation:  Within.
Transportation and the State of Louisiana. Louisiana and Transportation Louisiana’s infrastructure supports businesses by supporting transportation: 
Freight Transportation Plan Savannah, GA AMPO Conference - October 23, 2014.
Objective Transportation Assets Strategic Intermodal/International Points Next Steps & Discussion Critical Issues for Ohio.
Bureau of Transportation Statistics Inter-American Development Bank Freight Transport and Logistics Observatories October 19, 2010.
Economic Dynamics of Freight & Modes. The Trucking Industry.
Presented to Indiana Logistics Summit Indianapolis, Indiana presented by Keith Bucklew Director - Freight Mobility Indiana Department of Transportation.
The Freight Transportation System Background on domestic highway, rail, and waterborne freight modes.
October 22, 2013 Ontario Ministry of Transportation Transportation Planning Branch Systems Analysis and Forecasting Office Rob Tardif Ontario Update on.
Rice University – Baker Institute
Jeremy Sage, Eric Jessup & Ken Casavant
Economic Development Research Group, Inc.
Navigating Freight Data in the FAST ACT Era
Chapter 13 Transportation in a Supply Chain
Critical Commerce Corridors
Transportation and the State of North Carolina
Transportation and the State of South Carolina
Presentation transcript:

Freight Data - A Transportation Perspective September 2010 Michael Sprung – FHWA, Office of Freight Management and Operations

Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation Truck Transportation (NAICS 484) – Est. Revenue for Employer Firms: 2008 NAICS code Kind of business 2008 (millions of dollars) Selected transportation and warehousing industries 1 332, Truck transportation233, General freight trucking156, General freight trucking, local26, General freight trucking, long-distance129, General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload96, General freight trucking, long-distance, less than truckload33, Specialized freight trucking77, Used household and office goods moving14, Specialized freight (except used goods) trucking, local33, Specialized freight (except used goods) trucking, long-distance29,114 Source: U.S Census Bureau Service Annual Survey and administrative data, accessed September 2010.

Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation To inform policy and investment, we need to understand How does freight movement affect congestion, infrastructure wear, freight carriers, safety, and the environment? How does congestion, expected and unexpected delay, and cost affect freight movement? How does the economy adjust in productivity, shifting activity among regions, and global competitiveness? How will policies and investments affect freight movement and its consequences?

Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation An Understanding of Freight Transportation How much & what freight moves from place to place?  Weight  Value  Commodity Where & how is freight moving?  Origin & destination  Route used  Mode of transportation When is freight carried?  Season  Time of day

Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation FHWA Freight Transportation Data Freight Analysis Framework (FAF):  A database of regional freight flows by tons and value for all modes, with 30-year forecasts, and annual provisional updates  An assignment of average number of trucks to individual highway segments on the national network Freight Performance Measures (FPM) Program  500,000 + trucks and trailers  Travel time and travel time reliability for 25 Interstate Highways  Crossing time and crossing time reliability at major border crossings

Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation FAF3 Details Value & weight for all domestic, export, & import shipments 7 Domestic modes (truck, rail, water, air, multiple modes & mail, pipeline, and other & unknown) 7 Foreign modes (same as domestic modes) 123 Domestic regions 8 International regions (Canada, Mexico, & 6 groupings of countries based on UN definitions) 43 Commodity classes (2-digit SCTG codes)

Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation FAF3 Regions South, Central & Western Asia Eastern Asia Canada Mexico Rest of Americas Europe South-Eastern Asia And Oceana Africa

Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation Trucks on the Network

Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation FAF3 Tons and Value by Mode: 2007 Tons (thousands) Value ($ millions) Truck 13,083,855 11,690,942 Rail 2,040, ,332 Water 838, ,687 Air (include truck-air) 12,769 1,079,037 Multiple modes & mail 637,265 1,855,447 Pipeline 1,592, ,965 Other and unknown 295, ,788 Total, All Modes18,501,46616,672,198

Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation International Trade as a Share of Tons and Value by Domestic Mode Share of TonsShare of Value Truck 6.7%12.6% Rail14.5%36.5% Water52.4%61.4% Air (include truck-air)79.0%85.9% Multiple modes & mail18.5%9.5% Pipeline21.0%20.5% Other and unknown14.9%32.5% Total, All Modes11.4%19.6%

Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation Major FAF3 Data Sources Commodity Flow Survey (CFS) TransBorder Freight Data Foreign Trade Statistics Waterborne Commerce Statistics Port Import/Export Reporting Service (PIERS) Vehicle Inventory and Use Survey Highway Performance Monitoring System National Transportation Atlas Database Transportation Satellite Accounts

Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation Data Gaps Domestic-leg of international trade flows  True origin of exports  True destination of imports Transshipments  Trade between two foreign countries using the U.S. transportation system (ports, highways, borders, etc.)  Some progress made in this area with Canadian and Mexican transshipments from foreign trade data.

Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation FAF Summary FAF provides a comprehensive national picture of freight flows and baseline forecasts to support policy studies FAF shows states and regions who their major trading partners are with the volumes and sources of through traffic at a corridor level Local specific analysis requires supplemental data collection to provide local detail

Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation Freight Performance Measures Program Approximately 500,000 probe vehicles  340,000,000 truck positions (e.g. telemetry points) monthly  over 4,000,000,000 positions annually Partnership between FHWA and ATRI with a cooperative data governance model  FHWA sets general contractual guidelines on key business areas and management decisions it intends to use the data for  Congestion and Bottleneck Identification  Understanding Freight System Performance  FHWA and ATRI monitor requests for data and determine cooperatively who should have access to data and at what level of aggregation

Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation Freight System Performance

Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation Measuring Border Crossing Delay A Trip origin Diversion option to alternate crossing Final approach to border crossing (beyond the end of queue) End of queue Canada U.S. Stop bar Arrival at primary inspection B Border C D E F G H I Exit primary inspection Exit secondary inspection Trip Destination

Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation ‘Ideally’ Data Would Be: Timely Accurate Relevant Complete Obtainable Clear Consistent Harmonized Affordable

Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation Freight Data Challenges Definitions of freight transportation terms are not always harmonized:  Commodity Classifications  Mode Definitions ‘Available data’ must often be used as a proxy for ‘Needed data’  Trade (flow of $) used in lieu of international freight flows  Value-to-weight ratios used where $ or tonnage data are incomplete Lack of authoritative data sources and management agencies  Issues with comparability and quality when data must be sought from many different transportation and trade data collection efforts

Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation We rely on customer feedback Do the estimates we publish align with other sources you use? What would make existing freight data resources more usable? What are the major freight issues you and your partners are trying to address?

Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation Thank You! Without Data It’s Just An Opinion. DOT Freight Website: