SPX Improving the safety of high performance single pilot aircraft operations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Crew Compliment. OBJECTIVES The importance of Safety & the effects of reduce crew.
Advertisements

TEM & LOSA: The State of Affairs
Robert L. Helmreich, Ph.D. FRAes The University of Texas
“Line Operations Safety Audit (LOSA)”
Qantas Flying Operations Audit
1 GENERAL DYNAMICS Decision Systems Michel G, Gelinas Oct. 13, 2003 ACP WGC6/WP28 General Dynamics Decision Systems and Iridium Communications The Satellite.
Boeing’s Perspective on FCF Risk Mitigation
HEMS Vision & Mission Our Program, LLC. Vision Vision Mission Mission Principles Principles Collaboration Collaboration Authenticity Authenticity Mission.
Safety analysis of aircraft systems In aviation, safety is defined as the absence of accidents and incidents. JAR 25 treats systems as a whole. Acceptable.
Flight Testing Advanced Unmanned Aircraft Michael McDaniel - AIR Naval Air Systems Command NAS Patuxent River, MD, USA DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A:
NextGen GA Fund, LLC A Fund to Accelerate NextGen Equipage Benefits for the General Aviation Operator Community.
Best Practices for Taxi Operations at Towered & Non-Towered Airports
Authored by M. Moyer 01-Mar-2011 Modified by Lt Colonel Fred Blundell TX-129 Fort Worth Senior Squadron For Local Training Rev Jan-2014.
P-2028 Minnesota Wing Aircrew Training: Tasks P-2028 Crew Resource Management.
Confidential This document contains trade secrets, financial, commercial, scientific, technical or other confidential information, the further disclosure.
Sabre Airline Solutions
Commercial Decision Making Commercial Opns Need to focus on safety Decisions may not be popular Never base inflight decisions on how it will affect your.
Executive Briefing This briefing is designed as a stand alone briefing for Airline Senior Executives / CEOs. Minor text amendments following review at.
Aviation Safety International
SMS Implications for Education Jim Dow Chief, Flight Training & Examinations Transport Canada Presentation to National Training Aircraft Symposium
Best Practices for Taxi Operations at Towered & Non-Towered Airports
Beyond the Cockpit: The Spread of LOSA and Threat and Error Management
Incident Review Meeting Example  The next slides are an example of how to complete the template and identify latent conditions, threats, errors, UAS and.
TRAIN TO BE THE BEST. Overview  ECTS Joint Venture Owners  Embraer  CAE  Accomplishes all Phenom 100 and Phenom 300 OEM entitlement training  Pilot.
Mission Aircrew School Chapter 14: Crew Resources Management (March 2011)
Error Management OGHFA 1_HP_06_VIS_Error Management 1.
Monitoring Normal Operations and the Line Operations Safety Audit (LOSA): The Perspective of ICAO Captain Dan Maurino Captain Dan Maurino Flight Safety.
Presented to: Orlando Florida Flying Community By: The FAASTeam - Dennis H. Whitley Date: December 9, 2010 Federal Aviation Administration FAASTeam Orlando.
Threat and Error Management in Aviation
Mission Pilot Skill Set
Human Factors of Remotely Piloted Aircraft Alan Hobbs San Jose State University/NASA Ames Research Center.
Intro to Threat & Error Management
Slide 1Lesson 14: Fundamentals of the CAP Flying Safety Program Fundamentals of the CAP Flying Safety Program.
CREW RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
Prepare for Take-off: how media technology work experience is like airline pilot training. David Carugo, Department of Computing and Communications Technologies,
Tailwinds Flying Club Spring (Summer) Safety Session – 2009 WEATHER VFR – MVFR - IFR.
Lecture 3: Air Traffic Control Tower
The Aircraft Dispatcher “One stop shopping” source of information for the pilot.
Recite a prayer…(15 seconds) Course Contents Content 10 chapter: Chapter 1:INTRODUCTION OF CRM Chapter 2:GENERATION OF CRM Chapter 3:CRM SITUATIONAL.
The Successful Aviation Professional AST 141. Professionalism Positive, courteous attitude Punctuality Appearance Good follow-through Concern for other.
Runway Incursion Causal Categories OPERATIONAL ERROR (OE) - A human error caused by a tower controller. There are over 8000 tower controllers in the U.S.
“ A location on an aerodrome movement area with a history or potential risk of collision or runway incursion, and where heightened attention by pilots/drivers.
Human Factors Aeronautical Decision Making A systematic approach to the mental process used by aircraft pilots to consistently determine the best course.
Threat and Error Management. What is TEM?  “Defensive flying”
Effective leadership in airline crews. 2 Good teamwork in aircraft crews (Ginnett) & hospital teams (K-P) Aircraft crewsHospital teams.
READY OR NOT THE FLIGHT REVIEW.
Crew Resources Management Lecture 4:Lecture 4: Cognitive Skills:Cognitive Skills: Decision MakingDecision Making 1.
American Airlines Flight 1400 St. Louis, Missouri
Crew Resources Management
ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION HUMAN FACTORS. WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED TO PREVENT FUTURE ACCIDENTS A. TRAINING B. TESTING.
Brendon Bourne Northern Region Flight Examiner. CAA Flight Tests Standards Guide Threat and Error Management The candidate exhibits a high level of situational.
Flight Operations Research Centre of Excellence Dr. Hazel Courteney Head of Research & Strategic Analysis.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration CRM For General Aviation Sun N’ Fun Steve Brady April 13, 2008.
How Did That Happen? Analyzing Prevention Resources Available.
Case Study Title CRM CASE STUDY. Name Personal Info Etc.
Case Study Title CRM CASE STUDY.
Commercial Decision Making
Karim Zeghal EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre
Digital Copilot Cognitive Assistance for Solo Pilots
Simplified Vehicle Operations (SVO) Breakout Session Output
Case Study Title CRM CASE STUDY.
Data Science for Safety Intelligence
Case Study Title CRM CASE STUDY.
Case Study Title CRM CASE STUDY.
NBAA Single Pilot Working Group
Crew Resource Management
NBAA Single Pilot Working Group
General Dynamics Decision Systems and Iridium Communications
Case Study Title CRM CASE STUDY.
Presentation transcript:

SPX Improving the safety of high performance single pilot aircraft operations

SPIFR Single Pilot IFR Flying Is poised to increase Is bringing new travel options to GA Is presenting new challenges to the NAS

Most Common Causes of Single Pilot Accidents in High Performance Aircraft “Typically, about three quarters of all GA accidents are eventually attributed to pilot-related causes”.. AOPA NALL Report 2003, 2002, 2001  Falling Behind the Airplane Saturation Distraction Confusion  Aeronautical Decision Making Exceeding Skills of the Pilot Exceeding Aircraft Capabilities

Threat and Error findings from Line Operations Safety Audits (LOSA) of 4,800 flights Two-Pilot, Professional Crews Source: Robert L. Helmreich, Ph.D. FRAes The University of Texas The University of Texas Human Factors Research Project Human Factors Research Project % of Errors per Phase of Flight Pre-departure/taxi26% Take-off 20% Cruise 6% Descent/approach/landing 42% Taxi in 6% Errors and Undesired Aircraft States 75% of flights had 1 or more errors 35% of flights had a mismanaged error 32% of flights had an undesired aircraft state (UAS)

Standard Solutions  Add a professional pilot as SIC  Mentor Pilots  Rigorous, perpetual training  Extremely high experience requirements

SPX Process  Real-time voice/data connection to ground station  SPX performs as “Remote Co-Pilot” in a standardized CRM role  Interacts and monitors during critical phases of flight  Full-time dedicated connection during T/O and landing  Handles flight support tasks (ATIS, Checklists)  Performs pre-flight and enroute flight planning  Assist in the event of en-route emergency

 Increased Safety for SPIFR Operations  Reduced Stress on NAS  Improved Utility for Owners/Operators  Data source for NGATS SPX Benefits

ASPX, LLC - Confidential  Dual Channel Satcom On Aircraft Voice – intercom communication and monitoring of ATC Data –real-time transmission of flight data, aircraft configuration, and avionics settings during critical phases of flight  Connected approximately 20 minutes per flight and on-demand enroute SPX Hardware

 Professional, experienced, trained  Creates a professional, standardized, CRM approach to the flight  Serves in a pilot not flying/copilot role.  Assists in “Pilot Monitoring” role to lighten workload and keep the PIC ahead of the airplane  Assists in flight planning, enroute planning, and exceptional situations SPX Personnel

SPX Workstation

Manufacturers –Recurring revenues, upgrade paths –Operational oversight –FOQA feedback Training Organizations –Full training loop –Existing staff and facilities Operators –Enhanced safety and efficiency –Complete operational control ASPX –Licenses IP to Providers –Monitors Compliance and Standards (Insurability) –R&D, New Technologies, Sets Standards SPX Providers

SPX Future Enhancements Level 1 –Passive assistance –Use currently approved systems Level 2 –Active assistance – flight plan uploads Level 3 –Active control in case of pilot incapacity Autopilot, FADEC, Parachute, UAV

SPX Improving the safety of high performance single pilot aircraft operations