SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Southern California Region Heavy Duty Truck Model.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THURSTON REGION MULTIMODAL TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING MODEL IMPLEMENTATION IN EMME/2 - Presentation at the 15th International EMME/2 Users Group Conference.
Advertisements

SE Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting FDOT Systems Planning Office
Feedback Loops Guy Rousseau Atlanta Regional Commission.
New Orleans Intra-City Truck Freight Study Talking Freight Seminar April 19th 2005 Karen Parsons New Orleans Regional Planning Commission Eulois Cleckley.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Elizabeth Sall Maren Outwater Cambridge Systematics,
GREATER NEW YORK A GREENER Travel Demand Modeling for analysis of Congestion Mitigation policies October 24, 2007.
Status of the SEMCOG E6 Travel Model SEMCOG TMIP Peer Review Panel Meeting December 12, 2011 presented by Liyang Feng, SEMCOG Thomas Rossi, Cambridge Systematics.
Development of a New Commercial Vehicle Travel Model for Triangle Region 14 th TRB Planning Applications Conference, Columbus, Ohio May 7, 2013 Bing Mei.
The Argos Freight Modeling Project Presentation to SCAG Modeling Task Force 9/22/04 Genevieve Giuliano Peter Gordon School of Policy, Planning and Development.
Implementing the FHWA Quick Response Freight Model in the Twin Cities Steve Wilson and Jonathan Ehrlich SRF Consulting Group, Inc. SRF Consulting Group,
Intercity Person, Passenger Car and Truck Travel Patterns Daily Highway Volumes on State Highways and Interstates Ability to Evaluate Major Changes in.
GEOG 111 & 211A Transportation Planning Traffic Assignment.
Junction Modelling in a Strategic Transport Model Wee Liang Lim Henry Le Land Transport Authority, Singapore.
California Energy Commission Medium and Heavy Vehicles and Movement of Light and Heavy Vehicles Inputs and Assumptions for Transportation Energy Demand.
Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks
CE 2710 Transportation Engineering
The Freight Analysis Framework – Overview and Uses Bruce Lambert Office of Freight Management and Operations.
Interfacing Regional Model with Statewide Model to Improve Regional Commercial Vehicle Travel Forecasting Bing Mei, P.E. Joe Huegy, AICP Institute for.
Regional Travel Modeling Unit 6: Aggregate Modeling.
Use of Truck GPS Data for Travel Model Improvements Talking Freight Seminar April 21, 2010.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Development of a Truck Model for Memphis 2015 Transportation.
Milton-Madison Bi-State Travel Demand Model Rob Bostrom Planning Application Conference Houston, Texas May 19, 2009.
Implementing a Blended Model System to Forecast Transportation and Land Use Changes at Bob Hope Airport 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Vamsee Modugula and Maren Outwater Cambridge Systematics,
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 10 Traffic (Trip) Assignment Trip Generation Trip Distribution Transit Estimation & Mode.
Travel Demand Modeling At NCTCOG Presentation For IOWA TMIP Peer Review March 30 – April 1, 2004.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Development of a Hybrid Freight Model from Truck Travel.
Texas Freight Forecasting Rob Bostrom Monisha Khurana Liza Amar Planning Applications Conference 2015.
ODOT Freight Modeling Presented to the Ohio Conference on Freight Toledo, OH September 18, 2007 By Gregory Giaimo, PE Ohio Department of Transportation.
Considerations when applying Paramics to Strategic Traffic Models Paramics User Group Meeting October 9 th, 2009 Presented Matthew.
Craig O’Riley & Adam Shell Office of Systems Planning Wednesday, December 1,
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. TRB Applications Conference – Freight Committee May 7, 2013.
June 15, 2010 For the Missoula Metropolitan Planning Organization Travel Modeling
Florida Multimodal Statewide Freight Model
Lynn Peterson Secretary of Transportation Combining Macro Scopic and Meso Scopic Models in Toll and Traffic Revenue Forecasting SR 167 Corridor Completion.
How to Put “Best Practice” into Traffic Assignment Practice Ken Cervenka Federal Transit Administration TRB National Transportation.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA “Talking Freight” Seminar Series presented by Daniel Beagan Cambridge Systematics, Inc. February.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA “Talking Freight” Seminar Series presented by Lance Neumann Cambridge Systematics, Inc. August.
Transportation Planning, Transportation Demand Analysis Land Use-Transportation Interaction Transportation Planning Framework Transportation Demand Analysis.
Overview Freight Modeling Overview Tianjia Tang, PE., Ph.D FHWA, Office of Freight Management and Operations Phone:
Regional Goods Movement Study for the San Francisco Bay Area presented by Michael J. Fischer Cambridge Systematics, Inc. November 12, 2004 Agenda Item.
Major Transportation Corridor Studies Using an EMME/2 Travel Demand Forecasting Model: The Trans-Lake Washington Study Carlos Espindola, Youssef Dehghani.
Dynamic Origin-Destination Trip Table Estimation for Transportation Planning Ramachandran Balakrishna Caliper Corporation 11 th TRB National Transportation.
Incorporating Traffic Operations into Demand Forecasting Model Daniel Ghile, Stephen Gardner 22 nd international EMME Users’ Conference, Portland September.
MATRIX ADJUSTMENT MACRO (DEMADJ.MAC AND DEMADJT.MAC) APPLICATIONS: SEATTLE EXPERIENCE Murli K. Adury Youssef Dehghani Sujay Davuluri Parsons Brinckerhoff.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB 11 th Conference on Transportation Planning Applications presented by Dan Goldfarb, P.E. Cambridge.
1Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy Talking Freight Seminar Freight Analysis Framework, version 3 Diane Davidson Center for Transportation.
Tri-level freight modeling: A simulation of trucks going near and far Rolf Moeckel Parsons Brinckerhoff Sabya Mishra University of Maryland TRB Planning.
1 New Truck Models National Capital Region TPB Travel Forecasting Subcommittee William G. Allen, Jr., P.E. Transportation Planning Consultant 18 July 2008.
How Does Your Model Measure Up Presented at TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference by Phil Shapiro Frank Spielberg VHB May, 2007.
1 Fine Tuning Mathematical Models for Toll Applications Dr. A. Mekky, P.Eng., A. Tai, M. Khan Ministry of Transportation, Ontario, Canada.
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks.
Southern California Association of Governments Freight Transportation: Emerging Issues for Southern California Alan Bowser Goods Movement PlanningWorkshop.
November 28, 2006 CCOS On-Road Allocation Factors Page 1 Spatial & Temporal Allocation of On-Road Emissions CCOS Technical Committee November 28, 2006.
1 Methods to Assess Land Use and Transportation Balance By Carlos A. Alba May 2007.
BUSINESS SENSITIVE 1 Network Assignment of Highway Truck Traffic in FAF3 Maks Alam, PE Research Leader Battelle.
Presentation For Incorporation of Pricing in the Time-of-Day Model “Express Travel Choices Study” for the Southern California Association of Governments.
11 th National Planning Applications Conference Topic: Statewide Modeling Validation Measures and Issues Authors: Dave Powers, Anne Reyner, Tom Williams,
CE Urban Transportation Planning and Management Iowa State University Calibration and Adjustment Techniques, Part 1 Source: Calibration and Adjustment.
Chapter 9 Capacity and Level of Service for Highway Segments
1 Assessing Travel Demand for Exclusive Truck Facilities Matthew Roorda, University of Toronto Michael Hain, University of Toronto Glareh Amirjamshidi,
Company LOGO Georgia Truck Lane Needs Identification Study Talking Freight Seminar March 19, 2008 Matthew Fowler, P.T.P Assistant State Planning Administrator.
Southern California Ozone Study MOBILE SOURCE IMPROVEMENTS Ed Yotter Planning & Technical Support Division California Air Resources Board Sacramento, CA.
Travel Demand Forecasting: Traffic Assignment CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Freight Transportation Plan Savannah, GA AMPO Conference - October 23, 2014.
Transportation Modeling – Opening the Black Box. Agenda 6:00 - 6:05Welcome by Brant Liebmann 6:05 - 6:10 Introductory Context by Mayor Will Toor and Tracy.
Presented to Indiana Logistics Summit Indianapolis, Indiana presented by Keith Bucklew Director - Freight Mobility Indiana Department of Transportation.
Assessing Strengths and Limitations of a Statewide Tour Based Freight Model Using Scenario Analysis in Maryland By Colin Smith, RSG Sabya Mishra, University.
Johnson City MPO Travel Demand Model
Ventura County Traffic Model (VCTM) VCTC Update
Presentation transcript:

SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Southern California Region Heavy Duty Truck Model

SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Issues and Needs  Heavy Duty Truck Movements Important Element of Regional Planning  600 Million Annual Tons of Goods - 70% by Truck  Trade, Transportation and Manufacturing 40% of Regional Employment  30% Growth in Goods Movement for Next 20 Years  Heavy Truck Movements in Many Regional Corridors  SCAG Model only Forecasts Light and Medium Duty Vehicles  HDT Movements Were Previously Estimated Only  Effects of Trucks on Traffic  Effects of Traffic on Trucks

SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Purpose of the Project  HDT Travel Demand Modeling Capabilities for the Region  Forecast HDT Volumes and Patterns  Develop Direct HDT Emissions Analysis  Planning and Programming Regional Truck Improvements

SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Model Objectives  State of the Art HDT Model  HDT Model Integrated with SCAG Model  Relationship with Goods Movement and Economic Activity  Readily Available and Forecastable Input Data  Stratification by Truck Types  Stratification by Trip Type - Long Haul, Short Haul  Dynamic Simultaneous Assignment Procedure  Effects of Trucks in Terms of Passenger Car Equivalents  Outputs: Volumes, VMT, VHT, Speeds, Travel Time, Congestion

SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Project Components  Research and Data Collection  Model Component Development  Component Assembly and Incorporation with SCAG Model  Model Validation  Model Application and Forecasts

SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Research and Data Collection  Over 70 Reports, Data Bases and Documents Reviewed  Very Few Regional Models Have Comprehensive HDT Component  Goods Movement Data Base  Carrier Surveys  Trip Diaries  Shipper and Receiver Surveys  Caltrans Truck Counts  New Classification Counts  Weigh-in-Motion Station Data  Freeway PCE Speed/Flow Surveys  Discussions with Subregions and COGs  Technical Advisory Committee

SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Structure of the Model  Three Weight Categories by Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) per ARB  Trip Generation for Internal Trips  Trip Distribution for Internal Trips  External Trips Generation and Distribution  Special Generators, Generation and Distribution  Time of Day Factoring  Traffic Assignment - Light-Heavy -- 8,500 to 14,000 GVW - Medium-Heavy -- 14,000 to 33,000 GVW - Heavy-Heavy -- Over 33,000 GVW

SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model HDT Model Structure

SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Trip Generation for Internal Trips  Based on Shipper and Receiver Surveys  Telephone Surveys through Business Directory  Standard Industrial Classification Codes (SIC) - One Digit  Categories - Agricultural, Mining, Construction - Transportation and Communication - Wholesale Trade - Retail Trade - Services - Government - Households  Other National Truck Trip Rates  988,700 Total Internal Trips - 45% LH - 33% MH - 22% HH  Major Generators: Retail, Manufacturing and Transportation

SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Internal Trips

SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Special Truck Trip Generators  Port of Los Angeles  Port of Long Beach  Intermodal Transfer Terminals  Air Cargo Trips at Regional Airports

SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Total Trip Generation  989,000 Internal  36,000 External  16,000 Port Trips  10,000 Air Cargo Trips

SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Trip Distribution  Gravity Model Format  Friction Factors by Weight Class  Truck Trip Diary Surveys  Based on Observed Trip Length Frequencies

SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model External Trips  Based on Commodity Flows  Southern California Goods Movement Study  County to County Movement of Goods by Tonnage - Truckload - Less-than Truckload - Private Carrier Tonnage Converted to Truck Trips by Class  Outbound Based on Producing Industries  Inbound Based on Consuming Industries  Disaggregated to Regional Zones Based on 2-Digit SIC  Allocated to Regional Model Cordon Points

SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Time of Day Distribution  Daily Trip Generation  Distribution to Four Periods (AM, Midday, PM, Night-time)  Weigh-In-Motion (WIM) Station Data  Factors for Internal and External Truck Trips  Factors by Weight Class

SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Heavy Duty Vehicle Classification Correspondence

SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Heavy Duty Truck Time Period Distribution Factors (Percent of total daily 24-hour)

SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Network Development  Network Capacity Re-Adjustments  Network Coding of Significant Grades  Truck Restrictions

SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Traffic Assignment  Truck Assignment Integrated with Traditional Auto Assignment Process  Dynamic Two-way Interaction Between Autos and HDT During Assignment (Truck PCE Adjustments): - Significant Grades - Composition of Trucks - Level of Congestion

SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model HDT Traffic Assignment Process

SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Heavy Duty Truck PCE Values by Vehicle Type, Terrain and Percent Trucks

SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Heavy Duty Truck PCE Values by Vehicle Type, Terrain and Percent Trucks 12.5

SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model PCE Value Adjustment Factors for Highway Congestion > Note: Numbers in this table are not PCE values. They are adjustment factors which should be applied to PCEs in previous table for each condition.

SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Calibration/Validation  Model Calibration at Every Step  Assignment Validation - Total 11 Regional Screenlines - 1% Variance - Total 24 Sub-regional Screenlines - 8% Variance - Check for Reasonableness on Arterials (percent trucks between 4% and 7%)

SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Regional Model Screenlines

SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Comparison of Truck Volumes and Counts on Regional Model Screenlines

SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Subregional Corridor Screenlines

SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Comparison of Truck Volumes and Counts on Subregional Screenlines

SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Comparison of Total Vehicular Volumes and Traffic Counts on Regional Screelines

SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Products/Application  Provides Missing Component to the Existing SCAG Model  Forecast of HDT on Freeways, Arterials and Ramps  Forecast of HDT by Peak Periods and Classification  Forecast of HDT Speeds, Emissions, VMT, VHT,  O/D Trip Patterns, Local vs Through Trips, Facility Users

SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Comparison of 2020 and 1995 Forecast Truck Volumes on Regional Model Screenlines

SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Regional Model Screenlines

SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Comparison of 2020 and 1995 Forecast Truck Volumes on Regional Model Screenlines

SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Recent Improvements  New allocations of trucks to the four time periods (AM, PM, MD, and NT), based on driver survey.  New 2000 employment SIC data from EDD  Revised PCEs  New 24-hour truck counts  Removed K-factors in the original HDT model.