Adoption Leadership Board (ALB) Headline Measures and Business Intelligence Quarter 4 2013-14 update Please send any queries to:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Impact and Avoidance of Delay in Decision Making.
Advertisements

Northern Ireland Tourism Performance Overview January –March 2014.
Key Performance Indicators for the Junior Resource Sector: Q Update Prepared by Mike Doggett August 27, 2014.
ALB-3 Paper 1 Headline Measures and Business Intelligence Data Pack.
SSRG Annual Workshop 2011: How can the Children in Need census help to improve children’s services and outcomes? Monday 7 th March Birmingham Isabella.
Using Data to Plan Waiver Strategies and Drive Improvements: Key Indicators and Trends April 11, 2012.
Changes to the Special Educational Needs system Somerset’s Local Offer Education Health and Care Plans Annual Reviews and the transfer of statements to.
Introduction to the Children and Families Act 2014 Laxmi Patel 12 June 2014.
PHILIPPINES ADOPTION. Who are the children? Boys and girls, ages 1-18 Sibling groups Live in orphanage care and foster care Children with special needs.
Administration Arrangements of Government Grants to Schools Agenda Item 8.
PERMANENCY PLANNING. Permanency Planning  How is it defined?  What does it mean for parents? For children?
1 PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON HOME AFFAIRS STATUS OF THE AMENDMENTS TO THE REFUGEE ACT AND RELOCATION OF REFUGEE RECEPTION OFFICES CLOSER.
Home Care & Self-Directed Support surveys Julie Rintoul Health Analytical Services Division.
Improving Outcomes for Looked After Children, Young People & Care Leavers Moray Paterson Looked After Children Policy Manager.
How do McLean County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? McLean County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement23350%
C H I L D R E N A N D A D U L T S – L E A R N I N G A N D C A R I N G Thursday 18 September 2014 Transfer of Statements to Education, Health and Care Plans.
Moving up to Secondary School in September 2016 Important information, significant dates and useful contacts. Customer Services.
Economics.  How unemployment is measured  Potential issues with measurement.
High needs funding arrangements: 2014 to 2015 Briefing for local authorities Russell Ewens Funding Policy Unit 1.
New Home Sales as a Measure of Economic Well Being Rabin Saidian Patricia Trujillo Market Indicators Spring 2007.
Private Fostering “Someone else’s Child”
What’s new in the Child Poverty Unit – Research and Measurement Team Research and Measurement Team Child Poverty Unit.
Private Fostering – “Someone else’s Child”
Information for Parents on Key Stage 2 SATs March 2015.
7 September 2015 Information for Parents Key Stage 2 SATs 2013.
STUDENT ASSISTANCE LIAISON ONLINE QUARTERLY REPORTING Guidance On Understanding and Completing the Quarterly Reporting Form.
Children in Care. What is a Corporate Parent? Either through agreement with their parents, or through court proceedings, children might come to be cared.
>  Slide 1 Coaching Insights Coaching statistics and analysis 2015/16.
Inflation Report February Output and supply.
The application of selective editing to the ONS Monthly Business Survey Emma Hooper Office for National Statistics
204: Assessing Safety in Out-of-Home Care Updates.
FNB Estate Agent Survey - Home Buying Market 1st Quarter 2014 Survey Results 9 April 2014.
Additional analysis of poverty in Scotland 2013/14 Communities Analytical Services July 2015.
Provisional End of Key Stage Outcomes v4 This includes provisional indications of performance by vulnerable groups at Early Years and at Key Stage 2 As.
Need for Change Change Future Change POLICY AND LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK – ADOPTION AND FOSTERING 1.
Ohio’s Progress on the Maintenance of Demographic Data on PCSA Prospective Adoptive Families August 2005 Developed for: Adoption Services Section Office.
Deprivation and the Pupil Premium - what you need to know. After prior attainment, poverty is the strongest predictor of a child’s future life-chances.
Ian Thomas Strategic Director Children and Younger Adults School Governor Briefing, October 2013.
Practical messages from research on the costs of care provision Harriet Ward, Lisa Holmes and Jean Soper Centre for Child and Family Research Loughborough.
Budget and Caseload Update Policy and Fiscal Committee April 4, 2011.
Improving the knowledge and support of Care Leavers in Higher Education Using statistics from HESA and the DFE to improve services that support Care Leavers.
Alternative Provision (AP)& Permanent Exclusions Agenda Item 7b Forecast Budget Pressures and Solutions.
SATS 2016 What’s new?.  Your children will be in the first year group to take tests based on the new National Curriculum (2014).  Schools only began.
Presentation to Children’s Partnership Board 17 th July 2012 by Jill Forrest Head of Family Placements and Resources Slough Looked After Children, Young.
ESDS Seminar Apr The EU Labour Force Survey Arturo de la Fuente, Estat-F2 “Labour Market Statistics”
Future Scenarios for the Adoption Sector Presented by Aliya Saied-Tessier 11/03/16.
Census – Summer Agenda Overview School Census 2016 Dummy Run Create and Validate Return Break Identify and analyse validation errors Detail and.
Placement Stability & Permanence. What is Permanence 'a sense of security, continuity, commitment and identity a secure, stable and loving family.
STAGE 5: LA ESTIMATE Annual Population Survey (APS) SUMMARY STAGE: NATIONAL ESTIMATE STAGE 4STAGE 3STAGE 2STAGE 1 Family Resources Survey (FRS) School.
Foster Care & Adoption Neglected or abused children may be removed from the family home, placed in a foster home, or made available for adoption.
2016 Primary Assessment Update 27th September 2016
University College Cork 17 January 2013
Management Information
The Bespoke Family Finding Service sits under the umbrella of CFAS – Adoption Support, which is also a collaboration of the two VAA’s.
Family and household structure Part 2
Deleting Pupils and CME WORKSHOP
Assistant Team Manager St. Francis’ Children’s Society
Moving up to Secondary School in September 2018
Information Session Maggie Davies.
MST Evaluation April 2016.
POLICY AND LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK – ADOPTION AND FOSTERING
 Introduction Permanency Planning Meetings (PPMs) are held in addition to the Child’s Looked After Review to establish a child’s permanency pathway and.
Placement Stability & Permanence
SECONDARY TRANSFER Y5 Parents’ meeting
PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON HOME AFFAIRS
Finance Information Groups
CVAA Practice Workshop 5 July 2018 #CVAAPractice
Placement Stability & Permanence
Understanding ASP and FFT Data
The Impact and Avoidance of Delay in Decision Making
Presentation transcript:

Adoption Leadership Board (ALB) Headline Measures and Business Intelligence Quarter update Please send any queries to:

Data sources Figures relating to have been derived using the SSDA903 data (for children) and Ofsted data (for adopters). Figures relating to have been derived using quarterly surveys of local authorities and voluntary adoption agencies. Annual SSDA903 data Local authorities provide data on their looked after children using the SSDA903 collection. Data are collected from all local authorities. The information is collected at child level and includes information about the child’s characteristics and their dates for each stage of the care process, including adoption. The data goes through thorough quality assurance and local authorities are able to update their historic data annually. We therefore view this as the most robust source of information on adoption. It is used to produce the Looked After Children statistical first release (SFR) and the Adoption Scorecards. The latest data covers the financial year. Data for will be published in the SFR on 30 September Quarterly survey This pack includes new quarterly data covering the final quarter of This is the first time we have been able to make estimates for based on actual full-year data. This quarter’s collection marked the first time responsibility for quarterly surveys moved from DfE to the ALB. The form sent to local authorities included new variables, the biggest change being that adopter data was requested at adopter level (previous collections asked for this aggregated to LA level). This was also the first time voluntary adoption agencies (VAAs) were asked for the same adopter information as LAs. The response rate is promising, with 119 LAs (79%) returning in quarter , an improvement on quarter 3 (69%). Estimates for are based on data provided by LAs who returned in all four quarters of the year. Therefore the latest analysis includes 53% of local authorities. The exception to this is the adopter timeliness information which was not collected in the same way in previous collections, and so in order to exploit the higher response rate we have included all LAs who returned in quarter Ofsted data Ofsted publish annual data on the recruitment of adopters and the children placed with them. Data is collected on both local authority recruitment and voluntary adoption agency recruitment. We include information on adopter timeliness taken from this collection in this pack.

Latest data Key findings for the four headline measures are: Children waiting“The number of children with a placement order waiting to be placed” The latest annual data shows that there were 6,000 children with a placement order waiting to be placed with an adoptive family as at 31 March Quarterly data suggests that there has been a 24% decrease to 4,550 at the end of The number of new placement orders granted has decreased since quarter , falling by 46% (from 1,570 to 850) to quarter 4. The number of new decisions has also decreased since quarter 2, falling by 39% (from 1,800 to 1,100) to quarter 4. Adopter Gap“The difference between the ‘number of adopters needed for children with a placement order waiting to be placed’ and the ‘number of adopters waiting to be matched” Our most recent estimate for the “adopter gap” suggests we need to approve 3,100 more adopters to close the gap. Child Timeliness“The average time between a child entering care and moving in with their adopted family” The latest adoption scorecards show that child timeliness had not improved since the previous round. Quarterly data suggests there has been an improvement in (down 12% from 658 days in to 581 days in ). This is encouraging but is still 34 days above the threshold and the three- year average will be higher. Adopter timeliness “The average time between an adoption agency receiving an application from a potential adopter to a child moving in to their home to be adopted” Latest quarterly data suggests adopter timeliness has improved since : the proportion of applications approved within 6 months in quarter was 35%. This compares to 27% of decisions being made within 6 months of applications in The proportion of approved adopters matched within 6 months of approval in quarter was 78%, compared with 69% in Timeliness from application to approval has, however, been declining since quarter

1. Children waiting Children waiting with a placement order The latest annual data shows that there were 6,000 children with a placement order waiting to be placed with an adoptive family as at 31 March Quarterly data suggests that there has been a 24% decrease to 4,550 at the end of The number of new placement orders granted has decreased since quarter , falling by 46% (from 1,570 to 850) to quarter 4. Children waiting with a decision Annual data shows that there were around 6,890 children with a decision that adoption was the best option who had not yet been placed with an adoptive family as at 31 March Quarterly data suggests that there has been an 11% decrease to 6,160 by the end of The number of new decisions has decreased since quarter 2, falling by 39% (from 1,800 to 1,100) to quarter 4. However, having increased during the first two quarters of the year, the total number of decisions in is still slightly higher than expected. Children with a decision who had not yet been placed by the end of March 2014 had on average entered care 22 months before (a decrease of 3 months from those waiting at the end of quarter ). This average is beyond the current threshold set in the adoption scorecards of 20 months. Waiting times by characteristics Please note there is currently a comparability issue between the annual and quarterly data with regards to the children waiting with a placement order measure. The quarterly data excludes children with an ADM decision reversal. Comparing the 4,550 quarter figure with quarterly data from the same quarter in suggests the fall in children waiting with a placement order was 17%, not 24%.

2. Adopter Gap Adopter gap The key components of the adopter gap are: VAA adopters not yet matched LA adopters not yet matched1,9001,600 Total adopters not yet matched2,1001,800 Children not yet placed5,2006,000 Number of adopters needed4,0004,900 “Adopter gap”2,0003,100 Adopter recruitment 7,160 applications in ,590 to LAs and 570 to VAAs. Information is not available for VAAs for , but applications to LAs increased by 51% compared to from 4,360. 5,450 approvals in This is an increase of 32% from 4,120 in LA approvals increased by 31% (3,490 to 4,570) and VAA approvals increased by 40% (620 to 880). New 2 Stage Process 37% of approvals in quarter were made using the new two stage process. (38% in LAs, 29% in VAAs). The new process is quicker Approvals via the new process were 10 weeks quicker than those approved via the old process in quarter Stage 1 takes 9 weeks Stage 2 takes 16 weeks For adopters approved through the new process, the average time taken to complete stage 1 was 62 days (9 weeks) whilst stage 2 took 113 days (16 weeks). The “adopter gap” is measured by calculating the gap between the number of adopters needed for children with a placement order who have not yet been placed and the number of approved adopters not yet matched with children. We estimate that this was 3,100 at the end of

3. Child Timeliness The latest adoption scorecards show that child timeliness had not improved since the previous round. Quarterly data suggests there has been an improvement in (down 12% from 658 days in to 581 days in ). These times are derived from the annual data Adoption scorecard The latest round of scorecards, covering , showed that: The average time between a child entering care and moving in with its adoptive family (indicator A1) was 647 days (or 22 months). The average time between a local authority receiving court authority to place a child and the local authority deciding on a match (indicator A2) was 210 days (or 7 months). This was not an improvement on the scorecards and 65 local authorities missed both thresholds (20 months and 6 months respectively). 55% of children waited less than 20 months between entering care and moving in with their adoptive family (indicator A3). Quarterly data Latest quarterly data suggests that timeliness is improving: The chart below shows performance on indicator A1 in At 581 days this is closer to the threshold (547 days). This is encouraging but this is still 34 days above the threshold and the three-year average will be higher. Combining the quarterly and annual data suggests a three year average of 624 days. The timeliness of decisions and placements have improved, there was a 14% improvement in the average time each took from entering care between and Child enters care Court makes placement order (i.e. gives LA authority to place) LA decides on a match between child and adopter Child is placed with adopter Adoption Order Application made and child is legally adopted (after hearing) ADM decision in LA made for the child to be adopted Average time taken: 11 months Average time taken: 1 month Average time taken: 9 months Average time taken: 10 months

4. Adopter Timeliness Ofsted data – Application to decision LAsVAAsTotal Total decisions = 3, ,130 Less than 3 months 6%3%5% 3 months but less than 6 months 24%12%22% 6 months but less than 9 months 38%46%39% 9 months but less than 12 months 20%22%20% 12 months but less than 18 months 10%12%10% 18 months or more 3%4%3% Approval to match LAsVAAsTotal Total matches = 3, ,690 Less than 3 months 42%15%38% 3 months but less than 6 months 29%40%31% 6 months but less than 9 months 13%23%15% 9 months but less than 12 months 7%12%7% 12 months but less than 18 months 4%6%5% 18 months or more 4%3%4% The latest quarterly data suggests adopter timeliness has improved since The proportion of applications approved within 6 months in quarter was 35%. This compares to 27% of decisions being made within 6 months of applications in The proportion of adopters matched within 6 months of approval in quarter was 78%, compared with 69% in Timeliness from application to approval has, however, been declining since quarter Quarterly data – Q4 Application to approval LAsVAAsTotal Total approval =1, ,380 Less than 3 months5%7%5% 3 months but less than 6 months32%15%29% 6 months but less than 9 months45%61%47% 9 months but less than 12 months11% 12 months but less than 18 months6%4%6% 18 months or more2%1% Approval to match LAsVAAsTotal Total matches = Less than 3 months49%20%45% 3 months but less than 6 months30%53%33% 6 months but less than 9 months10%14%11% 9 months but less than 12 months6% 12 months but less than 18 months3% 18 months or more2%3%2% The average number of days between application and approval in quarter in England was 222 days, whilst the average number of days from approval to match was 131 days.

Contextual information 3,980 children were adopted during up 15% from This is the highest number of adoptions since the current data collection began in Quarterly data suggests that 4,960 children were adopted in , an increase of 25% on The majority of children placed for adoption were in care due to abuse or neglect (70%). This was higher than all children looked after at 31 March 2013 (62%) There were 68,110 children looked after at 31 March % had been placed for adoption whilst three quarters were in foster placements. There were 4,560 children placed for adoption during Quarterly data suggests that the number of children placed during was 5,210, an increase of 14% on There were 600 children adopted by their foster carers during This was 15% of all adopted children. There were 970 reversals of decisions to place a child for adoption during Reasons for these were: The child’s needs changed subsequent to the decision27% The Court did not make a placement order10% Prospective adopters could not be found37% “Any other reason”26%