Response to Intervention: Multi- Tiered Systems for Student Success Janet Graden, PhD University of Cincinnati October, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Advertisements

Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Policy & Practice Institute June 25, 2008 Mike Stetter and Lori Duerr Delaware Department of Education.
Instructional Decision Making
MTSS Trainers: Janet Stephenson Melissa Long School Psychologist: Griselle Zeno.
Response to Intervention: A Different Look
Mike W. Olson RTI. RTI is… 2 the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time.
Visions of Community 2012 March 10, 2012 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support (MTSS) Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
Policy Considerations and Implementation. Overview Defining RtI Where did it come from and why do we need it? Support for RtI in federal law Core principles.
Response to Intervention (RtI) A Basic Overview. Illinois IDEA 2004 Part Rules Requires: use of a process that determines how the child responds.
Ingham RtI District Leadership Team November 4, 2009.
General Universal Level Targeted Level Intensive Level Bonus
An Introduction to Response to Intervention MN Response to Intervention Center Ann Casey, Ph.D. Director St. Croix River Ed. District
Response to Intervention: The new Road to Ensuring Student Success January, 2011 PISD.
RtI Response to Intervention April 2, 2008 Board Presentation.
Getting Started with RTI School-wide Assessment Tool for an RTI Model.
C4K – Building an efficient and effective delivery system to impact critical outcomes for kids Our initial focus as we build this system is early literacy.
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
May Dr. Schultz, Dr. Owen, Dr. Ryan, Dr. Stephens.
Statewide Expectations Presenter: Christine Spear Alabama Department of Education.
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
Essential Elements in Implementing and Monitoring Quality RtI Procedures Rose Dymacek & Edward Daly Nebraska Department of Education University of Nebraska-
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What is RTI?
Comprehensive Reading Model Teaching Reading Sourcebook 2 nd edition.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
9/15/20151 Scaling Up Presentation: SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting October 2009 Marick Tedesco, Ph.D. State Transformation Specialist for Scaling Up.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Response to Intervention
D62 Response to Intervention
Winston/Salem Forsyth County Schools RESPONSIVENESS TO INSTRUCTION (RTI)
Response to Intervention (RtI) Secondary Model for Intervention.
Parent Leadership Team Meeting Intro to RtI.  RtI Overview  Problem Solving Process  What papers do I fill out?  A3 documenting the story.
Response to Intervention in KPS Linda Campbell
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
Lori Wolfe October 9, Definition of RTI according to NCRTI ( National Center on Response to Intervention) Response to intervention integrates assessment.
RtI.  Learn: ◦ What is RtI ◦ Why schools need RtI ◦ What are the components that comprise an RtI system - must haves ◦ Underlying assumptions for the.
Victoria White, PhD Ann George, EdD Associate Professor Assistant Professor Director of KC Metro Center SSLS.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Brief Overview of Response to Intervention within Glenbrook South Andy Piper & Lindsay Schrand NSSED Problem-Solving Coaches.
RtI Initiative Intensive Coaches Institute 9/8/09 Setting the Context.
DSAC Leadership Meeting 1/24/12 Massachusetts Tiered System of Support (MTSS)
Response to Intervention in a Nutshell August 26, 2009.
By: Jill Mullins. RtI is… the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time and.
Broward County Public Schools BP #3 Optimal Relationships
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
Part 2: Assisting Students Struggling with Reading: Multi-Tier System of Supports H325A
What IS RtI?. National RtI Model “Response to Intervention” –Born out of Reauthorization of Special Ed Law (IDEA 2004) Two Models of RtI: –Problem-Solving.
Addressing Learning Problems in Elementary School Ellen Hampshire.
RtI: A Framework for Student Success Janet Graden, PhD University of Cincinnati
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental IV: Multi-Tiered System of Supports.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Essential Component: Schoolwide, Multi-Level Prevention System Katie Klingler Tackett National Center on.
Revisiting SPL/IIT/SAT/SLD AND OTHER ALPHABETIC ANOMOLIES!
MULTI-TIERED SYSTEM OF SUPPORTS Presented by Adrienne T. Dixson, Specialist, Response to Intervention Antonio Burgess, MTSS Instructional Facilitator March.
Multi-Tiered Systems of Support Kent ISD MTSS Implementation Team.
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
Response to Intervention Instruction. Agenda Ultimate Purpose Components of RtI Expectations Break Problem Solving Teams Homework.
Tier 1 Positive Behavior Support Response to Intervention for Behavior Faculty Overview.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
MTSS MULTI-TIERED SYSTEMS OF SUPPORT A LOOK AT THE SYSTEMS TODAY IN CALIFORNIA GAIL LANCASTER –ASSOCIATE FACULTY NATIONAL UNIVERSITY/FRESNO CAMPUS RESOURCE.
(MTSS) Multi-Tiered System of Supports Charles R. Eccleston, District MTSS Trainer.
Florida’s MTSS Project: Self-Assessment of MTSS (SAM)
Refining & Aligning: Recommendations for preparation policy to support rti2 and Special Education in Tennessee Kim Paulsen, vanderbilt university Blake.
RTI & SRBI What Are They and How Can We Use Them?
Visions of Community 2012 March 10, 2012
Response to Intervention R. E. A. C. H
Response to Intervention Implementation
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Presentation transcript:

Response to Intervention: Multi- Tiered Systems for Student Success Janet Graden, PhD University of Cincinnati October, 2011

RtI/MTSS MTSS is term in ESEA reauthorization proposed language Think “bigger” than RtI – is about success for ALL students – School-wide system of support for ALL – Growth for ALL

RtI is NOT Not just interventions (think INSTRUCTION and INTERVENTION – for ALL) Not about a different way to refer or to consider eligibility (think support for progress for ALL, when they need it)

MTSS requires: A district-wide approach to support implementation, with these components: – Leadership teams (district and building) – Multi-tiered system of instruction and intervention – Strong core of curriculum and instruction and supplemental intervention – Assessment and data-based decision making – Collaborative problem solving – Positive School Climate

Leadership Teams and System Processes Functioning district-level and building-level teams to guide implementation and problem solve; leadership from administration Vision and commitment to multi-tiered systems of support (support for implementation) Teams at all levels review student performance data for decision making (district, building, grade- level or teaching teams)

Building Data Indicates Need: Where is your response targeted? District Level Building Level Grade Level Classroom Level Small Group Level Individual Student Level Building Grade Level Classroom Small Group Student District

Multi-Tiered System of Instruction and Intervention High quality and standards-aligned curriculum and instruction and safe, supportive learning environments – Three-tiered system for academics and behavior Grade-level (or teaching) teams – Comprised of classroom teachers, interventionists, support staff – Responsible for instruction and instructional decision making

Multi-Tiered System of Instruction and Intervention Supplemental and intensive grouping of students is linked to intensity of student needs – More intense: smaller group size, more time, highly trained educator Flexible staffing – Meet needs of students based on student data

Assessment and Data-based Decision Making Comprehensive assessment system – Universal screening – Diagnostic/functional behavior assessment – Progress monitoring – Reliable and valid – Measure all essential components of academics and behavior

Assessment and Data-based Decision Making Data management system – Reports for decision making, considering: Ease of use Clear communication and decision making Graphical representation of student performance and progress

Assessment and Data-Based Decision Making System capacity – Universal screening 3x/year – Discipline referrals – Use of documented decision rules – Progress monitoring data across the tiers Decision rules are documented and clear – Access to supports – Changing supports – Intensifying supports – Exiting supports

Curriculum and Instruction Aligned with student needs, state standards and are research-based Formal curriculum for teaching essential components of academic and behavior across tiers Staff is trained to deliver the academic and behavior core, supplemental, and intensive instructional materials Implemented with fidelity

Instruction and Intervention Instructional practices are scientifically-based (federal requirement for reading and math) Implemented with fidelity and supported with coaching Include differentiation for ALL and incorporate principles of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) Flexible instructional practices to match to student needs based on data Interventions are automatic; delivered within tiered system, not referral-based or “wait to fail”

Collaborative Problem Solving Collaborative problem-solving all teaming levels – Define problem using data – Analyze problem situations – Develop plan – Implement plan – Evaluate effectiveness

Collaborative Problem Solving Staff have understanding of data analysis and instructional decision making Problem solving process is used for continuous improvement at all levels

Problem Solving Framework 1. Problem Identification- What’s the problem? 2. Problem Analysis- Why is it occurring? 3. Intervention Design/Implementation- What are we going to do about it? 4. Response to Intervention- Is it working? Tier I Tier II Tier III

Positive School Climate Positive behavior supports visible at all levels Practice address the needs of all students (including students with disabilities and students with advanced proficiency needs) Learning supports are customized to make content relevant and responsive to all types of student diversity Commitment to partnership to families and community to improve student academic and behavioral outcomes

National Implementation of RtI (from Spectrum K12, 2011) 68% of districts in full or partial district-wide implementation (was 25% in 2007) 94% of districts in some stage of implementation 24% of districts report full implementation 80% report full implementation at elementary levels (reading most common domain)

National Implementation of RtI (from Spectrum K12, 2011) 56% have district implementation plan Majority report RtI implementation shared across GE and SE Of those with data (about half of districts), 80% report significant reductions in SE referral 62T of districts using RtI for personalized instruction for ALL students (up from 49% in 2010)

What is the Purpose of RtI: The “Why” Purpose: to identify student with special education label as an end point – to get the child services, RtI then test for eligibility? Purpose: to focus on success and positive outcomes for all students – to prevent learning problems, early intervention for all who need it, when they need it, of appropriate intensity, “special” education for those who need it, same attention to outcomes for special education?

Germann, 2010 “There is no right way to do the wrong thing. What a shame it will be, and what an opportunity lost, if RtI becomes just another way to define SLD or is defined as a prereferral intervention strategy! RtI is a new paradigm for educational problem solving, not a new way to identify SLD!”

Germann, 2010, cont. “RtI requires that all school resources be aligned and allocated to provide effective and efficient interventions for the purpose of improving child outcomes. The provision of instructional and behavioral interventions is not limited to those who have a disability…all students are served on the basis of their need, without regard to causality, just as medicine does not make treatment to patients with cancer, available, or not available, based on whether the cancer is primarily caused by genetic or environmental reasons.

Final Thoughts on the “Why” “If the water in the aquarium is dirty, it makes little sense to spend our time diagnosing individual fish” (Illinois RtI website)

What is your team’s purpose, your “why” for MTSS/RtI

Resources (RtI Action Network website) UC Center for Student Success website (implementation tool and resources; US DOE implementation guides, reading and math across tiers (