Alternate Performance Task Assessment APTA Parent Power Point Presentation Beth Judy, Coordinator Office of Assessment and Accountability 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Test Accommodations Students with Disabilities 2013 Presented by Janice Koblick, Curriculum Supervisor Exceptional Student Education 1.
Advertisements

WESTEST 2 Training for Accommodations. Standard Conditions with Accommodations for Students with an IEP or Section 504 Plan All students with an IEP or.
CAPA California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) Presented by Contra Costa SELPA with information provided by California Department of Education.
Working with Parents of a Child with Disabilities Perry C. Hanavan, Au.D.
1 Test Accommodations for Students with Disabilities in Virginia’s Accountability Assessment System Virginia Department of Education Division of Assessment.
Enforcing and Maintaining the IEP
Understanding the IEP Process
A Guide for IEP Teams Including Students with Disabilities in State and District- wide Assessment.
IDEA AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS WITH DISABILITIES Office of General Counsel Division of Educational Equity August 15, 2012.
Special Test Accommodations Virginia Association of Test Directors 2008 Assessment Conference October 2008.
West Virginia Educational Standards Test WESTEST 2005 Training for County Test Coordinators Part II – “Bundling”
– 14 CASSP CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT PERFORMANCE AND PROGRESS TEST EXAMINER TRAINING Whittier City School District.
Course Code Manual. SUPPORT Click on the SUPPORT tab and then look on the right side toward the middle of the page Click on
2013 NeSA-Writing Grade 4 Paper/Pencil Test Administration Training 1.
LEP Updates: Testing Accommodations & Alternate ACCESS Carrie Perkis Division of Accountability Services September 12, 2012.
ARD Training Education Service Center and School District Training TEA Student Assessment Division.
Beginning-of-Grade 3 Test Assessment Guide Training Fall 2013.
Alternative Maryland School Assessment (Alt-MSA)
PARCC Accommodation: Text-to-Speech, Screen Reader Version, ASL Video, Human Reader/Human Signer For the ELA/Literacy Assessment December 2014.
NC Final Exam Implementation Plan 2015 NHCS. Rationale  The schedule is designed to parallel the secure and controlled manner in which end-of-grade assessments.
NC Final Exams High School Spring 2015 NHCS. Rationale  The schedule is designed to parallel the secure and controlled manner in which end-of-grade assessments.
Facts About the Florida Alternate Assessment Created from “Facts About the Florida Alternate Assessment Online at:
TEST ACCOMMODATIONS 2013 English Language Learners (ELLs) 1 Presented by: Leyda Sotolongo Title III Coordinator ESOL Department.
I nitial E valuation and R eevaluation in IDEA Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
Newark Central School District Special Education District Plan November 1, 2014-October 31, 2016 Submitted by: Jennifer Singer Director of Pupil Services.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California High School Exit Examination Program Update Bilingual.
Wisconsin Extended Grade Band Standards
KCCT Kentucky’s Commonwealth Accountability Testing System Overview of 2008 Regional KPR.
Identifying the gaps in state assessment systems CCSSO Large-Scale Assessment Conference Nashville June 19, 2007 Sue Bechard Office of Inclusive Educational.
Special Education in the United States Susie Fahey and Mario Martinez.
Testing Students with Disabilities Office of Assessment Update Suzanne Swaffield Anne Mruz November
Smarter Balanced Accommodations – Knowing and Using Allowed Resources Presenters: Donna Gearns Alicia Skelly 8/20/2014.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction National Center and State Collaborative California Activities Kristen Brown, Ph.D. Common Core.
Course Code Manual. SUPPORT Click on the SUPPORT tab and then look on the right side toward the middle of the page Click on
1. 2 Roots of Ontario Legislation and Policy Bill 82 (1980), An Amendment to the Education Act: –Universal access: right of all children, condition notwithstanding,
Alabama Alternate Assessment
1 Results for Students with Disabilities and School Year Data Report for the RSE-TASC Statewide Meeting May 2010.
So Much Data – Where Do I Start? Assessment & Accountability Conference 2008 Session #18.
OHIO’S ALTERNATE ASSESSMENT FOR STUDENTS WITH SIGNIFICANT COGNITIVE DISABILITIES(AASCD).. AT A GLANCE.
Alternate Assessment Attainment Task Overview Part 2.3 Click here to download the Administration Guide Required for completion of this training 1Overview/Attainment.
2009 WESTEST 2 ONLINE WRITING Training Session For Examiners By Karen Canterbury Mingo County Test Coordinator.
INTODUCTION TO ASSESSMENT INTODUCTION TO ASSESSMENT Chapter One.
Test Accommodations Students with Disabilities 2012 Presented by Janice Koblick, Curriculum Supervisor Exceptional Student Education 1.
NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.
Alternate Assessment Attainment Task Overview Part 2.3 Click here to download the Administration Guide (Required for completion of this training)
Suggested training for region, district, and campus professionals 9/24/2014Texas Education Agency – Student Assessment Division 1.
How Do Students with Disabilities Participate in the Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program? December 9, 2009.
WESTEST 2 SCHOOL REPORTS. WESTEST 2 school reports are used to make programmatic level decisions –School administrators are encouraged to use other data.
Exceptionality and Special Education
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA) and the Special Education Process.
TESTING AND ACCOUNTABILITY DEPARTMENT New Hanover County Schools September 2012 ACT and PLAN.
Testing Accommodations. Allowable Test Administration Procedures and Materials  Available to any student who regularly benefits from the use of these.
1 NCEXTEND1 Alternate Assessment with Alternate Achievement Standards Conference on Exceptional Children November 17-18, 2008 NCDPI Division of Accountability.
MontCAS CRT-Alternate (CRT-Alt) Spring 2011 Test Administrator Training Grades 3-8 and 10 in Reading and Math Grades 4, 8, and 10 in Science Presentation.
NC Final Exam Implementation Plan NHCS.
Teacher Roles and Responsibilities in the IEP Process Amanda Strong Hilsmier EDUC 559.
Time for Change: Examining Utah Data Relating to Student Performance
Understanding the IEP Process
Anne Arundel County Public School District Profile October, 2013
Shelton Special Education
Florida Standards Alternate Assessment Performance Task
Special Education Workshop #2 By Lori Centeno, IEP Teacher
Cowan Ave. Elementary Special Education
Hope College December 2, 2013 Laurie.
CoAlt: Science and Social Studies Administration
Federal Policy & Statewide Assessments for Students with Disabilities
Downingtown Area School District Central Office April 4, 2018
ATTENTION This presentation may be used for Spring 2016 CoAlt Test Examiner trainings. Districts/schools may need to be update slides with local assessment.
Evaluation in IDEA 2004.
Presentation transcript:

Alternate Performance Task Assessment APTA Parent Power Point Presentation Beth Judy, Coordinator Office of Assessment and Accountability 1

Development Collaboration with the Office of Special Programs, Extended and Early Learning West Virginia Stakeholders: WVDE staff, CTB, Administrators, Teachers, Parents, Business Full alignment with standards which link to CSOs 2

Profile of Test Takers 3

4

Eligibility  A student shall not be assessed by APTA unless he/she is instructed by the Extended Standards  Reasons why a student cannot participate in WESTEST must be clearly stated on the student present levels of academic achievement and on functional performance section of the IEP 5

Eligibility Sources Resources.htmlhttp://wvde.state.wv.us/ose/Instructional Resources.html (Guidelines, p. 21) West Virginia Guidelines for Participation in State Assessments, (p. 26) Policy 2419: Regulations for the Education of Students with Exceptionalities (Chapter 4, Eligibility) 6

What the data shows… 7

Progress Noted  Number of students achieving Mastery and Above Mastery increased  Number of Unscorable Books decreased significantly in 2007  Less unscorable items than in

APTA Website To access site Click 1) Data, 2) WESTEST 3) other assessment sites and 4) APTA 9

10 Grade % Above Mastery % Mastery % At or Above Mastery 2006 % At or Above Mastery 2007 % Partial Mastery % Novice % Below Mastery 2006 % Below Mastery %37%68%72%26%2% 32%28% 440%48%66%65%26%9% 34%35% 540%34%65%74%19%7% 35%26% 651%17%66%68%29%3% 34%32% 757%25%67%82%17%1% 33%18% 841%36%67%76%19%5% 33%24% 1050%26%67%76%21%2% 33%24% Grade % Above Mastery % Mastery % At Or Above Mastery 2006 % At or Above Mastery 2007 % Partial Mastery % Novice % Below Mastery 2006 % Below Mastery %30%67%75%25%1% 33%25% 445%31%67%76%21%3% 33%24% 568%12%67%80%18%2% 33%20% 637%32%65%69%28%3% 35%31% 735%38%64%73%25%2% 36%27% 839%35%64%74%22%3% 36%26% 1024%50%61%75%22%4% 39%25% Performance Chart 2006 Math 2007 Math 2006 RLA 2007 RLA

APTA Trend Data Math Trend Data RLA Trend Data Grade% At or above Mastery 2006 % at or Above Mastery 2007 Grade% At or above Mastery 2006 % at or Above Mastery nd Grade %32nd Grade % 467%76%468%65% 567%80%566%74% 667%69%665%68% 765%73%766%82% 864%74%867%76% 109th Grade %109th Grade %

Test Administration Procedures 12

 APTA individually administered  Examiner fills out required demographic information in the test booklet  Student’s responses are recorded in the test booklet by the student and/or the examiner  Examiner follows the scripts provided in the test booklet 13

Score Design The level of assistance and the correct response determine the student score for MC and CR Items MC Items CR Items (Rubric) I3 Points 5-6 Points P2 Points 3-4 Points F1 Point 1-2 Points NR/Unscorable 0 Points Incorrect Response 0 Points 14

Biogrid Information (check one for each) Race/Ethnicity (Asian/Pacific Islander; Black; Hispanic; American Indian/Alaskan Native; White; Other) Student IEP Status (LEP; Migrant; SwD; Low SES; 504; Title I) Accommodations (Braille; Signing; Use of Translator; Use of Computer) Primary Disability Diagnosis (Mild; Moderate; Severe; Profound; Autism) Secondary Disability Diagnosis (Speech Impairment; Hearing Impaired; Partially Sighted; Blind; Deaf; Deaf and Blind; Orthopedic; Traumatic Brain Injury; Other Health or Multiple Disabilities) Special Education Instruction (21% of School Day; % of School Day; % of School Day; Separate Schooling) 15

Test Booklet Format The Examiner’s Page faces the examiner The student page faces the student The examiner asks the student the question The student responds independently or The examiner provides prompting if the student does not independently provide an answer Book in large print; braille and tactile graphics available 16

Examiner’s Page 17

Student Page 18

Cut Scores (see chart on next slide) Each grade level has performance level cut scores The student’s score falls into one of four performance levels Student scores indicate if the student places at the bottom, middle or top of the cut score range Higher performance level can be achieved by answering a few more questions independently 19

Cut Scores 20

Using Test Results Teachers and administrators use test results to plan instruction Strengths and weaknesses are charted Goals and objectives planned from results Assessments are necessary for check points on student progress Classroom, formative and summative assessments show what students know and can do 21

Summative Assessment (APTA) is used to inform instruction 22

Beth Judy, Alternate Assessment Coordinator Office of Assessment and Accountability West Virginia Department of Education (304)