Presenter’s Name June 17, 2003 Catastrophic Preparedness Incorporating Whole Community Philosophy  We must plan for the real, not the manageable  Plan.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hurricane Sandy. Sandy was the second-largest Atlantic storm on record Storm surge reached over 13 feet in coastal areas of New York and New Jersey The.
Advertisements

Presenter’s Name June 17, 2003 Situational Awareness & Assessment James R. Kish, Director Technological Hazards Division National Preparedness Directorate.
A Brief Overview of Emergency Management Office of Emergency Management April 2006 Prepared By: The Spartanburg County Office of Emergency Management.
Emergency Management Overview Kelly Rouba EAD & Associates, LLC April 22, Annual Conference of AT Act Programs.
Hurricane Katrina Lessons Learned Laurence I. Broun Departmental Emergency Coordinator Office of Law Enforcement, Security and Emergency Management May.
Capability Cliff Notes Series PHEP Capability 2—Community Recovery What Is It And How Will We Measure It?
Implementation Guide to the United States National Grid.
MODULE 3. MANAGING EMERGENCY RESPONSE Dick Evans.
@TxSchoolSafety Continuity of Operations Planning Workshop Devolution & Reconstitution.
For Discussion Purposes Only
Bridging the Gaps: Public Health and Radiation Emergency Preparedness Mr. James Kish, Director Technological Hazards National Preparedness Directorate.
Planning Fundamentals  Include participation from all stakeholders in the community.  Use problem-solving process to help address the complexity and.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Ty Brumfield (LNO to FEMA –RSF-IS National Coordinator Office of Homeland Security Directorate of Contingency.
All-hazards readiness in the United States Learning to communicate and build a culture of preparedness David Passey Senior Representative U.S. Federal.
RAP: Tools and Technology National Preparedness Goal: Whole Community Geospatial Support 06 December 2011.
National Disaster Recovery Framework Overview Presented By: Ken Rathje Federal Disaster Recovery Coordinator FEMA Region III.
Session 121 National Incident Management Systems Session 12 Slide Deck.
Role of Alberta Human Services at the POC in support of the delivery of Emergency Social Services ESS Forum
North Carolina Healthcare Preparedness Response and Recovery Program Healthcare System Preparedness Capabilities Mary Beth Skarote Healthcare Preparedness.
An Orientation to the National Mass Care Strategy A Whole of Community Approach to Mass Care.
National Disaster Recovery Framework. National Disaster Recovery Framework Reasons for establishing the Framework Past large-scale recovery efforts revealed.
Spring Directors’ Conference Presented By: Andrew Velasquez III
AmeriCorps in Times of Disaster AmeriCorps Conference July 23,
Part of a Broader Strategy
1 1 FEMA Region VII Private Sector. Private Sector Representative Subject Matter Experts Provide Situational Awareness Manage Logistics Crosscutting Planning.
CITIZEN CORPS & CERT ORGANIZATIONS. What is Citizen Corps? Following the tragic events that occurred on September 11, 2001, state and local government.
Los Angeles County Department of Public Health Emergent Disease Annex Briefing.
Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorological Services and Supporting Research (OFCM) Presentation for the ITS America 2006 Annual Meeting May 9,
Overview of NIPP 2013: Partnering for Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience October 2013 DRAFT.
Alberta-A Province Prepared Alberta Emergency Management Agency- Provincial Services.
TAIRS Conference 2013 DISASTER!: The Importance of Partners & I&R.
National Earthquake Program Managers Meeting 1 May 2013 Region X Cascadia Subduction Zone Planning Effort.
Division of Emergency Management & Homeland Security Department of Emergency Services & Public Protection June 25, 2013 Connecticut All-Hazards Response.
Fostering a ‘Whole Community’ Approach to Emergency Management David J. Kaufman Director, Office of Policy and Program Analysis 8 June 2011.
Association of Defense Communities June 23, 2015
Critical Infrastructure Protection Overview Building a safer, more secure, more resilient America The National Infrastructure Protection Plan, released.
Critical Infrastructure Protection: Program Overview
ESF #3 – Public Works and Engineering IS-803 – February 2009 Visual 1 Public Works and Engineering ESF #3.
INTEGRATED RISK MANAGEMENT Decision Maker Workshop February 26, 2013 Franklin County Emergency Management and Homeland Security.
Texas Emergency Management Conference San Antonio April 3, 2012.
Survivor Centric Emergency Management Integrating the Access and Functional Needs of the Whole Community Before, During and After Disasters August 2015.
1 The “New FEMA” The National Logistics Coordination Forum March 27, 2008 Eric Smith Assistant Administrator Logistics Management Directorate FEMA LOGISTICS.
Bernards Township Office of Emergency Management February 28, 2012.
{ MEMA Massachusetts Statewide Mass Care and Shelter Coordination Plan 1.
© 2014 The Litaker Group LLC All Rights Reserved Draft Document Not for Release or Distribution Texas Department of State Health Services Disaster Behavioral.
Florida Catastrophic Planning. “Failure Is Not An Option” Planning Scenario.
Bridging the Gaps: Public Health and Radiation Emergency Preparedness Planning Guidance and Infrastructure Effects March 23, 2011.
Session 161 National Incident Management Systems Session 16 Slide Deck.
Roles and Responsibilities of Community Health Workers (CHW) within the overall DRM system in Pakistan Module 1 Session 1.4 National Disaster Management.
California’s Flood Future Recommendations for Managing the State’s Flood Risk Flood Risk Management & Silver Jackets Workshop August 21, 2012.
2015 USACE Exercise – December 1, 2015 New Madrid Seismic Zone – Earthquake FEMA Mission, Legal Authorities and Regional Capability Overview Gus Wulfkuhle.
Canadian Best Practice Recommendations for Stroke Care Recommendation 1: Public Awareness and Patient Education (Updated 2008)
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N.
Recreation & Security HPR 413. General Security Must encompass all operations of the organization Should be written into management plans – Plans include.
2016 THIRA & State Homeland Security Grant. Threat & Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment (THIRA) National Preparedness Goal driven Annual Assessment.
@NACCHOalerts th St NW Washington, DC Integrating GIS Mapping into Radiation Emergency Response Planning to Maintain Situational.
Horizon 2020 Secure Societies Disaster-Resilience Workshop 18 Mar /06/2016.
Citizen Corps Volunteer for America “Engaging Citizens In Homeland Security”
Healthcare Coalitions. John Heywood English Writer
Overview Briefing Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (THIRA) Presidential Policy Directive 8 / PPD-8: National Preparedness May 2012.
April 21, 2017 Workshop Overview
Emergency Operations Planning
Southern California Catastrophic Earthquake Response Plan
John M. Felker Director, NCCIC.
An Introduction To VDEM VDEM Director of External Affairs
Continuity Guidance Circular Webinar
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security
The People in Your Neighborhood; A Whole Community Partnership April 23, 2018 Title Slide Sample.
Introduction to: National Response Plan (NRP)
Unit 5- IS 800 Introduction to the National Response Framework
Presentation transcript:

Presenter’s Name June 17, 2003 Catastrophic Preparedness Incorporating Whole Community Philosophy  We must plan for the real, not the manageable  Plan for the “Maximum of the Maximums” catastrophic event  Look across all levels of society as emergency responders  View public as an asset, not a liability  Private sector and VOADs are key contributors  Focus on essential activities for life saving/sustainment and stabilization within the first 72 hours (Golden Hours) Phase 2a: Immediate Response E to 24 Hours Phase 2b: Deployment 24 hours to 72 hours Phase 2c: Employment, sustained response 72 + hours E 72 hrs

Presenter’s Name June 17, 2003 Addressing Resource Requirements State and Local Federal Deltas Capabilities Based Planning Public / Private/VOAD

Presenter’s Name June 17, Potential Solutions/Courses of Action  New ways of thinking and/or conducting business will need to be explored. Working groups will examine:  New partners  New concepts of operation  Authorities: More effective use of existing authorities or identification of requirements for new ones  Necessary waivers and/or declarations  New authorities required  New or enhanced pre-scripted mission assignments  Pre-incident preparedness programs  Implications for academic, R&D, and other communities  Implications for physical, programmatic and effective communications accessibility

NOAA Imagery (Navigation Services) -Rapid Response -Imagery Publically Available ≤ 24hrs from collection (Whole Community) FEMA Use -Enables FEMA to help Disaster Survivors Respond/Recover faster - Speed of delivery in major catastrophic events -Helps us to assess areas quickly where ground entry is not practical -Potential for cost savings for future assessments

Presenter’s Name June 17, 2003 Initiatives  Facilitate a National Dialogue  Preparedness and outreach that actively engages “Whole Community”  Private/public/VOADs are integral to success  Recognition that those that are capable will take up space in front of those that are truly not capable  Reshaping planning and preparedness around “Maximum of Maximums”  Planning efforts that truly identifies capabilities at all levels of society 5

Presenter’s Name June 17, 2003 The Meta-Scenario  No-notice event  Impact area  ~7 million population  25,000 square miles  Several states and FEMA regions  190,000 fatalities in initial hours  265,000 citizens require emergency medical attention  Severe damage to critical infrastructure and key resources  Severe damage to essential transportation infrastructure  Ingress/egress options limited In order to anticipate catastrophic requirements and to avoid narrow focus on a limited number of specific scenarios, the Whole Community methodology is built upon a foundation of a meta-scenario consisting of the maximum of maximum challenges across a range of scenarios

Presenter’s Name June 17, 2003 Core Capabilities Enables Response ■Situational Assessment ■Public Messaging ■Command, Control, & Coordination ■Critical Communications ■Environmental Health & Safety ■Critical Transportation These critical capabilities represent the highest priority essential functions necessary for both saving and sustaining lives, and stabilizing the site and the situation within 72 hours. The first six “enable” a rapid and effective response, while the remainder explicitly address the needs and priorities of the people and communities impacted by the catastrophic event. Survivor Needs ■On-Scene Security and Protection ■Mass Search and Rescue Operations ■Health and Medical Treatment ■Mass Care Services ■Public & Private Services & Resources ■Stabilize and Repair Essential Infrastructure ■Fatality Management Services