ASTARTE test site Lyngen Carl B. Harbitz – NGI (adapted by Alberto Armigliato) ASTARTE WP8 Meeting Bologna, 7 March 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DRM Working Group FAO Rome
Advertisements

Bush Fire Risk Management Planning Community Participation Department of Lands, National Parks and Wildlife Service, Integral Energy, Rural Fire Service,
Clim ate Change - A dapting to T he I mpacts, by C ommunities in Northern Peripheral Regions.
NPP products and services 21 st April 2010 – Portrush, Northern Ireland Teresa Lennon and Michael O’Brien European Union European Regional Development.
Update on Landslide Risks for Thurston County Washington Presented to the Board of County Commissioners June 25, 2014 M. Biever, L.E.G. N. Romero, L.H.G.
WHAT COULD BE THE NEXT EARTHQUAKE DISASTER FOR JAPAN  A difficult question, but ---  It is the one that was being asked long before the March 11, 2011.
RECOVERY and RECONSTRUCTION after the PAKISTAN EARTHQUAKE CHOOSING OPTIONS THAT WILL FACILITATE LONG-TERM RECOVERY THE OCTOBER 8, 2005 DISASTER.
Tsunami Disaster Countermeasures Based on the Lessons Learned from the Great East Japan Earthquake March 16, 2015 Masahiko Isobe Vice President, Kochi.
Instrumentation and Quantification of Tsunamis With an Emphasis on the Santa Barbara Channel.
LESSONS LEARNED FROM PAST NOTABLE DISASTERS JAPAN PART 1A: EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA.
Funding by the Australian Government represented by the Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency. Coastal Adaptation.
Climate & Transportation R&D program conducted by the Norwegian Public Roads Administration , cca 2,5 mill € Update design, construction, operation.
California Tsunami Preparedness and Hazard Mitigation Program Accomplishments FY07 $272,300 FY08 $284,546 Progress in 2 nd generation tsunami inundation.
SEA LEVEL RISE: A California Perspective Julie Thomas Coastal Data Information Program Southern California Ocean Observing System Scripps Institution of.
BE-AWARE Project BONN AGREEMENT
By virtue of the sloping topography of the region and the quality of the soil, as well as its proximity to the Dead Sea fault, region is exposed to.
ALASKA TSUNAMI SCENARIO (Source: US Geological Survey) September 4, 2013 Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA.
HERAKLION (partner NOA) Institute of Geodynamics National Observatory of Athens, Greece (1892-today) HERAKLION (partner NOA) Institute of Geodynamics National.
Tsunami Countermeasures in Japan 1999 Tohoku University Dr. Fumihiko Imamura Asian Disaster Reduction Center Taichi Kusaka.
Preparing Your Business for Emergencies: A Step-by-Step Guide.
NORDRESS Nordic Center of Excellence on Resilience and Societal Security Guðrún Pétursdóttir & Guðrún Gísladóttir University of Iceland.
LESSONS LEARNED FROM PAST NOTABLE DISASTERS. THE PHILIPPINES
Foster and sustain the environmental and economic well being of the coast by linking people, information, and technology. Center Mission Coastal Hazards.
LESSONS LEARNED FROM PAST NOTABLE DISASTERS INDONESIA PART 1B: TSUNAMIS Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA.
Climate change and Environmental Degradation Risk and Adaptation assessment Step 2 Collect scientific information.
Who in the Baltic Sea Region is affected by Climate Change? ASTRA Stakeholder Workshop 26 October 2006 Gdansk Klaus Eisenack Potsdam Institute for Climate.
A 21 ST CENTURY LOOKBACK WILL SUSTAIN A COMMUNITY’S FOCUS ON DISASTER RESILIENCE Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, University of North.
HAZARDS AN DISASTERS HUMAN RESPONSE. Responses to the risk of hazard events – adjustments before Discuss the usefulness of assessing risk before deciding.
Pacific Island Countries GIS/RS User Conference Suva, Fiji November 2010 Tools for Disaster Risk Management and Climate Change Adaptation Abigail Baca.
ICTs Tackling Climate Changes Dr. Amr Badawi Executive President NTRA.
GEOSCIENCES CONSULTANTS sarl Paris, France Type of organisation: mixed group of partners : private, research, universities and NGO Specialising in: Assessment.
DISASTER PROTECTION A Time-Dependent and Policy- Driven Process to Protect a City’s Transportation Systems From Disaster Walter Hays, Global Alliance.
Delegation of the European Commission to Thailand 17 September 2009 EC Funding Mechanisms for coastal and climate hazards in ASIA: Priorities and opportunities.
Risk Management in the Province of Tyrol 2nd European Forum for Disaster Risk Reduction October 2011, Skopje Mag. Andreas Koler
Flash Floods in a changing context: Importance of the impacts induced by a changing environment.
16 th meeting of the EUWI EECCA Working Group Impacts of climate change on water resources in Moldova and possible adaptation measures. Trans-boundary.
The Physical Observing System: From Monitoring and Predicting Hazards to Long Term Changes Doug Wilson Co-Chairman, IOCARIBE-GOOS U.S. NOAA GEO CZCP Workshop.
Information Kit for the Caribbean Media
IOC Expert Missions May-August, 2005 UNESCO IOC TSUNAMI PROGRAMME.
LESSONS LEARNED FROM PAST NOTABLE DISASTERS PART III D: CHINA LANDSLIDES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA.
WP8 - From hazard to risk assessment LIST OF PARTICIPANTS.
Improvement of Community DRR by Proper Disaster Education & Simulation through CBDRM BY ZUHAIR AHMED KOWSHIK INSTITUTE OF DISASTER MANAGEMENT & VULNERABILITY.
Research Data Management Nova Southeastern University – Halmos College of Natural Sciences and Oceanography – Ocean Campus November 2015 Data Management.
International Centre for Geohazards (ICG) Oslo, Norway The ICG is a research cooperation between 3 research institutes and 2 universities in Norway. Funded.
DISASTER RECOVERY A PILLAR OF DISASTER RESILIENCE PART 2: EARTHQUAKES AND TSUNAMIS Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, University of North.
LESSONS LEARNED FROM PAST NOTABLE DISASTERS. TAIWAN PART I: EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA.
Mountain Risks: A Marie Curie Research & Training Network J. Corominas and the ‘Mountain-Risks’ research team Department of Geotechnical Engineering.
Seminar on early warning systems October 2008 Aix-en-Provence Summary of outcomes.
Disaster Risk Management Concepts and Applications Southern Province of Sri Lanka 1.
Hazards: Take Control TSUNAMI By NEMO Saint Lucia.
Horizon 2020 Secure Societies Disaster-Resilience Workshop 18 Mar /06/2016.
Climate Action The EU Strategy on Adaptation to Climate Change Presented by George Paunescu (Climate Action DG, Adaptation Unit) At the Workshop "Adapting.
Marine Life – Our Common Responsibility Challenges facing the management of the aquaculture industry in Norway GENIMPACT – Bergen 3rd of July 2007 Terje.
Insert the title of your presentation here Presented by Name Here Job Title - Date How can we make London’s transport network resilient to climate change?
2015 Snohomish County Hazards Mitigation Plan Update Public Meeting Snohomish County Department of Emergency Management, Everett, WA October 23, :00.
Towards a robust transportation infrastructure to respond extreme weather events in Norway Project manager Bjørn Kristoffer Dolva, 2016 International Partnership.
Capacity for Service Delivery China Meteorological Administration
Geologic Hazards Geologic Hazards are those Earth processes that are harmful to humans and/or their property. Includes: Earthquakes Volcanic eruptions.
DISASTER MANAGEMENT.
MODERATE-MAGNITUDE EARTHQUAKE IMPACTS GREECE AND TURKEY 1:30 AM local time Friday, July 21, 2017 Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction,
Presented by Russell Arthurton Coastal Geoscience, UK
The EU strategy on adaptation to climate change
Strengthening Early Warning Systems in Europe
VII. Earthquake Mitigation
The EU strategy on adaptation to climate change
A three steps assessment
Work Programme 2012 COOPERATION Theme 6 Environment (including climate change) Challenge 6.4 Protecting citizens from environmental hazards European.
Innovation for disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation
WICKLOW COUNTY COUNCIL CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION STRATEGY
The Technology Mechanism of the UNFCCC
Presentation transcript:

ASTARTE test site Lyngen Carl B. Harbitz – NGI (adapted by Alberto Armigliato) ASTARTE WP8 Meeting Bologna, 7 March 2014

Lyngen test site, northern Norway

Potential rockslide from the mountain Nordnes, 7 km from the village Lyngseidet Volume estimate up to 22 Mm 3 with 11 Mm 3 as the most likely upper limit

1810 Rock slide tsunami from Pollfjellet Mountain Among the largest rock slides in Norway 2 km wide head scar, 20 km south of Nordnes Waves observed more than 20 km away in both directions 3 large waves 2 m high waves in the head of the fjord 14 perished, large damages Today: Road tunnel to protect snow avalanches and rockfalls

Vulnerability and risk The Lyngen test site consists of several villages along the fjord based on fishery and local industry Total population 6000 The ferries and the boats on the fjord, together with the road running along the shoreline, are the only alternatives for transport and travelling in the region The area is much visited by tourists

What has already been done by NGI? 3 reports on rockslide tsunamis in Lyngen 2008, 2010, 2013 Updated volume estimates Refined inundation modelling NGI’s results are the official ones used by the local authorities for evacuation and land-use planning, etc.

Description of the rockslide Detailed geological surveying for slope stability analysis «1a» ~ 7 Mm 3 «2» ~ 11 Mm 3

Bathymetry, rockslide location Areas 1-31 for detailed inundation studies Nordnes rock slope

Official results Used for evacuation and land-use planning, etc. (in pipeline)

Mitigation Rockslope monitoring Lasers, crackmeters, tiltmeters, rod extensometers, GPS network, instrumented boreholes TWS system based on the monitoring Operational cell phone warning; location and address 72 hours warning! Initial land-use and evacuation planning for rockslide tsunamis in Lyngen is now performed by the ASTARTE end-users Troms County, the local municipalities, and the preparedness centre NordNorsk FjellOvervåking (NNFO) Much based on studies of rockslide tsunamis by NGI 2013 Barents Rescue international emergency exercise

Available datafor analysis of tsunami hazard, vulnerability and resilience, risk Bathymetry (resolution 25 m) Topography (1 m contours in most areas) Rockslide scenarios Location, volume, configuration, monitoring data/movements, dynamics Literature and data on the submarine landslides (+NERC) Detailed modelling of tsunami inundation scenarios Data on population, infrastructure, critical facilities, land use, ecosystems, tourism, etc. Experience from exercise Some data are restricted

Submarine landslide tsunami sources (1) At least 6 very large landslides have occurred in the Norwegian and Greenland Basins during the last ~20ka, giving a frequency of 1 in ~3-to-4000 years The 8200 BP Storegga Slide produced a far field tsunami This project will consider tsunamis generated at 3 different locations within the Norwegian and Greenland Basins to capture the effects of variable source location

Submarine landslide tsunami sources (2) Modelling will consider a range of landslide motions, including how multi-stage failure affects tsunami generation Slide motion will be informed by field studies of the Trænadjupet Slide, which is the last major slide at ~4 ka. This work will extend from a £2.3 Million UK (NERC) funded research project, which includes a 1 month research cruise to map and date the Trænadjupet Slide in summer 2014

Lyngen test site interaction with other ASTARTE WPs WP2: Tsunami source areas and likelihood WP3: Tsunami «source design» WP5: Tsunami impact on coastal structures WP7: Norwegian fjords as a laboratory for short-time TWS? WP8: Tsunami hazard and risk analysis Applications of methods WP9: Tsunami resilience analysis

The EU FP7 CONCERT-Japan RAPSODI project: Risk Assessment and design of Prevention Structures fOr enhanced tsunami DIsaster resilience ( ) 1.Establish a new method for quantitative tsunami risk assessment 2.Design of novel mitigation measures 3.Cooperation and exchange of knowledge Partners: NGI, Norway – PARI, Japan – METU, Turkey – TU-BS, Germany

Why Lyngen? A real threat exists! The situation is considered hazardous Combination of sources Rockslides and submarine landslides Special challenges related to complex fjord geometries Much work already performed Slope stability and tsunami analyses, monitoring, operational TWS, evacuation and land-use planning, rescue exercises  Much data Norwegian fjords as a laboratory for short-time TWS Attractive, but don’t forget the climate (70 o N) Our kind request: All work should be planned jointly with the end-user Ensure usefulness and consistency Avoid confusion and fear  Joint workshop for “Lyngen partners”

Thank you

What has already been done by NGI? 2008: NGI report , run-up based on amplification factors. Volumes 7 og 11 Mm : NGI report R, suggesting areas to be included for refined run-up modelling. Volume 22Mm : NGI report R, hazard zoning by using run-up model («MOST»). NGI’s results are the official ones. The set of numerical models at NGI were improved during the last ten years (generation, propagation and run-up)