Florida Department of Transportation District One Interstate Planning for I-4 and I-75 October 30, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Executive Summary Introduction In 1988, by virtue of State Statute , the Nebraska State Legislature first assigned the Nebraska Department.
Advertisements

Public Meeting Presentation March 15, Project Location Project Purpose –Traffic reliever to I-95 –Integrate road with the Northwest Sector Plan.
Managed Lanes Development Strategy Phase I District Four October 17, 2012.
Expanding the Potential of Tolling: A 21 st Century Look AASHTO November 18, Brian Peters Florida DOT, Assistant Secretary of Finance and Administration.
City of Omak Central Avenue Bridge Replacement Project Prepared by Highlands Associates Photos by FlyBy Photos.
Titusville to Edgewater Bike Loop PD&E Study
I-4 Master Plan Implementation Harold W. Barley Executive Director Tampa Bay Regional Transportation Summit October 10, 2013.
Highways and Sprawl in North Carolina David T. Hartgen Professor of Transportation Studies UNC Charlotte A Report for the John.
Location Hammock Dunes DRI – Includes: -Hammock Beach -Ocean Hammock
Alachua County BoCC Meeting November 8, Project Background and Location Study Purpose Study Activities Bridge Alternatives Evaluation Schedule.
Transportation Infrastructure Preliminary Assessment March 10, 2015.
Tysons 1 Operational Analysis of Dulles Toll Road Ramps to Tysons Board Transportation Committee Meeting September 17, 2013 Seyed Nabavi Fairfax County.
State of Florida Department of Transportation SR 7 (US 441) Value Engineering Study September 24-28, 2001 Segment III - From North of Hollywood Blvd to.
Proposed State Highway Projects: Kendall County September 20, 2007 Region 2/District 3 Illinois Department of Transportation.
River to Sea TPO May 28, 2014 River to Sea TPO May 28, “I-4 BEYOND the ULTIMATE” PD&E REEVALUATION STUDY From west of US 27 to west of Kirkman Road.
INTERSTATE 75 / OVERPASS ROAD INTERCHANGE JUSTIFICATION PROCESS Presentation to Pasco County Board of County Commissioners December 6, 2011 Presentation.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT RED LIGHT CAMERA UPDATE FY Budget Worksession July 12, 2011.
4 TH STREET BRIDGE Pueblo, Colorado December 2006 Project Overview.
PROPOSAL FOR PORT ST LUCIE RAILWAY STATION SERVING FT PIERCE AND JENSEN BEACH LOCATED AT WALTON ROAD. ACCESS TO CROSSTOWN PARKWAY AND SE GREEN RIVER PARKWAY.
Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan June 2010 Steering Committee - January 28, 2010 Polk Transportation Planning Organization.
Goods Movement and Traffic Issues In the SACOG Region The Effects of Congestion on Goods Movement in our Region February 9, 2006 Jason Crow.
Congressional District Projects New CD-7 North I-25 Record of Decision (ROD): — Recently signed the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), for the corridor.
What are Managed Lanes What are Express Lanes What are HOT Lanes Regional Express Lanes Network I-95 Express I-595 Express I-75 Express.
SR 997 / KROME AVENUE Florida Department of Transportation April 27th, 2006 South Miami-Dade Watershed Study Advisory Committee.
2040 Population/Employment
Enhanced 511: Beyond the Basics Jerry Woods Florida DOT – District 5 iFlorida - Automated Message Generation Based on Travel Times.
Comprehensive Update on Indian Trail Infrastructure Plan September 8, 2015.
PUBLIC HEARING Draft Amendments FY 2011/12 – 2015/16 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
N. Hancock Road Traffic Signals October 14 th, 2014 Presentation Prepared By Lake County Public Works Department.
Florida Department of Transportation District One Presented By: American Acquisition Group, LLC District Wide Acquisition and Relocation Services.
1 Wakulla County Concurrency Management System October 6, 2011.
Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year Summary of Document and Projects Advisory.
ZOM A request for a minor amendment to the existing South Pointe PD (Planned Development) 110 acres West Newberry Road.
Jack is currently performing travel demand model forecasting for Florida’s Turnpike. Specifically he works on toll road project forecasting to produce.
Titusville to Edgewater Bike Loop PD&E Study FDOT Project Number: Volusia County, Florida FDOT Project Number: Brevard County,
2040 LONG RANGE PLAN UPDATE 2040 LRTP Update – Needs Plan Development October 6, 2015 City of Lynn Haven.
US 25 Corbin to London Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting December 2011.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Fairfax County Parkway Corridor Study Board of Supervisors Transportation Committee December 1,
Design Manager: Chris Thomas CEAL July 17, Interstate 8 (I-8) to Interstate 5 (I-5) Connector Widening and Auxiliary Lane Project.
I-15 Express Lanes Project January 2012 I-15 Express Lanes Project January 2012.
September 14, 2015 Transportation Board of Directors John M. Terry Assistant Director- Engineering SR-160 from SR-159 to Mountain Springs Phase 2 Final.
Interstate 95 Managed Lanes PD&E Study (95 Express) Project Development and Environment Study SE FSUTMS Users Group The Corradino Group November 2, 2007.
2010 Regional Intelligent Transportation Systems Plan: 2015 Progress Report on Implementation.
Metro Highway Program Presentation to CMAA Abdollah Ansari
Program Manager Administrator
Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan Nov./Dec Draft Amendments to the Polk 2035 Mobility Vision Plan (MVP) Steering.
MED SR 18 Corridor Project MED PID October 13, 2015.
ALACHUA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PRIORITIES FOR FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WORK PROGRAM Fiscal Year 2013/14 – 2017/18 Presentation to Board of County.
CENTRAL FLORIDA EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY FY Five Year Work Plan December 10, 2015 Presented by: Jeanette Maldonado-Ambler, PE Atkins.
A presentation by Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Broward Boulevard Presentation to the Broward MPO TCC and CIR March 2012 Agenda Item NA-1, Attachment.
Transportation Program (Infrastructure) Presentation Board of Aldermen Work Session February 29, 2012.
Pioneer Road Relocation and Reconstruction Project
SR 417 Extension Sketch-Level Traffic & Revenue Evaluation
SR 29 Project Development & Environment Study Presentation to SR 29 Stakeholders Advisory Committee January 23, 2014.
Central Polk Parkway PD&E Study
Interstate 15 North Phase 4
SR 417 Extension Sketch-Level Traffic & Revenue Evaluation
River to Sea TPO Meeting US 92/International Speedway Boulevard
CR184 (Quintette Road) Bridge #480045
Metropolitan Planning Organization
CR295A (Old Corry Field Road) Bridge #484092
2040 Deficiency Analysis Overview February 11, 2015
District Three Approach
Lyle Parkway to SR 540 (Winter Lake Road)
Transportation Impact Fees and Funding
29th & Choctaw Rd Project Projected time line.
Student Center A South: Inaccessible Element
Space Coast TPO State Road (S.R.) 528 Update
TPO Board Meeting September 12, 2019.
West Cervantes Traffic Feasibility Study Jill Lavender, Transportation Planner Cory Wilkinson, AICP CEP, Project Manager Mary Morgan, PE, Engineer.
Presentation transcript:

Florida Department of Transportation District One Interstate Planning for I-4 and I-75 October 30, 2012

Purpose  Define Deficiencies on the Interstate Mainline –Capacity needs between 2012 and 2050 if no improvements were made  Determine Years in which Interstate Mainline Widening is Needed  Provide Recommendations for Managed Lanes Study Limits in D1  Determine feasibility of replacing bridge structures 1

Traffic Methodology – Growth Rate Development  Available FDOT Traffic Data –FTI DVD  Recent and Current Studies –Central Polk Parkway IJR, I-75 SIMR, I-75/SR 951 IMR, I- 75/Everglades IJR  Cost Feasible Models –CPP IJR, SR 951 IMR –Lee-Collier, Sarasota-Manatee-Charlotte  Population Growth and Projections Reviewed –Census Data from 2000 and 2010 –BEBR Medium Projections 2010 to 2035  Recommended Growth Rate Selected I-4 Growth Rate = 2.0%I-4 Growth Rate = 2.0% I-75 Growth Rate = 2.5%I-75 Growth Rate = 2.5% 2

Traffic Methodology – Capacity Analysis  Geometry and Functional Classification of Mainline Segments was Reviewed  LOS Standard Applied Segment by Segment –Rural Interstate – LOS C –Urban Interstate – LOS D  FDOT Generalized Tables used to Determine Capacity Thresholds –6 lane –8 lane  Recommended Growth Rate Applied to 2011 AADTs 3

I-4 Future Capacity Assessment 4

Results – County Line Road to US 98/SR 35 5 NA: This segment currently has 8 lanes (6 lanes plus 1 auxiliary lane in each direction) 6 Lanes

Results – US 98/SR 35 to Polk Pkwy West 6 LOS D Urban

Results – Polk Pkwy West to Champion’s Gate Blvd 7 6 Lanes

Conclusions – Phase 1: US 27 to Champions Gate Blvd 8  8 Laning: This segment currently exceeds the 6- lane LOS C threshold  10 Laning: This segment requires widening to 10 lanes in Lanes LOS C Rural

Conclusions – Phase 2: County Line Rd to Polk Pkwy West 9  8 Laning: This segment is currently 8 lanes.  10 Laning: This segment requires widening to 10 lanes in 2029 LOS D Urban

Conclusions – Phase 2: Polk Pkwy East to US  8 Laning: This segment requires widening to 8 lanes between 2017 and 2021 This segment requires widening to 8 lanes between 2017 and 2021  10 Laning: This segment requires widening to 10 lanes between 2032 and 2036 This segment requires widening to 10 lanes between 2032 and Lanes

Conclusions – Phase 3: Polk Pkwy West to N. Socrum Loop Rd 11  8 Laning: This segment requires widening to 8 lanes between 2025 and 2030 This segment requires widening to 8 lanes between 2025 and 2030  10 Laning: This segment requires widening to 10 lanes between 2039 and 2045 This segment requires widening to 10 lanes between 2039 and Lanes

Conclusions – Phase 4: N. Socrum Loop Rd to Polk Pkwy East 12  8 Laning: This segment requires widening to 8 lanes between 2035 and 2036 This segment requires widening to 8 lanes between 2035 and 2036  10 Laning: This segment requires widening to 10 lanes between 2050 and 2051 This segment requires widening to 10 lanes between 2050 and 2051 LOS D Urban

Summary – I-4 Capacity Analysis 13 Phasing - 8 Lanes Widening Phasing - 10 Lanes Widening  8 Lanes provide acceptable LOS for 15 years  Managed Lanes Feasibility can be examined up to Polk Pkwy East

I-75 Future Capacity Assessment 14

Conclusions – Phase 1: US 301 to US  8 Laning: This segment requires widening to 8 lanes between 2012 and 2020 This segment requires widening to 8 lanes between 2012 and 2020  10 Laning: This segment requires widening to 10 lanes between 2023 and 2031 This segment requires widening to 10 lanes between 2023 and 2031

Conclusions – Phase 2: I-275 to US  8 Laning: This segment requires widening to 8 lanes in 2026 This segment requires widening to 8 lanes in 2026  10 Laning: This segment requires widening to 10 lanes in 2038 This segment requires widening to 10 lanes in 2038 LOS D Urban 6 Lanes

Conclusions – Phase 2: US 41 to N River Rd 17  8 Laning: This segment requires widening to 8 lanes between 2021 and 2027 This segment requires widening to 8 lanes between 2021 and 2027  10 Laning: This segment requires widening to 10 lanes between 2033 and 2039 This segment requires widening to 10 lanes between 2033 and 2039 Requires 6 laning in 2012

Conclusions – Phase 3: North of Moccasin Wallow Rd to I  8 Laning: This segment requires widening to 8 lanes in 2034 This segment requires widening to 8 lanes in 2034  10 Laning: This segment requires widening to 10 lanes between 2045 and 2050 This segment requires widening to 10 lanes between 2045 and 2050 NA: This segment currently has 8 lanes (6 lanes plus 1 auxiliary lane in each direction) LOS D Urban

Conclusions – Phase 3: N River Rd to Choctaw Blvd 19  8 Laning: This segment requires widening to 8 lanes between 2033 and 2036 This segment requires widening to 8 lanes between 2033 and 2036  10 Laning: This segment requires widening to 10 lanes between 2044 and 2048 This segment requires widening to 10 lanes between 2044 and 2048 LOS C Rural

Conclusions – Phase 3: SR 80 to Pine Ridge Rd 20  8 Laning: This segment requires widening to 8 lanes between 2026 and 2035 This segment requires widening to 8 lanes between 2026 and 2035  10 Laning: This segment requires widening to 10 lanes between 2037 and 2047 This segment requires widening to 10 lanes between 2037 and 2047

Conclusions – Phase 4: Choctaw Blvd to SR  8 Laning: This segment requires widening to 8 lanes between 2037 and 2048 This segment requires widening to 8 lanes between 2037 and 2048  10 Laning: This segment requires widening to 10 lanes between 2048 and 2059 This segment requires widening to 10 lanes between 2048 and 2059

Conclusions – Phase 5: Pine Ridge Rd to SR  8 Laning: This segment requires widening to 8 lanes between 2040 and 2077 This segment requires widening to 8 lanes between 2040 and 2077  10 Laning: This segment requires widening to 10 lanes beyond 2051 This segment requires widening to 10 lanes beyond 2051 LOS D Urban 6 Lanes

Summary – I-75 Capacity Analysis 23 Phasing - 8 Lanes Widening Phasing - 10 Lanes Widening

Summary Contd.  8 Lanes provide acceptable LOS for 11 to 12 years  Managed Lanes Feasibility can be extended to –US 301 to US 41/SR 681 –US 41/SR 681 to N. River Rd 24