Developing an understanding of science What science is and what it is not. What science can do and what it cannot do. How science contributes to culture.

What is the Nature of the Processes which Relate to Science ? Is Science a process which: 1.can solve all kinds of problems and questions ? What is your viewpoint?? A possible viewpoint you may hold The scope of science is limited strictly to solving problems about the natural world. Science is not properly equipped to handle the supernatural realm (as such), nor the realm of values and ethics (or religious beliefs).

Science is a process which: 2.can ignore rules ? A possible viewpoint - Science must follow certain rules; otherwise, it's not science (just as football/ice hockey, is not football/ice hockey if the rules are not followed). 3.seeks the truth or facts ? A possible viewpoint - The goal of science is to come as close as we can to understanding the cause-effect realities of the natural world. It's never "truth" or "facts". "Truth" and "facts" can mean different things to different people. WHAT !! THE GOAL OF SCIENCE IS NOT ABOUT FACTS !! WHAT DO WE TEACH IN SCIENCE LESSONS ???

This is a nice spiral, right? Wrong... It's a set of independent circles

Science is a process which: 4. attempts to prove things ? A possible viewpoint - The process of science, when properly applied, actually attempts to disprove ideas (i.e. tentative explanations)... a process called "testing", or "challenging". If the idea survives testing, then it is stronger, and more likely an accurate explanation. 5. can produce any kind of explanation ? A possible viewpoint - Supernatural explanations cannot be used, since they can never be disproved (supernatural forces, by definition, do not predictably follow the laws of nature. Whatever results occur in any test can be attributed to those nebulous forces, effectively ending any further efforts to explain).

Science is a process: 6. which produces certainties, or absolute facts ? A possible viewpoint - Science is a process which can only produce "possible" to "highly probable" explanations for natural phenomena; these are never certainties. With new information, tools, or approaches, earlier findings (theories, or even facts) can be replaced by new findings. 7. for which one solution is as good as another ? A possible explanation - In science, there is a rigorous analysis and fair-test comparison of alternative explanations, using discriminate criteria, e.g., confirmation by multiple independent lines of evidence, leading to one "best" solution.

8. which can be relied on due to its total objectivity and internal self-correction ? A possible explanation - Science can be done poorly, just like any other human endeavour. We are all fallible, some of us make fewer mistakes than others, some observe better than others, but we are still subjective in the end. 9. which is always used properly ? A possible explanation - Unfortunately, science is all too frequently misused. Because it works so well, there are those who apply the name of science to their efforts to "prove" their favourite cause, even if the rules of science are not followed. Such causes are properly labelled "pseudosciences".

10. which is free from values, opinions or bias ? A possible explanation - Scientists are people, and although they follow rules and try to be objective, both in their observations and interpretations, biases are still there. Unconscious racial or gender bias, social status, source of funding, political leanings can, and do, influence one's perceptions and interpretations. 11. in which scientific theories are "tentative ideas" or "hunches". A possible explanation - The word "theory" is often used this way in everyday conversation, but a theory in science refers to a highly probable, well-tested, comprehensive explanation, usually for a large collection of observations.

Aspects of the Nature of Science Tentative Scientific knowledge is subject to change with new observations and with the reinterpretations of existing observations. All other aspects of NOS provide rationale for the tentativeness of scientific knowledge. Empirical Scientific knowledge is based on and/or derived from observations of the natural world. These are fine, but ……

A rabbit or a duck?

Illusions Do you see the face? Or an Eskimo?

A waterfall, but are you sure ??

Does A or B form the straight line extension of line C ?

Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe.

Do you believe that the lines at the top of the trapezia are the same length ?

Let us continue looking at aspects of science So far we have said that the Nature of Science is such that it is: Tentative Empirical (based on, or derived from, observation)

Socially and culturally embedded Science is a human endeavour and is influenced by the society and culture in which it is practiced. The values of the culture determine what and how science is conducted, interpreted, accepted, and utilised. Subjectivity The development of questions, investigations, and interpretations of data are filtered through the lens of current accepted theories and laws. This is an unavoidable subjectivity that allows science to progress and remain consistent, yet also contributes to change in science when previous evidence is examined from the perspective of new knowledge. Five Additional Aspects of Science

Creative Scientific knowledge is created from human imaginations and logical reasoning. This creation is based on observations and inferences of the natural world. Laws and Theories Theories and laws are different kinds of scientific knowledge. Laws describe relationships, observed or perceived, of phenomena in nature. Theories are inferred explanations for natural phenomena and mechanisms for relationships among natural phenomena. Hypotheses in science may lead to either theories or laws with the accumulation of substantial supporting evidence and acceptance in the scientific community. Theories and laws do not progress into one and another. They are distinctly and functionally different types of knowledge.

Observation and Inference Science is based on both observation and inference. Observations are gathered through human senses or extensions of those senses. Inferences are interpretations of those observations. Perspectives of current science and the scientist guide both observations and inferences. Multiple perspectives contribute to valid multiple interpretations of observations. WOULD YOU AGREE THAT THIS IS AN IMPORTANT MESSAGE FOR THE TEACHING OF SCIENCE IN SCHOOL. INFERENCE IS AN ESSENTIAL COMPONENT OF SCHOOL SCIENCE.

Dispelling the Myths about Science Scientific Laws and other such ideas are absolute. Hypothesis is an educated guess. A General and Universal Scientific Method Exists. Science and its Methods can answer all Questions Evidence accumulated carefully will result in sure Knowledge. Science and Its Methods provide Absolute Proof. Science is Procedural more than Creative. Scientists are particularly objective.

Experiments are the Principal route to Scientific Knowledge. Hypotheses become Theories that in turn become Laws. Scientific conclusions are reviewed for accuracy. Acceptance of new Scientific Knowledge is straightforward. Science models represent reality. Science and technology are identical. Science is a solitary pursuit. The Nature of Science in Science Education Rationales and Strategies William F. McComas 1998 Kluwer Academic Publishers

Try the following ACTIVITIES

A 3- holed bottle experiment A simple enough experiment, but …. What hypotheses did this involve ? What observations were relevant ? What explanations were offered ?

The 3 holed bottle experiment This is sometimes called a discrepant event as the reality is not as expected. (if you think about it, the sun ‘moving’ across the sky is a discrepant event). But what scientific question could initiate the experiment? If matter is made of particles, how can matter be stored in containers?

Observe what does actually happen. What explanation do you have for what happened? You should be able to put forward at least one explanation. Explanations from the group may not all be the same. Select one explanation which you like. Now based on that possible explanation, predict what will happen when the second hole is uncovered.

Observe what actually did happen. Did the result match your prediction ? If so, do you feel your prediction is good? If NOT, it seems your prediction is not good. Can you put forward another Prediction? Now we have one more hole. Let us again make a prediction about the outcome if we uncover all 3 holes.

Let us look at some ACTIVITIES related to ideas of research question, hypothesis, observation and deduction

Examining a cube Create a group of 2 persons Examine (but do not touch/move) the cube placed on the table. Individually, from your inquisitive observation, frame a question which you would wish to ask about the cube ? Each person records their questions.

Exploring one question further – what is written on the bottom, i.e. hidden side ? In your group, discuss this question. Record your group predictions. If you feel it is useful, your group may give more than one justification. If you have more than one prediction, identify the dominant hypothesis. Justify your predictions with appropriate evidence. (ANOTHER IMPORTANT STEP FOR THE TEACHING OF SCIENCE)

Examining another cube In your groups, examine (but do not touch/move) the new cube placed on the table. Put forward your predicted answer as to what is on the hidden, bottom face of the cube. Record your prediction(s).

Cube 2 - a further stage Carefully raise one corner of the cube so that, with the use of a mirror, you can see the number recorded in the top right corner, OR the bottom left corner (but not both !!) Modify your prediction as to what is written on the bottom of the cube, if appropriate.

Teaching and Cube 2 Does cube 2 give us any insight into the teaching of science ? Does it suggest that we do not necessarily need to observe everything and that we can make calculated guesses from other observations ? We can make inferences. If a gas is colourless and lighter than air, can we infer it is probably hydrogen ? Or if a gas is known to be hydrogen, then can we infer a balloon containing hydrogen will …..

A Quiz Did the previous slides make sense??? Which option would you choose for the following questions about science and technology ?

What to do? On a sheet of paper write your preferred response to each of the following 7 questions as per the instructions given. What is the purpose of this quiz ? Its purpose is to see how much there is general agreement among the participants.

The Nature of Science and Technology 1.Science is: (a) a study of fields such as biology, chemistry and physics. (b) carrying out experiments to solve problems of interest. (c) a systematic investigative process and the resulting knowledge. (d) inventing and designing things. (e) finding and using knowledge to make this world a better place. (f) a body of knowledge that explains the world around us. (g) exploring the unknown and discovering new things about the world. (h) an organisation of people called scientists who have ideas and techniques for discovering new knowledge. (i) do not know.

2. In your opinion, what does Science aim at ? (a) To make sure that what has been discovered about the world is really true. (b) To understand, explain and interpret the continuing change in nature and its characteristics. (c) To discover, collect and group facts about nature. (d) To find ways to make people’s lives better. (e) Do not know.

3. Why do you think Scientists do Scientific Research ? (a) To make new discoveries. (b) To try out their explanations for why things happen. (c) To make something which will help people. (d) To collect data as much as possible, and to draw out scientific laws from data. (e) Do not know.

4. Which of the following statements about Scientific Knowledge match your Understanding of Scientific Knowledge (a) Scientific knowledge is a well-organised collection of facts. (b) Today’s scientific knowledge is based on scientific perspectives, ideas and interpretations from the past. (c) Today’s scientists have produced today’s scientific knowledge. (d) Scientific knowledge contains only statements that are 100% true. (e) Do not understand the term ‘scientific knowledge’.

5.A Scientific Theory is : (a) An idea about what will happen. (b) A most appropriate interpretation and explanation which has been approved by scientists. (c) A fact which has been proved by many experiments. (d) Do not know.

6. Technology is: (a) The application of science to enhance life. (b) Manufactured artefacts such as appliances, tools and scientific instruments. (c) The hardware, techniques, processes, people associated with items such as tools, appliances and scientific instruments. (d) Inventing, designing, developing and testing things such as appliances, tools and scientific instruments. (e) Very similar to science. (f) The process of manufacturing and the underlying know- how. (g) Something else e.g. ?

7. Circle all the statements with which you agree: (a) Technological innovations and/or development of science bring about environmental problems such as pollution and acid rain. (b) Science and technology often makes our lives healthier, easier, and more comfortable. (c) The prosperity of the nation depends to a greater extent on science and technology. (d) Science and technology rarely do harm to our lives. (e) We cannot solve all the problems which we are facing only by the power of science and technology. (f) Because science, technology and society are independent mutually, they do not affect each other. (g) Science and technology affect society on the one hand, society affects science and technology on the other hand.