MCA II 2008-09. 08/09 Demographics StateDistrict Number of Students823,234787 Ethnicity24%5% LEP8%0 Special Education13%16% Free & Reduced33%42% Attendance.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jamesville-DeWitt School Report Card Presented to the Board of Education May 10, 2010.
Advertisements

Thriving in Our Learning Community Increasing Student Achievement Fewer Achievement Gaps September 20, 2005.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
School Report Cards 2004– The Bottom Line More schools are making Adequate Yearly Progress. Fewer students show serious academic problems (Level.
+ Duluth High School Gwinnett County, Georgia Joy Singleton Scott Gravitt Elizabeth Goff Duluth High School Analysis of Assessment Data.
Understanding MMR Dr. Margaret Biggerstaff 1. 2 MMR Calculation Process.
Norton Park Elementary Math Data Overview for 3 rd grade By: Amanda Gilbert.
Planning, Assessment & Research Analysis and Use of Student Data Part I.
Connecticut Academic Performance Test Spotlight on Assessment University of Connecticut Neag School of Education March 28, 2008.
Analysis of Student Performance on Assessments
OCTORARA AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT “CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES - MORE THAN PSSA AND AYP”
Review Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY.
San Antonio Independent School District Attendance Issues ALT Presentation November 2003.
Student Growth in Reading and Math SEPPAC October 4, 2012.
Grady Cluster Data 2014 John Keltz 8/27/2014. Content One-Sheets School achievement in context Attendance and suspensions.
Assessment Overview Dr. Gayle Potter Associate Director Curriculum, Assessment, and Research January 9, 2008.
Average National Arabic Scale Scores for Grade 1 By Gender MalesFemales Grade Level Scale Score 550.
Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) and the Connecticut Academic Achievement Test (CAPT) Spring 2011 Presented to the Guilford Board of Education September.
2009 CAHSEE Review 10th Grade Test Date Wed. March 18th.
MIDWAY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT USING DATA DIRECTOR TO INFORM PROGRESS TOWARDS STATE ASSESSMENT.
School Report Card ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS REPORT: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND GRADUATION RATE For GREENVILLE CSD.
MARSHALL PUBLIC SCHOOLS MCA RESULTS. Demographics StateDistrict Number of Students Ethnicity25.6%20.4% LEP7.7%11.1% Special Education14.8%16.8%
September 2015 Amanda Grinager, Director of Teaching and Learning.
Assessment Dashboard August 2012 Page Unified School District Curriculum AssessmentInstruction Data.
State law and the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act require Report Cards for every local school, every school district and for the state.
ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Accountability Services.
Spring 2012 Testing Results. GRANT API HISTORY
Student Achievement Gains and Gaps in Saint Paul Public Schools Tom Watkins Director of Research, Evaluation and Assessment Saint Paul Public Schools May.
Suspension Data Fall 2009 Compared to Fall Number of Students Suspended – Grade Level.
Why CAHSEE Matters to You It’s one of 3 types of requirements you must meet to earn your diploma from PHS Must pass BOTH English and math portions of CAHSEE.
Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST Enter School Name Version: Intermediate.
Rochester Area Math Science Partnership Our Mission: To support high student achievement through world class standards in math and science Continuous.
1 Student Achievement Data Displays Mathematics, Reading & Writing-Grade 7 Revised: October 30, 2009 Official WASL Results AYP Status District Reading.
MCAS 2007 October 24, 2007 A Report to the Sharon School Committee and Dr. Barbara J. Dunham Superintendent of Schools Dr. George S. Anthony Director of.
ITBS DATA. 3 RD GRADE ANALYSIS StrengthsWeaknesses Spelling – 58 Maps & Diagrams – 43 Reference Materials - 43 Math Computation - 42 Reading Comprehension.
Graduation Required Assessment for Diploma (GRAD) & MCA-II 2012 Results & Trends READING, MATH & WRITING REAOffice of Research Evaluation and Assessment,
District 11 CSAP Results School Year D11 Board Presentation August 9,2006.
Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST High School.
State Test Results MSP/HSPE/EOC Presentation to the Shelton School District Board of Directors September 9, 2014.
2015 State PARCC Results Presented to the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education Robert Lee MCAS Chief Analyst and Acting PARCC Coordinator October.
OAA 2010 Grade 3 Math Item Analysis 1 Number, Number Sense, and Operations (NS) A 96% (*) B 1% C 2% 8 Number, Number Sense, and Operations (NS) A 6% B.
WCPSS Student Achievement Evaluation and Research Dept. August 19, 2008.
SIP Reading Goal Our Reality: An average of 78% of the students met standard on the state reading assessment in Our SMART Goal: The average.
Georgia Milestone Assessments Bryant Elementary School 1"Where Scholars Are Prepared to Be LEADERS"
Annual Progress Report Summary September 12, 2011.
 Educator Effectiveness System  Comparative Measures  Resource for Professional Development.
JEFF DAVIS COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM Data Presentation FY12.
Percentage of Students Meeting or Exceeding 3 rd Grade Math 3 rd Grade Reading +6% +5%
FLORIDA STATE EOC EXAMS. **Districts will select testing dates. REQUIRED TESTING Students enrolled in the Florida Public Schools are required to participate.
Student Achievement Data Mount Olive Township Public Schools.
Leader slts PRIOR TO : Principal set a minimum of two goals, which express an expectation of student growth. SPS available for use.
Illinois.
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Bixby Public Schools OCCT Data and AYP/API December 12, 2011.
Assessment of Student Performance for 2011 – 2012
Bixby Public Schools OCCT Data and AYP/API September 13, 2010.
Marshall Public SchoolS MCA Results
Analyzing PARCC Results to Inform Instruction
School-Wide Achievement Mathematics
IFs and Nested IFs =IF(R3<60,”F”,”P”)
Lauren Kinsella Dr. Wright ITEC 7305
Online Data Workshop SIP Office of Curriculum and Instruction Office of School Improvement.
PARCC Results Spring 2018 Administration
Glen Ridge District Testing Report
Data Overview Shiver Elementary School Faculty and Staff July 21, 2013
Barling Report to the public 2017
Marshall Public SchoolS MCA II Results
Ola High School 11/12/16 Ola High School Data Team
Data Overview West Forsyth High School Forsyth County Schools, Georgia
Presentation transcript:

MCA II

08/09 Demographics StateDistrict Number of Students823, Ethnicity24%5% LEP8%0 Special Education13%16% Free & Reduced33%42% Attendance Rate95% Graduation Rate92%100%

ACGC DISTRICT

North Elementary

ACGC 5 th & 6th

ACGC SOUTH ACGC South Elementary

ACGC SECONDARY

ACGC ALP

DISCUSSION What are the hurdles in achieving higher tests scores? How can we over come these hurdles?

Achievement Analysis Green Green = GREAT: meets expectations Red Red = URGENT: in need of immediate action Analyze - Sort the Data to Examine Patterns (Stoplight Approach)

D Does not meet the standard P Partially meets the standard M Meets the standard E Exceeds the standard Alphabet Soup! What do the letters mean?

Let’s take a look at reading…

MCAII 2009 READING - Achievement Levels D State / ACGC P State / ACGC M State / ACGC E State / ACGC 3 rd 11.2 / N 13.6 S / N 6.8 S / N 31.8 S / N 47.7 S th 10.9 / N 8.3 S / N 27.8 S / N 36.1 S / N 27.8 S th 10.1 / / / / th 11.7 / / / / th 15.6 / / / / th 14.3 / / / / th 9.2 / / / / 40.9 Green = area of strength Black = average Red = area of concern

% of students scoring in the Exceeds Standards on MCAII Grade State 2008ACGC 2008State 2009ACGC rd 52.05% % D 47.4 N 47.7 S th 38.70% % D 37.9 N 27.8 S th 33.61% % th 37.41% % th 36.72% % th 34.87% % th 36.08% %40.9 READINGREADING

% of students scoring in the Does Not Meets & Partially Meets on the MCAII Grade State 2008ACGC 2008State 2009ACGC rd 21.02% % D 19.3 N 20.4 S th 27.77% % D 29.3 N 36.1 S th 26.57% % th 30.38% % th 35.31% % th 34.28% % th 29.31% %21.3 READINGREADING

Grade State ACGC State ACGC 3 rd North59%75% 3 rd South68%81% 4 th North66%62% 4 th South78%72% 5 th Grade66%58%69%66% 6 th Grade71%68%73%65% 7 th Grade75%72% 67% 8 th Grade64%60%65%59% 10 th Grade71%73%74%76% NONFICTION COMPARISON 72% 68% 66% 77%

CONSTRUCTED RESPONSE COMPARISON Grade State ACGC State ACGC 3 rd North32%73% 3 rd South48%81% 4 th North37%52% 4 th South63%61% 5 th Grade51%45%71%48% 6 th Grade50%46%54%44% 7 th Grade52%47%53%40% 8 th Grade45%38%45%36% 10 th Grade60%65%68%72% 47% 52% READINGREADING 77% 52%

Green Green = GREAT: meets expectations Red Red = URGENT: in need of immediate action Sub Score Analysis Analyze - Sort the Data to Examine Patterns (Stoplight Approach)

N: 44 Students S: 13 Students

N: 36 Students S: 22 Students

MCAII rd Grade Reading: South Elementary Sub-strand Pts Possible State/South All State/South White State/South FRP State/South SPE Vocabulary / / / / 4.8 Comprehension / / / / 9.0 Literature / / / / 15.0 MCAII th Grade Reading: South Elementary Sub-strand Pts Possible State/South All State/South White State/South FRP State/South SPE Vocabulary / / / / 4.2 Comprehension / / / / 12.0 Literature / / / / 10.8

MCAII rd Grade Reading: North Elementary Sub-strand Pts Possible State/North All State/North White State/North FRP State/North SPE Vocabulary / / / / 2.4 Comprehension / / / / 5.0 Literature / / / / 9.2 MCAII th Grade Reading: North Elementary Sub-strand Pts Possible State/North All State/North White State/North FRP State/North SPE Vocabulary / / / / 2.6 Comprehension / / / / 8.8 Literature / / / / 8.8

MCAII th Grade Reading Sub-strand Pts Possible State/ACGC All State/ACGC White State/ACGC FRP State/ACGC SPE Vocabulary / / / / 3.3 Comprehension / / / / 10.8 Literature / / / / 11.6 MCAII th Grade Reading Sub-strand Pts Possible State/ACGC All State/ACGC White State/ACGC FRP State/ACGC SPE Vocabulary / / / / 2.6 Comprehension / / / / 11.0 Literature / / / / 9.5

MCAII th Grade Reading Sub-strand Pts Possible State/ACGC All State/ACG White State/ACGC FRP State/ACG SPE Vocabulary / / / / 2.3 Comprehension / / / / 11.8 Literature / / / / 11.7 MCAII th Grade Reading Sub-strand Pts Possible State/ACGC All State/ACGC White State/ACGC FRP State/ACGC SPE Vocabulary / / / / 2.8 Comprehension / / / / 13.0 Literature / / / / 5.7

MCAII th Grade Reading Sub-strand Pts Possible State/ACGC All State/ACGC White State/ACGC FRP State/ACGC SPE State/ACGC ELL Vocabulary / / / / / 3.0 Comprehension / / / / / 11.0 Literature / / / / / 5.0

ACGC Reading Goal ?

DISCUSSION What will we do this year to improve READING at ACGC? Visit with your colleagues and determine a SMART Goal in reading for ACGC. SMARTSMART Specific _____________________________ Measurable __________________________ Attainable ___________________________ Reasonable _________________________ Timely _____________________________

INDIVIDUAL GOAL What will you do this year to improve READING in your classes? Reflect and determine a SMART Goal in reading for your class or classes. SMARTSMART Specific _____________________________ Measurable __________________________ Attainable ___________________________ Reasonable _________________________ Timely _____________________________

Let’s take a look at math…

MCAII 2009 MATH - Achievement Levels Green = area of strength Black = average Red = area of concern D State / ACGC P State / ACGC M State / ACGC E State / ACGC 3 rd 4.2 / N 4.5 S / N 20.5 S / N 59.1 S / N 15.9 S th 8.0 / N 8.3 S / N 33.3 S / N 36.1 S / N 22.2 S th 14.3 / / / / th 15.2 / / / / th 15.9 / / / / th 18.3 / / / / th 36.4 / / / / 20.4

% of students scoring in the Exceeds Standards on MCAII Grade State 2008ACGC 2008State 2009ACGC rd 35.26% % D 24.6 N 15.9 S th 31.14% % D 32.8 N 22.2 S th 25.61% % th 20.52% % th 21.36% %6.3 8 th 22.28% % th 13.93% %20.4 MATHMATH

% of students scoring in the Does Not Meets & Partially Meets on the MCAII Grade State 2008ACGC 2008State 2009ACGC rd 18.64% % D 19.3 N 25.0 S th 28.35% % D 32.8 N 41.6 S th 33.98% % th 35.36% % th 38.61% % th 41.78% % th 65.64% %55.6 MATHMATH

N: 44 Students S: 13 Students

MCAII rd Grade Math: North Elementary Sub-strand Pts Possible State/North All State/North White State/North FRP State/North SPE Number Sense / / / / 9.8 Patterns, Functions, & Algebra / / / / 3.6 Data, Stats, & Probability / / / / 3.2 Spatial Sense, Geometry & Measurement / / / / 6.8

MCAII rd Grade Math: South Elementary Sub-strand Pts Possible State/South All State/South White State/South FRP State/South SPE Number Sense / / / / 14.5 Patterns, Functions, & Algebra / / / / 6.5 Data, Stats, & Probability / / / / 5.3 Spatial Sense, Geometry & Measurement / / / / 9.8

N: 36 Students S: 22 Students

MCAII th Grade Math: North Elementary Sub-strand State/North All State/North White State/North FRP State/North SPE Number Sense / / / / 10.2 Patterns, Functions, & Algebra / / / / 2.6 Data, Stats, & Probability / / / / 4.4 Spatial Sense, Geometry & Measurement / / / / 5.6

MCAII th Grade Math: South Elementary Sub-strand State/South All State/South White State/South FRP State/South SPE Number Sense / / / / 15.2 Patterns, Functions, & Algebra / / / / 5.6 Data, Stats, & Probability / / / / 6.8 Spatial Sense, Geometry & Measurement / / / / 8.4

MCAII th Grade Math Sub-strand Pts Possible State/District All State/District White State/District FRP State/District SPE Number Sense / / / / 8.2 Patterns, Functions, & Algebra / / / / 4.6 Data, Stats, & Probability / / / / 6.8 Spatial Sense, Geometry & Measurement / / / / 7.3

MCAII th Grade Math Sub-strand Pts Possible State/District All State/District White State/District FRP State/Dist SPE Number Sense / / / / 7.6 Patterns, Functions, & Algebra / / / / 3.0 Data, Stats, & Probability / / / / 3.4 Spatial Sense, Geometry & Measurement / / / / 5.8

MCAII th Grade Math Sub-strand Pts Possible State/District All State/District White State/District FRP State/Dist SPE Number Sense / / / / 5.1 Patterns, Functions, & Algebra / / / / 3.5 Data, Stats, & Probability / / / / 3.1 Spatial Sense, Geometry & Measurement / / / / 6.4

MCAII th Grade Math Sub-strand Pts Possible State/District All State/District White State/District FRP State/Dist SPE Number Sense / / / / 4.6 Patterns, Functions, & Algebra / / / / 6.8 Data, Stats, & Probability / / / / 3.9 Spatial Sense, Geometry & Measurement / / / / 5.6

MCAII th Grade Math Sub-strand Pts Possible State/District All State/District White State/District FRP State/Dist SPE Patterns, Functions, & Algebra / / / / 8.8 Data, Stats, & Probability / / / / 5.5 Spatial Sense, Geometry & Measurement / / / / 4.3

ACGC Math Goal ?

DISCUSSION What will you do this year to improve MATH at ACGC this year? Visit with your colleagues and determine a SMART Goal in math for ACGC. SMARTSMART Specific _____________________________ Measurable __________________________ Attainable ___________________________ Reasonable _________________________ Timely _____________________________

INDIVIDUAL GOAL What will you do this year to improve MATH in your classes? Reflect and determine a SMART Goal in math for your class or classes. SMARTSMART Specific _____________________________ Measurable __________________________ Attainable ___________________________ Reasonable _________________________ Timely _____________________________

GRADE 5 SCIENCE (3-4-5)

GRADE 8 SCIENCE (6-7-8)

GRADE 10 SCIENCE (<=10)

ACGC Science Goal ?

DISCUSSION What will you do this year to improve SCIENCE at ACGC this year? Visit with your colleagues and determine a SMART Goal in science for ACGC. SMARTSMART Specific _____________________________ Measurable __________________________ Attainable ___________________________ Reasonable _________________________ Timely _____________________________

INDIVIDUAL GOAL What will you do this year to improve SCIENCE in your classes? Reflect and determine a SMART Goal in science for your class or classes. SMARTSMART Specific _____________________________ Measurable __________________________ Attainable ___________________________ Reasonable _________________________ Timely _____________________________

WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER! WE CAN ACCOMPLISH GREAT THINGS IF WE ARE SCOOPERS AND NOT POINTERS! SO, LET’S SCOOP TOGETHER!

How close are we to making AYP? How do we identify students to insure AYP?

LEVEL JUMPERS

There are four levels: D oes Not Meet Standards P artially Meets Standards ~ G40 M eets Standards and ~ G50 E xceeds Standards How does a student earn district points? D = 0 P =.5M = 1E = 1

LEVEL JUMPERS Who is most capable of jumping? Students within 3 scale points from G40 and G50!