FROM:THRU: 1. PERIOD OF TRAINING STUDENT COMMENTS ON TRAINING Collective Training Directorate Ft. Leavenworth, KS 2. TITLE OF COURSE:3. PLACE WHERE TRAINING.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

The Course experience questionnaire (P. Ramsden) Designed as a performance indicator 24 statements relating to 5 aspects 1 overall satisfaction statement.

Advertisements

Welcome to Home Base. Why Home Base? Improving teacher effectiveness by providing tools aligned to NC’s Standard Course of Study that promote efficiency.

Subject:001 Gender: MaleFemale Age: 42 You should agree or disagree with each item using the 1-7 scale below. Place a number from 1 to 7 next to each item.

Nursing Home Survey on Patient Safety Culture

Designing and Analyzing Questionnaires

HFM SAN Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2010 – 2011 School Year... BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support.

Learning Community II Survey Spring 2007 Analysis by Intisar Hibschweiler (Core Director) and Mimi Steadman (Director of Institutional Assessment)

New Teacher Induction Academy Data Collection November 30, 2011

X-class Survey Please respond to each statement based on your own personal opinion. For each statement, please indicate whether you: A. Agree B. Unsure.

AASHTOWare  - Transportation Software Solutions Contents Participants Follow-up Purpose Introduction Results Trnsport 2004 Customer Satisfaction Survey.

Evaluation Results Aug 28 Seminar. Question I 1. Instruction: Rate aspects of the workshop on a 1 to 5 scale by selecting the number corresponding to.

Business and Management Research WELCOME. Lecture 6.

HFM SAN Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2008 – 2009 School Year... BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support.

1 Sources:  SusanTurner - Napier University  C. Robson, Real World Research, Blackwell, 1993  Steve Collesano: Director, Corporate Research and Development.

EPIC Online Publishing Use and Costs Evaluation Program.

Early Results from the Council of Graduate Schools Study of the Bepress/UMI Online Submission Application ECURE March 2, 2005 Bill Savage UMI Dissertations.

CHAPTER EIGHT COLLECTING DATA I: THE QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY.

Does Technology Belong in the Classroom? Presented by: Molly Carlson.

TEAM MORALE Team Assignment 12 SOFTWARE MEASUREMENT & ANALYSIS K15T2-Team 21.

Business and Management Research

Name: Abdullah Mohammed Alhatmi ID:86497 Course: Quality &Assurance Name: Abdullah Mohammed Alhatmi ID:86497 Course: Quality &Assurance Start.

HFM SAN Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2004 – 2005 School Year... BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support.

Outreach NH HMIS Training Evaluation Form 08/10/2012.

HFM Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2003 – 2004 School Year... BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support.

HFM SAN Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2009 – 2010 School Year... BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support.

Lessons Learned.  Transformations campaign  Develop strategic plan  External review team proposes internal residential program  construct.

COMMUNICATION ENGLISH III October 4/5 th Today Introduction to Discussion Board. More Task 2 info. Surveys.

Welcome the Canadian Safe Boating Training Site! Lateral buoys section.

TH DERIVE & TI-CAS CONFERENCE 1 'Didactical principles of integrated learning mathematics with CAS' Peter van der Velden, M.Sc. Netherlands.

MARKETING SURVEYS Constructing the Questionnaire validity  A questionnaire has validity when the questions asked measure what they were intended.

Natural Europe Questionnaire for teachers (school visit) The questionnaire is aimed at collecting information and on the features and tools of the Natural.

.. HFM Distance Learning Project Student Survey 2003 – 2004 School Year BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support.

.. CRB/FEH/Questar III Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2009– 2010 School Year BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support.

Service Learning Dr. Albrecht. Presenting Results 0 The following power point slides contain examples of how information from evaluation research can.

A New Approach to Performing Course Evaluations: Using Q Methodology to Better Understand Student Attitudes Joe Jurczyk Susan Ramlo University of Akron.

.. SAN Distance Learning Project Student Survey 2002 – 2003 School Year BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support.

1 Claverley COE School Parent/Carer Questionnaire Results Summer Term - June 2014.

2014/15 Client Engagement Survey Results June 17,

WLUSA/OSSTF Annual Performance Review Process Human Resources & WLUSA| 2015.

Greater Nashua Continuum of Care (GNCoC) NH HMIS Training Evaluation 08/06/2012 1NH-HMIS Training on 8/6/ GNCoC.

.. CRB/FEH/Questar III Distance Learning Project Student Survey 2009– 2010 School Year BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support.

Multimedia Thematic Project – Part III Lesson II F-18E/F Maintenance Research Joe King University of Phoenix Designing and Producing Educational Technology.

Western Sussex Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Using a PN Patient Information Sheet 27/09/14 Richard Williams Team Manager Outreach Services and Health.

English 174.  Conducted individually  Main points of your research project  For: ◦ your English teacher ◦ Your classmates  5 to 8 minutes.

EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE Title of the training module:___________________________________________ Title of the lesson:_________________________________________________.

SAN Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2002 – 2003 School Year... BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support.

.. HFM Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2002 – 2003 School Year BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support.

November 5, 2000ATMI Conference, Toronto1 Technology as an Integral Part of the Music Classroom Incorporating Group Activities & Online Discussion Lists.

M & E System for MI’s Training Program & Guidelines for MI’s Completion Report Presented by Monitoring and Evaluation Officer Mekong Institute January.

Tips on Discussing the Standards & Giving Peer Feedback February 2010.

+ The Sales Process Steps Step 5: Closing the Sale Closing the Sale is obtaining positive agreement from the customer to buy. To close the sale,

10 th NCDR Annual Meeting March 26-27, 2009; Orlando, Florida 709 people attended 13 storyboards were presented 549 people completed online evaluation.

Adopting CALI Lessons My Two Purposes: 1 – Providing Course Content.

OPEN ENROLLMENT EMPLOYEE SURVEY Version 1 1.Were the communication materials provided to you over the last few weeks easy to understand?  Yes  No 2.Did.

Evaluation of new medical school curricula: identifying and treating

Tawfik Abdo Saleh King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals

A Survey of Learners Opinions

Balance of State Continuum of Care (BoSCoC)

What do you really think about Science??

Balance of State Continuum of Care (BoSCoC)

Balance of State Continuum of Care (BoSCoC)

Business and Management Research

MDCPS’ Division of Social Sciences Using Data to Drive Instruction

Thank you for your attention and cooperation

Overall Evaluation Results 3/24/08 69% response rate

Experiment with course materials concerning ‘Threads’

Business and Management Research

How to have successful math discussions

Instructor Provided Questions

Oriented by the SDG 11 and Supported by the City Prosperity Initiative

Presentation transcript:

FROM:THRU: 1. PERIOD OF TRAINING STUDENT COMMENTS ON TRAINING Collective Training Directorate Ft. Leavenworth, KS 2. TITLE OF COURSE:3. PLACE WHERE TRAINING WAS TAKEN: 4. HOME STATION: 5. PMOS: 7. TITLE OF CLASS: 6. DMOS: FORT LEAVENWORTH, KS 8. THE COURSE INFORMATION RECEIVED WILL HELP ME IN MY CAREER. (CHECK ONE) 9. THE TECHNICAL VALUE IS RIGHT.(CHECK ONE) 10. THE COURSE LENGTH IS RIGHT. (CHECK ONE) 11. THE COURSE CONTENT IS GOOD. (CHECK ONE) 12. THE COURSE OBJECTIVES WERE EXPLAINED WELL. (CHECK ONE) 13. ADMINISTRATIVE INSTRUCTIONS PROVIDED WERE SUFFICIENT. PART I: Please indicate the level of your agreement with statements 8 through 13 PART II: Please indicate the level of your agreement with statements 14 through LESSONS WERE WELL PRESENTED. (CHECK ONE) 16. THE INSTRUCTOR: (CHECK TWO) 15. THE INSTRUCTOR’S PRESENTATIONS WERE: (CHECK THREE) 17. THEORY ON SYSTEMS USE/ INTEGRATION: (CHECK ONE) 18.USE OF QUALITY OF PEs: (CHECK ONE) ____ STRONGLY AGREE____DISAGREE ____ AGREE____ STRONGLY DISAGREE (EXPLAIN DISAGREE/STRONGLY ____ NEUTRALDISAGREE IN ITEM 24) ____ STRONGLY AGREE ____DISAGREE ____ AGREE ____ STRONGLY DISAGREE (EXPLAIN DISAGREE/STRONGLY ____ NEUTRAL DISAGREE IN ITEM 24) ____ STRONGLY AGREE ____DISAGREE ____ AGREE ____STRONGLY DISAGREE (EXPLAIN DISAGREE/STRONGLY DISAGREE ____ NEUTRAL IN ITEM 24) ____ STRONGLY AGREE ____DISAGREE ____ AGREE ____STRONGLY DISAGREE (EXPLAIN DISAGREE/STRONGLY ____ NEUTRAL DISAGREE IN ITEM 24) ____ STRONGLY AGREE ____DISAGREE ____ AGREE ____STRONGLY DISAGREE (EXPLAIN DISAGREE/STRONGLY ____ NEUTRAL DISAGREE IN ITEM 24) ____ EASY TO FOLLOW____ DIFFICULT TO FOLLOW (EXPLAIN IN ITEM 24) ____ EASY TO UNDERSTAND ____ DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND (EXPLAIN IN ITEM 24) ____ INTERESTING____ UNINTERESTING (EXPLAIN IN ITEM 24) a. ____ FOLLOWED THE SUBJECT b. ____ DID NOT FOLLOW SUBJECT a. ____ GAVE OPPORTUNITY TO ASK QUESTIONS b. ____ DID NOT GIVE OPPORTUNITY TO ASK QUESTIONS ____ TOO MUCH ____ ABOUT RIGHT ____ NOT ENOUGH (EXPLAIN IN ITEM 24) ____ TOO MANY ____ ABOUT RIGHT ____ NOT ENOUGH (EXPLAIN IN ITEM 24) DISCLAIMER: This questionnaire is voluntary and the information acquired is used for internal process improvement only. No research will be conducted using this information. a. b. c. ____ STRONGLY AGREE ____DISAGREE ____ AGREE ____STRONGLY DISAGREE (EXPLAIN DISAGREE/STRONGLY ____ NEUTRAL DISAGREE IN ITEM 24) ____ STRONGLY AGREE ____DISAGREE ____ AGREE ____ STRONGLY DISAGREE (EXPLAIN DISAGREE/STRONGLY ____ NEUTRAL DISAGREE IN ITEM 24)

22. THE COURSE TRAINED ME TO PERFORM THE REQUIRED WORK IN THIS AREA. 23. THE STUDENT TOOL KIT AND OTHER COURSE MATERIAL WILL BE BENEFICIAL AFTER COMPLETION OF THIS COURSE. ______ YES______ NO (Please explain below. What would you change to make the toolkit beneficial to you?) 24. REMARKS (PLEASE BE SPECIFIC, OFFER SOLUTIONS, ETC) Please include your contact information if you wish us to contact you about course improvements. 19. TRAINING AID USE WAS GOOD. (CHECK ONE) VALUE OF TRAINING AIDS(CHARTS, MOCK-UPS, ETC) 21. OVERALL, THE COURSE WAS GOOD? PART III 20. TRAINING AIDS QUALITY WAS GOOD? (CHECK ONE) PART IVOPINION, REMARKS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF OVERALL COURSE ____ STRONGLY AGREE ____DISAGREE ____ AGREE ____ STRONGLY DISAGREE (EXPLAIN DISAGREE/STRONGLY ____ NEUTRAL DISAGREE IN ITEM 24) ____ STRONGLY AGREE ____DISAGREE ____ AGREE ____ STRONGLY DISAGREE (EXPLAIN DISAGREE/STRONGLY ____ NEUTRAL DISAGREE IN ITEM 24) ____ STRONGLY AGREE _____ AGREE ___ NEUTRAL____DISAGREE ____ STRONGLY DISAGREE (EXPLAIN DISAGREE/STRONGLY DISAGREE IN ITEM 24) 25. IF YOU WISH TO CONTACT US DIRECTLY PLEASE ___________________________________ ____ STRONGLY AGREE ____ AGREE ____ NEUTRAL ____DISAGREE ____ STRONGLY DISAGREE (EXPLAIN DISAGREE/STRONGLY DISAGREE IN ITEM 24)