1. Oriented by the SDG 11 and Supported by the City Prosperity Initiative
INTERNATIONAL TRAINING WORKSHOP Action Planning for Cities
Oriented by the SDG 11 and Supported by the City Prosperity Initiative

2. Training course evaluation

3. How to use your Response Cards:
Press the button with the letter that corresponds with your answer

4. After the session please, do not take the response card with you.
Leave it on the table or return it to Regina or Trang
All answers are anonymous You can click as many times as you want to change your answer, but it is only the last answer(s) that will count

5. O E K E Z
O J O W I
E T E A C
N I O E H
K_M Y_O_G_O_N
0 of 0

6. About yourself

7. I work for: National government Provincial government Local government
Private sector
University/academia
NGO/CSOs
Free-lancer
Others
0 of 0

8. My position is: The Mayor/City leaders Head of department
Deputy Head of department
Senior manager
Technical officer
Administrative officer
Consultant
Others
0 of 17

9. My profession is: Urban planner Architect Engineer Economist
Geographer
Social scientist
Business and Administrator
Lawyer
Others
17 of 18

10. Right now, I feel: Happy Tired Excited Contented Curious Disappointed
Homesick
Other
17 of 18

11. Have you heard of City Prosperity Index before?
Yes, we did a CPI report before
Yes, I know about CPI but never experienced it before
I only heard of CPI from other cities before
I never heard of CPI
17 of 18

12. Evaluation

13. How did the overall course content compare with your expectations?
Strongly disappointed
Somehow below my expectations
Met my expectations
Slightly surpassed
Highly surpassed my expectations
17 of 18

14. Do you think that the City Prosperity Initiative (CPI) would be useful for your city?
I did not understand what the CPI is
No, there are other priorities in my city
Maybe
Yes, it would be useful
My city is already implementing the CPI
0 of 18

15. How do you rate the balance between theory and practice in the course?
Extremely theoretical
Slightly theoretical;
Right balance of theory and practice
Slightly too practical; principles and methodology were not clear enough;
Extremely practical.
0 of 18

16. Which option would you choose as the FIRST action to implement CPI in your city?
Organize data collection
Develop the CPI indicators
Organize and involve stakeholders
Review master plans
Review legislation
Train municipal staff
0 of 18

17. How satisfied are you with the overall training methodology
How satisfied are you with the overall training methodology? (class sessions, simulation exercise, participants' presentations)
Very dissatisfied
Somehow dissatisfied
Overall satisfied
Very satisfied
I don’t know
17 of 18

18. SPECIFIC TRAINING SESSIONS
Please rank each training session using the options that best describe your experience

19. Session 3 Special lecture: The Fourth Industrial Revolution and Climate Smart Cities
Very useful, very interesting
Useful, adequate knowledge and depth
Useful, but lacks depth
No new knowledge provided
Interesting, but not useful
Not a useful session
17 of 18

20. Session 4: The Global Challenge of Urbanization, Trends, Analysis and the CPI
Very useful, very interesting
Useful, adequate knowledge and depth
Useful, but lacks depth
No new knowledge provided
Interesting, but not useful
Not a useful session
17 of 18

21. Session 5: Monitoring sustainable urban development – City Prosperity Approach
Very useful, very interesting
Useful, adequate knowledge and depth
Useful, but lacks depth
No new knowledge provided
Interesting, but not useful
Not a useful session
0 of 18

22. Session 6: The City Prosperity Index: conceptual and methodological aspects
Very useful, very interesting
Useful, adequate knowledge and depth
Useful, but lacks depth
No new knowledge provided
Interesting, but not useful
Not a useful session
17 of 18

23. Session 7: City Prosperity Initiative case studies – from data to policy implementation
Very useful, very interesting
Useful, adequate knowledge and depth
Useful, but lacks depth
No new knowledge provided
Interesting, but not useful
Not a useful session
16 of 18

24. Session 8: CPI in Vietnam: experience and lessons learnt for influencing policy-making process
Very useful, very interesting
Useful, adequate knowledge and depth
Useful, but lacks depth
No new knowledge provided
Interesting, but not useful
Not a useful session
17 of 18

25. Session 9 and 10: Introduction to the simulation exercises
Very useful, very interesting
Useful, adequate knowledge and depth
Useful, but lacks depth
No new knowledge provided
Interesting, but not useful
Not a useful session
17 of 18

26. Session 11: Field visit Very useful, very interesting
Useful, adequate knowledge and depth
Useful, but lacks depth
No new knowledge provided
Interesting, but not useful
Not a useful session
17 of 18

27. Session 12: Step-by-step guidance for City Action Planning
Very useful, very interesting
Useful, adequate knowledge and depth
Useful, but lacks depth
No new knowledge provided
Interesting, but not useful
Not a useful session
0 of 18

28. Do the exercises provide you useful tools for city planning?
Very useful and easy to apply
I would like to use them in my work but need post-course support
They are useful tools and I understand how to use them but not easy to apply in my work
Useful, but I didn’t understand some part of the exercises
Not useful at all
17 of 18

29. Group presentations Very useful, very interesting
Useful, adequate knowledge and depth
Useful, but lacks depth
No new knowledge provided
Interesting, but not useful
Not a useful session
0 of 18

30. LECTURING & MODERATION OF THE SESSIONS
FACILITATION SKILLS
LECTURING & MODERATION OF THE SESSIONS
Please rank the performance of our trainers and facilitators according to your experience in this training course Your opinions help us improving!

31. The sessions were interactive and well facilitated
Strongly Agree
Agree
Somewhat Agree
Neutral
Somewhat Disagree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
17 of 18

32. The lecturers know their subjects well
Strongly Agree
Agree
Somewhat Agree
Neutral
Somewhat Disagree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
17 of 18

33. The lecturers allowed sufficient time for questions and answers
Strongly Agree
Agree
Somewhat Agree
Neutral
Somewhat Disagree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
17 of 18

34. Sessions’ time and duration were well managed
Strongly Agree
Agree
Somewhat Agree
Neutral
Somewhat Disagree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
0 of 18

35. FACILITIES
SUPPORT AND LOGISTICS
Please rank each area according to your experience in this training course Your opinions help us improving!

36. IUTC training facilities are great
Strongly Agree
Agree
Somewhat Agree
Neutral
Somewhat Disagree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
0 of 18

37. The accommodation at IUTC is great
Strongly Agree
Agree
Somewhat Agree
Neutral
Somewhat Disagree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
17 of 18

38. The application procedure was easy and clear
Strongly Agree
Agree
Somewhat Agree
Neutral
Somewhat Disagree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
0 of 18

39. The staff at IUTC and from UN-Habitat were friendly and helpful
Strongly Agree
Agree
Somewhat Agree
Neutral
Somewhat Disagree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
17 of 18

40. YOUR TRAINING NEEDS
What do you think is a priority area that needs training and capacity development in your city?

41. Training suggestions Urban Planning Urban management & governance
Please select 04 top priorities
Urban Planning
Urban management & governance
Indicators for urban decision-making
Urban legislation
Municipal finance
Housing
Land policies
Slum upgrading
Cities and climate change
Urban risk reduction
0 of 18

42. Tमुरी मुरी धन्यवाद маш их баярлалаа Thank you very much
대단히 감사합니다
маш их баярлалаа
Thank you very much
muchas gracias
Terima kasih banyak
आपका बहुत बहुत धन्यवाद
Cảm ơn nhiều
بہت بہت شکریہ
மிக்க நன்றி

43. Please email comments and suggestions to Trang.Nguyen@unhabitat.org