Saving Energy Together Power Saver TM Program Putting Energy Efficiency to Work Presented by Fred Yebra, P.E. March 5, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Conservation Program Cost-Effectiveness Tests Presentation to the: Florida Public Service Commission Workshop on Energy Efficiency Initiatives November.
Advertisements

Demand Side Management: Concept, Need and scenario in West Bengal Saroj Sarkar Engineer (Retd.) WBSEDCL 1.
Power Saver TM Program Saving Energy Together Reducing Costs with Energy Efficiency Presented by Jerrel Gustafson, Unit Manager American Public Power Association.
Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Howard.
Introduction Build and impact metric data provided by the SGIG recipients convey the type and extent of technology deployment, as well as its effect on.
The Power to Make a Difference PPL Electric Utilities April 2010.
A Future of Clean, Efficient Energy
Save Energy and Money PNM Energy Efficiency Programs
October 8, 2013 Eric Fox and Mike Russo. AGENDA »Recent Sales and Customer Trends »Preliminary State Sales and Demand Forecast »Building a No DSM Forecast.
Energy Savings Opportunities in Controls, Lighting, Air Conditioning, Water Heating and Refrigeration Chuck Thomas, P.E. CEM Lead Engineer.
Commercial Energy Efficiency Program GAPPA May 27, 2014.
Established in 1975 by the Legislature as a public benefit corporation Administers renewable energy and energy efficiency programs, also performs research.
Demand Side Management Programs. Why Energy Efficiency? Money savings Increased comfort Conserve natural resources Cheapest power plant EPA Regulations?
ENERGY CONSUMPTION: MANZANITA HALL ENERGY UPGRADES BEN COHNDANNY GARNETT AUSTIN FROGGEPAUL SAIGEON MATT DUNCAN.
T OPPORTUNITIES FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY AT TRIBAL GAMING FACILITIES.
1 NARUC/FERC Collaborative on Demand Response Pepco and Delmarva Power Blueprint for the Future Filings J. Mack Wathen July 15, 2007.
Overview of Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) Program San Antonio Office of Environmental Policy December 16, 2009.
A Home Energy Workshop. Developed by Central Vermont Community Action Council In partnership with Efficiency Vermont.
Austin Energy’s Renewable Energy and Demand Side Management
Regulatory View of DSM/EE David Drooz Public Staff – N.C. Utilities Commission April 2015.
Energy Efficiency and Arizona’s Energy Future Jeff Schlegel Southwest Energy Efficiency Project (SWEEP) April
2005 LIEE Impact Evaluation Final Report January 23, 2007 Presentation to the Low Income Oversight Board West Hill Energy and Computing, Inc. with Ridge.
Connecticut’s Energy Future Removing Barriers to Promote Energy Sustainability: Public Policy and Financing December 2, 2004 Legislative Office Building.
State Incentives for Energy Efficiency Commercial and Industrial New Jersey Board of Public Utilities Office of Clean Energy Mona L. Mosser Bureau of Energy.
ON IT 1 Con Edison Energy Efficiency Programs Sustaining our Future Rebecca Craft Director of Energy Efficiency.
Promoting Energy Efficiency In Buildings in Developing countries.
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REGULATION AND POLICY-MAKING FOR AFRICA Module 14 Energy Efficiency Module 14: DEMAND-SIDE MANAGEMENT.
Steve Craker K-12 Team Lead Geoff Overland IT and Data Center Focus on Energy Increase IT Budgets with Energy Efficiency.
A New View on Energy Efficiency An Introduction for Public Power Utilities.
Energy efficiency & ethics All content copyright © 2008, Plains Justice e ee energy efficiency & ethics.
Conservation, Efficiency and Sustainability in Energy J. Todd Hall Vice President Lincoln Electric System Lincoln, Nebraska.
CLICK TO EDIT MASTER TITLE STYLE EFFICIENCY MAINE’S RECENT SUCCESSES AND MAJOR OPPORTUNITIES AHEAD Michael D. Stoddard Executive Director.
Energy Conservation Western North Carolina Recycler’s Networking Council Black Mountain, North Carolina December 9, 2004 Keyes McGee, E.I. North Carolina.
Incorporating an Affordability Rate Cap Into a Florida RPS Florida Public Service Commission July 26, 2007 Kim Owens, P.E. JEA Clean Power Coordinator.
Energy efficient housing: quick wins Maike Christiansen United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) Housing and Land Management Unit.
New Mexico State University EFFICIENT RESIDENTIAL ENERYGY Fahzy Cooperative Extension Service ______ County.
Efficiency Vermont your resource for energy savings The Economic Benefits of Energy Efficiency.
Energy Efficiency – it makes sense! Ken Curry Energy Efficiency Manager
A New View on Energy Efficiency An Introduction for Public Power Utilities (Approximately 30 minute presentation)
Name of Building(s) or Project Speaker(s) Organization(s)
Strategic Planning for DSM in a Community-owned Utility Presented by Shu-Sun Kwan & Ed Arguello Colorado Springs Utilities 2005 APPA Engineering & Operations.
Demand-Side Management Models & Practices in California Innovating for Sustainable Results: Integrated Approaches for Energy, Climate, and the Environment.
1 Energy Efficiency Program Status Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates On Behalf of the Electric Utility Marketing Managers of Texas (EUMMOT) Organization.
Assessing Electric Utility Incentives and Support Fred Yebra, P.E. Energy Engineer State Energy Conservation Office July 28, 2015 Presentation to the Association.
Smart Energy Smart Energy July 28, Smart Energy.
10 Turn off Lights Not in Use Motion Sensors simple ways to go green
Joint Agency Workshop on the Governor’s Energy Efficiency Goals CEC IEPR Workshop on 2030 Efficiency Goals Panel Topic Codes and Existing Buildings Monday.
2010 Massachusetts Energy Efficiency Programs July 1, 2010.
Demand Side Energy Management & Conservation Lighting Retrofits The University of Texas at Austin.
New York State System Benefits Charge (SBC) – NGA Center for Best Practices April 29, 2004 Bob Callender Vice President for Programs NYSERDA.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council A Look At The Council’s Conservation Planning Methodology and Assumptions A Look At The Council’s Conservation.
Energy Services Harsha Holalu Ramakrishna Energy Extension Specialist Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering.
Click to edit Master title style 1 Energy Savings Assistance Program And California Alternate Rates for Energy (CARE) Program Proposed Decision.
Overview for Local Energy Committees February 10, 2016.
CITY OF LEOMINSTER. Customer Charge The cost of providing customer related service such as metering, meter reading and billing. These fixed costs are.
PECO Smart Ideas for Your Business Greater Philadelphia Association of Energy Engineers Mike O’Leary, PECO April 20, 2016.
Hawaiienergy.com Graceson Ghen. hawaiienergy.com  Hawaii’s energy conservation and efficiency program  Administered by Leidos Engineering, LLC under.
EmPower MD Act overview and Demand Response Training EmPower Maryland.
Florida Energy Efficiency and Conservation Act (FEECA) Presentation to: Florida Energy & Climate Commission Terry Deason July 22, 2009 Radey I Thomas I.
EE379K/EE394V Smart Grids: Smart Grid, A Contrarian View
Presentation to the UUCF Coordinating Team October 5, 2016
Robert Greenwald, P.Eng, MBA February 26, 2004
SMECO Demand Response filing
Allegheny Power Residential Demand Response Program
Island Energy Advisory Committee Board
Efficiency maine’s recent successes and major opportunities ahead Michael D. Stoddard Executive Director.
State Allocation Board Hearing Solar Energy and Energy Efficiency Project Options for California Schools Mark Johnson, Energy Solutions Manager - Schools.
Anna Garcia Air Innovations Conference August 2004
Commercial Programs Elisabeth Reyes, Meagan Brown
New Jersey’s Clean Energy Program Direct Install for Small to Medium Sized Buildings New Jersey' Clean Energy Program includes a number of initiatives.
Presentation transcript:

Saving Energy Together Power Saver TM Program Putting Energy Efficiency to Work Presented by Fred Yebra, P.E. March 5, 2008

Saving Energy Together Power Saver TM Program How do we evaluate DSM programs? FY06 DSM Performance Measures DSM forecasting DSM projected cash flow Achievements To Be Covered

Saving Energy Together Power Saver TM Program 698

Saving Energy Together Power Saver TM Program 1999 Austin City Council Resolution September 14, 1999 “Cost-effective conservation programs shall be the first priority in meeting new load growth requirements of Austin Energy. ” Clean Energy Resolution August 28, 2003 … Austin Energy Strategic Plan to ensure Austin remains a national and international leader in the development and use of clean energy

Saving Energy Together Power Saver TM Program 2003 Austin Energy’s Response AE Strategic Plan Energy Efficiency is first priority 15% Demand-Side Management by % Renewable Energy by MWs of Solar by 2020

Saving Energy Together Power Saver TM Program Austin Climate Protection Plan Resolution on February 15, 2007 “Commit our City to addressing climate change and global warming” Makes Austin a national leader among cities in the fight against global warming.

Saving Energy Together Power Saver TM Program Austin Climate Protection Plan Makes COA facilities/fleets carbon neutral Makes Austin building codes most EE in nation Mechanisms for business to reduce carbon Austin Energy’s GHG-reduction by 2020 –Achieve 700 MW through energy efficiency –Meet 30% energy needs with renewable energy –Achieve carbon neutrality on new generation –Establish CO 2 cap for utility emissions

Saving Energy Together Power Saver TM Program Promoting Energy Efficiency Cash rebates pay 20 – 30% of cost Up to 70% incentives for Small Business Direct install measures Free home and business energy audits Low-income Free Weatherization Public education & outreach efforts

Saving Energy Together Power Saver TM Program Free Home Weatherization Energy Improvements Insulate Attics Duct Sealing Install CFLs Solar Screens Caulking and Weather-stripping Free Smoke & Carbon Monoxide Detector Minor Energy Related Repairs

Saving Energy Together Power Saver TM Program Power Saver Program FREE Energy Saving Products Lower energy costs 65,000 installed in homes, apartments 4,000 installed in commercial buildings

Saving Energy Together Power Saver TM Program Top 100 MW is used 43 hrs per year DSM Opportunity AE System Load Duration Curve MWs Generated Hours (8760)

Saving Energy Together Power Saver TM Program What is DSM? Utility initiatives which modify the level and pattern of electricity use by our customers.

Saving Energy Together Power Saver TM Program Peak Clipping Strategic Conservation Load Shifting Valley Filling Strategic Load GrowthFlexible Load Shape Energy Use Modification

Saving Energy Together Power Saver TM Program Peak Clipping Strategic Conservation Load Shifting Energy Use Modification

Saving Energy Together Power Saver TM Program Peak Clipping Power Saver Programs: A/C Cycling W/H Cycling Demand Response Volunteers Peak Clipping Strategy Represent 36% of new DSM program mix

Saving Energy Together Power Saver TM Program Total Home Efficiency Small Business Efficiency Green Building Program Appliance Efficiency Multi-family Rebates Commercial Rebates Refrigerator Recycling Free Weatherization Municipal Conservation Air Duct Sealing Strategic Conservation Represent 58% of new DSM program mix

Saving Energy Together Power Saver TM Program Load Shifting Time-of-Use Rate Thermal Energy Storage Systems Load Shifting Strategy Represent 6% of new DSM program mix

Saving Energy Together Power Saver TM Program Load Shifting ABIA Thermal Energy Storage Profile – August 2000

Saving Energy Together Power Saver TM Program Load Shifting ABIA Profile – July 1999

Saving Energy Together Power Saver TM Program Peak Day: June 2, 2005 Demand Response June 15, 2005

Saving Energy Together Power Saver TM Program Peak Clipping Impact Wednesday, June 15, 2005

Saving Energy Together Power Saver TM Program Strategic Conservation Impact Traffic Signal Conversion to LED Goal: 5,500 traffic signals Existing incandescent lamps 135 watts New LED lamps 15 watts Energy savings per lamp 120 watts = 90% energy reduction

Saving Energy Together Power Saver TM Program Energy Savings are Calculated Estimates (Baseline efficiency) – (Rated efficiency) = kW Savings

Saving Energy Together Power Saver TM Program KW Savings Calculation Example Calculation: Replace a standard 3-lamp T12 fluorescent fixture = 112 Watts* with a new 3-lamp T8 fluorescent fixture = 75 Watts* ( 112 watts – 75 watts) = 37 watts of energy saved per fixture. * ANSI rating

Saving Energy Together Power Saver TM Program Lighting Retrofits Persistence of Savings Require permanent fixture modifications Modifications last for 12 years Modifications make it incompatible to go back to standard fluorescent lamps.

Saving Energy Together Power Saver TM Program A/C Energy Savings Calculation Example: Replace old inefficient a/c unit (EER=8) with new high efficiency system (EER = 12). A/C Size x 12 x DF/OF x (1/EER EX – 1/EER NEW ) = kW saved. 75 tons x 12 x 0.9/1.25 x ( 1/8 – 1/12 ) = 27 kW Saved

Saving Energy Together Power Saver TM Program National/Independent Efficiency Rating Organizations ARI:American Refrigeration Institute ANSI:American National Standards Institute IESNA:Illuminating Engineering Society of North America NEMA:National Electrical Manufacturer’s Association ASTM:American Society of Testing and Measurements

Saving Energy Together Power Saver TM Program How do we know DSM works? Equipment changes – “not” behavior modification Inspection of installation work Consumption verification Independent evaluations

Saving Energy Together Power Saver TM Program DSM focuses on technology upgrades, not behavioral changes Eligible technologies –High efficiency ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) –Air Duct Sealing & Improvements –Energy efficient lighting equipment –Premium efficiency motor –Home weatherization Ineligible Conservation Measures –Behavior changes –Maintenance and operation changes –Turning off equipment –Removing equipment –Down-sizing equipment

Saving Energy Together Power Saver TM Program Inspections Pre-Inspection Post-Inspection Rebates payment based on post-inspection

Saving Energy Together Power Saver TM Program Independent Evaluations Historical evaluations: –SRC (Synergic Resource Corporation, 1988) –B & C, Inc. (Barakat & Chamberlin, Inc. 1994) –B & C, Inc. (Measurement & Verification, 1996) –E SOURCE, Inc. (2001) –ICF Consulting, Inc. (2004) “Through the use of actual billing histories, the programs do indeed save KWH and kW.” Program evaluations through measurement and verification were eliminated in 1998.

Saving Energy Together Power Saver TM Program What is the cost-effectiveness of the DSM programs?

Saving Energy Together Power Saver TM Program DSM Cost-Effectiveness Model “Standard Practice for Cost-Benefit Analysis of Conservation and Load Management Programs”, first published Used to compare DSM program costs to supply-side options. DSM is a lower cost option than supply-side options Residential DSM Cost: $439 per peak kW saved Commercial DSM Cost: $272 per peak kW saved

Saving Energy Together Power Saver TM Program Cost-Effectiveness Tests for DSM Participant Test: measures benefits to the customer. Utility Revenue Requirement Test: measures the net costs of DSM program incurred by the utility. Total Resource Cost Test: measures the net costs of DSM based on total costs to all participants and the utility. Rate Impact Measure Test: measures what happens to customer rates due to DSM program.

Saving Energy Together Power Saver TM Program Cost-Effectiveness Tests (Benefits $ / Costs $ > 1) The Participant Test = NPV of Savings on electric bill + financial rebate Customer’s additional cost incurred to participate The Utility Test = NPV of Avoided (fuel + power plant operating & maintenance + capacity cost) DSM program administrative cost + financial rebates Ratepayer Test = NPV of Avoided (fuel + power plant operating & maintenance + capacity cost) DSM program administrative cost + financial rebates + revenue losses The Total Resource Test = NPV of Avoided ( fuel + power plant operating & maintenance + capacity cost) DSM administrative cost + Customer’s additional cost incurred

Saving Energy Together Power Saver TM Program How do we incorporate DSM into the load forecast?

Saving Energy Together Power Saver TM Program Modeling DSM Programs in Load Forecast Hourly electric load shapes are created for DSM Hourly KW savings are determined using computer models. Participation budgets are established annually. DSM impacts are included in load forecast.

Saving Energy Together Power Saver TM Program DSM Savings Forecast

Saving Energy Together Power Saver TM Program DSM Reduction in Fuel Costs

Saving Energy Together Power Saver TM Program Cash Flow Projection of DSM

Saving Energy Together Power Saver TM Program FY 2006 Achievements Energy Savings MW % of ProgramsSavedGoal Residential % Commercial % Demand Response % Solar % Grand Total %

Saving Energy Together Power Saver TM Program MW Saved Programs FY2005FY2006 Residential Commercial Demand Response Solar Grand Total Energy Savings Comparison FY2005 to FY2006

Saving Energy Together Power Saver TM Program DSM Summary DSM programs are saving peak kW & kWh. Cost-effectiveness analyses include full program costs. DSM goals and budgets should vary to support AE resource plan requirements.

Saving Energy Together Power Saver TM Program Thank you!