Lismore STAG Public Consultation and Options - Summary Scott Leitham and Paul McCartney | 18 December 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Physical activity and the environment Implementing NICE guidance January 2008 NICE public health guidance 8.
Advertisements

CityCo, Piccadilly Hoteliers Forum
Riding a Bike for Transport 2011 Survey Findings.
The Scottish Ferries Review Islay 31March 2009 Welcome.
Questionnaire Analysis Steve Copeland. Coleorton Parish Plan Committee – Brief Established to develop a Parish Plan. The Plan was to represent the wishes.
GPAQ Survey Results & Summary Analysis for: Marple Cottage Surgery Individual Questions Analysis and Year On Year Comparison (2007/2008 – 2008/2009)
The Scottish Ferries Review Consultation Document 2010 Cumbrae - 17 August 2010 Cheryl Murrie.
The Scottish Ferries Review Consultation Document 2010 Islay - 19 July 2010 Judith Ainsley.
The Scottish Ferries Review Consultation Document 2010 Oban – 27 July 2010 Judith Ainsley.
The Scottish Ferries Review Consultation Document 2010 Mull – 28 July 2010 Judith Ainsley.
Fundamental Requirements for Sustaining Mobility Prof. Dr. Ahmad Farhan Sadullah School of Civil Engineering Universiti Sains Malaysia 30 April 2013 A.
‘STATED PREFERENCE’ FERRIES REVIEW. What is the Policy Question? To better understand how people ‘value’ different ‘attributes’ of their ferry service……
1 Corey W. Hill Chief of Public Transportation May 20, 2008 May 20, 2008.
The Current State and Future of the Regional Multi-Modal Travel Demand Forecasting Model.
Customer Satisfaction Surveys 2005/06 7 th August 2006.
Avoiding Gridlock Conclusions emerging from the Local Strategic Partnership Transport Summit. and: The Way Forward 15 November 2007 Manouchehr Nahvi.
Presentation to the AMP Leadership Team Moving forward. April 17, 2013.
Ferry Services Development Through The Oban Hub. Structure of Presentation  Existing transport services  Transport interventions  Approach to appraisal.
Walking and cycling routes Local facilities Streets Open space Public transport Supporting infrastructure Creating ‘commons’ Local planning.
Transport for Social Responsibility Mainstreaming Gender in Road Transport: Operational Guidance for World Bank Staff An overview Julie BABINARD Environmental.
A Very Big Experiment Congestion Charging in London Peter Jones Transport Studies Group University of Westminster.
Scottish Ferries Review Economic Work Package Key findings – September 2009.
2012 Citizen Survey results Background Implementing Our Vision Action Chart Key Drivers Areas of Significant Change Trends over Time What’s Next?
Recent Developments in UK Travel and Tourism BTEC National Travel and Tourism.
George Street ETRO Visitor Research Quarter 1 Findings September to November 2014 Key Findings Presentation December 2014.
Workshop on Infrastructures Sustainable Infrastructure for Efficient Mobility: the Key Challenges Luc Bourdeau ECTP Secretary General Industrial Technologies.
Tiddington 4 Village Plan Survey Results – Roads Two thirds of respondents wanted a controlled crossing of the A418 in Tiddington, with the very large.
Library Services Review Update on consultation 10 th January 2013.
Joint Transport Forum I Rapid Transit Line 2 Our Future Transport I West of England Sub Region.
Sustainable travel for Limerick and Area By Professor Lewis Lesley.
Mid Wales LTP Stakeholder Workshop 3 rd October Presentation by Ann Elias and Janice Hughes.
Greater Toronto & Hamilton Area School Travel Household Attitudinal Study.
 Scotland’s National Transport Strategy A Consultation.
Early findings in the Helena’s Planning Process Lisa Ballard, P.E. November 28, 2012.
Phase 1 Consultation Results 23 rd September 2014.
Arriva in Southend Kevin Hawkins Commercial Director.
1RET Stakeholder Meeting 19 January 2010 Road Equivalent Tariff Study Stakeholder Meeting – 19 January 2010.
GNTP Business Forum – The Big Idea – Gary Smerdon-White 18 th September 2012.
Ongoing The Hook Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group – Barry Deller (Chair & Site Selection Lead) – Diana Whittaker (Secretary) – Sue Mesher (Community.
LTP3 Development Sean Parks Nottinghamshire County Council.
Highlights of the Staff Survey 2011 Cheryl Kershaw Director of Surveys and Research.
Department of Health Sciences The Structure and Content of the European Health and Social Integration Survey (EHSIS) Washington Group meeting, 2011 Bermuda.
Improved Vehicle Operations in SSA Mustapha Benmaamar, TRL.
Community Health Services Update Loughborough 16 December 2009 Dominic Cox, Deputy Director of Primary Care.
Monitoring: Continuous Improvements & Achieving Results Scott Copsey Travel Plan Coordinator University of Hertfordshire.
© MORI Not to be used, reproduced or shown to any third party without the prior written permission of MORI The Big Listening - Living in Salford.
Economics of Congestion Jagadish Guria Presentation to the the 8th Annual New Zealand Transport Summit 25 February 2008.
Traffic Management and Transport Demand Management Gladys Frame Consultant Traffic Engineer The World Bank Module 4: Urban Transport Planning.
David Connolly MVA Transport, Travel and SHS Data SHS Topic Report: Modal Shift.
PARKING STRATEGY POLICY DEVELOPMENT Transportation & Asset Management Environment & Regeneration Scrutiny Committee 28 February 2007.
The Scottish Ferries Review Consultation Document 2010 Arran - 12 July 2010 Graham Laidlaw.
Choosing method of travel The method of travel chosen will depend on the following: the reason for the trip who is going on the trip (level of responsibility)
1 Weekly Supervisor Meeting – Project Waalbrug Project Waalbrug Improving transport accessibility in Nijmegen Bernat Goni, Vikash Mohan, Arjen van Diepen,
Powered by Earswick Village Residents Questionnaire Key Findings October 2015.
Why we do this.. 22% current population over 60 years One persons households – 27% by % of the population will be over 60 years of age by 2031.
Briefing for Transportation Finance Panel Nov 23, 2015 Economic Analysis Reports: 1.I-84 Viaduct in Hartford 2.I-84/Rt8 Mixmaster in Waterbury 3.New Haven.
The Scottish Ferries Review Judith Ainsley Small Isles October 2009.
Travel Benefits Benefit/Cost Transit Slides. Travel Benefits  Are a primary source of benefits  Include benefits to transit and auto users, and trucks.
Impacts of Free Public Transport – An Evaluation Framework Oded Cats Yusak Susilo Jonas Eliasson.
Ralph Mold Information for Choice Policy and Project Manager Information Prescriptions The right information at the right time.
DRAFT INNER MELBOURNE ACTION PLAN Presented by Elissa McElroy IMAP Executive Officer January 2016.
NHT Survey 2013 Explanation of Indicators. Survey Questions BIs (Benchmark Indicator) KBIs ( Key Benchmark Indicator) Theme e.g. Accessibility e.g. KBI.
The Scottish Ferries Review Consultation Document Gourock 23 August 2010 Judith Ainsley.
Road Equivalent Tariff Study Stakeholder Meeting 13th May 2009.
The Passenger View David Beer Passenger Executive.
Draft Transportation Element September 6, 2017
Mull Community Council Results of RET Questionnaire
The relation between Human behavior and the built environment.
Do Roads Connect or Divide? The Other Side of the Road
GCP Transport Update Meeting for: M11 J11 Park & Ride Engagement Group
Presentation transcript:

Lismore STAG Public Consultation and Options - Summary Scott Leitham and Paul McCartney | 18 December 2008

Lismore STAG | 18 December 2008 Contents Results from Consultation Exercise Lismore Appin / Port Appin Study ‘Transport Planning’ Objectives Initial Option Generation Next Steps

Lismore STAG | 18 December 2008 Survey Responses A very good response… Lismore Consultation Packs posted to households and businesses on Lismore: 120 questionnaires and 67 travel diaries were returned (approx 500 crossings) 60% of all households and businesses on Lismore returned at least one questionnaire 256 consultation questionnaires posted to households and businesses in Port Appin and Appin: 98 questionnaires were returned 38% response rate from Appin and Port Appin

Lismore STAG | 18 December 2008 Lismore Questionnaire

Lismore STAG | 18 December 2008 Q1 Ferry choice 58% of respondents primarily use the Point – Port Appin service 27% of respondents primarily use the Oban – Achnacroish service Which of the two island ferry services do you tend to use?

Lismore STAG | 18 December 2008 Q2 Travel Frequency The majority of respondents make 0-2 return crossings per week Around 10 were very frequent ferry users Roughly how many total return ferry crossings do you make in a typical week?

Lismore STAG | 18 December 2008 Views of Existing Ferry Services

Lismore STAG | 18 December 2008 Q3a Ferry timetables 61% stated Port Appin service is good (better than adequate) 38% stated Oban service is good New Oban timetable seen as a benefit by most Out of hours service and later/earlier crossings - 14% worse than adequate – Port Appin - 29% worse than adequate – Oban

Lismore STAG | 18 December 2008 Q3b Reliability and punctuality 75% stated the punctuality and reliability of the Oban service was good 66% stated the punctuality and reliability of the Port Appin service was good Port Appin ferry regularly breaks down Both services disrupted by bad weather - 13% worse than adequate – Port Appin - 3% worse than adequate – Oban

Lismore STAG | 18 December 2008 Q3c Cost of fare 91% - Port Appin passenger fare adequate or good 75% - Oban passenger fare adequate or good 69% - Oban vehicle fare poor (less than adequate) Out of hours fare too expensive Cost of vehicle fare too high - 9% worse than adequate – Port Appin - 69% worse than adequate – Oban (car) - 25% worse than adequate – Oban (pass)

Lismore STAG | 18 December 2008 Q3d Quality of service - onboard 60% - Onboard facilities on Oban service poor 34% - Onboard facilities on Port Appin service poor No disabled access Cold, uncomfortable Oban crossing Medical emergency access - 34% worse than adequate – Port Appin - 60% worse than adequate – Oban

Lismore STAG | 18 December 2008 Q3e Quality of service – at terminal 71% - terminal facilities for Port Appin service poor 39% - terminal facilities for Oban service poor Parking at Port Appin Parking at Oban - 71% worse than adequate – Port Appin - 39% worse than adequate – Oban

Lismore STAG | 18 December 2008 Q3f Ease of changing for onward travel 80% - public transport availability at Port Appin poor 24% - public transport availability at Oban poor No public transport at Port Appin Good link up with Citylink and rail services - 80% worse than adequate – Port Appin - 24% worse than adequate – Oban

Lismore STAG | 18 December 2008 Q3g Location of ferry terminals 52% / 45% described Point / Port Appin location as good 55% / 46% described Achnacroish / Oban location as good Parking at Port Appin Access road at Port Appin - 12% worse than adequate – Point - 22% worse than adequate – Port Appin - 6% worse than adequate – Achnacroish - 9% worse than adequate – Oban

Lismore STAG | 18 December 2008 Q3h Ferry capacity 74% - ferry capacity on Port Appin service adequate or good 65% - ferry capacity on Oban service adequate or good Vehicle capacity on ferry a problem Cal Mac booking system can cause problems - 26% worse than adequate – Port Appin - 35% worse than adequate – Oban

Lismore STAG | 18 December 2008 Q3i Overall assessment of service 80% - overall assessment of Port Appin service good or adequate 70% - overall assessment of Oban service good or adequate - 20% worse than adequate – Port Appin - 30% worse than adequate – Oban

Lismore STAG | 18 December 2008 Port Appin and Appin consultation

Lismore STAG | 18 December 2008 Q1-3 Use of Ferry 75% of respondents said they used the ferry – but most rarely Most use the ferry for leisure or visiting friends / relatives Much less work related use

Lismore STAG | 18 December 2008 Q4a Parking at Port Appin - car 61% - parking at Port Appin is a major problem Not enough parking spaces Traffic and parking has negative impact on business/tourism

Lismore STAG | 18 December 2008 Q4b Parking at Port Appin – goods and other vehicles 67% - parking of goods vehicles a major problem Block emergency accesses Issues with vehicles turning No provision for turning

Lismore STAG | 18 December 2008 Q4c Port Appin Access road 34% - ferry traffic on access road to Port Appin a major problem Road unsuitable for any increase in traffic Road is narrow, single track road with blind spots, poor quality

Lismore STAG | 18 December 2008 Q4d Quality of services at terminal 28% - quality of services at the pier are a major problem Basic/few facilities at terminal Facilities would have to be improved if vehicle ferry introduced

Lismore STAG | 18 December 2008 Q5 Ferry Service - Benefit or problem? 65% believe the ferry to Lismore is a benefit to the Port Appin residents: Greater interaction between communities Boost to businesses and tourism But, traffic and parking cause serious problems

Lismore STAG | 18 December 2008 Q6 Improved access – a benefit to you? 32% believe improved access would not benefit the people of Port Appin Problems associated with construction and increased traffic and parking issues But a boost to business / tourism and improve interaction between the two communities

Lismore STAG | 18 December 2008 Summary Aspects the where a majority rate the current Lismore services as worse than adequate: Cost of fares for car ferry to Oban Quality of on-board services – Oban-Achnacroish Quality of services at terminals – Point-Port Appin Ease of changing to onward travel (PT) – Point-Port Appin Following this, the worst rated aspects are: Quality of services at terminals – Oban-Achnacroish Ferry Capacity - Oban-Achnacroish Quality of on-board services – Point-Port Appin Timetables - Oban-Achnacroish At Port Appin, the parking and traffic issues come through strongly

Lismore STAG | 18 December 2008 Transport Planning Objectives and Initial Options

Lismore STAG | 18 December Census – Lismore key facts

Lismore STAG | 18 December 2008 Transport Planning Objectives (1) Accessibility and Social Inclusion (Safety): To allow islanders to benefit from improved access from mainland-based service providers (ie services which come to households); To provide continuing access to mainland based retail and other services for those islanders without access to a car; To improve islanders’ access to routine and emergency health services; To improve the quality (and safety) of crossing facilities – making them accessible in all respects to everyone including the mobility impaired ; and To maintain and develop community and economic links between Lismore and Port Appin / Appin.

Lismore STAG | 18 December 2008 Transport Planning Objectives (2) Economy: To provide an affordable and convenient means of regularly taking a car or commercial vehicle to and from the mainland for islanders and those on the mainland; and To tackle parking and traffic issues associated with current ferry services at Port Appin. Environment: To avoid significant new transport related environmental impacts associated with access to Lismore. Integration: To maintain or improve integration between ferry and onward public transport services on the mainland.

Lismore STAG | 18 December 2008 Initial Options Matrix on current routes *ROPAX = Roll-on-roll-off car & passenger ferry *PAX = Passenger only ferry

Lismore STAG | 18 December 2008 Other Potential Options…… A new route eg: Point / Achnacroish - Loch Creran Achnacroish – Port Appin Achnacroish – other new landfall Single ropax vessel serving both routes Addition of season ‘fast’ commercial passenger service (eg Jura)

Lismore STAG | 18 December 2008 The Next Steps…… STAG Part 1 Analysis of Options (8 th January) Public Meeting to report on those being taken forward – mid January 2009 Part 2 detailed appraisal Final reporting and Public Meeting in March 2009