Institutional Effectiveness Partnership Initiative Workshop Presented by: Dr. Dianne Van Hook, Chancellor, College of the Canyons Dr. Barry Gribbons, Deputy Chancellor, College of the Canyons Dr. Daylene Meuschke, Dean, College of the Canyons Theresa Tena, Vice Chancellor for Institutional Effectiveness Dr. Paul Steenhausen, Executive Dir. Success Center for CA Community Colleges Jeff Spano, Dean, Institutional Effectiveness Alice Van Ommeren, Administrator for Academic Planning and Development Ryan Fuller, Specialist, Information Systems and Analysis Dr. Matthew C. Lee, Project Director, IEPI

Overview of the Workshop Openers and Expectations What Is IEPI? – Context – Outcomes – Structure – Major Components Framework of Indicators – Overview and Definitions – College Goal Setting Process – Accessing Data and Setting Goals College Team Breakout Sessions – What Groups Should Participate in Process? – Process and Timeline for Year 1 – Process and Timeline for Future Years – Refinements

SLOs for Today Participants will be able to describe the purpose and the major components of IEPI. Participants will be able to describe the indicators framework, requirements for setting goals and best practices for setting goals. Participants will be able to apply requirements and best practices to the context of their college in developing a goal-setting plan for their college.

Other Expectations What Else Do You Hope to Get Out of Today?

What’s the Single Most Important Idea for Community College Effectiveness?

What Is the Context for Our Efforts? California Community Colleges Are the Largest, Most Effective and Innovative System of Higher Education in the World! Celebrate Hundreds of Innovations from the 112 Community Colleges on Nearly Every Topic Imaginable Support Disseminating These Innovations and Effective Practices Throughout the System Recognize that 1 in 5 of Nation’s Community College Students Attends a California Community College

What Is the Institutional Effectiveness Partnership Initiative? It Is: Designed to Advance Community Colleges’ Institutional Effectiveness by Drawing on Expertise within the System Funded by California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office A Five-Year Grant (Ongoing): December 2014 to June 30, 2019 $2.5 million per year

What Are the Desired IEPI Outcomes? Continue to Advance California Community Colleges as the Most Effective System of Higher Education in the World Eliminate Accreditation Sanctions and Audit Findings at the Local College Level Expand Access for Our Students and Attainment of Their Educational Goals

What Is the Structure of the Initiative? Executive Committee Chancellor’s Office College of the Canyons Foothill College Academic Senate for CCC Success Center for CCC, Funded by the Kresge Foundation and Administered through the FCCC

Advisory Committee Nominations from 16 Statewide Organizations Appointments by the ASCCC Monthly Meetings Began January 26 Advisory Committee Workgroups Provide Input on the Major Components of IEPI

What Are the Major Components of the IEPI? Framework of Indicators Professional Development Technical Assistance through Partnership Resource Teams (PRTs) Advocacy for Systemic and Policy Changes

What Is the Framework of Indicators? Is Required by Legislature Draws Heavily on Existing Resources for Year 1 Was Developed by Advisory Committee Workgroup Draws in Part on Input from Fiscal Experts Is to Have v1.0 Implemented by June 30, 2015 Includes: – Student Performance and Outcomes (e.g., Scorecard) – Accreditation Status – Fiscal Viability – Compliance w/State and Federal Programmatic Guidelines Much More Later in This Session

What Is the Focus of the Professional Development Component? Disseminate Effective Practices for Institutional Effectiveness Identify Pitfalls to Avoid Include an Online Clearinghouse Supplemented by Regional Workshops

What Is the Online Clearinghouse? Coordinated by Success Center for California Community Colleges, in Collaboration with TTIP South and Other Key Partners Pulls Together Hundreds of Resources by Topic (e.g. Integrated Planning, SLO Assessment, Basic Skills, Workforce Training, Board Governance, etc.), Highlighting Exemplary Practices Will Explore Modern Tools Such As Predictive Analytics (like Netflix and Amazon)

Professional Development Regional Workshops Complement Online Clearinghouse Host in the Northern, Central and Southern Parts of the State Coordinate and Co-present with Other Statewide Organizations Whenever Possible Started in March 2015

Professional Development Regional Workshop Topics in Spring/Summer During Today’s Workshop: – What Is IEPI? – What are the New Indicators and Goals Colleges Need to Set this Spring? – 481 Participants from 104 Colleges and 23 District Offices Other Possible Topics for Spring and Summer: – Student Support Redefined – Enrollment Management Developing a Calendar for Year 2

How Will the Partnership Resource Team (Technical Assistance) Visits Be Structured? Team Members’ Expertise Designed to Match College Areas of Focus Not Just a Single Visit: Each Team Commits to 3 Visits or More As Needed. Designed to: Understand Issues and Identify Scope of Support Develop Ideas for College’s (2 Page) Innovation and Effectiveness Plan in Areas Such As: Accreditation Issues Budget, Fiscal, and Audit Issues Integrated Planning Board Governance SLO Assessment Tools and Processes Follow Up Support As Needed

Partnership Resource Teams Grants of Up to $150,000 as Seed Money to Expedite Implementation of College’s Innovation and Effectiveness Plan (Available Until Funds Run Out) 20 College CEO Completed Letters of Interest So Far Review of Letters of Interest from College CEOs began March 12 th Announcement of Scheduling in Late March Team Visits Start in April 2015

PRT Expert Pool Nominations from Statewide Organizations and Others Appointments from Academic Senate Over 110 Have Volunteered for Pool to Date Surveys Completed by Volunteers to Identify Strengths

Framework of Indicators, Part 2 Initial Recommendation from Advisory Committee on February 5 Reviewed at Consultation Council on February 19 Updated Recommendation from Advisory Committee on Goals Framework Requirement, Including Timeline, March 9 Data for Colleges Being Assembled by CCCCO and Sent to Colleges in March Framework of Indicators Approved by BOG on March 16

Indicators Continued Indicators Workgroup Is Developing Recommendations for v2.0 – Additional Measures Access Student Equity (Connected to Student Equity Plan) – Timelines for Beyond Year 1 – Integration with Other Indicator Systems and Goals

What Indicators Are in the Framework? Student Outcomes Completion – Prepared – Unprepared – Overall Remedial Rate – Math – English – ESL CTE Completion Rate *Course Completion Rate Degrees Certificates Transfers Accreditation Status *Accreditation Status Fiscal Viability Salary and Benefits FTES Annual Operating Excess/Deficiency *Fund Balance Cash Balance State and Federal Programmatic Compliance *Overall Audit Opinion *Required Goals for Year 1

Monitoring Portal

Chancellor’s Office web link: – IE Monitoring portal After March 27, college/district CEOs will designate staff to set college/district goals, and those staff will receive the necessary passcodes.

Monitoring Portal

What Is the Connection with the Scorecard and ACCJC Annual Report? IndicatorScorecardACCJC / Datamart Completion Remedial Rate CTE Completion Course Completion Degrees Certificates Transfers

How Are the College Goals Different from System Goals? System Goals – Completion Rate – Number of ADTs – Completion Rate for Disadvantaged Groups and Equity Index – Participation Rate – Number of Student Education Plans

College Goal Setting Year 1 Requirements: – Adopt Indicators Framework (18 Indicators) – Set Goals for At Least One Indicator Per Category: Student Outcomes: Course Success Rate Accreditation: Accreditation Status (e.g., Reaffirmed) Fiscal Viability: Fund Balance State and Federal Programmatic Compliance: Overall Audit Opinion (e.g., Unmodified)

Year 1 Goal Setting Connect with Other Goals Already Set – E.g. Fund Balance, Success Rate from ACCJC Institution-Set Standard – Can be but does not have to be the same Should Be Challenging but Need Not Always Be Higher – E.g., Fund balance may currently be 12 percent – Goal does not have to be higher than 12 percent

Year 1 Goal Setting Accreditation Status: E.g. – 6-year Goal: Reaffirmed – 1-Year Goal may be NA Overall Audit Opinion: E.g. – Unmodified

Year 1 Goal Setting Can the College Do More If They Feel Others Are Important to Set in Year 1? – Yes – Some have volunteered to do all 18 for Lesson Learned Presentation in Fall

Goals What Happens If We Don’t Achieve Goals? – Nothing, as long as the college tried. – The most important activities for meaningful impacts on our students’ success have the greatest risk, but are worth trying!

Process Locally Determined Best Practice Is to Engage Groups on Campus, Such As: – Indicators Committee – Budget Committee – Planning Committee – Academic Senate – Classified Group – Board of Trustees

Mechanics of Accessing Data and Setting Goals

Goals Who are the important groups on your campus?

Process / Timeline What is the process and timeline that makes the most sense for Year 1? Future Years?

Adjustments Based on Report-Outs How would you adjust plans based on report- outs?

Workshop Evaluations Please complete the Workshop evaluation form: WorkshopsMarch2015https:// WorkshopsMarch2015 Thank you for your participation today!

Contact Information Theresa Tena, VC IE, Chancellor’s Office, Dr. Dianne Van Hook, Chancellor, College of the Canyons, Dr. Barry Gribbons, Deputy Chancellor, College of the Canyons, Dr. Matthew Lee, IEPI Project Director, Dr. Paul Steenhausen, Ex Dir., Success Center, Jeff Spano, Dean, Institutional Effectiveness, Dr. Daylene Meuschke, Dean, College of the Canyons,