1 FORMER AIR FORCE PLANT 36 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION Prepared for: Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence and Aeronautical Systems Center.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Technical Requirements for Site Remediation Backbone of New Jerseys Site Remediation Program.
Advertisements

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AT SOLID WASTE (SW) LANDFILLS QUIZ Ruxandra Floroiu, Environmental Engineer, ECSSD WB Safeguards Workshop Chisinau, Moldova October.
New Groundwater Techniques and Technologies 17 th Annual RETS REMP Conference June 25-27, 2007 Eric L. Darois, CHP EPRI Consultant/RSCS Inc.
Bliss Area Sewage System Groundwater Monitoring Pete Ganzel Washington County Department of Public Health & Environment.
2014 Vapor Intrusion Guidance Amendments Discussion Points Waste Site Cleanup Advisory Committee Meeting May 22, 2014.
MPCA Citizens’ Board Information Item February 25, 2014.
© 2011 COLUMBIA Technologies. Use of MiHpt Systems to Improve Project Outcomes Rapid, Real-Time High Resolution Site Characterization © 2013 COLUMBIA Technologies.
Further Site Investigation Sutton Walls Former Landfill
Environmental Testing at Immaculate Heart of Mary (IHM) Week of April 21, 2014 Presented by Ohio EPA and Summit County Public Health.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Headquarters U.S. Air Force 1 Direct Sampling Ion Trap Mass Spectrometry Rob R. Smith Oak Ridge.
Background Site of a former Industrial Waste Treatment Plant Contaminants accumulated in sludge drying beds and surge pond, they subsequently leaked into.
H23A14 Briton Ferry Gas Works Land Contamination Antreas Christodoulides Georgios Efstathiou Antreas Christodoulides Georgios Efstathiou.
Environmental Investigation by Con Edison Former E115th Street Gas Works November 13, 2007.
Former Landfill Environmental Management Plan Update May 8, 2012.
Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management
Vapor Intrusion Guidance Proposed Updates
A Numerical Study of Barometric Pumping Jeff Sondrup AgE 588 Fluid Mechanics of Porous Materials April 11, 2001.
Soil Contamination Countermeasures Hyogo Prefectural Government Agricultural & Environmental Affairs Department Environmental Management Bureau Water &
FSA Groundwater Flow and Solute Transport Model Presentation to Scottsdale Citizens Group March 19, 1999.
IMPROVING SITE CHARACTERIZATION Rhode Island’s Perspective IMPROVING SITE CHARACTERIZATION Rhode Island’s Perspective Overview by Leo Hellested, P.E. Chief.
 EPA’s soil sampling objectives  Technical approach  Technical assistance to DTSC/DOE  Next Steps and Schedule.
Of Massachusetts Department ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Soil Vapor Intrusion... A Decade of Regulatory Requirements & Experiences Paul W. Locke MA DEP Bureau.
Overview of USGS Groundwater Quality Assessment Activities and Related Data in Alabama 2011 Alabama Water Resources Conference September 9, 2011, Perdido.
Gradient CORPORATION Vapor Intrusion Attenuation Factors (AFs) – Measured vs. EPA Defaults A Case Study Presented by Manu Sharma and Jennifer DeAscentis.
Background and lessons learned Managers Meeting February 13, 2014.
Discerning Background Sources from Vapor Intrusion Jeffrey Kurtz, Ph.D. and David Folkes, PE EnviroGroup Limited Denver Boston Albuquerque Seattle Colorado.
Unit 3: Environmental Requirements and Growth Factors Group Work.
7th Avenue and Bethany Home Road Water Quality Assurance Revolving Fund Site August 20, 2013.
History and Cleanup at Chemical Commodities, Inc. Jeff Field US EPA Region 7 1.
Presented by Michael Taraszki, PG, CHG Engineering and Consulting, Inc. Perchlorate Monitoring in the Llagas Groundwater Subbasin South Santa Clara County,
1 Effective Characterization Technologies Deana M. Crumbling, M.S. Technology Innovation Office U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, D.C. (703)
Environmental Drilling By: Josh Humphreys October 10,2006.
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Division of Health Assessment and Consultation Meeting Agenda Monday, September 27, :30 pmMeet and.
Former DuPont Barksdale Works Project Update December 14, 2004 DuPont Corporate Remediation Group Great Lakes Visitors Center.
Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) Nevada Field Office (NFO) FY 2015 Status Report Milinka Watson-Garrett Analytical Services Manager U.S. Department.
SITE STATUS UPDATE TOP STOP PETROLEUM RELEASE SITE GUNNISION, UTAH Morgan Atkinson – Division of Environmental Response and Remediation, Project Manager.
Former DuPont Barksdale Works Project Update May 19, 2004 DuPont Corporate Remediation Group Great Lakes Visitors Center.
Course AE2104 Environmental Measuring and Monitoring.
Preliminary Hydrogeologic Evaluation Part #1 Cedar Ridge Estates Application for Comprehensive Permit Under MGL Ch40B Residential Development
Preparing a Site Conceptual Model. Typical Site Management Problems: Site complexities  Complicated hydrogeology  Multiple contaminants of concern (COCs)
SAINT FRANCIS HIGH SCHOOL Case Study Continuous Gas Monitoring Sacramento County Environmental Management Department.
Area I Burn Pit Santa Susana Field Laboratory RCRA Facility Investigation Work Plan February 19, 2008 Laura Rainey, P.G. Senior Engineering Geologist California.
Waste Program Monitoring Technology Needs and the 21M 2 Effort ETC Brownbag Thursday, May 19, 2005 Daniel Powell, U.S. EPA Office of Superfund Remediation.
GORE, GORE-TEX and designs are trademarks of W. L. Gore & Associates © 2007 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. 1 Environmental Investigations Using Versatile,
New activities Tour de Table – Lithuania Kestutis Kadunas, Geological Survey of Lithuania.
1 RAB Update Trap and Skeet Range 17 Remedial Investigation Activities 25 March 2010.
Groundwater Pollution
Ukraine Petro Nakhaba All-Ukrainian Public Organization “ Chysta Khvylya ” Deputy Head Kyiv, Ukraine Contaminated Sites Management Joint UMOE-DEPA Project.
By Alex Walton Josh Bush Alex Walton, Josh Bush1.
Water Recourses in the Tucson Basin Arizona Department of Environmental Quality H2O Is it safe?
GO C3Analyze and Evaluate Mechanisms Affecting the Distribution of Potentially Harmful Substances within an Environment. Transport of Materials Through.
Risk Assessment and Monitoring for Environmental Chemicals SURIN AREE Environmental Scientist Thailand.
Tour de Table Kestutis Kadunas LITHUANIA. Background (1) Inventorization of contaminated sites- two step approach –LGT projects –Declaration of activities.
High Resolution Site Characterization Approach: Rapid Sample Collection with High Quality Analyses Targeting VOCs/SVOCs Presented by: Harry O’Neill, President.
Ljubljana, | Slide 1 Groundwater Quality Assessment Determination of chemical status and assessment on individual sites Austrian experience.
GEORGIA PACIFIC WEST PROPOSED INTERIM ACTION Public Meeting & Open House – July 12, 2011.
Application of CSIA in Assessing and Cleaning Organics-Contaminated Sites Dr. Yi Wang Director, ZymaX Forensics Isotope April 5, Brownfields 2011.
Date of download: 7/2/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Illustration of quantities in Eq. : Ath is the ratio of the striped area under the.
Fort Detrick Installation Restoration Program Area B Groundwater November 1, 2010 Fort Detrick, Maryland A Sustainable Community of Excellence.
Proposed Plan for No Further Action
East Hennepin Avenue Site
Chemical Metals Industries, Inc. (CMI)
Timothy Veatch, Section Chief
LUST Investigation – Five Basic Questions
Connecticut Remediation Standard Regulations: Volatilization Criteria
Case Studies Bruce H. Trimble Sunbelt Environmental Services, Inc.
Brownfield Corrective Action with Revised RRS
Chemical Metals Industries, Inc. (CMI)
Board of Public Utilities August 17, 2017
Preparing a Site Conceptual Model
Presentation transcript:

1 FORMER AIR FORCE PLANT 36 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION Prepared for: Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence and Aeronautical Systems Center

2 PURPOSE FOR MIP AND PDB TECHNOLOGY Characterize lateral/vertical extent of cl- VOCs in soil and ground water Evaluate vertical distribution of cl-VOCs in ground water Provide real-time data on lithology and contaminant distribution

3 HISTORY AND STATUS OF CORRECTIVE ACTION AT GEAE GEAE buys AFP 36 in 1989 Corrective action begins in 1990 Numerous investigations/interim measures performed Approximately 150 monitoring wells on/off site TCE and TCA in ground water remaining corrective measure Investigate source of TCE/TCA at AF Plant 36

4

5 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION Determine Source of TCE/TCA in groundwater –1. Sampling Design –2. Sampling Locations –3. Methodology MIP Survey –1. Sensor and Detector Outputs (Fig ) –2. Sampling Area (Fig ) –3. EC and ECD Results (Fig ) Direct Push Results –1. Soil (Fig ) –2. Groundwater (Fig ) –3. MIP/Direct Push Comparison (Fig ) Groundwater Monitoring Results Passive Diffusion Bag Results (Fig )

6 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION MIP Survey 1. Sampling Design –2. Sampling Area (Fig ) –3. EC and ECD Results (Fig )

7

8 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION MIP Survey –1. Sensor and Detector Outputs (Fig ) –2. Sampling Area (Fig ) –3. EC and ECD Results (Fig )

9

10 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION MIP Survey –1. Sensor and Detector Outputs (Fig ) –2. Sampling Area (Fig ) –3. EC and ECD Results (Fig )

11

12 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION Direct Push Results –1. Soil (Fig ) –2. Groundwater (Fig ) –3. MIP/Direct Push Comparison (Fig )

13

14 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION Direct Push Results –1. Soil (Fig ) –2. Groundwater (Fig ) –3. MIP/Direct Push Comparison (Fig )

15

16

17 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION Groundwater Monitoring Results Passive Diffusion Bag Results (Fig )

18