Using Activity Insight to Standardize the Annual Adjunct Faculty Evaluation Process Vicky Fennell AI Administrator & Faculty Records Analyst Kaplan University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluator 101: An Introduction to Serving as a MSCHE Evaluator Dr. Luis G. Pedraja MSCHE Vice President.
Advertisements

Promotion and Tenure Workshop 1. Evaluation Procedure There is only one evaluation procedure leading to recommendations regarding promotion, tenure and.
Presented by:Stella Garcia May 2007 Service Standards for the Telephone Presented by:Stella Garcia.
Evaluations: Administrative & Classified Employees
 Humboldt State University Joyce Lopes, Carol Lorentzen, Volga Koval, Randi Darnall Burke, Kate Stroup, Teal Sexton, Amber Blakeslee, Jacque Honda.
PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING WORKSHOP SUSAN S. WILLIAMS VICE DEAN ALAN KALISH DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING ASC CHAIRS — JAN. 30,
Based on Survey Feedback from LEAs Examples:  Copy Rosters for a Teacher: ◦ Able to copy over a teacher’s entire roster to another subject area  Update.
Tier 1/Universal Training The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin PBIS Network (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support.
Update prepared for Deans’ Council June 14, 2012.
CTE Credential Program For IHE and District Representatives Meetings held March & April 2010.
Preparing for NCATE October 22-26, 2005 Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
The Assistant Principal Pool Process 2014
Introduction to the Faculty Evaluation System
Faculty & Staff Compensation Programs Board of Regents Meeting
Promotion and Tenure at Ohio University Martin Tuck PhD Associate Provost for Academic Affairs.
University Council Shared Leadership for Integrated Planning and Consultative Decision-Making.
Supporting Yale Together Reporting Relationship between Business Managers and Finance & Administration Business Manager Meeting Omni Hotel April 18, 2007.
PGCE School Experience 1 Briefing Gill Woods. Important Dates for SE1 PRELIMINARY VISIT DAYS Wednesday 1st October Wednesday 8 th October 8 WEEK BLOCK.
The Pathway to Success Goal IV Strengthen and Leverage Programs of Strength and Promise.
PRESENTATION TITLE Tenure-Track Faculty Recruitment Training Human Resources, Diversity & Inclusion Employment Services Fall 2014 Reaching Higher... we.
Performance Management Open Information Session Spring 2009.
Leadership that Works: How can you help? 2013 Committee Chair Training.
New Annual Faculty Assessment... after the Beta.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.
Teacher Advisory & Assessment Scheme. Ambition in Action TAA Advisory and Assessment Scheme TAA1 Advisory Activity Workshop for New.
Promotion and Tenure Lois J. Geist, M.D. Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs and Development.
SLU School of Medicine: Introduction to the Promotion and Tenure Process Lia Lowrie, MD Professor of Pediatrics Chair, SOM Credential’s Committee.
PARTNERSHIP FOR STUDENT SUCCESS AT SANTA BARBARA CITY COLLEGE Overview and Two Models.
Area Governor Training June 15, 2013 The Best Job Ever!
IT-301 Project Management I: Unit 2: Scope Management January 13, 2011.
Teacher Evaluation Training Gen Admin Meeting December 1st, 2011 By Dr. Glenn Maleyko.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
Changes in the Faculty Review Process for United Academics Faculty Presenter: Patricia Linton, College of Arts & Sciences.
The purpose of this section of our training modules is to familiarize you to all that goes in to our very successful group exercise program. Our program.
WELCOME TO CE 100 Preparing for a Career in Early Childhood Development Unit 4 WELCOME TO CE 100 Preparing for a Career in Early Childhood Development.
PRESENTATION TO ASSOCIATION OF INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH AND PLANNING OFFICERS BUFFALO, NEW YORK JUNE 11, 2009 How Campuses are Closing the GE Assessment.
WELCOME TO PTI Adjunct FACULTY INFORMATION SESSION.
Aligning IT Investments (Plan) and the Institutional Strategic Plan Team 2 Ed Pokraka Shelley Reed Jeff Cepull Will Krause Educause Seminars On Academic.
Presented by: Theresa Elliot-Cheslek AVP & CHRO Terry Ryan Asst. Attorney General, AGO Dealing with Faculty Personnel Issues Revised October 2015.
WLUSA/OSSTF Annual Performance Review Process Human Resources & WLUSA| 2015.
1 HR Forum USPS ePerformance December 10, FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY Office of Human Resources Agenda Welcome HR Updates Payroll Updates USPS ePerformance.
Adjunct Dinner August 18,  SPC Adjunct Expectations  TSI Quick Reference Chart  Who Do You Contact at SPC?  SPC & Dual Credit Calendar  Dual.
Enterprise IT Decision Making Governance Amy Gee, Portfolio Manager, EITDM Office of the CIO.
MYWRITINGLABPLUS AND BUSINESS. WHAT IS MYWRITINGLABPLUS? MyWritingLabPlus is an online program designed to help you with writing and grammar necessary.
SNU HLC/NCA Accreditation Update SNU Graduate & Professional Studies Fall Meeting October 24, 2008.
Welcome to NU 304!!! I am so excited about this class!! I have identified some items in this presentation to help orient you to the course! Please do not.
Setting the context Multiplying leaders to build movements everywhere requires that development be designed around the needs of the individual as.
Teacher Advisory & Assessment Scheme. Ambition in Action Gerard Kell Learning and Innovation Annette Leverett Learning and Innovation.
Presented by Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 Principals’ Conference September 16, 2011.
What are the DCC-413 and DCC-414 and how do they pertain to me? The STARS Interim Report.
For the Students Students in elementary school right now have always used technology, classes seem outdated and boring to most because of the lack of.
PEOPLESOFT UPDATES PeopleSoft Support and Sustainment Center PeopleSoft Support and Sustainment Center.
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Appraisal Training for Central Office and Campus-Based Non-Teacher Employees September 2013 HOUSTON INDEPENDENT.
Department of Medicine Faculty Development
Navigating the Performance Review Process
Promotion: Policy and Procedures for COM Faculty in State College
Lecturer’s employee organization (leo)
Academic Year UNC Asheville
Lia Lowrie, MD Professor of Pediatrics
Lia Lowrie, MD Professor of Pediatrics
Student Concerns about Faculty Conduct Faculty and staff together provide support to students that help align the student experience with the mission and.
Achieving Tenure and Promotion
Promotion/Tenure Portfolio
Welcome to Penn State’s 2018 New Faculty Orientation
Faculty Promotions Information Meeting
Annual Review of Faculty
HLC Update: Progress and Preparation for the Visit
Training for Reviewers Fall 2018
New Faculty Orientation Non-tenure-track Faculty Appointments
Presentation transcript:

Using Activity Insight to Standardize the Annual Adjunct Faculty Evaluation Process Vicky Fennell AI Administrator & Faculty Records Analyst Kaplan University October 2014

2 Overview Why did we need a new annual process for adjunct faculty evaluation? What is the new process and how was it developed? What does the ongoing use of the evaluation and follow up look like?

3 Why Did We Need a New Process? At KU, faculty performance is evaluated based on the five criteria found in the Faculty Handbook: -Substantive Expertise -Preparation -Presentation -Classroom Management -Cultural/Environmental Contribution Even though all faculty are evaluated on the above criteria, the frequency, and format for doing so has differed from school to school - s -SharePoint -Word documents -Some bi-annually, some annually, some never, etc.

4 Building the New Process To meet HLC requirements, the Vice Provost of Kaplan University made the decision to standardize the process for completing annual reviews for adjunct faculty. Pre-change steps: 1.Create a new annual review form that would be used across ALL schools within KU -Our Vice Provost worked with several Deans and Chairs to create the form that made sense but was also aligned with the faculty handbook 2.Get buy-in and approval from all Deans and Assistant Deans 3.Review form with HR and the University Provost 4.Build the form in Activity Insight along with any reporting to go along with the process 5.Communicate the new process to all Deans, Chairs, and Faculty and provide training on the new form

5 What Is the New Process? The Annual Adjunct Evaluation form was built right into Activity Insight, helping it to increasingly become the one-stop shop for faculty members’ professional information.

6 The New Evaluation Form

7 A Sample to Faculty Dear Barbara, As you may recall, at Kaplan University we complete a formal, holistic evaluation of each faculty member’s performance each year. I have had the opportunity to review your classes and contributions in the past year, and look forward to sharing that feedback with you. To access the evaluation, go to KU Campus > Quick Links > Activity Insight > Manage Your Activities > Teaching > Annual Adjunct Faculty Evaluation. I would like to set up a time to give you a call so we can discuss your many strengths as well as areas for further concentration. I also want to hear more about your professional goals and discuss ways in which I can support you in reaching them. I am available during the following time slots next week. Please let me know a couple times that would work for you: Monday 1 – 4 pm ET, Wednesday 5 – 8 pm ET, Friday 9 – 11 am ET. Best regards, and I look forward to our discussion, Sally

8 Associated Reports 1. Anniversary Report Pulls all faculty with a hire date within the month the Chair pulls the report in order to determine which of their faculty need to be evaluated that month 2. Evaluation Verification Report Pulls list of faculty and shows the date their evaluation was entered. If no date is listed, there is no evaluation entered. Two reports were built to aid this new evaluation process:

9 Ongoing Use, Feedback, and Improvement New process for adjunct faculty annual evaluations was rolled out in March of this year Going smoothly ever since! Currently in the process of surveying Chairs for feedback We are also VERY excited about the new workflow function in AI which will make this entire process even better!

10 Appendix A: The Evaluation Form

11 Appendix A: The Evaluation Form (Cont.) When the evaluation is complete, average the ratings in the 5 areas and round to the closest half point:

12 Appendix A: The Evaluation Form (Cont.)

13 Appendix A: The Evaluation Form (Cont.)

14 Appendix A: The Evaluation Form (Cont.)

15 Appendix A: The Evaluation Form (Cont.)

16 Appendix A: The Evaluation Form (Cont.)

17 Appendix A: The Evaluation Form (Cont.)