English Language Learners in the Arizona Accountability SYSTEM

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AYP to AMO – 2012 ESEA Update January 20, 2013 Thank you to Nancy Katims- Edmonds School District for much of the content of this presentation Ben Gauyan.
Advertisements

‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
The Monitoring Process
California English Language Development Test (CELDT) and Reclassification Palm Middle School
WELCOME English Language Learners (ELLs) Pat Faircloth Student Achievement through Language Acquisition (SALA) Kim Ward Education Information Services.
The New York State Assessment System and LEP/ELLs: An Update David Abrams Assistant Commissioner for Standards, Assessment, and Reporting OBE-FLS 2007.
Madison Rose Lane School School Improvement Plan.
AZ Learns and A-F Letter Grades Arizona Department of Education Presentation to the NCAASE Committee ASU Washington Center, Washington D.C. March 7, 2012.
Title III Accountability. Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives How well are English Learners achieving academically? How well are English Learners.
Arizona’s Federal Accountability System 2011 David McNeil Director of Assessment, Accountability and Research.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
A Parent’s Guide to Understanding the State Accountability Workbook.
Acquiring English Proficiency in the Torrington Public Schools Programs, Process, and Student Progress Cheryl F. Kloczko.
Chart of Accounts and Specific Budget Codes North Carolina Department of Public Instruction K-12 Programs Title III/ESL Office 2.
Virginia Department of Education May 8, English Language Proficiency Targets: Title III Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives (AMAOs) 2.
Title III Notice of Proposed Interpretations Presentation for LEP SCASS/CCSSO May 7, 2008.
Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives. Thompson School District Core Values Integrity –We will consistently demonstrate respect, honesty, transparency,
NCLB Federal Funding Planning Meeting Private Non Profit Schools LEA Date.
Helping EMIS Coordinators prepare for the Local Report Card (LRC) Theresa Reid, EMIS Coordinator HCCA May 2004.
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-4:00.
Title III, Part A: Language Instruction for Limited English Proficient (LEP) and Immigrant Students  The purpose of Title III, Part A is to help ensure.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
2014 A - F Letter Grades - AIMS The State of Arizona utilizes AIMS to measure student growth. In measuring student growth, the State of Arizona then identifies.
Title III – General Provisions AREA OF FOCUS: PARENTAL NOTIFICATION.
Annual Measurable Achievement Objective s (AMAOs): Update Jacqueline A. Iribarren, DPI September 27, 2007.
Creating a Good Title III Plan Title III & Migrant Directors’ Meeting Lansing, Michigan April 26, 2011 Shereen Tabrizi, Ph.D. Manager, Special Populations.
Testing Coordinators: October 4, 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Academic Performance Index (API)
Arizona Department of Education Office of English Language Acquisition Services.
Connecticut’s Performance on Title III Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives, Presentation to Connecticut Administrators of Programs for English.
Meeting Private School Student Participation Requirements Under Title III West Virginia Department of Education.
ELL AMAO and Grad Rate Data ELL Outcome Improvement Group Oregon Department of Education July 21, 2015.
Title III Updates & AMAOs Jacqueline A. Iribarren, Title III Susan Ketchum, Office of Educational Accountability September 24, 2008.
Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.
AZELLA Reassessment Test Training
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California English Language Development Test and Title III.
Parents as Partners: How Parents and Schools Work Together to Close the Achievement Gap.
 All students with a “Yes” on the Home Language Survey are required to be assessed in order to determine if they are an English Language Learner or Proficient.
Understanding AMAOs Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives for Title III Districts School Year Results.
Title III Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives (AMAOs): LEA Reports and Responsibilities Presented by the Pennsylvania Department of Education Bureau.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Special Populations Michigan Department of Education Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability Paul Bielawski.
Arizona Department of Education Assessment – AZELLA December 2015
Federal and State Student Accountability Data Update Testing Coordinators Meeting Local District 8 09/29/09 1.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
The Arizona English Language Learner Assessment (AZELLA)
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
ELL – ACCESS for ELLs PIMS Data Collection School Year.
To Test or Not To Test Arizona Department of Education Assessment – AZELLA December 2015.
Agenda Review Public Comments Election of Chair NDE ELL Program Professionals: Jane Splean – Program Supervisor Kulwadee Axtell Jonathan Gibson Blakely.
December 2008 Title III Master Plan Institute Language Acquisition Branch Reclassification of English Learners and Monitoring of RFEP students.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Title III Accountability Update Bilingual Coordinators Network.
ESEA Title III Accountability System. JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 22 Title III Requires States to: Define two annual measurable.
New Jersey DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Title I, Part A & Title III, Part A Changes Under ESSA New Jersey Department of Education The Office of Supplemental.
The Arizona English Language Learner Assessment (AZELLA)
WorkKeys February 19 – 21, 2013 Online
Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015: Highlights and
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
Welcome to the BT Super Conference
Kansas Leads the World in the Success of Each Student.
Kim Miller Oregon Department of Education
The Arizona English Language Learner Assessment (AZELLA)
WELCOME!!! Triple I Conference November 19, 2005
Summary of Final Regulations: Accountability and State Plans
Reclassification: Fluent English Proficient
English Learner Advisory Committee
Accountability Update
DELAC Meeting May 17, 2017.
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Presentation transcript:

English Language Learners in the Arizona Accountability SYSTEM Arizona Department of Education, Research & Evaluation Division Hildie A. Cohen

ELL Points in the A-F Letter Grade System English Language Learners ELL Points in the A-F Letter Grade System

ELL Point Criteria Schools/LEAs can receive 3 additional points if they meet 3 criteria: School wide n count of greater than or equal to 10 ELL students Test 95% of students with an ELL need on the Spring 2013 AZELLA 30% Reclassification of FAY ELL students

ELL Point Criteria N-Count Criteria: All ELL students counted (A.R.S 15-756) ELL Need ELL Program Students withdrawn due to SPED criteria and withdrawn by parent request are included in n count.

ELL Point Criteria 95% Tested on AZELLA: Based on enrollment as of the first day of Spring 2013 AZELLA testing window. January 14, 2013 Spring 2013 AZELLA 95% Tested Report will be posted on Common Logon on January 15, 2013.

ELL Point Criteria Students included in 95% Tested: Students with an ELL need in the current year or continuing need from prior Fiscal Year ELLAR students re-enrolled in an ELL program in the current or prior Fiscal Year Students with an ELL service program withdrawal code of ‘Withdrawn by parent request’ in FY 2011 or later (until they score proficient)

ELL Point Criteria Students excluded in 95% Tested: IFEP FEP 1 & 2 ELLAR students NOT re-enrolled in an ELL program in the current Fiscal Year Students with an ELL service program withdrawal code of ‘Withdrawn due to SPED criteria’ and not re-enrolled in an ELL program

ELL Point Criteria Reclassification Rate: Only Full Academic Year (FAY) ELL students are included in the Reclassification Rate Students with an ELL program code of ‘Withdrawn due to SPED Criteria’ are removed

ELL Point Criteria In SY 2011-2012, 63% of eligible schools received ELL points under the A-F Letter Grade criteria.

Title III: Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives (AMAOs) English Language Learners Title III: Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives (AMAOs)

AMAO The No Child Left Behind Act (2003) states that every LEA must be evaluated on three measures: ELLs Making Progress on AZELLA Reclassification of ELLs An Achievement Index (formerly known as adequate yearly progress) for ELL subgroup

AMAO Which students are included in AMAO calculations? All ELL students as identified in Arizona Revised Statute 15-756: Students with an ELL need Students currently in an ELL program

AMAO AMAO 1: ELLs Making Progress At the LEA level, 23% or greater of ELL students must make progress across AZELLA performance levels for Fiscal Year 2013.

AMAO AMAO 1: ELLs Making Progress* Making Progress for Kindergarten Pre-Emergent/ Emergent Basic or Intermediate or Proficient Basic/ Intermediate Proficient *Proposed change to USED

AMAO AMAO 1: ELLs Making Progress* Making Progress for Grades 1 through 12 Pre-Emergent/ Emergent Basic or Intermediate or Proficient Basic Intermediate or Proficient Intermediate Proficient *Proposed change to USED

AMAO In SY 2011-2012, 97% of LEAs met Making Progress.

AMAO AMAO 2: Reclassification of ELLs At the LEA level, 23% or greater of ELL students must reclassify in FY 2013.

AMAO In SY 2011-2012, 81% of LEAs met Reclassification.

AMAO AMAO 3: An Achievement Index (formerly known as adequate yearly progress) The LEA must test 95% of the students in the ELL subgroup in every grade/subject combination on AIMS Meet the 2013 Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) Have an attendance rate of 90% or a graduation rate of 80%

AMAO In SY 2011-2012, 90% of LEAs met AMAO 3.

AMAO for 2013 ADE will submit the change to the calculation of AMAO 1 to the USED by December 31, 2012 USED will review changes and determine requirements We will send a memo regarding any changes as soon as we hear back from the USED

For questions on the AMAOs, please email AMAO@azed.gov Thank You Questions? For questions on A-F Letter Grades, please email Achieve@azed.gov For questions on the AMAOs, please email AMAO@azed.gov