Infrastructure Planning and Funding MID-REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS MID-REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION MARCH 19, 2015 NAIOP-NEW MEXICO CHAPTER.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Public Transit Alliance (NuPTA) RIPEC Study: Transportation at a Crossroads (2002) Growing Smart with Transit: A Report of the Transit 2020 Working.
Advertisements

General Update March Background As the region grows, increased travel demand on our aging Metro Highway System will continue to create additional.
Wisconsin Transportation Finance and Policy Commission Freight Rail Day 2012 October 26, 2012.
Wade E. Kline, AICP Community Development Planner.
1 6-Year Transportation Improvement Program ( ) Kit Baker, Chair ( Citizen’s Transportation Advisory Committee ) Desiree’ Winkler, P.E. ( Transportation.
City Transportation Funding Overview House Transportation Committee January 13, 2004 Ashley Probart AWC Transportation Coordinator.
I-95 Corridor Coalition December 14, 2001 I-95 Corridor Coalition Mid-Atlantic Rail Operations Study — An Integrated Strategy to Eliminate Choke Points.
PSRC’s Project Selection Process February 6,
1 How to Succeed in Statewide and MPO Transportation Planning.
Nathan Masek, AICP 18 th ITS World Congress, October
2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan Final Approval GVMC Board May 7, 2015.
THE PRESIDENT’S FISCAL YEAR 2012 BUDGET REQUEST Federal Transit Administration.
21 st Century Committee Report Recommendations NC 73 Council of Planning Annual Meeting January 22, 2009.
1 Status Report on the Bus Systems in the National Capital Region Report of the Regional Bus Subcommittee to the Access for All Advisory Committee April.
LOW CARBON TRANSIT OPERATIONS PROGRAM [SB 862 (2014)] DECEMBER 2014.
TPO Board. 25-Year Planning Horizon Update LRTP every 5 years Identify needed major improvements Determine those that are “cost feasible” (i.e., highest.
Program Update Baltimore MPO November 25, Internal Draft AGENDA  Program Overview  Alternatives Development  Stakeholder and Public Outreach.
Fiscal Years Outlook Preliminary Six-Year Financial Plan and Six-Year Improvement Plan Strategy John W. Lawson, Chief Financial Officer Reta.
U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration MAP-21 Moving Ahead with Progress in the 21 st Century Linking.
Patrick Weidemann Ryan Wilson, P.E., AICP Minnesota Department of Transportation MnDOT – ACEC/MN Annual Conference March 5, 2013.
1 1 Executive Board January 22, 2009 Update to the Regional Transportation Plan TRANSPORTATION 2040.
Quality Region Principles The New Visions Plan addresses the region’s quality of life in a number of important ways and provides a framework for improving.
The Regional Forum for Transportation Planning. Southwestern Pennsylvania 10 Counties >7,000 square miles 2.66 million citizens 548 municipalities 132.
MnDOT-ACEC Annual Conference March 5,  Capital planning and programming at MnDOT  Major considerations  A more transparent and collaborative.
Ron Hall Tribal Technical Assistance Program Colorado State University
MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Virginia Association of Planning District Commissions October 4, 2012.
Transportation leadership you can trust. prepared for National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board presented by Arlee Reno, Cambridge Systematics.
Structure of Presentation Federal Requirement Methodology WMATA Expenditures and Core Capacity Constraint Draft Revenues and Expenditures for 2015 – 2040.
Jeff’s slides. Transportation Kitchener Transportation Master Plan Define and prioritize a transportation network that is supportive of all modes of.
KEY PROVISIONS OF THE DRIVE* ACT H.R. 22, as passed by the Senate on July 30, 2015 *Developing a Reliable and Innovative Vision for the Economy Thomas.
Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.
Energy Law, Fall 2010 Natashia Holmes
Growth Management Legislative Discussion March 20, 2012.
1 Transportation Infrastructure Programs Past, Present & Future Transportation Association of Canada Fall Conference September 2011 Edmonton, Alberta.
Draft Transportation 2035 Plan for the San Francisco Bay Area ACT February 24, 2009.
Transit Revitalization Investment Districts Planning and Implementation of Act 238 of 2004 July 2006 Getting to TRID Lynn Colosi Clear View Strategies.
Prepared for Transportation Planning Board presented by Arlee Reno Cambridge Systematics, Inc. in cooperation with K.T. Analytics November 16, 2005 Status.
Financial Planning Session E-1 The Metropolitan Transportation Planning Process.
On the Road to a New Metropolitan Transportation Plan Spokane Regional Health District Board of Health April 25, 2013.
Comprehensive Plan Update Kevin O’Neill Seattle Bicycle Advisory Board September 2, 2015.
Metro’s Capital Improvement Needs Presented to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board By Tom Harrington, Director of Long Range Planning.
“People should have transportation options.” TRANSPORTATION MOVING PEOPLE AND COMMERCE WHERE THEY WANT AND NEED TO GO.
“Connecting People and Places” REGIONAL MOBILITY PLAN CRTPA Board September 20, 2010.
Transportation Funding Workshop Nova Southeastern University December 10, 2012.
ODOT STIP Process and Funding Jerri Bohard –Planning Section Manager –Transportation Development Division Steve Leep –Program and Funding Services Manager.
PRESENTED BY PRISCILLA MARTINEZ-VELEZ CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SACRAMENTO, CA (916)
June 9, 2009 VTA 2009 Annual Conference DRPT Annual Update 2009 VTA Conference Chip Badger Agency Director.
Growth Management Legislative Discussion: Transportation Concurrency April 24, 2012 Growth Management Legislative Discussion: Transportation Concurrency.
Investing in Transportation Infrastructure Government Research Association Annual Policy Conference Janet Oakley, AASHTO July 28, 2009.
Transportation Disadvantaged Local Coordinating Board (TDLCB)
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century TEA-21 Prepared by Iowa Department of Transportation September 1998.
San Diego Regional Comprehensive Plan Presentation to Senate Transportation and Housing Committee February 8, 2005.
1 Status Report on the Bus Systems in the National Capital Region Report of the Regional Bus Subcommittee to the National Capital Region Transportation.
The Regional Big Picture Preparing to Conduct Outreach For the 2010 Constrained Long-Range Plan Presentation to the TPB Access for All Advisory Committee.
The 2006 Constrained Long-Range Transportation Plan: Plan Performance Ronald F. Kirby Director of Transportation Planning October 18, 2006 Item #7.
Capital Plan Update FMCB Meeting February 26, 2016 Pre-Decisional – Draft for discussion only.
Making the Job-Infrastructure Connection CALCOG Region Issues Forum Darin Chidsey.
Goals and ObjectivesFeb. 20, 2014 TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN: FACILITATING TEXAS’ ECONOMIC GROWTH AND GLOBAL COMPETIVENESS Regional Freight Advisory Council.
GOODS MOVEMENT COLLABORATIVE AND GOODS MOVEMENT PLAN 1 Goods Movement Collaborative and Goods Movement Plan Final Plan Alameda County Transportation Commission.
Presented by Maryland Department of Transportation Office of Planning and Capital Programming Funding Prioritization Process Chapter 725 January 2016.
Next Steps.  To begin Planning Council discussion about the MPO’s Next Steps. Now that the 2035 Regional Transportation Plan has been updated and adopted,
Unit 1 THE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS AND THE ROLE OF THE MPO LCTCC Educational Program.
Presentation to the Joint Committee On Transportation Oversight 1 Jack Basso Chief Operating Officer and Business Development Director American Association.
Planning Commission Ian Macek May 26, 2016 Freight Master Plan.
Review of 2016–2021 Strategic Budget Plan Development Process and 2016 Budget Assumptions Financial Administration and Audit Committee April 14,
 SCDOT has over 41,000 miles of pavements and over 8,400 bridges.  4 th largest state maintained system in the country.  Started working on the TAMP.
Review of 2018–2023 Strategic Budget Plan Development Process and
Future Construction FasTracks Corridors Federal Funding Analysis
Intercity Bus Study 5311/Update
Focus40 Overview A long-range plan for how the MBTA can meet the needs of the region in 2040: A 20-year plan as required by MBTA enabling legislation A.
Presentation transcript:

Infrastructure Planning and Funding MID-REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS MID-REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION MARCH 19, 2015 NAIOP-NEW MEXICO CHAPTER

About MRCOG o Regional planning agency o Consortium of: o Local governments o Tribal governments o State agencies o Forum to collaboratively address issues of regional importance o Provide technical assistance

MRCOG Programs o Metropolitan Planning Organization o transportation planning o Rural Transportation Planning Organization o Regional Planning Assistance o water resources o land use, zoning, comprehensive planning o Rio Metro Regional Transit District o Workforce Connection of Central NM o Agricultural Collaborative o Economic Development

Overview of the Metropolitan Planning Process Mid-Region Metropolitan Planning Organization (MRMPO) is a federally mandated program for transportation planning. ◦Analyze projected population growth & growth patterns to predict future travel demand ◦Program all federal transportation funding ◦Highway funds ◦Transit funds ◦Special funds (safety, tribal transportation program, railroad crossings, etc.) ◦Program regionally significant transportation projects ◦Develop long-range transportation plans (Futures 2040, Metropolitan Transportation Plan) ◦Develop short-range transportation funding program (Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) ◦Analyze strategies to address highway congestion ◦Data Collection

Overview of the Metropolitan Planning Process Regional Planning process involves all state, local and tribal government stakeholders engaging in the 3C process ◦Continuous ◦Cooperative ◦Comprehensive MTB (Metropolitan Transportation Board) established committees comprised of representatives of various agencies to develop the MTP and TIP

The Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP)  Long-range (20+ years) multi-modal transportation plan for the Albuquerque metro area  Updated every 4-5 years (current update  April 2015)  Outlines regional transportation challenges & strategies for responding to those challenges  Analyzes future travel demand  Projections of growth/development  Contains list of all anticipated transportation projects in the region based on projected growth, development & funding  MTP provides key locations for additional development, transportation strategies and recommendations to improve regional mobility.

Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)  Federally mandated short-term funding plan  Updated every 2 years  Covers a six year period (FFY )  Programs funding for transportation projects in the Albuquerque Metropolitan Planning Area (AMPA)  All federally funded highway projects  All federally funded transit projects  All “regionally significant” projects whether state, local, tribal, or privately funded  Is developed by representatives from all state, local, and tribal agencies

How does the TIP relate to the MTP? The adopted MTP will guide transportation investments for the region Projects to be funded are selected from the MTP project listing or must be consistent with the MTP The TIP allocates limited financial resources among the many transportation needs Funding categories have specific eligibility requirements & conditions

Project Prioritization Process A tool for evaluating TIP project proposals is the Project Prioritization Process (PPP) Each project is evaluated and receives a prioritization score depending on how well the proposed project supports the goals and regional directions outlined in the MTP. Highest Scoring Projects address: - multimodal connectivity - target key activity centers & corridors - goals and directions of the MTP

Fiscal Constraint for the TIP & MTP Fiscal Constraint – the total amount of all projects cannot exceed the amount of funds “reasonably expected to be available”. The TIP & MTP must be fiscally constrained: ◦Projects to be funded cannot exceed funds available ◦Total projects contained in the MTP cannot exceed projected funding levels. ◦The plan must provide reasonable assurance that the federally supported transportation system is being adequately operated and maintained Funds for system expansion must be targeted to projects which provide the greatest regional benefit and efficiency

Transit Mode-Share Goal Established by the Metropolitan Transportation Board  Established a goal for 20% of the aggregate trips along the priority transit network are to be achieved via transit by 2040  Introduced a Priority Transit Network  Beginning in FFY 2016 and continuing each subsequent year, 25% set-aside of sub-allocated federal funds (STP-Large Urban and CMAQ- Mandatory funds) will be:  Allocated to transit projects or transit-related projects on the priority transit network  Approx. $5.3 million each year

2040 MTP Publicly Funded Projects by Project Type

2040 MTP Privately Funded Projects

2040 MTP Fiscal Constraint Projected Federal & State Revenues FFY $4,831,798,993 billion dollars Projected Local Revenues FFY $5,905,378,655 billion dollars Projected Total Public Revenues FFY = $10,737,357,648 billion dollars Projected Maint. & Oper. Cost for All Agencies -$5,649,589,429 billion dollars Projected Total Public Revenue for Capital Projects = $5,087,768,219 billion dollars Total Estimated cost of All Publicly Funded Projects = $5,087,266,371 billion dollars The projected total public revenue for capital projects is below the total estimated cost of all publicly funded projects which = Fiscal Constraint for the MTP

Key Differences 2035 MTP & 2040 MTP Less public spending on Highway Capacity Projects More public spending on Highway and Bridge Preservation ◦Greater accuracy in projecting Maintenance and Operations Expenditures ◦Greater accuracy in projecting NMDOT funding needs for capital preservation projects (reconstruction, rehab, bridge replacements) Increases in transit expenditures and available transit funding allocations are due to: ◦Increases in transit ridership region-wide (29% increase in trips) ◦Additional FTA funds allocated to region as a result of NM Rail Runner operations; this amounts to over $12.5 million in FFY 2015 alone with an increase expected in FFY 2016

Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) FFY Summary Statistics Total funds by Project Type

Key Infrastructure Funding Challenges 1). Over $150 Million dollars of TIP requests submitted for sub-allocated federal funds (STP-Large Urban, CMAQ-Mand & STP-Sm Urban funds) this past TIP development cycle and only $50 Million of those requests were actually funded 2). Public Funds for transportation have decreased with no new revenue streams for transportation funding anticipated ◦Federal and state gas tax have not been increased since 1993 ◦Decrease in VMT (Vehicle Miles Traveled) results in less gas purchases/less tax ◦Increased fuel efficiency in vehicles results in less gas purchases/less tax ◦Inflation has increased cost of projects resulting in lower “purchasing power”

Key Infrastructure Funding Challenges 3). Limited funding generating a priority shift to Highway & Bridge Preservation improvements ◦aging infrastructure requires reconstruction and rehabilitation 4). Funds for system expansion must be targeted to projects which provide the greatest regional benefit and efficiency of the entire transportation network 5). Greater emphasis on public-private partnerships to implement projects

Further Information Final Draft: Futures 2040, Metropolitan Transportation Plan Final Draft: FFY Transportation Improvement Program Documents are also available at: Albuquerque Main Library Rio Rancho Main Library Los Lunas Library Belen Library MRCOG Offices