Updated Guidance on Use of BDI-2 Screening Test for Child Outcomes Measurement System August 26 th & 31 st, 2010 – State Leadership Team Calls - Indicators.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The BRIGANCE® Screens-II
Advertisements

Promoting Quality Child Outcomes Data Donna Spiker, Lauren Barton, Cornelia Taylor, & Kathleen Hebbeler ECO Center at SRI International Presented at: International.
EvalS Application User Guide version September 17, 2011.
Early On System Updates Winter 2011 Early On Training and Technical Assistance (EOT&TA)
NJ Regulations on Dyslexia. CHAPTER 105 AN ACT concerning professional development for public school employees and supplementing chapter 6 of Title 18A.
DETERMINING ELIGIBILITY IN MA EARLY INTERVENTION A General Overview to Scoring.
July 2013 IFSP and Practice Manual Revisions April 29, 2013 May 3, 2013 Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Practice Manual Infant & Toddler Connection.
LACES Cohorts. Cohort #1: Enter Employment The most important thing to remember regarding employment cohorts for 12/13 is that most of the employment.
Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.
Data and Fiscal Management Monthly Webinar March 03, 2015.
PRT Determinations & Public Reporting Adria Bace & Amy Bunnell, NDE Barb Jackson, UNMC-MMI.
Partnering with Local Programs to Interpret and Use Outcomes Data Delaware’s Part B 619 Program September 20, 2011 Verna Thompson & Tony Ruggiero Delaware.
Speech and Articulation Screening Test August 5, 2011 Presenter: Jennifer Crookham, MH/Disability Manager Pearson Preschool Language Scale Fourth Edition.
1 Implementation of the New Part C Eligibility Criteria Effective 7/1/2010.
SPP Indicators B-7 and B-8: Overview and Results to Date for the Florida Prekindergarten Program for Children with Disabilities PreK Coordinators Meeting.
School Readiness: We’re Better Together
Pre-K Contacts Meeting DOE Update Lake Mary, Florida May 5 and 6, 2010.
1 Using a Statewide Evaluation Tool for Child Outcomes & Program Improvement Terry Harrison, Part C Coordinator Susan Evans, Autism Project Specialist.
What’s New?. Planning for Child Evaluator Training First Steps is using Survey Monkey to support planning in the coming year The Kentucky PLE Needs Assessment/
Sarah Walters - Part C Coordinator KDHE Tiffany Smith - Part B ECSE Coordinator KSDE 1.
1 WSS and WAM Update. 2 PMRN Update PMRN v4 for closed on June 15, 2015 Performed app-year roll-over Added enhancements.
Getting Started with BDI-2™ Mobile Data Solution for Windows®
Update on Selective Editing and Implications for Staff Skills International Trade Conference September 2008 Ken Smart.
1 Charting the Course: Smoother Data Sharing for Effective Early Childhood Transition Wisconsin’s Journey Lori Wittemann, Wisconsin Department of Health.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Special Education Self Review (SESR) Activity Three: Corrective.
Legal Aspects of Special Education Eligibility and Placement IEP and 504.
Enrollment Determination Colorado Charter School Institute BOOT CAMP September 1, 2015.
Florida DOE/Florida DOH-CMS Florida’s Efforts to Link Part C and 619 Outcomes Measurement April 25, 2006.
JANUARY 6, 2014 VERNA THOMPSON Delaware 619 Meeting.
July 2009 Copyright © 2009 Mississippi Department of Education State Performance Plan Annual Performance Report Indicators 8, 11, 12, 13, and 14 July 2009.
Florida Center for Reading Research: Mission & Projects Dr. Marcia L. Grek Council of Language Arts Supervisors, May 2003.
Early Childhood Outcomes Indicator 7 Data Collection Application Review.
1 Transition: Part C to Part B Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Spring/Summer 2007.
1 Indicator 7 Child Outcomes: Changes & Updates June 2011 Indicator 7 Child Outcomes: Changes & Updates June 2011.
Desired Results Experienced Administrators Desired Results for Children and Families A project of the California Department of Education, Early Education.
Early Development Network Conference June 10, 2015 Kearney, NE Amy Bunnell & Cole Johnson, NDE Julie Docter, DHHS.
PROFESSOR KERI MCCORVEY M. CCC-SLP PROFESSOR KERI MCCORVEY M. CCC-SLP Seminar Unit 3 Identification and Early Intervention.
Significant Developmental Delay Annual State Superintendent’s Conference on Special Education and Pupil Services October 20-21, 2015.
PREKINDERGARTEN DISABILITIES CONTACT MEETING MAY 9-10, 2012 Guidance Update for the BDI-2.
Special Education Coordinators’ Meeting June 1, 2015.
1 Resources for Increasing Child Development Knowledge Virginia August 27, 2008 Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia.
From Preschool to Post-School Outcomes Preparing Florida’s Youngest Students to Become College and Career Ready Monica Verra-Tirado, Chief Florida Department.
Spencer County Preschool Update 2013 – 2014 SCHOOL YEAR.
ESOL END-OF-YEAR PROCEDURES & REQUIREMENTS Hall County School District April 2015 Dr. Cindy Tu, ESOL Coordinator.
MARCH 9, 2016 Informal DTC Webinar Welcome! Thank you for joining us. We will begin shortly.
CCB TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CALL July 12, :30-1:30 1.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
Make-Up Testing/Undo Student Test Submissions
Children Services Committee Project 4 Update
Getting Started with BDI-2™ Mobile Data Solution for Windows®
Early Childhood Outcomes
Child Outcomes Summary Process April 26, 2017
What’s Unique about the Child Outcome Summary Process in Minnesota:
Student Health Screening
IFSP Aligned with the Early Intervention Data System
AIS Edge November 19, 2007.
Orders & Shipment Tracking
Screener Administration
Student Health Screening
Overview Slides: HB Statewide Training
Alternate Assessment Updates
Adding Students With A Temporary ID
Getting Started with BDI-2™ Mobile Data Solution for Windows®
Building Capacity to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Systems and Practices 2018 DEC Conference.
Update on the TEA Sped corrective action plan
Supporting SEACs across the Province:
Measuring EC Outcomes DEC Conference Presentation 2010
Welcome to the Workshop!
TEXAS DSHS HIV Care services group
Presentation transcript:

Updated Guidance on Use of BDI-2 Screening Test for Child Outcomes Measurement System August 26 th & 31 st, 2010 – State Leadership Team Calls - Indicators C3 & B7

Today, we’ll talk about Memorandum released on August 20 th with more detailed guidance on use of the BDI-2 Screening Test Update information of interest ◦ Status of data entry for ◦ Webinars on use of Data Manager reports ◦ Resources under development 2

Review of Memo Background ◦ Memo relates to use of Screening Test for the purpose of the Child Outcomes Measurement System ◦ It does not address eligibility considerations ◦ Screening Test results are not sufficient information for determining eligibility as an infant, toddler, or preschool child with a disability 3

Review of Memo Definition – “Level Comparable to Same Age Peers” ◦ For Florida’s Child Outcomes Measurement System, this is defined to mean > -1.5 standard deviations (SD) below the mean on either the BDI-2 full assessment or Screening Test 4

Review of Memo Application of definition of “level comparable to same age peers” to the administration of Screening Test ◦ On the Screening Test, you will use the standard deviation “cutoff score” of -1.5 SD below the mean ◦ A result of “Pass” in a domain means that the child performed higher than the cutoff score of -1.5 SD below the mean ◦ A result of “Refer” in a domain means the child performed at or below the cutoff score of SD below the mean 5

Review of Memo Throughout the memo we have referenced entering either “raw or item- level” data into the electronic assessment record. ◦ Each Local Early Steps (LES) and school district has made a decision with regard to whether they are entering raw or item-level scores in the BDI-2 Data Manager™ (Data Manager) 6

Review of Memo – “C-In” If an assessment other than the BDI-2 is being used for eligibility determination ◦ You may start the accountability assessment for Child Outcomes Measurement System with the Screening Test ◦ For any domains on the Screening Test that were not scored “pass,” administer the complete BDI-2 assessment for those specific domain(s) 7

Review of Memo – “C-In” Use of Data Manager ◦ Enter the raw or item-level scores for all domains of the Screening Test in the Data Manager; select the cutoff level of -1.5 SD ◦ For any domain scored “refer,” you must create a new assessment record for the complete BDI-2 and enter the raw or item- level scores for all the domains of the complete BDI-2 assessment that the child did not pass on the Screening Test 8

Review of Memo – Data Manager Procedures To create a new assessment record ◦ Search for child’s existing record in Data Manager ◦ Select “New Complete Assessment” ◦ Enter the assessment scores for whatever domains were administered 9

Review of Memo – Data Manager Procedures If item-level data are being entered, ALL item-level scores for a particular domain must be entered, including scores for items that were administered as part of the Screening Test and were not re- administered because the follow-up complete assessment was conducted within the 2-week window permitted by the BDI-2 Examiner’s Manual 10

Review of Memo – “C-Out” NOT Transitioning to Part B Preschool It is allowable to start the accountability assessment for exit with the Screening Test Enter the raw or item-level scores from the Screening Test into the Data Manager For any domains scored “refer” ◦ Administer the complete assessment in those specific domains ◦ Enter the scores from the complete assessment in the Data Manager into a new assessment record. 11

Review of Memo – “C-Out” Transitioning to Part B Preschool If the BDI-2 will not be used for Part B eligibility consideration, it is allowable to begin the exit assessment with the Screening Test Enter the raw or item-level scores of the Screening Test into the Data Manager For any domains scored “refer” ◦ Administer the complete assessment in those domains ◦ Enter the scores from the complete assessment in the Data Manager into a new assessment record. 12

Review of Memo – “B-In” [NOT Transitioning from Part C] If the BDI-2 will not be used for Part B eligibility consideration it is allowable to begin the entry assessment with the Screening Test Enter the raw or item-level scores of the Screening Test into the Data Manager For any domains scored “refer” ◦ Administer the complete assessment in those domains ◦ Enter the scores from the complete assessment in the Data Manager into a new assessment record. 13

Review of Memo – Data Manager Procedures To create a new assessment record ◦ Search for child’s existing record in Data Manager ◦ Select “New Complete Assessment” ◦ Enter the assessment scores for whatever domains were administered 14

Review of Memo – Data Manager Procedures If item-level data are being entered, ALL item-level scores for a particular domain must be entered, including scores for items that were administered as part of the Screening Test and were not re- administered because the follow-up complete assessment was conducted within the 2-week window permitted by the BDI-2 Examiner’s Manual 15

Review of Memo – Exit from Part B Preschool (“B-Out”) For children determined eligible in the sole area of speech impairment (speech sound, voice, or fluency disorders) who on entry were functioning comparable to same age peers [on either Screening Test or complete assessment] ◦ Allowable to use the Screening Test ALONE at exit, even if child has been later determined as having another disability 16

Review of Memo – “B-OUT” for “Speech Impaired Only” The raw or item-level scores of the Screening Test must be entered into the Data Manager. No further assessment is required, even if the child scores “refer” on one or more domains. 17

Review of Memo – “B-Out” For all other children exiting preschool ◦ It is allowable to start the accountability assessment with the Screening Test Enter the raw or item-level scores of the Screening Test into the Data Manager For any domains scored “refer” ◦ Administer the complete assessment in those domains ◦ Enter the scores from the complete assessment in the Data Manager into a new assessment record. 18

Scenario - For children older than age 30 months, for whom the Screening Test is administered by the LES and all domains are “pass” ◦ If Part B preschool has determined the child eligible based on other assessment procedures, ◦ Screening Test administered by the LES may still be used as “Data Point - B IN (Assessed by Part C)” ◦ Remember – child would not be in the Part C outcomes system 19

Remember this resource The BDI-2 Data Manager™, Guide to Use for the Florida Birth to Five Child Outcomes Measurement System, located on the TATS website Has been updated to include references to Screening Test. See Chapter 3 – “Adding Assessment Data” 20

21 Questions?

Assessment Data for The state will export all local data in order to analyze and prepare the Annual Performance Report All data from exit assessments administered in were due in the Data Manager on AUGUST 13 th !! We have heard from a few of you about issues It is imperative that we know right away of any other issues We need any data entry completed immediately! 22

Webinars on Data Manager Reports Two calls completed - one more scheduled Date: Thursday, September 2, 2010 Time: 10:00-11:30 am, Eastern Daylight Time Go to D%3D D%3D 23

Lessons Learned from 1 st call We recognize that the complexity may overwhelm some We understand that the primary interest is in learning how to create lists that will assist you in knowing which children are due for exit assessment We have a solution in development that will simplify this process We will conduct follow-up calls to roll out solution 24

Resources Under Development “Refresher” resource for staff already trained in administration is in development Worked with staff of publisher in June to do taping of training on aspects of administration of full assessment and Screening Test with “real audience” [Thank You Pinellas County Schools!] This will be edited and posted as on-line modules and will “sit” on TATS website 25

Resources Under Development Manual on the Florida Child Outcomes Measurement System Under development through assistance of the University of Miami Will include content found in multiple documents in a single guide Once complete, will “roll out” through conference calls. 26

Thank You! We have come a long way thanks to your help, cooperation, and hard work The best is yet to come … ◦ Having data for consideration on what needs to happen to improve programs for our children! 27