CEE 320 Winter 2006 Traffic Forecasting CEE 320 Steve Muench.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Transportation Systems. PARTIII: TRAVELER TRANSPORTATION.
Advertisements

THURSTON REGION MULTIMODAL TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING MODEL IMPLEMENTATION IN EMME/2 - Presentation at the 15th International EMME/2 Users Group Conference.
Interim Guidance on the Application of Travel and Land Use Forecasting in NEPA Statewide Travel Demand Modeling Committee October 14, 2010.
DEVELOPMENT OF MODE CHOICE MODEL FOR WORK TRIPS IN GAZA CITY State of Palestine Ministry of Transport Sadi I. S. AL-Raee EuroMed Regional Transport Project:
CEE 320 Winter 2006 Route Choice CEE 320 Steve Muench.
Demand for bus and Rail Analyzing a corridor with a similar Level Of Service 5 th Israeli-British/Irish Workshop in Regional Science April, 2007.
GREATER NEW YORK A GREENER Travel Demand Modeling for analysis of Congestion Mitigation policies October 24, 2007.
Geometric Design CEE 320 Steve Muench.
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2014 Lecture 07
The Current State and Future of the Regional Multi-Modal Travel Demand Forecasting Model.
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW CLASS THREE Denver Regional Council of Governments July 7, 2011.
What is the Model??? A Primer on Transportation Demand Forecasting Models Shawn Turner Theo Petritsch Keith Lovan Lisa Aultman-Hall.
Status of the SEMCOG E6 Travel Model SEMCOG TMIP Peer Review Panel Meeting December 12, 2011 presented by Liyang Feng, SEMCOG Thomas Rossi, Cambridge Systematics.
Modal Split Analysis.
Final Exam Tuesday, December 9 2:30 – 4:20 pm 121 Raitt Hall Open book
Chapter 4 1 Chapter 4. Modeling Transportation Demand and Supply 1.List the four steps of transportation demand analysis 2.List the four steps of travel.
Sequential Demand Forecasting Models CTC-340. Travel Behavior 1. Decision to travel for a given purpose –People don’t travel without reason 2. The choice.
Transportation Planning CE 573 Course Introduction and Four-Step Travel Demand Moding (FSTDM)
Queuing CEE 320 Anne Goodchild.
CEE 320 Fall 2008 Trip Generation and Mode Choice CEE 320 Anne Goodchild.
Modelling individual vehicle and driver behaviours Stephen Cragg Associate – SIAS Limited.
CEE 320 Spring 2007 Queuing CEE 320 Steve Muench.
Lec 20, Ch.11: Transportation Planning Process (objectives)
Discrete Choice Models for Modal Split Overview. Outline n General procedure for model application n Basic assumptions in Random Utility Model n Uncertainty.
Estimating Congestion Costs Using a Transportation Demand Model of Edmonton, Canada C.R. Blaschuk Institute for Advanced Policy Research University of.
CEE 320 Fall 2008 Transportation Planning and Travel Demand Forecasting CEE 320 Anne Goodchild.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Understanding Changes in Ridership Unit 7: Forecasting & Encouraging Ridership.
CEE 320 5Winter 2005 Mode Choice Survey Results. CEE 320 5Winter 2005 Utility Models U(Walking)= (ShortDistance) U(Bicycle)=3.797(ShortDistance)
CEE 320 Fall 2008 Mode Choice Survey Results. CEE 320 Fall 2008 Which variables do you think matter? What is your age? How far from campus do you live?
Signalized Intersections
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW Denver Regional Council of Governments June 24, 2011.
Traffic Concepts CEE 320 Steve Muench.
Urban Transportation 6. Introduction The major problem facing the transportation is congestion. The major problem facing the transportation is congestion.
May 2009 Evaluation of Time-of- Day Fare Changes for Washington State Ferries Prepared for: TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Transportation Operations/Mobility in the Baltimore Region Customer Satisfaction Survey AMPO Operations Work Group September 28-29, 2006 Las Vegas.
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW CLASS FIVE Denver Regional Council of Governments July27, 2011.
Transport Modelling– An overview of the four modeling stages
Transit Estimation and Mode Split CE 451/551 Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 7.
A COMPARISON OF TRIPS TO SCHOOLS IN SUBURBAN BANGKOK Nattapol PIYAEISARAKUL King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi and Associate Professor Viroat.
MPO/RPC Directors Meeting Asadur Rahman Lead Worker-Traffic Forecasting Section, BPED, July 28, 2015.
23e Congrès mondial de la Route - Paris 2007 Public Transport in Gauteng Province: Order out of Chaos Prof Nevhutanda Alfred Department of Transport(South.
Is Transit Part of the Equation? Is Transit Part of the Equation? Travel Data Users Forum: How Will the Changing Cost of Energy Affect Personal Travel?
Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate the number of travelers or vehicles that will use.
Behavioral Modeling for Design, Planning, and Policy Analysis Joan Walker Behavior Measurement and Change Seminar October UC Berkeley.
CEE 320 Winter 2006 Trip Generation and Mode Choice CEE 320 Steve Muench.
Cal y Mayor y Asociados, S.C. Atizapan – El Rosario Light Rail Transit Demand Study October th International EMME/2 UGM.
Professor: Keren Mertens Horn Office: Wheatley 5-78B Office Hours: TR 2:30-4:00 pm ECONOMICS OF THE METROPOLITAN AREA 212G,
Pilot National Travel Survey 2009 Summary Findings Prepared by Mairead Griffin.
DR O.S ABIOLA DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE, ABEOKUTA. CVE 505 HIGHWAY & TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING I.
Labor Day Travel Plans August 31, 2015 © TNS 2015 Labor Day Travel Plans August 31, 2015.
Transportation Forecasting The Four Step Model. Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate.
Measuring road traffic volume through passenger mobility surveys Vasilis Nikolaou AGILIS SA Task Force on statistics on the volume of road traffic (vehicle-kilometres),
CEE 320 Fall 2008 Route Choice CEE 320 Steve Muench.
Travel Demand Forecasting: Traffic Assignment CE331 Transportation Engineering.
CEE 320 Winter 2006 Transportation Planning and Travel Demand Forecasting CEE 320 Steve Muench.
Estimating the Benefits of Bicycle Facilities Stated Preference and Revealed Preference Approaches Kevin J. Krizek Assistant Professor Director, Active.
TRAFFIC STUDY AND FORECASTING SHRI DEVI POLYTECHINIC
EUROPEAN FORUM FOR GEOGRAPHY AND STATISTICS KRAKOW CONFERENCE October, Krakow, Poland Travel Behaviour in Pristina City Author 1: Naim Kelmendi.
Improving the Residential Location Model for the New York Metropolitan Region Haiyun Lin City College of New York Project Advisors: Prof. Cynthia Chen,
How may bike-sharing choice be affected by air pollution
Transportation Planning and Travel Demand Forecasting
Transportation Engineering Mode Choice January 21, 2011
Trip Generation and Mode Choice
Chapter 4. Modeling Transportation Demand and Supply
Travel Demand Forecasting: Mode Choice
Mode Choice Survey Results
Modeling Approach Direct vs. Sequenced
Travel Demand and Traffic Forecasting
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2016 Lecture 07
Traffic Concepts CEE 320 Steve Muench.
Presentation transcript:

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Traffic Forecasting CEE 320 Steve Muench

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Outline 1.Need for Traffic Forecasting 2.Traveler Decisions 3.Trip Generation 4.Mode Choice a.Survey

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Need for Traffic Forecasting Impacts of facilities or modes of travel –Lines on existing roads –Roads –Light rail –Bus service Geometric design Pavement design

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Traveler Decisions Types of decisions –Time (when do you go?) –Destination (where do you go?) –Mode (how do you get there?) –Route choice (what route do you choose?) Influences –Economic –Social

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Predicting Travel Decisions Collect data on travel behavior –Observation (number of buses, cars, bikes, etc.) –Surveys Collect data on what travelers have done Collect data on their values and choices (utility) Inexact nature of prediction –Incomplete data –Reporting problems

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Trip Generation & Mode Choice

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Trip Generation Purpose –Predict how many trips will be made –Predict exactly when a trip will be made Approach –Aggregate decision-making units –Categorized trip types –Aggregate trip times (e.g., AM, PM, rush hour) –Generate Model

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Motivations for Making Trips Lifestyle –Residential choice –Work choice –Recreational choice –Kids, marriage –Money Life stage Technology

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Reporting of Trips - Issues Under-reporting trivial trips Trip chaining Other reasons (passenger in a car for example)

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Trip Generation Models Linear (simple) Poisson (a bit better)

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Example Recreational or pleasure trips measured by λ i (Poisson model):

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Example Probability of exactly “n” trips using the Poisson model: Cumulative probability –Probability of one trip or less:P(0) + P(1) = 0.52 –Probability of at least two trips:1 – (P(0) + P(1)) = 0.48 Confidence level –We are 52% confident that no more than one recreational or pleasure trip will be made by the average individual in a day

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Mode Choice Purpose –Predict the mode of travel for each trip Approach –Categorized modes (SOV, HOV, bus, bike, etc.) –Generate Model

CEE 320 Winter 2006 A Mode Choice Model Logit Model Final form Specifiable partUnspecifiable part s = all available alternatives m = alternative being considered n = traveler characteristic k = traveler

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Discrete Choice Example Regarding the TV sitcom Gilligan’s Island, whom do you prefer?

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Ginger Model U Ginger = – (carg) (mang) (pierceg) – (genxg) carg=Number of working vehicles in household mang=Male indicator (1 if male, 0 if female) pierceg=Pierce Brosnan indicator for question #11 (1 if Brosnan chosen, 0 if not) genxg=generation X indicator (1 if respondent is part of generation X, 0 if not)

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Mary Anne Model U Mary Anne = – (privatem) – (agem) – (sinm) – (housem) (seanm) (collegem) – (llm) (boomm) privatem=number of years spent in a private school (K – 12) agem=age in years sinm=single marital status indicator (1 if single, 0 if not) housem=number of people in household seanm=Sean Connery indicator for question #11 (1 if Connery chosen, 0 if not) collegem=college education indicator (1 if college degree, 0 if not) llm=long & luxurious hair indicator for question #7 (1 if long, 0 if not) boomm=baby boom indicator (1 if respondent is a baby boomer, 0 if not)

CEE 320 Winter 2006 No Preference Model U no preference = – x10-6(incn) – (gunsn) (nojames) (cafn) (ohairn) incn=household income gunsn=gun ownership indicator (1 if any guns owned, 0 if no guns owned) nojames=No preference indicator for question #11 (1 if no preference, 0 if preference for a particular Bond) cafn=Caffeinated drink indicator for question #5 (1 if tea/coffee/soft drink, 0 if any other) ohairn=Other hair style indicator for question #7 (1 if other style indicated, 0 if any style indicated)

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Results Average probabilities of selection for each choice are shown in yellow. These average percentages were converted to a hypothetical number of respondents out of a total of 207.

CEE 320 Winter 2006 My Results U ginger =– U mary anne =– U no preference =–

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Primary References Mannering, F.L.; Kilareski, W.P. and Washburn, S.S. (2005). Principles of Highway Engineering and Traffic Analysis, Third Edition. Chapter 8 Transportation Research Board. (2000). Highway Capacity Manual National Research Council, Washington, D.C.