SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION POLICY REFORMATION TRENDS IN TRANSITION COUNTRIES ON THE MODEL OF ARMENIA Tigran ARZUMANYAN 2nd PhD School on Innovation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Science, Technology and Innovation Data Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan
Advertisements

Pakistan National Services Roadmap. Strategies for increasing Services Exports ~ August, 2007.
Vision and Missions of the Turkey’s Seed Sector Kazım Abak 2 nd International Workshop on Seed Business Antalya 2-3 December 2013.
NIS in Poland current situation and recommendations for the future I. Kijenska Faculty of Materials Science and Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology/PRESAFE.
“Steering and Funding – The Governance of science systems” Sources Based ont the reports of the Ad Hoc Working Group Steering and Funding of Research Institutions.
Entrepreneurship youth
TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES
1 Fiscal Federalism in Iraq: OIL and GAS. The oil situation: a snapshot.
Incubation in Israel: Model and Performance. Extent  24 incubators  About 10 projects per incubator Typically between 8-12 projects  Grant of $
Sharing Best Practice amongst European universities 1 THE ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI ISO 9001:2000 and AUTH Research Committee Christina Besta,
Enterprise Policy and National Competitiveness - the Irish Experience Presentation by Andrew McDowell (Forfas) to the Bentley Study Tour May 14, 2002.
How to improve the appeal of research career to university graduates? Eero Vuorio University of Turku Finland.
Workshop ”InDeCS-H: Development of Healthcare Biotechnology SMEs“ 10th September 2009 Budapest Strategy for Hungarian pharmaceutical and biotechnology.
R&I Policy in Latvia Recent Reforms Dr. Agrita Kiopa Deputy State Secretary – Director of Higher Education, Science and Innovation Department Ministry.
CYPRUS-AUSTRIA JOINT COMMITTEE MEETING 6-7 October 1011 “ Collaboration between Austrian and Cypriot Organizations ” Dr Despina Martidou-Forcier Acting.
National innovation strategies and policies - Republic of Slovenia Dr. Klemen Grošelj SIPO Novi Sad,
“Support of anti-crisis program of Uzbekistan government to financial sector: In focus leasing market of Uzbekistan ” Mustafaev Z.B. General Director of.
John McDougall, President 10 th Annual Re$earch Money Conference, 11 May 2011.
Instruments for support to innovative and competitive SMEs in Serbia
Some aspects of National STI system in Albania & The Research at Polytechnic University of Tirana T.Korini, UPT, Tirana Tbilisi, 11 April 2012.
Main directions of innovation policy development in the Republic of Belarus State Committee for Science and Technology Prague, December 2, 2014.
MBA IN ECONOMY OF AGRICULTURE AT DUEL AND DSAU: CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT ISSUES 1. GENERAL IDEA: THE REGIONAL ECONOMY AND UNIVERSITIES’ INTERESTS COMBINING.
REFORMS IN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT SECTOR OF ARMENIA:
Business Model for an Industrial development agency
1 Russia’s Innovation System in Transition Rio de JaneiroApril 25, 2007 BRICS National Innovation Systems:
Influence of foreign direct investment on macroeconomic stability Presenter: Governor CBBH: Kemal Kozarić.
Guidance for AONB Partnership Members Welsh Member Training January 26/
Research and Technology in Japan by Dr G.A. Papadopoulos Research Director National Observatory of Athens.
1 The Innovation Performance Review of Kazakhstan: Main Conclusions and Recommendations.
National Innovation Strategy of the Republic of Moldova. Implementation, mechanisms and measures Ghenadie CERNEI Director, Agency for Innovation.
PUBLIC R&D POLICY IN RUSSIA Restructuring Government S&T Institutions Tatiana Kuznetsova STATE UNIVERSITY – HIGHER SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS Institute for Statistical.
All-Russian Non-governmental Organization of Small and Medium-Sized Business OPORA RUSSIA Sergey R. Borisov President of OPORA RUSSIA Zurich, 19 March.
A new start for the Lisbon Strategy Knowledge and innovation for growth.
NAS RA AND ITS ROLE IN THE INNOVATION SYSTEM OF ARMENIA TIGRAN ARZUMANYAN International S&T Programs’ Department National Academy of Sciences of Armenia.
BACKGROUND AND COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGES  Armenia as a regional center for ICT  Comparative advantages of Armenia:  qualified and experienced labor force.
9 th CBUR Conference Public & Private Partnership in University Financial Support June 13 – 15, 2003 Latvia Higher Education in New Europe in New Europe.
S&T and Innovation Policy in the Republic of Armenia Innovation Programs Division, SCS RA “Development of Coherent Innovation Policy in South Caucasian.
Key Barriers for the ICT Research Sector in Serbia, and Recommendations for Future EU- Serbia Collaboration Miodrag Ivkovic, ISS Milorad Bjeletic, BOS.
The Romanian National Defence College Bucharest, 1-2 November 2007Romania Ministry of Education, Research and Youth National University Research Council.
NETWORK STRUCTURE AND COOPERATION BETWEEN UNIVERSITIES AND INDUSTRY Prof. Ing. Tatiana Čorejová, PhD. Prof. Ing. Ján Čorej, PhD.
Innovation and Competence Building systems in Russia Brics-workshop, Aalborg, February 12–15, 2006.
National Academy of Sciences of Armenia WORKSHOP ON PhD PROMOTION TOOLS June 2014.
1 Alexander Belyaev, BRICS meeting, April 2007 State University – Higher School of Economics Institute for Statistical Studies and Economics of Knowledge.
COORDINATION OF INNOVATION STRATEGIES/SCHEMES IN METROPOLITAN AREAS. THE ROLE OF PUBLIC POLICIES. WHY OUR INNOVATION MANAGEMENT SCHEMES ARE APPOPRIATE.
Innovation Division. Innovation Its embedded novelty, providing qualitative increase in the efficiency of processes or products demanded by the market.
1 SMEs – a priority for FP6 Barend Verachtert DG Research Unit B3 - Research and SMEs.
The Hungarian Innovation System Adam Tichy-Racs CPR Hungary.
Financing Innovation March 25, 2004 Knowledge Economy Forum III Budapest, Hungary NATIONAL INNOVATION FUND KAZAKHSTAN.
Collection, Summarizing and Publishing of Statistical Information on Science and R&D in the Republic of Armenia Central Asian sub-regional consultation.
R&D STRATEGIES IN SUPPORT OF INDUSTRIAL TRANSFORMATION Arm.Dpt. ROMANIA MINISTRY OF DEFENCE ARMAMENTS DEPARTMENT 01 November 2007.
E u r o p e a n C o m m i s s i o nCommunity Research Global Change and Ecosystems EU environmental research : Part B Policy objectives  Lisbon strategy.
24 October,2013 Technology Transfer Office “Information and Communication Technologies for Energy Efficiency” TTO “ICTEE” AComIn – Starosel, Bulgaria.
MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE ACADEMY OF SCIENCE Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators: Trends and Challenges in South Eastern Europe Edmond.
CURRENT SITUATION IN SCIENTIFIC SPHERE OF UKRAINE Borys Grynyov STATE FUND FOR FUNDAMENTAL RESEARCH OF UKRAINE 1.
R&D in the Czech Republic Věda v Olomouci, 27 / 11 / 2012.
R&I policy in Ukraine Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine Dmytro Cheberkus Director of the Department of Science and Technology Development, PhD.
R&D Supports by Ministry of Science, Industry and Technology.
Career Guidance Aimed at Improving Higher Education - role of Ministry of Youth and Sport of Republic of Serbia- Ministry of Youth and Sport Development.
R&I policy in Ukraine Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine Dmytro Cheberkus Director of the Department of Science and Technology Development, PhD.
Ivan Mikloš Deputy prime minister of the Government of the Slovak Republic responsible for economic affairs Bratislava 22 November 2004 COMPETITIVENESS.
GREECE: Meeting of the National Councils for S&T policy of the EU Member Countries Prague,25-26 May 2006 National Research Council General Secretariat.
PROGRAM of creation a key university on the basis of Oryol State University named after I.S. Turgenev and Priokskiy State University for
Measuring the Innovation Potential of the Bulgarian Economy Establishing an IRC in Macedonia, Skopje, March 29, 2006 Ruslan Stefanov Economic Program Center.
ERDF for Education and Science th March 2011.
Innovation Development Strategy
Knowledge Economy Forum V Prague 2006
Assoc. Prof. Evgeni Evgeniev, PhD
ACADEMIC ENTREPRENEURSHIP, TECHNOLOGY INCUBATORS AND R&D ENTERPRISES
Research and Innovation Strategy for Smart Specialisation of the Slovak Republic Mgr. Martin Svoboda
China's technological achievements and institutional experience in forty years of reform and openness WANG Yang College of Philosophy and Sociology, Huaqiao.
Presentation transcript:

SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION POLICY REFORMATION TRENDS IN TRANSITION COUNTRIES ON THE MODEL OF ARMENIA Tigran ARZUMANYAN 2nd PhD School on Innovation and Economic Development: Globelics Academy 2005, Lisbon, Portugal 23 May – 4 June, 2005

A LITTLE HISTORY... During the Soviet period Armenia developed a ramified and actively operating system of research and technological institutions. These capabilities were oriented to a significant degree toward supporting the Soviet military-industrial complex and most of research institutions were well financed directly from Moscow.

After the collapse of the USSR... The difficulties of a transition period, worsening of the economic situation, destruction of previous economic, scientific and other connections, sharp decrease of a demand for a traditional Armenian production (including intellectual) have unavoidably led to the sufficient reduction in the activities of many scientific and technical subdivisions and relevant S&T capacious productions/industries.

PROBLEMS FACED  reduced budget allocations to R&D, mainly used for salaries and covering growing operating costs;  sharp reduction of total number of research staff and slowdown of inflow of young specialists to science and technology resulting in deficiency of practicing scientists in the age bracket;  emigration of qualified Armenian specialists to the developed foreign countries or other sectors of the economy.

DYNAMICS OF GERD/GDP % ( ) Source: National Statistical Service of Armenia, Statistical Yearbook of Armenia,

FINANCIAL ALLOCATIONS TO R&D Gross Domestic Expenditure on R&D (GERD) was 0,2 % of GDP in 2002 In 2002 GDP was around 50% of GDP 1990 in nominal values; Governmental funds according to type of activity: –about 70% to basic research –about 27% to applied research –about 3% to experimental developments

Source: National Statistical Service of Armenia, Statistical Yearbook of Armenia, NUMBER OF R&D INSTITUTIONS ( )

NUMBER OF RESEARCH PERSONNEL ( ) Source: National Statistical Service of Armenia, Statistical Yearbook of Armenia,

S&T INFRASTRUCTURE Parliamentary Commission for Science Department of Science Ministry of Education and Science Presidium of National Academy of Sciences Science Departments of Relevant Branch Ministries R&D Institutes University R&D Subordinated R&D Institutes Source: Compiled by the author

MAIN R&D INSTITUTIONS OF ARMENIA NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES - Total number of Institutes - 40 Including: Division of Physical, Mathematical & Technical Sciences - 13 Institutes, in the fields of ICT, Physics, Nuclear Physics, Astrophysics, Radiophysics &Electronics, Geophysics, Engineering Seismology, Mechanics, Mathematics, Geological Sciences, etc.

NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES (2) Division of Natural Sciences - 16 Institutes, in the fields of: Biotechnology, Medical Genetics, Environmental Studies, Neurochemistry, Chemical Physics; Fine Organic, General and Inorganic Chemistry, Microbiology, Physiology, Ichthyology, Zoology, Physiology, Hydroponics, Botany, etc.

NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES (3) Division of Humanities and Social Sciences - 11 Institutes, in the fields of: Archaeology, Ethnography, Oriental Studies, Philosophy, Sociology, Law, Economics, History, Armenian Studies, Art History, Linguistics, etc.

MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE 20 national universities supervised by the Ministry of Education & Science including: Yerevan State University, Medical University, Engineering University, Agricultural Academy, etc. About 70 private universities established during last years

OTHER BRANCH R&D INSTITUTIONS Ministry of Trade & Economic Development About 40 institutes (Yerevan Physics Institute, Institute of Biotechnology, Institute of Optic- physical Measurement, Institute of Applied Chemistry, etc.) Ministry of Health Care 10 institutes involved in various medical research Ministry of Agriculture 6 institutes

RESPONSIBILITIES OF EXECUTIVE BODIES MINISTRY OF EDUCATION & SCIENCE Responsible for general S&T policy making in the country Management of Universities’ R&D Institutional & project based distribution of budget funding to all R&D institutions based on the decision of Expert Commissions (Peer review)

MEMBERS OF EXPERT COMMISSIONS Experts from each R&D Institution & University Scientific Councils of R&D Institutes and Universities elect experts Problems Impartiality of decision-making is questionable (conflict of interests) Need for involvement of independent experts

NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES The Law assigns the Academy to: Manage R&D Institutes of NAS RA Coordinate basic research carried out throughout Armenia Act as official scientific consultant to the highest governing bodies of the country, proposals of which in the field of S&T are to be necessarily taken into discussion.

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN S&T&I During last years Armenian Government initiated steps to improve the situation and declared S&T and Innovation Policy as priority area for development. Law on Scientific & Technological Activity adopted in 2000 to regulate interrelations between research & technological organizations, state bodies and consumers of research outcomes. It states the need for promoting innovation and commercialization of research outcomes as main factor of economic growth.

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN S&T (2) In 2002 the Government also specified main scientific directions as priority areas for development as follows: –Armenian Studies; –Information Technologies –Basic research promoting applied research of vital importance –Advanced Technologies (Biotechnology & Nanotechnology) –New Energy Sources and New Materials –Risk Factors & Human Health

PROBLEMS Absence of S&T&I coordinating body at the highest governmental level; Status of the academic institutes as non-commercial organizations as restricting factor to commercialization of R&D results; The measures undertaken are mostly of declarative character and don’t provide real mechanisms for achieving the stated objectives; Declared priority areas are very general and hardly to be developed all together by scarce funds allocated for R&D.

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN S&T (4) Along with stated problems certain positive trends can be observed: According to officials, growth in IT sales has been nearly 20% per year during last years, accounting for 2% of the GDP (about $ 50 million USD in export revenues in 2003). Around 200 small private software companies have emerged in recent years, working primarily through outsourcing contracts with large Western software firms.

SUCCESS STORIES Enterprise Incubator Foundation founded in 2002 to assist: Building successful business incubation mechanisms for IT start-ups. Stimulate growth in IT sector by providing interrelated services; Drive Armenian technology products to international market; Attract foreign investments.

SUCCESS STORIES (2) Open Source Armenia, initiated in 2003 The project in Armenia in the IT area aimed at developing a community of IT professionals and exposing their potential to the world. Provide organizational, legal, technical, management, marketing and financial support for the OSA open-source software projects. Encourage development of hi-tech enterprises in the country.

SUCCESS STORIES (3) Viasphere Technopark State-of-the-art technology park located in Yerevan providing infrastructure to local startups and ICT companies worldwide looking to extend their core development offshore; Currently houses several US-based subsidiaries developing advanced technologies in variety of ICT fields.

CONCLUSIONS To ensure further development of S&T and Innovation processes in Armenia urgent reformation of the whole system is needed. Establishment of coordinating body (Council on S&T&I ) to develop system reformation recommendations and carry out enforcement; Creation of special state programmes directed to promoting academy-university-industry cooperation;

CONCLUSIONS (2) With presently available resources it seems to be very difficult for Armenia to sustain its robust and huge R&D infrastructure, particularly, in the field of basic research with sometimes overlapping research activities. This necessitates some realignment of the overall governmental research structure with the concentration of available resources for establishment of a few centers of excellence in the declared priority areas.

Armenia is a small country but it has a striking landscape and it contains some awesome vistas

MATENADARANMATENADARAN

NORAVANQ MONASTRY -XII-XIV AD

Yerevan by night

THANK YOU! Tigran Arzumanyan Foreign Relations Department, National Academy of Sciences of Armenia Institute of Philosophy, Sociology and Law