1 Workplace ADR Evaluation Tracey Therit ADR Manager Department of Veterans Affairs June 18, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Key Performance Indicators KPI’s
Advertisements

1.) Identify the learning goals of one of your campus CIRTL programs. To provide a diverse group of STEM Ph.D. students with mentored teaching and research.
Youth Outcome Questionnaire & Arkansas Indicators Compliance Rates and Satisfaction with Services Kazi Ahmed Paula Stone October 18, 2012.
Presentation to the Standing Committee on Appropriations (SCOA) 2013/14: Q3 Performance and Expenditure reports DATE: 19 February 2014 The Presidency Department.
D D Department of Veterans Affairs Comparing the Denver Forum Survey and Supplier Perception Survey Regional Forum – Denver, CO March 6, 2012.
MEM 650 Quality Control The Customer. MEM 650 Quality Control TQM’s Customer Approach  “the customer defines quality.”  “the customer is always right.”
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Collecting and Analyzing Data.
Jim Moran Nancy Lucero MEASURING OUTCOMES. TELLING THE WOKSAPE OYATE STORY Assumptions.
1-1 Human Resource Management Gaining a Competitive Advantage Chapter 10 Employee Separation and Retention McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill.
1-1 Human Resource Management Gaining a Competitive Advantage Chapter 10 Employee Separation and Retention McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill.
Making the difference: Customer service in today’s university Sarah Willard 1 May 2008.
EXECUTIVE RETREAT JULY 20, 2011 COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF RHODE ISLAND Student Affairs.
1 Customer and Market Focus in the Baldrige Criteria Examines how an organization determines requirements, expectations, and preferences of customers and.
Shelter Diagnostic Survey Shelter Name Results and Planning.
THE MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL OF QUALITY, 5e, © 2002 South-Western/Thomson Learning TM 1 Chapter 4 Focusing on Customers.
MEMBERSHIP ENGAGEMENT 2 YOUR TAKE-AWAYS AT END OF DAY YOU WILL/HAVE/KNOW: Experienced a Membership Survey Understand the Survey Contributed to the Questionnaire.
Customer Focus Module Preview
Strategic Management of Human Capital Recruitment Strategy
Mentorship. More people are applying for and completing mentorship Mentorship recommended  15 Completing mentorship  2.
Principles of Effective Evaluation Prof Keithia Wilson Academic Leader Student Success & Retention.
TOURISM DATA COLLECTION. Data collection Situational analyses – to perform situational analysis should be carried out marketing research to obtain quantitative.
Area of Study 1: Large-Scale Organisations in Context
Tulane University 1 Tulane University Employee Satisfaction Survey Results October 2012.
CRVA Strategic Plan Fiscal February 2, 2011.
Brand Awareness Supplemental questions may detail to uncover brand and messaging impact and intent to act. These following questions are fundamental questions.
Promoting student engagement through online seminars.
The Evaluation Plan.
Performance Indicators
NorthSky Nonprofit Network Creating Customer Satisfaction Surveys Presented by Christine A. Ameen, Ed.D. Ameen Consulting & Associates
Evaluation of the Indianapolis, Indiana September 2002 – August 2003 Stamp Out Syphilis Coalition.
LOUGHBOROUGHCOLLEGE Business Support Self Assessment
2010 Results. Today’s Agenda Results Summary 2010 CQS Strengths and Opportunities CQS Benchmarks Demographics Next Steps.
Agency Health and the State of the Service Report 2006–07.
ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT SUPPORT SERVICES Kimberly Gargiulo, Coordinator of Assessment Office of Institutional Research and Assessment.
Federal Human Capital Survey: A Closer Look - FY 2008 The Department of the Treasury Building our Workforce for the Future April 2009.
ASSESSMENT. Assessment is the systematic and on-going process of collecting and reviewing evidence about the College's academic and administrative programs.
OFFICE OF DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION (ODI) OFFICE OF DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION (ODI) U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Charlie Norwood VA Medical Center May.
POLICY SCAN - RATING THE INDICATORS – PART TWO Ventura County Public Health.
Campus Quality Survey 1998, 1999, & 2001 Comparison Office of Institutional Research & Planning July 5, 2001.
The Balanced Score Card
U. S. ARMY, SIMULATION TRAINING AND INSTRUMENTION COMMAND (STRICOM) R ESOLVING E MPLOYMENT D ISPUTES S WIFTLYREDS.
New Business Overall Satisfaction Ratings Rating Scale = Extremely Satisfied 6 = Very Satisfied 5 = Satisfied 4 = Neither Satisf. nor Dissatisfied.
Evaluation and the AccessData/Data Services Workshops
© Prentice Hall, 2005Excellence in Business, Revised Edition Chapter Fundamentals of Marketing, Customers, and Strategic Marketing Planning.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Mixed Method and Action Research Designs Chapter 12 This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright.
Final FRCA SOE Course Evaluation Course 1 : June 1 st – 2 nd 2015.
The Swedish Agency for Participation National monitoring using the recommendation of the UN Human Rights Office 7 October 2015 Arvid Lindén Head of department.
Public Relations Campaigns. _view0/part1/chapter1/multiple_choice_quiz.html
Design, Development and Roll Out
Control Phase Part of the Report Out for Completed Projects Lean Government Initiative.
Customer Focus Module Preview This PowerPoint provides a sample of the Strategic Planning Module PowerPoint. The actual Strategic Planning PowerPoint is.
The Office of Collaborative Action and Dispute Resolution How we got here…
EXTERNAL FACTORS AND OPPORTUNITIES WHY WOULD YOU CONSIDER EXTERNAL INFLUENCE WHERE THINKING ABOUT YOUR CAREER? PG NAME, TEACHER AND DATE.
Chapter 3: Evaluation of performance Area of Study 1: Large-Scale Organisations in Context.
Workplace Conflict Consultation Program Office of Employment Dispute Resolution Virginia Department of Human Resource Management.
Intentionally Targeting Student Learning Outcomes through Course Assessment and Design Patty Roberts, Ph.D. Patricia Noteboom, Ph.D NASPA INTERNATIONAL.
Employee Development Human Resource Management. Employee Training: Trends n Four economic and demographic trends u Unskilled and undereducated youth u.
Report on Higher Education Strategic Plan Initiatives Maggie Dalrymple Purdue University.
Internal Mediation in Transport for London London Underground.
1 HOW TO BUILD A CUSTOMER-FOCUSED CONTRACTING ORGANIZATION WITHOUT SACRIFICING SOUND CONTRACTING PRINCIPLES SESSION D02 Iris Cooper and Valerie Veatch.
AQIP Category Two: Meeting Student and Other key stakeholder needs
Functional Area Assessment
Alternative Dispute Resolution Program
Chapter 7: Client Satisfaction
Part 6 Staffing System and Retention Management
Service - Profit Chain Inputs Outputs
Strategic Management of Human Capital Recruitment Strategy
Student Satisfaction Spring 2009 Short Version
Items in red require your input
Academic Development Survey By School Spring 2007
Presentation transcript:

1 Workplace ADR Evaluation Tracey Therit ADR Manager Department of Veterans Affairs June 18, 2008

2 What Do We Evaluate? Use of ADR  How often are employees electing to use ADR? Effectiveness of ADR  How often are disputes resolved through ADR? Satisfaction with ADR  How satisfied are individuals with ADR? Cost Savings  How much money is saved through ADR?

3 Use of ADR

4 Effectiveness of ADR

5 5 Satisfaction with ADR

6 ADR Surveys Participant Feedback  Twenty questions on a 1-5 scale  Examines satisfaction with the convening process, neutral, outcome, relationship with other, and overall impression of the process Neutral Feedback  Seven yes/no questions on the intake process  Four yes/no questions if co-mediation  Thirteen questions on the session and outcome

7 7 ADR Reports

8 Summary Report on Satisfaction Participant Responses  Totaled and averaged by question Neutral Responses  Totaled and averaged by questions and results FY08 results to date reflect overall participant satisfaction of 4.5 on a scale of 5

9 Cost Savings Fee-for-Service EEO Complaint Processing Average of $8,000 to process an EEO complaint ADR is not a reimbursable service

10 Why Do We Evaluate? ADR measures in the VA Strategic Plan Marketing the program Targeting resources Identifying areas for improvement

11 Future Evaluation Increase emphasis on qualitative measures  Morale, productivity, retention, attendance Analyze nature of disputes going into ADR and examine trends Consider supplementing surveys with interviews Consider external evaluation of program

12 QUESTIONS?