ESEA Reauthorization: NCLB and the Blueprint Based on information from: A Blueprint for Reform July 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Indian Education Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Flexibility Request: Summary of Key Provisions.
Advertisements

Race to the Top Discussion Points to determine LUSD’s interest in participating in the State program January 7, 2010.
Consensus Questions.  The Education Study scope is broad and includes the following areas under the role of the federal government in public education.
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
ESEA Reauthorization and Waivers AFT Teachers PPC Meeting March 13, 2012 New York, NY.
States Leading the Way: New Accountability Models & ESEA Reauthorization Gene Wilhoit September 8, 2011.
BIE Flexibility Request Summary of Key Provisions Bureau of Indian Education U.S. Department of the Interior.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
State and Federal Accountability Directors of Special Education October 10, 2013 Region One Education Service Center Office of School Improvement, Accountability,
NCLB Waiver for CORE Districts
Getting Organized for the Transition to the Common Core What You Need to Know.
Quick facts about the Washington State ESEA waiver.
NEW JERSEY ASSOCIATION OF FEDERAL PROGRAM ADMINISTRATORS SEPTEMBER 11, 2014 ESEA: FLEXIBILITY INSTEAD OF REAUTHORIZATION.
Shelda Hale, Title III, ELL and Immigrant Education Kentucky Department of Education.
Nebraska Department of Education Focus on Effective Instruction and Student Learning Revised Standards and NeSA Nebraska’s P-16 Effort Federal Agenda Fiscal.
ESEA: A Blueprint for Reform Presented by, Kristie Renzi & Bridget B. Potts.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
SAU # WELCOME TO THE NEW SCHOOL YEAR.
Module 4 TED 356 Curriculum in Sec. Ed.. Module 4 Explain the current official federal and state standards, including professional and accrediting groups.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Title One Program Evaluation Report to the CCSD Board of Education August 20, 2012 Bill Poock, Title One Coordinator.
Understanding Stimulus Funding and Leveraging Philanthropy to Support Long-Term Education Goals A Webinar for the Foundation Community February 16, 2010.
Massie Ritsch U.S. Department of Education ESEA REAUTHORIZATION.
Technology Leadership
Education in Delaware: ESEA Flexibility Renewal Community Town Hall Ryan Reyna, Office of Accountability.
Eric W. Waldo U.S. Department of Education Deputy Chief of Staff July 2012 U.S. Department of Education Policy Overview.
Title I Program Evaluation Report to the IDOE (Site Visit): April 3 rd, 2014 Parent Advisory Meeting/Program Evaluation: May 27 th, 2014 Report to the.
STATE CONSORTIUM ON EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS September 10, 2013.
Florida’s Implementation of NCLB John L. Winn Deputy Commissioner Florida Department of Education.
ESEA Flexibility U.S. Department of Education SECRETARY OF EDUCATION’S PRIORITIES.
Race to the Top Scope of Work Broward County Public Schools.
Standards The Achievement Gap The Debate Continues.
HEE Hui For Excellence in Education June 6, 2012
ESEA FLEXIBILITY REQUEST September 26, 2012 Educational Service District 113 Andy Kelly, Assistant Superintendent, Travis Campbell, Director K12 Office.
U.S. Department of Education Reform Agenda Overview April 2010.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
A BLUEPRINT FOR REFORM Presented by Julia Renberg EDLE 813.
Forum on Educational Accountability Gene Wilhoit Council of Chief State School Officers January 7, 2010.
Dr. Nancy S. Grasmick July 26,2012.  Maryland is proud to be the top-ranked state in U.S. growth as reported in this study, and judged by Education Week.
April 29, 2011 Developing Effective Leaders: Principal Evaluation Systems CCSSO – National Summit on Educator Effectiveness.
Building Capacity to Support High Quality Instruction Ryan Saxe, Title I Coordinator Office of Federal Programs.
North Carolina’s Race to the Top Proposal. Why RTTT? Teacher Incentive Grant School Improvement Grant Innovation Grant ESEA IDEA SFSF …….
Lansing Central School District District Assessment Results Presentation May 14, 2012 Dr. Stephen L. Grimm, Superintendent District Leadership Team 1.
No Child Left Behind Waivers: Promising Ideas from Second Round Applications By Jeremy Ayers and Isabel Owen with Glenda Partee and Theodora Chang.
Education Outlook: Where are we headed? “Wild West” Leadership Conference June 18, 2010.
B UILDING N EXT -G ENERATION A CCOUNTABILITY S YSTEMS March 28, 2011 | 10:00-11:00 a.m.
ESEA Flexibility NCLB Waiver Discussion October 24, 2011.
Mark Roosevelt - Superintendent of Schools A Four-Year Comprehensive Framework for Improvement  Presented May 12,
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
2012 AASA Legislative Agenda NCE 2012 Bruce Hunter Houston, TX February 17, 2012 Associate Executive Director Advocacy and Communication.
March 30, 2012 Marriott Hotel- Charleston, WV Committee of Practitioners Developing Federal Programs of Excellence.
Kansas Leads the World in the Success of Each Student. Brad Neuenswander, Deputy Commissioner KSDE.
July 26,  To move away from the narrowly defined accountability system in NCLB  To have a new accountability system that uses multiple measures.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: EDUCATION STAKEHOLDERS FORUM September 29, 2011 Carmel Martin, Assistant Secretary for Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development.
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference Crystal City, VA July 30, 2010 Jacqueline Jones, PhD Senior Advisor to the Secretary for Early Learning.
C&I 212 Dr. Brown. Federal Role in Education  Bill of Rights (10th Amendment)  Morrill Acts  Smith-Hughes Act (1917), George-Barden Act (1946)  GI.
February 2016 Overview of the Every Student Succeeds Act.
EDU 4245 Class 5: Achievement Gap (cont) and Diagnostic Assessments.
Neo-Conservative Ideas Berliner and Biddle ( ) Neo-conservative “centrist” thought won out in school reform. Main approaches to school reform: Get.
Overview: Every Student Succeeds Act April ESEA in Ohio In 2012, our state applied for and received a waiver from provisions of No Child Left Behind.
National Association of State Directors of Special Education Tuesday, October 23, 2012 Michael Yudin and Deb Delisle.
How can ARRA Funds Be Wisely Applied? How Researchers Can Help Lou Cicchinelli, Ph.D. Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning Fourth Annual IES.
Obama Education Policy: Beyond No Child Left Behind Susan Fuhrman Teachers College Lyon, France May 25, 2009.
Aim: Does the US need to reform the educational system? Do Now: Make a list of the best aspects of the education you receive and make a list of the worst.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
Addressing Curricular Barriers to Completion
Chapter 5 Reframing the Curriculum
Maryland State Board of Education October 25, 2011
Meeting the challenge Every Classroom Every Student Every Day
Ace it!SM Tutoring Teacher Training
Presentation transcript:

ESEA Reauthorization: NCLB and the Blueprint Based on information from: A Blueprint for Reform July 2010

2 Core Policies to Maintain in ESEA Reauthorization Standards-based reform and accountability Disaggregation and focus on improving performance for all groups of students Focus on equity

3 NCLB & Blueprint: Accountability NCLBBlueprint “Race to the bottom” for state standards States adopt college- and career-ready standards. Real rewards for high-poverty schools, districts and states showing real progress, especially in serving underserved populations and closing achievement gaps. Many ways to “fail,” no recognition for success Focus on proficiency; schools making progress can still be “failing” Differentiation of schools based on student growth and school progress. Develop and support the use of better assessments. Look beyond assessments to determine what a school needs, including attendance, conditions for learning, course completion, to paint a fuller picture of a school. Allow use of additional subjects. Additional resources for developing a well-rounded curriculum Exclusive focus on tests, narrowing of curriculum

4 Meaningful change in persistently low-performing schools. Allowing persistently low- performing schools to avoid real change NCLB & Blueprint: Accountability NCLBBlueprint Holding every level of the system responsible for improvement and support. All consequences focused at the school level Punitive/labels without support Meaningful investment in low-performing schools. Targets more limited portion of schools for significant intervention. More local flexibility around how best to serve schools; no mandated SES or choice. Over-identifies schools Mandated SES and choice

5 Ignored need for better school leaders Invest in preparing and improving better leaders. Utilize surveys of teachers (around working conditions, professional development & support), and surveys of conditions for learning that include teacher perspective. Not focused enough on building the profession and teacher voice Greater focus on getting great teachers where they are needed most. Equitable distribution requirements not meaningful NCLB & Blueprint: Teachers and Leaders NCLBBlueprint No acknowledgement or support of teacher collaboration Invest in expanded learning time programs that provide more time for educators to plan and collaborate.

6 Ignored important factors like conditions for learning Make accountability about more than test scores for most schools. Fund development of measurement systems around conditions for learning. NCLB & Blueprint: Broad Principles NCLBBlueprint Narrow vision of school’s role Greater opportunities and structures for positive adult-student relationships. Funding for providing comprehensive services so that students are safe, healthy, able to focus on learning. No acknowledgement that equitable funding matters Encourage funding equity.