1. July 26, 2012 1

2.  To move away from the narrowly defined accountability system in NCLB  To have a new accountability system that uses multiple measures with goals that are unique to each school/district  To have results which are more meaningful measures of the success and progress of Kansas schools  KS is already doing many of the parts, i.e. common core standards 2

3.  No more AYP beginning with 2013 assessments  No more 100% proficient by 2014  No more Title I schools or districts on improvement  No more required Title I school choice or supplemental educational services (SES—after school tutoring)  No more Highly Qualified Teacher (HQT) Improvement Plans 3

4. 1. College- and Career-Ready Expectations for All Students 2. State-Developed Differentiated Recognition, Accountability, and Support 3. Supporting Effective Instruction and Leadership 4

5. 5

6. 6

7. 7

8. 8

9. 9

10.  Affect of waiver on 2013 QPA still under development  2012 was last “AYP” for QPA  2013 possibly use new annual measurable objectives (AMOs) to measure student performance (“P” in QPA) 10

11. 11

12. 12