Acclamation 2015 Approved June 18, 2010. Preamble Misericordia University’s new strategic plan is a roadmap designed to transform the University. Acclamation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The PRR: Linking Assessment, Planning & Budgeting PRR Workshop – April 4, 2013 Barbara Samuel Loftus, Ph.D. Misericordia University.
Advertisements

Presented by: Jerry Legge Associate Provost for Academic Planning (Interim), and Professor of Public Administration and Policy (SPIA) Provost Advisory.
What Did We Learn About Our Future? Getting Ready for Strategic Planning Spring 2012.
Using the New CAS Standards to Assess Your Transfer Student Programs and Services Janet Marling, Executive Director National Institute for the Study of.
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
A relentless commitment to academic achievement and personal growth for every student. Redmond School District Graduates are fully prepared for the demands.
Strategic Plan: Status Update 2014 Annual Faculty Conference Terry Parker, Provost.
A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
College of Business Goals Academic Year Goal 1: Increase Awareness of Academic Programs and Centers Goal 2: Maintain AACSB Accreditation Goal.
Facilities Management 2013 Manager Enrichment Program U.Va.’s Strategic Planning Initiatives Colette Sheehy Vice President for Management and Budget December.
Cedarville University is a Christ-centered learning community equipping students for lifelong leadership and service through an education marked.
Five Guiding Themes Provide Civic Leadership through Partnerships --Lead as a civic partner, deepen our engagement as a critical community asset, demonstrate.
1 GETTING STARTED WITH ASSESSMENT Barbara Pennipede Associate Director of Assessment Office of Planning, Assessment and Research Office of Planning, Assessment.
CEC Advisory Council October 25, 2013 Miami 2020 Plan: Moments that Transorm.
1 GETTING STARTED WITH ASSESSMENT Barbara Pennipede Associate Director of Assessment Office of Planning, Assessment and Research Office of Planning, Assessment.
1 Strategic Planning: An Update March 13, Outline What we have done so far? Where do we stand now? Next steps?
College Strategic Plan by Strategic Planning and Quality Assurance Committee.
TOP 25 A summary of the plan. An update on the progress that’s been made. A challenge for faculty. FEBRUARY 2011.
SAR as Formative Assessment By Rev. Bro. Dr. Bancha Saenghiran February 9, 2008.
EMU Strategic Planning Strategic Planning Material Mission/Vision/Values Goals and Objectives January 10, 2014.
Towards an Integrated Academy: A Teaching and Learning Framework for Carleton University
EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY Eastern Washington University EWU ODP Maps EWU ODP Maps
STRATEGIC PLANS An Overview of Plans Within Maricopa.
Report to Professional Council June 4, 2009 By Carla Boone Planning Council: A New Way of Doing Business at COM.
TODAY AND TOMORROW University of Houston- Downtown Strategic Plan Highlights.
The UWF Strategic Planning Facilitators Robert Dugan, Jim Hurd, Kyle Marrero, Dottie Minear, Stacie Whinnery, and Josh Finley The University of West Florida.
BUILDING THE VISION Gregory G. Dell’Omo FACULTY CONVOCATION August 26, 2005.
Planning Sub Meet and Confer Strategic Priorities and the Future of Minnesota State University.
Strategic Planning Strategic planning follows "the five question logic” ("Who are we? Where are we now? Where do we want to be? How do we get there? How.
Spring Convocation Academic and Student Affairs Update Academic Affairs Vision – Texas A&M University-Central Texas strives to be an innovative.
WELCOME Strategic Directions Finale May 1, SETTING THE STAGE Planning for BC’s Future 2015—2018.
MUW Diversity Plan April 2012 DRAFT 5-Year Strategic Plan.
Convocation Week 2008 Strategic & Academic Action Planning Update.
Strategic Academic Visioning and Empowerment (SAVE) Final Report to UWF BOT December 2011.
Institutional Snapshot Undergraduate students: 10,346 Graduate students: 543 International students: 141 Multicultural students: 630 Faculty and academic.
Strategic Plan Presentation to Faculty & Staff Spring 2006.
The UWF Strategic Planning Facilitators Robert Dugan, Jim Hurd, Kyle Marrero, Dottie Minear, Stacie Whinnery, and Josh Finley The University of West Florida.
Foundations of Excellence TM in the First College Year Improving the First Year of College: Foundations for Excellence Scott E. Evenbeck IUPUI FACULTY.
District Improvement Plan August 10, 2015.
Preparing and Evaluating 21 st Century Faculty Aligning Expectations, Competencies and Rewards The NACU Teagle Grant Nancy Hensel, NACU Rick Gillman, Valporaiso.
Greenville Technical Charter High School Strategic Plan Developed October 2014.
Serving: What does the learner demand of us? Process: What processes do we need to master in order to serve our population? Development: What competencies.
District Improvement Plan September 21, 2015.
Key requirements Focused on student learning Inclusive Transformative Five year duration Strong assessment component.
University of Minnesota Metrics Framework Working Document: 3/18/2010 Extraordinary Education – Recruit, educate, challenge, and graduate outstanding students.
Think Academics: Academic Visioning David Marker Interim Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs.
Overview of the Self Study Presented to NAQAAE Review Team November 7 th, 2010 November 7 th, 2010.
MDC Strategic Plan Strategic Plan Coordinating Committee October/November 2010.
Cedar Crest College Strategic Planning Community Day.
Planning 101 Overview of integrated planning at SCC
Time to answer critical and inter-related questions: Whom will we serve? What will we offer? How will we serve them?
CREATING A CULTURE OF EVIDENCE Student Affairs Assessment Council October 2013 Dr. Barbara Copenhaver-Bailey Assistant Vice President for Student Success.
For Strategic Planning. Today: Mission Future: 5-year Vision.
UTPA 2012: A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-PAN AMERICAN Approved by President Cárdenas November 21, 2005 Goals reordered January 31, 2006.
Cal Poly Pomona University Strategic Plan 2011 ‐ 2015 Partial Assessment of Progress Presented to the University Strategic Planning Committee (USPC) 12/4/2014.
1 GOAL: Provide students with a quality educational experience that enables them to complete their educational goals in a timely fashion. Review and restructure.
Strategic Plan: Goals, Objectives & Success Measures Administrative Forum, South Campus June 17,
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
Chancellor Pam Shockley-Zalabak
New Faculty Orientation Provost’s Report August 22, 2016
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING GEORGIA TECH Academic Year
VCU Strategic Plan 2025: Fall Town Halls
Pace Path to Success: Combining Academic and Real-World Experiences through Purposeful Planning and Mentoring. 9/18/2018.
District Improvement Plan June 26, 2017
How does the Branding fit into ECC Excels???
The City University of New York Performance Management Process (PMP)
Columbus state university
Minnesota State University, Mankato
Accreditation Leadership Committee Opening Meeting
A Workshop for New Academic Administrators
Presentation transcript:

Acclamation 2015 Approved June 18, 2010

Preamble Misericordia University’s new strategic plan is a roadmap designed to transform the University. Acclamation 2015 is the next step in a process that has generated significant success for the institution and its graduates. As a result of the accomplishments of the last two strategic plans, Misericordia has moved from period of subsistence to sustainability. We now intend to take a bold step and evolve from a position of sustainability to one of acclamation. Over the next five years Misericordia will undertake new initiatives and audacious thinking to brand itself as regionally acclaimed and nationally recognized for our distinctive approach to teaching and learning. The prominent initiatives in this plan will not be easily achieved. However, with optimal use of current and future resources, attainment of an aggressive enrollment target of 1812, excellent communication and management, and adherence to our brand, the vision of Misericordia University delineated herein is well within reach if the entire Misericordia community thinks progressively and acts aggressively in striving to reach the goals.

A Vision of Acclamation Based firmly upon its Catholic identity and Mercy traditions, Misericordia University is a premier small, liberal arts based Catholic university in the northeast. Misericordia’s ability to effectively combine outstanding academics, superb career preparation and passion for serving others—our Trinity of Learning—has elevated the University to a position where it is regionally acclaimed and nationally recognized for graduating students who have, indeed, learned to succeed.

VISION: ACCLAMATION 2015 Based firmly upon its Catholic identity and Mercy traditions, Misericordia University is a premier small, liberal arts based Catholic university in the northeast. Misericordia’s ability to effectively combine outstanding academics, superb career preparation and passion for serving others—our Trinity of Learning—has elevated the University to a position where it is regionally acclaimed and nationally recognized for graduating students who have, indeed, learned to succeed. MISSION GOAL Misericordia University is a stellar Catholic and Mercy institution, nationally recognized for our seamless integration of mission and academic excellence. 21 ST CENTURY CURRICULUM GOAL Misericordia University’s educational programs, including the liberal arts based core curriculum, major programs, and the co- curriculum, are academically rigorous, distinctive for their interconnectedness, and recognized by prospective students, our peer institutions, and employers for the University’s integrated and holistic approach to teaching and learning. INCLUSIVE EXCELLENCE GOAL Misericordia University is transformative for students, faculty, staff, and our extended community through our efforts to engage and exemplify diversity and to create an environment that is defined by inclusive excellence. FACULTY EXCELLENCE IN TEACHING & SCHOLARSHIP GOAL Faculty excellence in teaching, research and other scholarly endeavors insures academic excellence permeates Misericordia University. The University is known for personal attention, robust student-faculty interaction and faculty- driven quality in all majors, which allows us to attract, hire and retain talented faculty. RESOURCES GOAL - Misericordia University is a financially strong and vibrant institution that invests appropriately in its employees, campus, operations and reserves. The beautiful campus is well-maintained and evolving. Employees are appropriately compensated and feel well-treated, respected and supported both individually and operationally. MARKETING GOAL – Through a collaborative effort between faculty, staff, students and the marketing department, Misericordia University is known for academic rigor, excellence among faculty and staff, and students who are not only prepared professionally but who also have a passion for serving others. COMMUNICATION & MANAGEMENT GOAL Misericordia University’s growth and progress is facilitated by effective, timely, and clear communication and management systems. Mutual trust permeates our organizational culture. While our goal is efficient management, we are guided by our charisms and emphasize civility and mutual respect in our communication and management styles.

5 Mission Goal:Misericordia University is a stellar Catholic and Mercy institution, nationally recognized for our seamless integration of mission and academic excellence. 1.1Increase service-learning participation for students, faculty and staff 1.2Develop flagship Mercy orientation and Mercy integration programs for students, faculty and staff 1.3Develop courses throughout academic and co-curricular programming that authentically and explicitly address mission 1.4Use, promotion, and dissemination of Mercy Matrix as Catholic higher- ed standard for assessing mission integration 1.5Attain national recognition for campus-wide mission integration and articulation Manager: Sr. Bernadette Duross

6 Mission Strategies and Indicators STRATEGIES 1.1Increase service-learning participation for students, faculty and staff 1.2Develop flagship Mercy orientation and Mercy integration programs for students, faculty and staff 1.3Develop courses throughout academic and co-curricular programming that authentically and explicitly address mission 1.4Use, promotion, and dissemination of Mercy Matrix as Catholic higher-ed standard for assessing mission integration 1.5Attain national recognition for campus- wide mission integration and articulation INDICATORS 1.1 Percent participation (student and faculty) in service-learning 1.2Percent participation in Mercy orientation and integration programming 1.3Number of courses developed 1.4Assess institution using Mercy Matrix as appropriate 1.5 National and regional conference presentations and publications related to mission DASHBOARD INDICATORS: Percent participation in service-learning courses; Mercy Matrix assessment score

7 21st Century Curriculum GOAL:Misericordia University’s educational programs, including the liberal arts based core curriculum, major programs, and the co-curriculum, are academically rigorous, distinctive for their interconnectedness and recognized by prospective students, our peer institutions, and employers for the University’s integrated and holistic approach to teaching and learning. 2.1Create, enhance, and/or accredit new and existing degree programs that attract traditional and non-traditional students and enable them to pursue 21 st century careers and/or post-graduate study. New programs must result in a positive contribution margin 2.2New core curriculum emphasizes an integrated liberal arts and professional preparation learning experience 2.3New co-curriculum experiences seamlessly connect academic and campus programming, including the expansion of experiential learning and cultural and athletic programming 2.4 Develop a dynamic and responsive culture of assessment that informs planning and program development, guides reallocation of resources where appropriate, and results in continuous improvement 2.5Develop an intercultural study program that supports global courses, study abroad and experiential learning opportunities 2.6Implementation of an innovative foreign language program Manager: Mari King, Deans

8 21st Century Curriculum Strategies and Indicators STRATEGIES 2.1Create, enhance, and/or accredit new and existing degree programs that attract traditional and non-traditional students and enable them to pursue 21 st century careers and/or post- graduate study 2.2New core curriculum emphasizes an integrated liberal arts and professional preparation learning experience 2.3New co-curriculum experiences seamlessly connect academic and campus programming, including the expansion of experiential learning and cultural and athletic programming 2.4 Develop a dynamic and responsive culture of assessment that informs planning and program development, guides reallocation of resources where appropriate, and results in continuous improvement. 2.5Develop an intercultural study program that supports global courses, study abroad and experiential learning opportunities 2.6Implementation of an innovative foreign language program INDICATORS 2.1a Graduate and/or professional school acceptance rates 2.1bPercentage of students with jobs in field of study at graduation 2.1c Professional exam first time pass rates 2.1d Employer survey ratings on student preparedness in career 2.2NSSE academic challenge and active and collaborative learning ratings 2.3aNSSE enriching educational experiences ratings 2.3bStudent participation in academic, cultural and athletic programming 2.4 Percentage of student learning outcomes comprehensively (in majors and core) assessed annually 2.5Number of students participating in study abroad and/or intercultural experiences 2.6 TBD DASHBOARD INDICATORS: NSSE - LAC, EEE, ACL measures; Post graduation employment and graduate school rates

9 Inclusive Excellence GOAL: Misericordia University is transformative for students, faculty, staff, and our extended community through our efforts to engage and exemplify diversity and to create an environment that is defined by inclusive excellence. 3.1Initiate and support campus and community-wide diversity initiatives 3.2Develop an intercultural office that provides and promotes campus programming focused on diversity and inclusive excellence 3.3Develop courses in core and majors that are focused on foreign language acquisition, diversity and global issues 3.4Increase institutional diversity demographics by recruiting and retaining a diverse population Manager: Mary Hinton

10 Inclusive Excellence Strategies and Indicators STRATEGIES 3.1Initiate and support campus and community-wide diversity initiatives 3.2Develop an intercultural office that provides and promotes campus programming focused on diversity and inclusive excellence 3.3Develop courses in core and majors that are focused on foreign language acquisition, diversity and global issues 3.4Increase institutional diversity demographics by recruiting and retaining a diverse population INDICATORS 3.1 Number of diversity programs delivered on campus 3.2a Number of participants in intercultural programs/experiences 3.2b NSSE measures regarding diversity 3.3Number of courses developed in core and major programs focused on foreign language, diversity and/or global awareness 3.4Carry over demographic measures with increasing numbers DASHBOARD INDICATORS: Demographics; Number of intercultural courses/programs

11 Faculty Excellence in Teaching and Scholarship Goal: Faculty excellence in teaching, research and other scholarly endeavors insures academic excellence permeates Misericordia University. The University is known for personal attention, robust student-faculty interaction and faculty-driven quality in all majors, which allows us to attract, hire and retain talented faculty. 4.1 Maintain appropriate ratio of adjuncts to full-time faculty 4.2 CETL provides pedagogical and professional development assistance and supports research grant acquisition 4.3 Identify, orient, and support adjuncts so that, when utilized, they uphold high- quality student-faculty interactions 4.4 Provide and promote opportunities for significant, high-quality student-faculty interaction 4.5 Optimize available resources for research, including faculty research and summer research grants, and support for securing external funding, thereby insuring that resources match faculty needs 4.6 Provide innovative solutions to science facility and other lab needs that are aligned with faculty teaching and research 4.7 MU will remain a leader among its peers in providing class sizes that foster personal attention in major programs and in the core curriculum Manager: Mari King, Deans

12 Faculty Excellence in Teaching and Scholarship Strategies and Indicators STRATEGIES 4.1 Maintain appropriate ratio of adjuncts to full- time faculty 4.2 CETL provides pedagogical and professional development assistance and supports grant acquisition 4.3 Identify, orient, and support adjuncts so that, when utilized, they uphold high-quality student- faculty interactions 4.4 Provide and promote opportunities for significant, high-quality student-faculty interaction 4.5Optimize available resources for research, including faculty research and summer research grants, and support for securing external funding, thereby insuring that resources match faculty needs 4.6 Provide innovative solutions to science facility and other lab needs that are aligned with faculty teaching and research 4.7 MU will remain a leader among its peers in providing class sizes that foster personal attention in major programs and in the core curriculum INDICATORS 4.1Identify and maintain various adjunct ratios (determined by college and department needs) 4.2Number/percentage of faculty participating in professional development via CETL 4.3 Adjunct evaluation scores related to SFI 4.4NSSE Student-Faculty Interaction (SFI) and Level of Academic Challenge (LAC) index ratings 4.5a Number/percentage of faculty attaining faculty research and summer research grants 4.5bPercentage of faculty with publications and/or conference presentations (annually) 4.6aPercentage of science faculty conducting lab research 4.6bScience facility capital campaign plan and building design approved by Graduating student survey and faculty satisfaction survey ratings regarding class size DASHBOARD INDICATORS: Faculty Satisfaction Survey; NSSE LAC index ratings; Publication/Presentation percentages

13 Communication and Management Goal: Misericordia University’s growth and progress is facilitated by effective, timely, and clear communication and management systems. Mutual trust permeates our organizational culture. While our goal is efficient management, we are guided by our charisms and emphasize civility and mutual respect in our communication and management styles. 5.1Roles and responsibilities are clarified and upheld to enable decisions to be made at the appropriate level 5.2Decision making is done in a timely and transparent manner 5.3Improve communication between and among faculty, staff and administrators at every level, insuring that University-wide communications are timely and widely shared Manager: Sr. Bernadette and Rebecca Steinberger

14 Communication and Management Strategies and Indicators STRATEGIES 5.1Roles and responsibilities are clarified and upheld to enable decisions to be made at the appropriate level 5.2 Decision making is done in a timely and transparent manner 5.3 Improve communication between and among faculty, staff and administrators at every level, insuring that University-wide communications are timely and widely shared INDICATORS 5.1 Organizational charts developed, utilized and updated annually 5.2Utilization of online technology and decision models in announcing areas of responsibility for decision-making, proposed timelines and progress towards final decisions 5.3 Faculty and staff satisfaction survey ratings on communication and management DASHBOARD INDICATORS: Faculty and Staff Satisfaction Survey Ratings;

15 Resources Goal 6: Misericordia University is a financially strong and vibrant institution that invests appropriately in its employees, campus, operations and reserves. The beautiful campus is well-maintained and evolving. Employees are appropriately compensated and feel well-treated, respected and supported both individually and operationally. 6.1 Establish a transparent and timely resource, budgeting, planning and allocation process 6.2 Provide the appropriate level of support, resources, and compensation to employees 6.3Secure funding through revenue generation and expense reallocation to improve Misericordia’s financial position and to address the institution’s priorities 6.4 Evolve the campus, physically and operationally, into a well-functioning, extended campus that meets the needs of our traditional and non-traditional students, scholar- athletes, and employees Manager: John Risboskin

16 Resources Strategies and Indicators STRATEGIES 6.1 Establish a transparent and timely resource, budgeting, planning and allocation process 6.2 Provide the appropriate level of support, resources, and compensation to employees 6.3Secure funding through revenue generation and expense reallocation to improve Misericordia’s financial position and to address the institution’s priorities 6.4 Evolve the campus, physically and operationally, into a well-functioning, extended campus that meets the needs of our traditional and non- traditional students, scholar- athletes, and employees INDICATORS 6.1Faculty and staff satisfaction with involvement in budget preparation (Faculty Satisfaction Survey Question 23; consider new question in staff survey) 6.2a Faculty satisfaction with the availability of resources for academic needs of faculty (Faculty Satisfaction Survey Question 5k) 6.2b Salary goals to be developed 6.2c Employee satisfaction % 6.3a Viability ratio 6.3b Endowment fair market value 6.3c Dollars allocated to strategic plan activities 6.4a Overall student satisfaction with facilities (new question for the Graduating Student Survey) 6.4b Overall student satisfaction with support and administrative services (new question for Graduating Student Survey) 6.4c Faculty and staff satisfaction with physical facilities (Faculty Satisfaction Survey Quest 17/18; consider new question for staff survey) DASHBOARD INDICATORS: Endowment contribution, Student, faculty and staff satisfaction ratings

17 Marketing Goal 7: Through a collaborative effort between faculty, staff, students and the marketing department, Misericordia University is known for academic rigor, excellence among faculty and staff, and students who are not only prepared professionally but who also have a passion for serving others. 7.1Collaboratively promote, internally and externally, faculty excellence in research and teaching and student accomplishments 7.2Develop and implement a marketing strategic plan that emphasizes new and non-traditional programs 7.3In concert with communication and management initiatives, coordinate an internal marketing plan designed to shift our campus culture to one that anticipates and explicitly works toward acclamation Manager: Sue Helwig, Deans

18 Marketing Strategies and Indicators STRATEGIES 7.1Collaboratively promote, internally and externally, faculty excellence in research and teaching and student accomplishments 7.2Develop and implement a marketing strategic plan that emphasizes new and non-traditional programs 7.3In concert with communication and management initiatives, coordinate an internal marketing plan designed to shift our campus culture to one that anticipates and explicitly works toward acclamation INDICATORS 7.1 Number of faculty who receive recognition in the press (annually) 7.2 Number of annual marketing strategic plan benchmarks met 7.3 Faculty and staff satisfaction survey responses DASHBOARD INDICATORS: Number of faculty who receive recognition in the press (annually)