Click here to add text The Single Prime Contractor Delivery Method Ohio School Facilities Commission Ohio Construction Reform.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Construction Project Coordination Presented by: Philip H
Advertisements

Construction Contracting
Lessons Learned: CM at Risk & Design Build
Contract CloseOut.
What Small and Emerging Contractors Need to Know Introduction to Construction Risks and Contracting Practices © Copyright 2014 NASBP.
SUBMITTALS PROCESSING Fall 2008 ARCH 330
Prequalification Process / Subcontract Lisa Conomy Construction Counsel, OSU Lane Beougher State Architect.
Your Presenters Lisa Dal Gallo Dave Kirn Regional Executive/Justice Market Leader Partner, LEED AP
Facilities Excellence Project Delivery Methods Board of Trustees April 12, 2005.
Subcontracting Construction Engineering 380. Subcontracts Owner doesn’t “recognize” subcontractors They are representatives of the contractor Prime usually.
A Match made in Heaven? Connecting you with a builder.
OCR Payment Process Training 01/17/2012. Article 9 – Compensation and Payment General Conditions – Article 9 – 9.1 Preconstruction Stage Compensation.
Your Deliver Method... …Pick it Early
Facilities Institute July , 2012 Houston, Texas Click to edit Master title style
Managing Risk in Construction Contracts Brendan D. Bowles Glaholt LLP.
Measure L Program Implementation Management Considerations Report to the Board of Trustees San Joaquin Delta Community College District July 13, 2004.
MANAGING PRODUCTION SYSTEMS. Managing Production Systems –A project should be worked  Within schedule  Within budget  And safely –Management has to.
KFUPM, Department of Construction Engineering and Management CEM 520 LIABILITY ALLOCATION AMONG THE PARTIES TO FIXED-PRICE CONSTRUCTIN CONTRACTS IN SAUDI.
PROJECT DELIVERY SYSTEMS
THE PROJECT TEAM TYPICAL REQUIREMENTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PROJECT TEAM TRADITIONAL TEAM ORGANIZATION AND VARIATIONS THE OWNER’S TEAM THE DESIGN.
Performance Monitoring All All Contracts require basic monitoring once awarded. The Goal of contract monitoring is to ensure that the contract is satisfactorily.
Construction Engineering 221 Drawings and Specifications.
Expectations What your Construction Professional, Architect, Construction Manager/Contractor expects from you? What you can expect from your Construction.
Prof Awad S. Hanna C HANGING P ROJECT D ELIVERY S YSTEMS by Awad S. Hanna, Ph. D., P. E. The University of Wisconsin, Madison Department of Civil and Environmental.
Honoraria for Design Build Projects Methodology Assessment Matrix.
PM/CAM Training H. Jeff Moore May 11, AGENDA Overview CM at Risk Design (Completion) / Build Lunch Break / Discussion – 11:30 AM – 12:30 PM CM Agency.
CMR Contract Documents Jon Walden Manager of Contracts & Compliance Ohio School Facilities Commission Lisa Conomy Construction Counsel The Ohio State University.
This Presentation is a Copyrighted Property of Waller S. Poage, AIA, CSI, MAI, CVS – All Rights are Reserved Session CDT 01 – Fundamentals Lesson CDT 1.3.
Summary of Changes to Other OSFC Roles February 21, 2012.
Project Delivery Options in the California Construction Market CSI Fresno Chapter - February 16, 2010 PROJECT DELIVERY OPTIONS in the CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION.
Construction Contracts and Project Delivery Methods
Welcome to the OCR Academy. Overview of Rules & Law Craig Weise Construction Reform Program Director.
CVE 4070 Construction Engineering Test-2 & Review Prof. Ralph V. Locurcio, PE.
January 24, …a delivery method which entails a commitment by the Construction Manager to deliver the project within a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP).
Lecture #2: The Design and Construction Team Professor: Robert Powell, AIA TA: Matt O’Brien, AIA August 20, 2008 AREN 231: Methods and Materials.
January 31, …a delivery method in which the construction team is known as the design-builder…and is responsible for taking a concept developed by.
CE 366 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS Robert G. Batson, Ph.D., P.E. Professor of Construction Engineering The University of Alabama
The Projects Side Steve Berezansky OSFC Chief of Projects.
CVE 4070 Construction Engineering Course Review & Critique Prof. Ralph V. Locurcio, PE.
PROJECT PHASES ACT Objective To provide an understanding of the design & construction process and the roles of the different participants in this.
January 14, The NAMC LCDP Will Provide A Proven Contractor Capacity Building Program For The Public and Private Sector.
Project Delivery Methods Part I. What is A Project Delivery Method? The owner’s selection of the organizational structure of the project. Three popular.
You passed the Bond or secured some funds What do we do now? 2014.
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING SPRING SEMESTER ASSOC.PROF.DR. İBRAHİM YİTMEN CIVL 493 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT.
Construction Eng 221 Project Management and Administration.
LACCD Building the Future THOMAS HALL Director Facilities Planning and Development.
© 2011 Orbach Huff & Suarez 1 Lease Leaseback Project Delivery Method Kimble Cook Orbach, Huff & Suarez.
CVE 4070 Construction Engineering Course Review & Critique Prof. Ralph V. Locurcio, PE.
University of Calgary Continuing Education
CVE 4070 Construction Engineering HW #6 review Test-2 & Review Prof. Ralph V. Locurcio, PE.
1 1 Effective Administration of Commercial Contracts Breakout Session # Session D06 Name: Holly Walker, CPCM Corporate Learning Solutions and Contract.
CAPITAL PROJECT DELIVERY METHODS APRIL 20, 2015 – SACUBO Annual Conference By Al Stoverink, AVC for Facilities Arkansas State University.
Measure N Modernization IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS Planning, Bidding, Construction, and Occupancy.
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AT RISK Prepared by: Nancy Fouad Carey Attorney AGC Alabama Birmingham Section Meeting November 5, 2012.
CHANGING PROJECT DELIVERY SYSTEMS
by Awad S. Hanna, Ph. D., P. E. The University of Wisconsin, Madison
2016 SAME Small Business Conference - Atlanta
Lease-Leaseback Project Delivery Method
Profession Practices (ECIV-5105)
What Small and Emerging Contractors Need to Know Introduction to Construction Risks and Contracting Practices © Copyright 2017 NASBP.
CM at Risk v. Design-Bid-Build
PROJECT DELIVERY METHODS
CHANGING PROJECT DELIVERY SYSTEMS
FIVE PROJECT PHASES 5C-3 Sun. 8:00-10:00am 21/ 2/2016.
Designers’ Manual Overview and Chapter Contents
Subcontracts Owner doesn’t “recognize” subcontractors
PROJECT DELIVERY METHODS
Chapter 2 – Review ‘construction management’
Construction Management Services April 16, 2018
The Players OWNER/CLIENT Construction Manager (CM)
Presentation transcript:

Click here to add text The Single Prime Contractor Delivery Method Ohio School Facilities Commission Ohio Construction Reform

What is Single Prime Contracting? A Design—Bid—Build Method Public Bid process with Lowest, Responsive, Responsible Bidder. One Contractor responsible for all the Work in the Bid Documents. One Contractor responsible for managing the Schedule of the Work.

Why Select Single Prime Contracting? Reduction in Administrative expenses  Fewer contracts to administer (payment is easier, EDGE is easier)  No “scope gap” issues  No confusion on accountability when incidents occur or issues arise.  “Coordination issues” eliminated  One warranty/guarantee contact  Schedule review by Owner’s agent, not schedule management

Why Select Single Prime Contracting? Reduction in Project expenses*  Greatly reduced occurrence of claims  Fewer change orders  Reduced general conditions due to potential to share job sites costs.  Reduced perceived risk for the Prime results in less “protection” for potential issues included in bid (no “forced marriages”). *Single vs. Multiple Prime Contracting, Electric International, The Foundation of Electrical Construction, Inc., Dr. Eddy M. Rojas, 2007 *Impact of the Wick’s Law on Public Construction in New York City, Ashenfleter & Ashmore, 1994

Challenges?  Potential of Increased Construction Costs due to Subcontractor Mark-up  A difficult/incompetent contractor can mean increased administrative costs.  Smaller, local contractors can get left out  Bid Shopping These challenges can be managed with proper planning by your team.

Roles Current Primary Players  Architect  Construction Manager  Prime Contractors (HVAC, Plumbing, Electrical, General Trades, Fire Suppression) New Roles for Single Prime Model  Prime Contractor  Program Manager aka Owner’s Rep.  CM “Lite”  Architect “Heavy”

Responsibilities Current Model  Roles and Responsibilities Matrix Current Model.docRoles and Responsibilities Matrix Current Model.doc Single Prime Model Possible Option 1  Roles and Responsibilities Matrix Single Prime CM Lite.docRoles and Responsibilities Matrix Single Prime CM Lite.doc Single Prime Model Possible Option 2  Roles and Responsibilities Matrix Single Prime AE Heavy.docRoles and Responsibilities Matrix Single Prime AE Heavy.doc Single Prime Model Possible Option 3  Roles and Responsibilities Matrix Single Prime Program Manager.docRoles and Responsibilities Matrix Single Prime Program Manager.doc

Single Prime Contract Changes General Thoughts  The contract revisions are fluid (i.e, not complete)  The initial revisions contain more CM responsibilities  Future modifications will likely lesson the CM role and allow OSFC consultant flexibility (i.e. CM Lite, Program Manager, Owners Rep, Cxing Agent, etc.)  Future modifications likely more in line with current SAO single prime  PAs need to study and understand contract changes

Multi-Prime vs. Single Prime Contracts  Risk shifted from Owner to Contractor  MP Article 4 schedule and coordination role now shifted to general contractor (new Article 5)  Architect is primary party for scheduling progress meetings (where CM involved, it is through CM).  72 Hour Notice is returned to the general conditions (Article 2.3)

Multi-Prime vs. Single Prime Contracts Subcontractors (New Article 4)  GC must use State of Ohio Subcontract Form  GC form incorporates requirements from the Subcontractor Form Rule  GC can supplement with its own non- conflicting terms and conditions  Owners get right to reject subcontractors

Characteristics of a Candidate for Single Prime Delivery Model Owner Characteristics: Experience with < 6 major projects Staff available 2-8 hours per week Willing to share moderate level of risk Moderate involvement in project details Project Characteristics: Small to medium size <$20 M Simple to moderately complex construction Typical schedule expectations

Single Prime Delivery Model Examples Things to consider:  Size of project  Owner’s Experience (including Treasurer)  Availability of Contractors in the area with appropriate bonding capacity.  Schedule issues?  Multiple Buildings?  Community concerns? (i.e. track record of contractors, other Districts’ issues, etc.)

Single Prime Delivery Model Questions?