Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

LACCD Building the Future THOMAS HALL Director Facilities Planning and Development.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "LACCD Building the Future THOMAS HALL Director Facilities Planning and Development."— Presentation transcript:

1 LACCD Building the Future THOMAS HALL Director Facilities Planning and Development

2 Delivery Methods Design Bid Build Design Build Lease-Leaseback CM at-risk Design Assist Job Order Contracting (JOC)

3 Are we able to use Design Build? STATUTORY AUTHORITY – California Community College Design Build AB 1000, EC 81700 (September 18, 2002) Pilot Program – Enabling Legislation for Cal Community College Design Build Project Value Threshold Minimum of $10 Million SB 614 (October 11, 2007) Reducing Project Value Threshold to $2.5 Million Extends Sunset Provision

4 Design-Bid-Build DISTRICT PRIME ARCHITECT GENERAL CONTRACTOR Design-Bid-Build TIME – Long, Non-Concurrent Activities in Schedule (Scope, Design, Bid, Award) -QUALIFICATIONS - Low Bid Award Solely on Price – Any Responsive Bid Must be Selected -RISK - Owner responsible for Errors and Omissions in the Design -COOPERATION - Most Adversarial – Incentive to Identify Weaknesses by Contractor -ADMINISTRATION - High Administrative Burden – Change Order Requests and RFIs -OWNERS INVOLVEMENT – Required but not onerous

5 DISTRICT DESIGN BUILDER DESIGN UNIT CONSTRUCTION UNIT Design Build TIME – Many Concurrent Activities in Schedule and reduced overall duration QUALIFICATIONS – Best Value Selection based on Qualifications, Innovation, References and Price RISK - Design Builder responsible for Errors and Omissions/ Coordination (Party Most In Control) COOPERATION - Less Adversarial – Incentive Develop Quality Documents Early and Coordinate ADMINISTRATION - Low Administrative Burden – Change Order Requests and RFIs minimized OWNER INVOLVEMENT - Requires a greater commitment of owners time

6 DESIGN / BUILD TEAM Includes –A/E –Contractor –Sub-Contractors Hired Through –RFP –Low Bid –Design Competition Did not use a bridging document Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP)

7 Definition – “Best Value” BEST VALUE – A selection process based on predetermined criteria that may include Price, Design, Past Performance, Ability to Perform the Work, or other criteria as defined in the RFQ or RFP.

8 Selection Scoring: –Price – 35% –Design Excellence – 35% –Project Management – 15% –Outreach – 10% –Safety – 5% Request for Proposals

9 LACCD Design Build Process Step 1 – Team Prequalification –Qualifications Based creation of prequalified pools by project type Step 2 – Project Specific Shortlisting –Relevant Pool invited to submit for specific projects and shortlisted by relevant experience, references and personnel Step 3 – Request for Proposals –Design Competition amongst shortlisted teams for final award

10

11 Completed Design Build Projects Trade Technical College Project –1 Structure 900 Car Parking Garage Southwest College Project –6 Structures Facilities Maintenance and Operations Student Services Building Field House Parking Structure Stadium Sheriff’s Office

12 Trade Tech Experience First Design Build Project Two Proposals – Design Competition Parking Structure Cost –Original Budget - $13 million –Final Cost - $12 million Project Completion –Projected – 18 months –Delivered – 14 months

13 Trade Tech - Points to Note Formal Partnered Process Strong Aesthetic Value Difficulty in Close Out

14 Southwest Experience Reduced Cost Per Square Foot –$450 using traditional methods –$200 actual with design-build Significant Speed Advantage –6 buildings in 18 months Startling Transformation

15 Southwest – Points to Note $63 million project cost Fast Track – 18 months DSA review issues

16 PROJECTS WELL-SUITED FOR DESIGN / BUILD COST MORE THAN $2.5 MILLION NO, OR LIMITED, SITE ISSUES NOT TECHNICALLY COMPLEX ???? REPETITIVE IN NATURE BUDGET CONSTRAINTS PRESENT TIME CONSTRAINTS PRESENT

17 DESIGN / BUILD ADVANTAGES TEAM WORK ENHANCED WITH ONE TEAM GUARANTEED PRICE HELPS CONTROL COST GMP PROVIDES NO INCENTIVE FOR CHANGE ORDERS MAJOR TIME SAVINGS OPPORTUNITIES

18 DESIGN / BUILD DISADVANTAGES SCHEDULE AND BUDGET CONSTRAINTS MAKE FOCUS ON QUALITY DIFFICULT GMP OFFER MAY NOT COME WITHIN AVAILABLE BUDGET SIGNIFICANT STAFF TIME REQUIRED TO MAKE DECISIONS FOR D/B TEAM ARCHITECT IS NOT INDEPENDENT

19 Contact Information Thomas Hall –thall@laccd.edu Phone 213-891-2119


Download ppt "LACCD Building the Future THOMAS HALL Director Facilities Planning and Development."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google