Institute for Military Support to Governance

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Program partners engage in a broad range of security cooperation activities to include homeland defense/security, disaster response/mitigation, consequence/crisis.
Advertisements

EAC HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY
Unified Land Operations
U.S. Army John F. Kennedy Special Warfare Center and School The U.S. Army’s Special Operations Center of Excellence The overall classification of this.
1 Joint Logistics Education & Development Forum Welcome Fort Lee … home of the Army Logistics University.
Special Operations Center of Excellence
Army Doctrine Publication (ADP) 3-07; and Army
ARSOF WARFIGHTING CHALLENGES
Counter-Terrorism Implementation Task Force (CTITF) Open Briefing to Member States 27 July 2010 Conference Room 2 NLB.
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Industry Day Brief 18 September 2014.
United States Army Combined Arms Center
Army G-3/5/7 AMERICA’S ARMY: THE STRENGTH OF THE NATION Army Foreign Area Officer Program National Military Intelligence Association Fall Symposium
Training for Integrated Operations
Unclassified. Program Management Empowerment and Accountability Mr. David Ahern Director, Portfolio Systems Acquisition AT&L(A&T) 14 April 2009 The Acquisition.
Korea Environment Institute KEI Introduction Government-sponsored research institute, under the Prime Minster’s office involved in policy development.
Assets and Capabilities DOD Civil Affairs January 30 th, 2012 Kenneth Shedarowich, LTC, SP, USAR The MHS: Healthcare to Health USACAPOC (A)
Comprehensive Approach to Building Partnerships
Unit 2 – Part 2 How United Nations Peacekeeping Operations Function.
Overview of NIPP 2013: Partnering for Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience October 2013 DRAFT.
UNCLASSIFIED Joint and Coalition Warfighting Mr. John Vinett March 2012 Technical Baseline Capability.
1 Civilian Stabilization Initiative UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Coordinator for Reconstruction and Stabilization April 10, 2008 Building a USG.
G OVERNANCE I NNOVATION FOR S ECURITY AND D EVELOPMENT (GISD) Interim Program Report 30 Sept – 30 Dec 2013 Karen Guttieri, Principal Investigator.
Civil Affairs Capabilities and Deployment CPT Marshall Sybert
To Support and Serve 1 U.S. Army Financial Management School COL T. A. CLAY Chief of the Corps / Commandant Financial Management: State of the Corps 18.
HQ USPACOM Integrated Operations Training WJTSC 10-1 (U) Col S. Scott Davis Director, Training and Exercises USPACOM J7 2 April 2010 This brief is classified:
The overall classification of this briefing is UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Africa Command … building the command.
Interagency Reconstruction & Stabilization FY10/11 Training, Exercises and Experiments Update to the Department of Defense Worldwide Joint Training & Scheduling.
11 NWS Climate Services Michelle Hawkins, PhD Climate Services Division NWS Partners Meeting June 29, 2010.
1 The Federal Shared Youth Vision Partnership A Federal Partnership between the Corporation for National community Service;
UNITED KINGDOM CULTURE & LANGUAGE IN DEFENCE Deputy Chief of the Defence Staff (Personnel & Training)
G OVERNANCE I NNOVATION FOR S ECURITY AND D EVELOPMENT (GISD) Interim Program Report 30 Sept – 30 Dec 2013 Karen Guttieri, Principal Investigator.
1 Preventing & Responding to Conflict: A New Approach January 2009.
Measuring Stakeholder Support for the Institute for Military Support to Governance (IMSG) Norm Cotton National Security Consultant (#Irregular Warfare,
U.S. Army John F. Kennedy Special Warfare Center and School The U.S. Army’s Special Operations Center of Excellence The overall classification of this.
OVERALL CLASSIFICATION OF THIS BRIEFING IS UNCLASSIFIED United States Southern Command SOUTHCOM’s Role and Responsibilities in Foreign Humanitarian Assistance.
Emergency Management Training and Education System Protection and National Preparedness National Preparedness Directorate National Training and Education.
This model portrays the complexity of “growing” noncommissioned officers. At its core are two critical requirements: NCO lifelong learning (LLL) and.
Mr. Tom Matthews OUSD(I) The overall classification of this brief is UNCLASSIFIED Discussion with the Intelligence Community Officer Course 10 April 2006.
FA50 Qualification Course
The Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict: the Austrian Model and the Role of Military Academies in Research and Teaching Karl.
1 Humanitarian Mine Action (HMA) Colombia Assistance Plan 9 – 12 June 2009 Mr. José M. Matos Stability Directorate Humanitarian Assistance Division
Work Group 3 Outbrief: (Governance Innovation for Security and Development) Peacekeeping and Stability Operations Training and Education Workshop 2014.
Lt Col Kris O’Brien JS J4 / KBLD Joint Logistics Compass Plank Briefing Logisticians Effectively Working in a Joint, Interagency and/or Multinational Environment.
MPE – Enabling ALL to securely SEE, DECIDE, ACT MPE - Highlights  Establish Core Implementation Working Group  Build Joining, Membership, and Exiting.
Aim To examine what developments are needed in curricula to prepare military officers and defense officials for their roles in dealing with future defense.
Visit us at usacac.army.mil AMERICA’S ARMY: OUR PROFESSION – LIVING THE ARMY ETHIC Challenges and Opportunities BG John Kem.
Governance Innovation for Security and Development: Concept of Operations SGT Charles N. Palmares Civil Affairs Training Sergeant, 1005 th CAPO Training.
Defense Daily Cyber Summit
Joint Concept Development and Experimentation (JCD&E)
THE SECURITY SECTOR REVIEW PROCESS. ISSUES Understanding: -Scope: What are the elements of a SS Review? -Need: Why review the Security Sector? -Process:
UNCLASSIFIED National Defense University Center for Complex Operations An Initial Framework for Transitional Public Security Bernie Carreau SSE IPR Workshop.
Rebalancing The Instruments of National Power COL John F. Agoglia Director US. Army Peacekeeping and Stability Operations Institute (PKSOI) 10 April 2008.
PERKINS IV AND THE WORKFORCE INNOVATION AND OPPORTUNITY ACT (WIOA): INTERSECTIONS AND OPPORTUNITIES.
Social Well-Being, in conversation with Sustainable Economic Development Panel Convener: Prof Marc Ventresca NPS and University of Oxford Co-Convener:
UNCLASSIFIED Liberty Brigade Civil Information Management Status Update 1.
UNCLASSIFIED / FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY USAFMCOM UNCLASSIFIED / FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY.
NATIONAL INCIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Department of Homeland Security Executive Office of Public Safety.
US European Command UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED This briefing is UNCLASSIFIED Stronger Together JOINT STAFF J7 / WJTSC 10-1 Training to Integrated.
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N.
Geospatial Line of Business FGDC Steering Committee Meeting October 23, 2006.
UNCLASSIFIED Ms. Ann Campbell UNCLASSIFIED Vesion Apr 2011.
Introduction Welcome to the Introduction to Special Operations Forces lesson on Special Operations Forces. In the first lesson of this course we defined.
Individual and Staff Joint Training Working Group
Chef of Section for Strategic Documents,
Civil Affairs’ (CA) Role In Stability PKSOI Lead (Liddick)
Mission Command Center Excellence Directorate of Training
Mission Command Center Excellence Directorate of Training
How United Nations Peacekeeping Operations Function
LREC Management Office (LRECMO)
Director - Mr. Wayne Raabe
Presentation transcript:

Institute for Military Support to Governance COL Terry Lindon Information 1 May 2014 v4

Background The USASOC Commander directed establishment of the IMSG in support of: DoDD 5100.01, Functions of the DoD and Its Major Components, 21 Dec 2010, Directs the Army to “occupy territories abroad and provide for the initial establishment of a military government, pending transfer of responsibility to other authority.” DoDD 3000.05 Stability Operations, 16 Sep 2009, Directs DoD components to Conduct, Support, or Lead Stability Operations. DoDD 2000.13, Civil Affairs, 11 Mar 2014, Directs DoD components to: "Establish and conduct military government until civilian authority or government can be restored" and "Support stability operations, including activities that establish civil security; provide support to governance; provide essential services; support economic development and infrastructure; and establish civil control." Joint Resource Oversight Council Memorandum (JROCM) #162-11, 1 Dec 2011: CA DOTMLPF Change Recommendation to CA formations in general and specifically to CA Functional Specialty capabilities in governance, economic stability, public health and welfare, rule of law, infrastructure, public education, and public information. Joint Resource Oversight Council Memorandum (JROCM) #172-13, 4 Nov 2013: Stability Operations DOTMLPF Change Recommendation to Transitional Military Authority, Military Governance, and requirements for coordination with IA MN and NGO partners. USASOC Guidance for Development of the Force (UGDF), tasking to USAJFKSWCS, page 66, Oct 2013: "establish the IMSG to strengthen partnerships with interagency and further leverage the civil sector expertise." ARSOF 2022, page 21: "Establish the Institute for Military Support to Governance to strengthen partnerships with interagency and further leverage the other ‘5th Forces Providers’ such as academia, non-governmental organizations and civil enterprises." “When Civilian expertise normally provided by USG Agencies is not available, CA functional specialists may be required to fill key planning, operational, or liaison roles until replaced by their OGA counterparts.” FM 3-57 Civil Affairs Operations, October 2011

Institute for Military Support to Governance Capability Requirement Mission Military Government is a Geneva/Hague Convention and USC Title X responsibility. Identifies and addresses critical civil vulnerabilities in undergoverned and ungoverned areas or high-threat environments where local authorities or the interagency cannot engage. Military Government specialist have existed in the Army Force structure since WW II; Capability currently exists in the Army Reserve. Seeks to revitalize the existing force structure with new standards and expanded capabilities. The Institute for Military Support to Governance manages the provision of civil sector expertise across the range of military operations in order to support USG obligations under international law and promote stability. On order, supports Theater Security Cooperation, Transitional Military Authority, and Support to Civil Administration operations. Specified Tasks Revitalize military governance capabilities Establish credentialing standards for 38G/Civil Sector Experts required to support future operations Inform Military Governance policy, doctrine and training Coordinate associated DOTMLPF functions; shape policies, authorities, doctrine and training for access to civil sector expertise Research, analyze and provide civil sector expertise for Support to Civil Administration (SCA) and Transitional Military Authority (TMA) Provide reach-back support to operational practitioners with research and analysis, concept development and experimentation Collaborate with civil sector experts to provide information to military planners Support Theater Security Cooperation (prevent and shape) Conduct Concept Development and Experimentation for Employment of Civil Sector Experts Develop a Future Operational Concept for the Employment of Civil Sector Experts and non-military capabilities resident in U.S. Government, private business, and academia

Civil Affairs 2020 Strategy CA forces support commanders by engaging the civil component of the operational environment to achieve CMO or other stated U.S. objectives and ensure the sustained legitimacy of the mission and the transparency and credibility of the military force before, during, or after other military operations. CA forces plan, prepare for, execute, assess, and transition CAO at all levels of war. (FM 3-57, Oct 11) 21st Century CA Soldier Attributes Civil Domain Professionals Diplomatically Astute Proficient Planner Critical Thinker Comfort with Ambiguity Adaptive Effective in the JIIM Environment ENDS CA Soldier 2020 The Civil Affairs Soldier understands civil societies and excels in complex, ambiguous, and non-contiguous environments. Trained in culture, language, social sciences, civil analysis and planning.  Capable of identifying and mitigating vulnerabilities that threaten the stability of foreign civil societies. The “Civil Scout” of the future is educated to conduct Civil Affairs Operations in a JIIM environment during persistent and/or episodic engagements. Critical Capabilities Civil-Military Warriors PMESII-PT/ ASCOPE Analysis Human Terrain Cultural/ Societal SME Language Proficiency Advanced Civil Education Government Functions Foreign Policy Strategic Stability and Security CA Regimental Vision 2020 Military Government Specialist 2020 The Military Government Specialist is uniquely trained, educated, and qualified to conduct responsibilities normally performed by civil governments. Trained in culture, language, civil analysis, and planning. Educated to both implement and oversee the complexities of transition to civil authorities. JROC/CA DOTMLPF Civil Affairs and Military Government are the Nation’s first choice for mitigating threats to civil society; executed through global persistent engagements across the range of military operations in order to enable our nation to prevent and deter conflict or prevail in war. WAYS Lines of Effort TRADOC PAM 525-3-1 Train and Educate the CA Force Design comprehensive, innovative, and relevant curriculum with commensurate resourcing Strengthen CA Credibility Build technical competence that distinguishes the Army CA Regiment within the DOD Improve the CA Force Increase the capacity and capability of the Army CA Regiment MEANS Holistic redesign of CA courses Collaborative development Culture / Social Sciences Language Advanced CA Skills Continuing Education School of Military Government Standardize Training and Professional Military Education (PME) Strategic communications DOD wide participation Military Government Doctrine refinement Professional articles Joint & Army experimentation Regimental esprit de corps Manage professional credentials 525 series CA concept Identify future requirements Right-size the force TRAC-LEE / Proponent CA CBA Normalize Force Mod functions CIMDPS NET/Fielding FY12-17 Sustainable Career Models Support JROC CA DOTMLPF change recommendations “Commanders must be prepared to ensure ARSOF and conventional civil affairs units have the resources to enable essential governance functions when reinforcements from joint, interagency, intergovernmental, and multinational partners are not immediately available.” TRADOC Pam 525-3-3 Functional Concept for Mission Command

Operational Concept

Organization - USAJFKSWCS 13-Apr-17 Organization - USAJFKSWCS Commander USAJFKSWCS Operations & Integration Section Director Dean PhD GS-14 Sir, The latest version of the proposed Organizational Structure is depicted on the slide and includes Active, Reserve and future Civilian Personnel. In order to reach this level of structure it is critical to gain approval of the MOU with USARC. This is envisioned as a Zero Growth organization. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ This is a FORCE RESTRUCTURING EFFORT and does not include new personnel. This version depicts IMSG seated well under SWCS and seated with a host of Supervisory, Advisory, and support personnel. Currently the personnel assigned as the IMSG are the Director, Deputy Director, Operations Officer, Assist OPS Officer, and the OPS NCO. (LASER POINTER) The other personnel resources that are depicted and requested for the future are: The Directors are comprised of O-6 Drilling Individual Mobilization Augmentee positions: Once these positions are on the SWCS TDA, we can recruit select officers for part time USAR duty at the IMSG to begin the required UAP / Academic outreach.  Funding for Reserve Component Augmentation during IMSG establishment has been requested from USARC and is included in the MoA. This funding will allow for USAR soldiers to be brought on active duty in FY15 and 16 and bridge until the establishment of a TDA and systemic manning. These IMA and AGR Soldiers will fill out the remainder of the structure here at Fort Bragg and will enable the growth process to be complete NLT 1 OCT, FY16. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ The next domain is Training. This domain will focus on illustrating the Training Pathway for the conversion and creation of the Military Government Officer. (Slide)   Deputy Director for Interagency Affairs USASOC POLAD Deputy Director 38A COL SGT MAJ 00G SGM Registrar GS-10 Operations Officer 38A LTC Asst Ops Off 38A MAJ Civil Security Department Governance Department Essential and Humanitarian Services Dept Economy and Infrastructure Department Rule of Law Department Homeland Integration Department Ops NCO 38B MSG Advisor 38G COL Advisor 38G COL Advisor Public Health 38G COL Advisor Economics 38G COL Advisor 38G COL Advisor 38G COL Strategic Planner 59A MAJ/LTC Lead Coord O1A LTC/MAJ Lead Coord O1A LTC/MAJ Advisor Education 38G COL Advisor Infrastructure 38G COL Lead Coord 01A LTC/MAJ Lead Coord O1A LTC/MAJ Exercise Off 01A LTC/MAJ Lead Coord 05A LTC/MAJ Advisor Agriculture 38G COL IA LNO 01A MAJ/LTC Lead Coord 01A LTC/MAJ AC Private Sector Integrator 01A MAJ/LTC Support Personnel AGR JAG 27A MAJ/LTC COMPO3 ADMIN NCO 42A SFC LOG NCO 92A SFC BUDGET NCO 36B SFC DAC Cultural Anthropologist PhD GS-13 CIV UNCLASSIFIED

Governance Innovation for Security and Development Marc Ventresca, NPS/Oxford Behavior Tech Margarita Quihuis, Stanford Mark Nelson, Stanford Curt Blais, NPS Paula Philbin, NPS HOMELAND INTEGRATION Melanne Civic, CSO Marc Ventresca, NPS/Oxford Karen Guttieri, NPS Jon Czarnecki, NWC Maria Pineda, NPS/UCLA

Research Products Functional Specialties Structure What Functional Specialties are required? (by Stability Sector) What are the standards? (Civilian education, experience, and certifications) Develop descriptions How many of each Functional Specialty are required? Is the IMSG structure correct? What Functional Specialty teams are at battalion, brigade, and CACOM? Composition/distribution of functional specialty teams Additional Research Topics Timeline What are the policies, authorities, and doctrine that affect employment and deployment? What are the laws and policies affecting direct commissioning? What are the functions and authorities of IMSG, SWCS, CAPOC, and HRC? Curriculum for Direct Commissionees and other 38G's including Military Governance Certificate

Qualification Training 13-Apr-17 Qualification Training XXX Civilian Education and Experience IMSG Validates Commissioned 38A Area of Concentration Training Transfer AOC DL 3-6 Months SSDCO Civilian Education and Experience IMSG Validates Commissioned Non-38A Branch Training Fully Qualified38G Branch Transfer DL RC CAQC(-) DL 6-12 Months SSDCO 3 Months Sir, This slide shows the three variants of training in order to "Grow" a 38G - Military Government Officer, A Branch Transfer - One for Civil Affairs Commissioned Officers and one for those transferring from their basic branch after having completed Captain's Career Course. The third is the Direct Appointment from the Civil Sector and NCOs. The Reclassification of a Commissioned 38A is the Most Viable Option since CAQC has already been completed and the SSDCO will take the least amount of time once the individual Soldier's civilian technical expertise is validated by the IMSG. This process would occur immediately since SSDCO is considered PME. The SM would be enrolled as slots became available. The Branch Transfer of an existing Reservist from another branch will take a bit longer due to the availability of the individual Soldier, a need to attend a portion of CAQC and the SSDCO course. This process is anticipated to take 6-12 Months to complete and is based on the Availability of the Soldier per Fiscal Year, USAR funding, and the availability of the courses. The Direct Appointees would be validated in much the same way as a 38A transfer, however their training is the most comprehensive and requires Army Approval and Initial Military Training. The IMT process is expected to take and average of 6-18 Months with DCC, BOLC and CAQC requiring up to 3 years to complete based on the availability of the Civil Sector Expert. The process culminates with the final PME of SSDCO at the 3.5 - 5 year mark. The next slide will illustrate the envisioned composition of the IMSG and the current "Functional Specialist" titles……. (Slide) Civilian Education and Experience IMSG Validates Requires TRADOC Approval Civilians NCOs Direct Appointment BOLC – A BOLC – B DCC BOLC Common DL DL RC CAQC(-) 3.5 - 5 Years SSDCO 6-18 Months 3 Years Schools Existing ARMY Existing SWCS Future SWCS UNCLASSIFIED

Working Issues Governance Innovation for Security and Development (38G Skill Identifier Development -- define, describe, standards) 17-18 Dec 13: Internal IPR; 14-15 Jan 14: Rule of Law IPR; 28-29 Mar 14: Social Well-Being/Economy IPR; 12-13 May 14: Safe and Secure Environment IPR; 17-19 Jun 14: Governance IPR; 24-26 Jun 14: Homeland Integration IPR; 22-24 Jul 14: Wrap up IPR 20 Aug 14: Delivery of Final Report APAN Website: https://wss.apan.org/s/GISD/default.aspx 24-27 Mar 14: Peace and Stability Operations Training and Education Workshop Stakeholder Analysis under revision Governance Certificate preparing for implementation Proponent and USACAPOC Direct Appointment program Recruiting/Classification Future Operating Concept Training and Education IMSG Charter in staffing USASOC-USARC MOU in staffing Operationalize the IMSG Outreach to IA, NGOs, IGOs, Academia, and Business (PPP) Experimentation Silent Quest Unified Challenge JRTC Irwin Middle School - Jun 14

Institute for Military Support to Governance QUESTIONS?