Community Dashboard 2012 key socioeconomic indicators for Austin & Travis County Community Action Network April 2012 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Halftime Highlights Minnesota at Mid-Decade. Minnesota Ranks 1 st in home ownership 2 nd in labor force participation 3 rd highest in high school completion.
Advertisements

November 14, 2013 Johnson County Poverty Trends.
REACH Healthcare Foundation Prepared by Mid-America Regional Council 2013 Kansas City Regional Health Assessment.
+ James Carras. + Carras Community Investment, Inc. Prepared Fair Housing and Equity Assessment for regional vision and plan – Seven/50 Prepared Regional.
Distributing the Benefits and Burdens of Growth: Metropolitan Equity in the Portland Region.
University as Entrepreneur A POPULATION IN THIRDS Arizona and National Data.
Texas Demographic Characteristics and Trends Million Reasons to be Proud of Texas (among a few more) Demographic Highlights TEXAS is: big. The population.
1. 2 What is the E 3 Alliance? A catalyst for change in Central Texas and in regions across the state Building a research-based regional blueprint to.
Fuerza Latina: A Paradox of Success and Hardship Phillip J. Bowman Lecture Institute for Research on Race and Public Policy Sylvia Puente Executive Director.
FACET Workshop Presentation – January 2014 UMKC. Who We Are We are a metropolitan collaborative working together for systemic change by advocating for.
Metropolitan Transportation Plan/ Sustainable Communities Strategy MTP—Regional transportation plan developed every four years. SCS—New SB 375 requirement.
Comparative Overview of Dashboard Indicators for Counties in the Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos MSA Intergovernmental Public Policy Committee June 15, 2012.
Changing Demographics in Texas
Texas: Demographic Characteristics and Trends Texas Association of Healthcare Interpreters and Translators August 19, 2011 Dallas, TX.
Promoting the Economic and Social Vitality of Rural America: The Demographic Context Rural Education Conference New Orleans, LA April 14, 2003 by Dr. Daryl.
Demographic Trends and Missouri’s Children Missouri State Board of Education April 21, 2005 Dr. Bill Elder University of Missouri-Columbia Office of Social.
Building the Local Government/ School Partnership Laura Morrison City Council Member Austin, Texas.
Income and Education Statistics. People Quick Facts USA People Quick Facts USA Population, 2005 estimate 296,410,404 Female persons, percent, %
Texas Demographic Characteristics and Trends Texas Association of Mutual Insurance Companies October 7, 2010 Round Rock, TX 1.
Texas Demographic Characteristics and Trends Joint House Redistricting Committee hearing with the House Committee on Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence.
Who is ProvPlan? Mission to promote the economic and social well-being of the city, its people, and its neighborhoods. 501(c)3 non-profit created in 1992.
YOUTH DEMOGRAPHICS IN THE CITY OF TORONTO Toronto Community and Neighbourhood Services: Social Development and Administration Division.
1 Taking action together. CAN is a partnership of governmental, non-profit, private and faith-based organizations which leverage mutual resources to collectively.
The Changing Population of Texas Bastrop County Rotary Club October 30, 2012 Bastrop, TX.
Community Dashboard gauging our progress together Presentation to National Association of Planning Councils May 6,
Advancing equity through Thrive MSP 2040 Equity: The Superior Growth Model.
Triennial Community Needs Assessment A Project of the Valley Care Community Consortium.
The Perfect Storm Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa - October 2007.
Texas Demographics and Sustainability Texas State University November 17, 2010 San Marcos, TX 1.
Texas and West Region: Demographic Characteristics and Trends AgriLife Regional Extension Leadership Program Conference March 30, 2012 Fredericksburg,
Community Needs Assessment Project Highlights and Key Findings of Data Analysis.
Common Trends in the Well-Being of Children and Youth A presentation to the Cultural Diversity Resources Annual Diversity Conference October 30, 2012.
Understanding Health Disparities in Texas Maureen Rubin, Ph.D., MSW Assistant Professor Department of Social Work University of Texas at San Antonio Nazrul.
Minnesota Demographic Change And Dentistry Tom Gillaspy, State Demographer Mn Dept of Administration March 2008.
The Link Between Thriving Children and Economic Security: Creating Equity in Early Childhood for Our Common Good.
Timebanking and Poverty: Creating Abundance in a Challenged Economy.
Demographics. National Statistics  “America’s Children: Key National Indicators of Well- Being, 2009” Report:  In 2008, 73.9 million children 0-17 y/o.
Children Entering School Ready to Learn The Maryland School Readiness Report what the school readiness data mean for Maryland’s children.
One Voice Central Texas Put People First Imagine One Austin – Health and Human Services August 11, 2014.
Texas State Agency Business Administrators Association June 5, 2014 San Marcos, Texas Texas Population Characteristics, Trends, and Projections.
Texas Demographic Data Users Conference May 22, 2014 Austin, Texas.
CATS CONSORTIUM & THE SUSTAINABLE PLACES PROJECT CAPITAL AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS.
Institute of Real Estate Management November 15, 2013 Austin, Texas Texas Demographic Characteristics and Trends, Texas and Greater Austin.
Coastal Bend and State Population % Distribution by Age Groups % Fewer in Working Age Source: US Census.
Texas Demographic Characteristics and Trends and Education
Greene County Community Health Needs Assessment Sociodemographic Indicators.
Rensselaer County Community Health Needs Assessment Sociodemographic Indicators.
CAN DASHBOARD 2015 Key socioeconomic indicators for Greater Austin & Travis County.
Legislative Working Group on Economic Disparities in Minnesota SUSAN BROWER, MINNESOTA STATE DEMOGRAPHER January 2016.
Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council Meeting June 17, 2011 Regional Demographic Profile: 2010 Census.
Laura Dresser Center on Wisconsin Strategy Seeds of Workforce Change A regional approach to improving the economic landscape of Southwest.
Albany County Community Health Needs Assessment Sociodemographic Indicators.
Poverty in Johnson County Primary Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey 1-year estimates, 2014 Prepared January 2015.
Schenectady County Community Health Needs Assessment Sociodemographic Indicators.
Who is ProvPlan? Mission to promote the economic and social well-being of the city, its people, and its neighborhoods. 501(c)3 non-profit created in 1992.
Community Foundation of Collier County Our Mission: To improve the quality of life in Collier County by connecting donors to community needs and providing.
Columbia County Community Health Needs Assessment Sociodemographic Indicators.
Improving Community Health through Planning and Partnerships Greene Community Health Council.
The Status of Young Children in Wayne County The Status of Young Children in Wayne County A 2010 Update from Great Start Collaborative - Wayne Presented.
SCOPE presents: 2015 Community Report Card Road Show.
key socioeconomic indicators for Greater Austin & Travis County.
Children Entering School Ready to Learn The Maryland School Readiness Report what the school readiness data mean for Maryland’s children.
Improving Community Health through Planning and Partnerships Nelson Community Health Council.
The High Costs of High Cost Housing Michael C. Lens UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs Department of Urban Planning 1.
WOODY L. HUNT, CHAIRMAN HIGHER EDUCATION STRATEGIC PLANNING COMMITTEE THE FUTURE OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN TEXAS July 23,
Improving Community Health through Planning and Partnerships Albemarle and Charlottesville Community Health Council.
STATE OF THE COUNTY - HAYS The Capital Area Council of Governments.
Cecil County March 2012 Children Entering School Ready to Learn
FRANKLIN COUNTY THRIVE.
How Hispanics Are Changing the Face of Nevada
Presentation transcript:

Community Dashboard 2012 key socioeconomic indicators for Austin & Travis County Community Action Network April

Gauging our community’s well-being  The Community Dashboard tracks 16 key indicators of the social and economic health of Austin and Travis County. 2 We Achieve Our Full Potential Equity & Opportunity We are Healthy We are Safe, Just & Engaged Our Basic Needs Are Met

Demographic Trends  Low-income and poverty populations are growing at twice the rate as the population as a whole  Increasing economic division  Stark geographic division of income  Urban sprawl and pooling of poverty populations  Large and fast-growing Hispanic child population  Fastest growing pre-senior population in the nation 3

Austin-Round Rock MSA Population # and % Growth since 2000 Travis County tot. pop. 1,024,266 26% ⇧ Williamson County tot. pop. 422,679 69% ⇧ Hays County tot. pop. 157,107 61% ⇧ Bastrop County tot. pop. 74,171 28% ⇧ Caldwell County tot. pop. 38,066 18% ⇧ From 2000 – 2010, the five-county Austin metro area was the fastest growing metro in Texas and the 8 th fastest growing in the nation. Source: U. S. Census Bureau (American Community Survey 1-Yr. Estimates and Decennial Census)

Austin-Round Rock MSA Population # and % Growth since Federal Poverty Level # and % Growth since 2000 Travis County tot. pop. 1,024,266 26% ⇧ poverty 194,156 95% ⇧ Williamson County tot. pop. 422,679 69% ⇧ poverty 34, % ⇧ Hays County tot. pop. 157,107 61% ⇧ poverty 22,962 76% ⇧ Bastrop County tot. pop. 74,171 28% ⇧ poverty 11,708 81% ⇧ Caldwell County tot. pop. 38,066 18% ⇧ (low-income and poverty data not available) Source: U. S. Census Bureau (American Community Survey 1-Yr. Estimates and Decennial Census)

Austin-Round Rock MSA Population # and % Growth since Federal Poverty Level # and % Growth since Low Income (200% of FPL) and % Growth since 2000 Travis County tot. pop. 1,024,266 26% ⇧ poverty 194,156 95% ⇧ low-income 375,147 66% ⇧ Williamson County tot. pop. 422,679 69% ⇧ poverty 34, % ⇧ low-income 101, % ⇧ Hays County tot. pop. 157,107 61% ⇧ poverty 22,962 76% ⇧ low-income 46,256 66% ⇧ Bastrop County tot. pop. 74,171 28% ⇧ poverty 11,708 81% ⇧ low-income 28,850 72% ⇧ Caldwell County tot. pop. 38,066 18% ⇧ (low-income and poverty data not available) Source: U. S. Census Bureau (American Community Survey 1-Yr. Estimates and Decennial Census)

We are safe, just & engaged 7

Violent crime occurred at a rate of 417 per 100,000 population in Travis County  Violent crime decreased and is at its lowest point in five years. City of Austin rate is lower than the average for metro areas of similar size and most other cities in Texas. 8

Arrests are disproportionate by race  African Americans make up 8% of the total adult population, but represent 23% of all those arrested in Travis County. 9

Voter turnout is disproportionate by age  Young people are much less likely to participate in elections than people 35 and older.  This is especially true in non-presidential election years.  Younger voters are least likely to participate in local elections. 10

Strategic Framework for Action 11 promote safe communities embrace diversity & expand opportunity engage and empower people We are safe, just & engaged We are Safe, Just & Engaged— Community Plans: Travis County Plan for Criminal Justice and Related Activities Austin Travis County Integral Care, Mental Health Jail Diversion Plan City of Austin, Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan

Our basic needs are met 12

37% of Travis County residents are low-income  The percent who are low-income increased and remained higher than the national rate.  Over 375,000 people in Travis County were low-income in  For the first time since the report has been tracking the statistic, the rate for the City of Austin surpassed the state rate. 13

41% of Travis County households are housing cost-burdened  The percent of households in Travis County who paid 30% or more of their total income on housing increased for the second year in a row.  Renters are much more likely to be housing cost burdened than home owners. 14

24.4 daily vehicle miles traveled per capita  Vehicle Miles Traveled per capita increased in 2010 and is now at its highest point in five years after almost a decade of steady decline. 15

2,244 people are homeless in Travis County  Fewer people were identified in the point-in- time homeless count.  This annual count of unsheltered people tends to undercount families and children and does not include those doubling up or sleeping on friends’ couches. 16

Strategic Framework for Action 17 crisis, safety net, and long- term care and services connect people to resources affordable housing linked to work, services and transit Our basic needs are met — Community Plans: Austin Travis County HHS Community Health Improvement Plan (under development) ECHO Plan to End Community Homelessness CAMPO 2035 Plan Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan Regional Transit Coordination Committee Capital Area Coordinated Transportation Plan Our basic needs are met

We are healthy 18

22% of those under age 65 in Travis County have no health insurance  The percent of people with no health insurance decreased in Austin and Travis County.  The local rates are better than the state, though not the nation. 19

20% of adults in Travis County report poor mental health (data is 3-year aggregate)  The percent who report poor mental health increased one percent and is now equivalent to the state and national rate.  People who earn less than $25,000 per year are three-times more likely to report poor mental health than those earning $75,000 or more. 20

24% of adults in Travis County are obese (data is 3-year aggregate)  About one in four adults in Travis County were obese in  The obesity rate for adults who are low-income was even higher. 21

14% of adults in Travis County are smokers (data is 3-year aggregate)  The rate of smoking continued to decline.  The local rate is much lower than the state and national rates.  24% of adults earning less than $25,000 report smoking. 22

Austin area is in attainment of EPA air ozone standards  The Austin area ended a six year trend of steadily declining air ozone readings with a slight increase in  The area remains on the cusp of non- attainment. 23

Strategic Framework for Action 24 access to integrated health care continuum promote healthy behaviors healthy and safe community environment We are healthy — Community Plans: Austin Travis County HHS Community Health Improvement Plan (under development) Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan Capital Area Planning Council of Governments (CAPCOG) 8 Hour Ozone Flex Program Austin-Round Rock MSA We are healthy

We achieve our full potential 25

50% of children enter kindergarten ready for school  50% of children enter kindergarten ready for school, which is a decrease from last year’s rate of 52%.  Children who are economically disadvantaged are much less likely to be school-ready. 26

79% of Austin ISD students graduate from high school in four years  High school graduation rates at Austin ISD increased for the second year in a row and improved in each of the five largest school districts in the five- county metro area.  Large discrepancies exist among racial and ethnic groups. 27

65% of Austin ISD students are college-ready in math 65% are college-ready in English/Language Arts  The college-ready rate for AISD graduates increased in both Math and English Language Arts. 28

6% of Travis County workers were unemployed this past January  The local unemployment rate, falling since 2010, has remained consistently lower than both the state and national rates. 29

Strategic Framework for Action 30 early care and caregiver education and support successful transitions throughout continuum workforce and economic development We achieve our full potential — Community Plans: Travis County School Readiness Action Plan (under development) E 3 Alliance Blueprint for Educational Change Capital Area Planning Council of Governments (CAPCOG) Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy We achieve our full potential

community dashboard.org 31  Download the 2012 Community Dashboard report  Find more information for each indicator, including…  Historical trends  More data and maps  Graphs depicting disparities among groups, where available  Information on vulnerable populations  More local efforts to improve the indicator  Common strategies found in multiple planning documents  Find information about the Dashboard Steering Committee

CAN…..convener…connector…informer 32 Community Action Network is a partnership of government, non-profit, private and faith-based organizations that work together to enhance the social, health, educational, and economic well-being of Central Texas through collective action that promotes opportunities for all people to achieve their full potential. www. caction.org community dashboard.org