美的分析论 —— 《判断力批判》美者分析论第一、二契机 西方美学经典导读 —— 康德的美学思想 杜洁 10300110043.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Moral Issues
Advertisements

Immanuel Kant ( ) Theory of Aesthetics
THE CRITIQUE OF JUDGEMENT by Immanuel Kant
The analysis of the Beautiful (I)
The Subject-Matter of Ethics
AS Religious Ethics Revision Deontology & Kant. DEONTOLOGICAL ETHICS based on the idea that an act’s claim to being right or wrong is independent of the.
Morality As Overcoming Self-Interest
Kant Career Köningsberg in East-Prussia Professor at the University Lutheran rationalist The categorical imperative One of the most influential.
Immanuel Kant Early Life Konigsberg, Prussia Baptized Emanuel Humble beginnings Pietist Household & Devout Education.
The Categorical Imperative
Aristotle and Rationalism By: Noorain, Sonya, Pooneh.
Categorical Imperative Universal Maxim Respect of Persons
Seminar “Kant: Critique of the Power of Judgment” University of Iceland Session 2 19/9/2007 Text: Introduction (I-II) Claus Beisbart How the first two.
Kant’s Ethical Theory.
 Humans are metaphysically free  Our choices define us and as a result our intuitions about the human condition are satisfied.  Dualism  Kant  Existentialism.
Computer Ethics PHILOSOPHICAL BELIEF SYSTEMS Chapter 1 Computer Ethics PHILOSOPHICAL BELIEF SYSTEMS Chapter 1 Hassan Ismail.
Kant, Transcendental Aesthetic
Hume on Taste Hume's account of judgments of taste parallels his discussion of judgments or moral right and wrong.  Both accounts use the internal/external.
Kant on Duty. Introduction Kant will be the culmination of two themes traced over the ages Kant will be the culmination of two themes traced over the.
Education and Physical Education During the Reformation KPE 260 – Fall, 2000 Dr. D. Frankl.
Of the Standard of Taste
Philosophy A philosophy is a system of beliefs about reality.
Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals Immanuel Kant Enriquez | Lee | Lim | Montano | Rombaoa.
Parsing Categories of Belief Why Early Modern M&E divides belief into two types: Sensory & Mathematical.
Seminar “Kant: Critique of the Power of Judgment” University of Iceland Session 3 20/9/2007 Text: Introduction (III-IX) Claus Beisbart The Power of Judgment.
Philosophy 1050: Introduction to Philosophy Week 10: Descartes and the Subject: The way of Ideas.
Kantian ethics (& suicide): Kantian ethics (& suicide): Immanuel Kant ( ). A German philosopher. Ought implies Can Maxims Categorical Imperative.
Duties, Rights, and Kant Ethics Dr. Jason M. Chang.
An Introduction to Ayn Rand’s Philosophy
Deontological Morality IMMANUEL KANT. ARGUMENT 1 VS. HAPPINESS (395) 1) Telic Principle: In an organized being suitably adapted to the purpose of life,
Objectives: SWBAT  Identify Immanuel Kant  Analyze Kantian Rationality  Identify and discuss the Categorical Imperative.
WHAT IS HIS DUTY? Duty - something that one is expected or required to do by moral or legal obligation. Your response:
The Sheriff’s Dilemma How to structure your answer.
Kant Deontology Categorical Imperative. Immanuel Kant Profile: Dead German Time of Berkley, Rousseau, Hume, Bentham Not a fan of music or arts.
The Turn to the Science The problem with substance dualism is that, given what we know about how the world works, it is hard to take it seriously as a.
Issues and Alternatives in Educational Philosophy Philosophic Issues in Education Chapter 2 Philosophic Issues in Education Chapter 2.
1 Immanuel Kant ( ) Immanuel Kant’s analysis of aesthetic judgments is found in the first part of the third critique in the Critique of Judgment.
Seminar “Kant: Critique of the Power of Judgment” University of Iceland Session 7 2/10/2007 Text: Critique of the Aesthtical Power of Judgment (9-17) Claus.
Class 6 Kant. Immanuel Kant (1724–1804) From Königsberg, Germany.
Thomas Reid Founder of the Scottish School of Common Sense Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man 1785 (Essay VIII: Of Taste)
Morality in the Modern World
L ECTURE 15: C ERTAINTY. T ODAY ’ S L ECTURE In Today’s Lecture we will: 1.Review Hume’s radical empiricism and its consequences 2.Outline and investigate.
Hume on Ethics and the Passions The influencing motives of the will and of moral judgment, IV Paola Chapa, Oct
Immanuel Kant and the moral law. Kant (1) Kant’s ethics are those of the deist, rather than the theist. He was an important thinker in the deist project,
Seminar “Kant: Critique of the Power of Judgment” University of Iceland Session 9 4/10/2007 Text: Critique of the Aesthtical Power of Judgment (41-53)
An analysis of Kant’s argument against the Cartesian skeptic in his ‘Refutation of Idealism” Note: Audio links to youtube are found on my blog at matthewnevius.wordpress.com.
Immanuel Kant ( ) “ The Synthesizer ”. Synthesized Rationalism and Empiricism We learn through our senses, but we also must use reason to make.
Philosophy 224 Kant and Humans and Morality. Immanuel Kant Immanuel Kant ( ) was one of the most important philosophers of the modern era. His.
Existentialism, Albert Camus, and The Stranger
Morality. 1. Fundamental differences between abstract right and morality (1) Unlike the content of abstract right, the content of the moral will is not.
Chapter 7: Ethics Morality and Practical Reason: Kant
AS Ethics Utilitarianism Title: - Preference Utilitarianism To begin… What is meant by preference? L/O: To understand Preference Utilitarianism.
Immanuel Kant and the Enlightenment Immanuel Kant: German ( ) Enlightenment: 1700's (18th Century) Applies the new rational scientific method of.
The Study of Ethics How do we know how to do the Right Thing?
Philosophy, Logic and Human Existence ETHICS AND HUMAN CONDUCT IN THE SOCIETY.
The philosophy of Ayn Rand…. Objectivism Ayn Rand is quoted as saying, “I had to originate a philosophical framework of my own, because my basic view.
Natural Law What is beyond?. Who is he? Sapere Aude (Dare to be wise, dare to know) Born in 1724 in Konigsberg, Prusia (Kaliningrad) German philosopher.
Immanuel Kant Critique of Judgment 1790 Kant on the judgment of taste.
Seeing the Father John 14:5-11.
GRADING: First essay 25% Second essay 35% Exam 25%
Immanuel Kant ( ).
History of Philosophy.
Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals
Absolutism.
Kant’s Categorical Imperative - revision
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 14 Immanuel Kant
Philosophical or Ethical school
Ethical theorists: A comparison of main ideas
Critique of Practical Reason [Kritik der reinen Vernunft]
The Philosophiser A compendium of philosophical questions to get you thinking about thinking. Made by Mike Gershon –
Presentation transcript:

美的分析论 —— 《判断力批判》美者分析论第一、二契机 西方美学经典导读 —— 康德的美学思想 杜洁

“Two things fill the heart with renewed and increasing awe and reverence the more often and the more steadily that they are meditated on: the starry skies above me and the moral law inside me.”

content 01 A short introduction about Immanuel Kant 02 An introduction about Kant’s important works 03 FIRST MOMENT. Of the Judgment of Taste*: Moment of Quality. 04 SECOND MOMENT. Of the Judgment of Taste: Moment of Quantity. Who is Immanuel Kant? What did he experience?

01 A short introduction about Immanuel Kant Immanuel Kant (1724–1804) Immanuel Kant is the central figure in modern philosophy. He synthesized early modern rationalism and empiricism, set the terms for much of nineteenth and twentieth century philosophy, and continues to exercise a significant influence today in metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, political philosophy, aesthetics, and other fields.

01 A short introduction about Immanuel Kant Birthplace——Königsberg Family——artisan family of modest means , trade in decline Education—— the Collegium Fridericianum(a Pietist school); the University of Königsberg(known as the Albertina) Academic career

01 A short introduction about Immanuel Kant Academic career—— six years as a private tutor to young children outside Königsberg ; teaching at the Albertina ; (1754—1796) had a burst of publishing activity during that time. natural philosophy moral philosophy

content 01 A short introduction about Immanuel Kant 02 An introduction about Kant’s important works 03 FIRST MOMENT. Of the Judgment of Taste*: Moment of Quality. 04 SECOND MOMENT. Of the Judgment of Taste: Moment of Quantity. Critique of Pure Reason Critique of Practical Reason Critique of Judgement

02 An introduction about Kant’s important works First: Critique of Pure Reason Human understanding is the source of the general laws of nature that structure all our experience.

02 An introduction about Kant’s important works Second: Critique of Practical Reason Human reason gives itself the moral law, which is our basis for belief in God, freedom, and immortality

02 An introduction about Kant’s important works Third: Critique of Judgement The bridge between the moral man and the scientific man.

content 01 A short introduction about Immanuel Kant 02 An introduction about Kant’s important works 03 FIRST MOMENT. Of the Judgment of Taste*: Moment of Quality. 04 SECOND MOMENT. Of the Judgment of Taste: Moment of Quantity. Why is “quality” first?

03 FIRST MOMENT. Of the Judgment of Taste*: Moment of Quality. What is required for calling an object beautiful ? To which moments attention is paid by this judgment in its reflection? Quality is what the aesthetic judgment on the beautiful looks to in the first instance

03 FIRST MOMENT. Of the Judgment of Taste*: Moment of Quality. §1.The judgment of taste is aesthetic. To discern whether anything is beautiful or not By means of the imagination we refer the representation to the subject and its feeling of pleasure or displeasure. The judgment of taste, therefore, is not a cognitive judgment, and so not logical, but is aesthetic—which means that it is one whose determining ground cannot be other than subjective.

03 FIRST MOMENT. Of the Judgment of Taste*: Moment of Quality. §2. The delight which determines the judgment of taste is independent of all interest. whether we are, or even could be, concerned in the real existence of the thing what estimate we form of it on mere contemplation (intuition or reflection) All one wants to know is whether the mere representation of the object is to my liking, no matter how indifferent I may be to the real existence of the object of this representation. One must not be in the least prepossessed in favour of the real existence of the thing, but must preserve complete indifference in this respect, in order to play the part of judge in matters of taste

03 FIRST MOMENT. Of the Judgment of Taste*: Moment of Quality.

§3. Delight in the agreeable is coupled with interest. the senses find pleasing in sensation referred solely to the subject and is not available for any cognition, not even for that by which the subject cognizes itself The green color of the meadows belongs to objective sensation, as the perception of an object of sense; but its agreeableness to subjective sensation, by which no object is represented we do not merely say of the agreeable that it pleases, but that it gratifies

03 FIRST MOMENT. Of the Judgment of Taste*: Moment of Quality. §4. Delight in the good is coupled with interest. by means of reason commends itself by its mere concept end the relation of reason to willing a delight in the existence of an object or action some interest or other

03 FIRST MOMENT. Of the Judgment of Taste*: Moment of Quality. Delight in the beautiful must depend upon the reflection on an object precursory to some (not definitely determined) concept. It is thus also differentiated from the agreeable, which rests entirely upon sensation. The good VS The agreeable mediately or immediately good; what pleases immediately, like the beautiful Only by what a man does heedless of enjoyment, in complete freedom, and independently of what he can procure passively from the hand of nature, does be give to his existence, as the real existence of a person, an absolute worth. Happiness, with all its plethora of pleasures, is far from being an unconditioned good

03 FIRST MOMENT. Of the Judgment of Taste*: Moment of Quality. §5. Comparison of the three specifically different kinds of delight. The goodThe agreeableThe beautiful a delight pathologically conditioned a pure practical delight simply contemplative what is ESTEEMED (approved) what GRATIFIES a man what simply PLEASES him every rational being in general irrational animalsonly for human beings

03 FIRST MOMENT. Of the Judgment of Taste*: Moment of Quality. Delight of taste in the beautiful may be said to be the one and only disinterested and free delight Definition of the Beautiful derived from the First Moment: Taste is the faculty of estimating an object or a mode of representation by means of a delight or aversion apart from any interest. The object of such a delight is called beautiful.

content 01 A short introduction about Immanuel Kant 02 An introduction about Kant’s important works 03 FIRST MOMENT. Of the Judgment of Taste*: Moment of Quality. 04 SECOND MOMENT. Of the Judgment of Taste: Moment of Quantity.

04 SECOND MOMENT. Of the Judgment of Taste: Moment of Quantity. §6. The beautiful is that which, apart from concepts, is represented as the Object of a universal delight. The judgement of taste, with its attendant consciousness of detachment from all interest, must involve a claim to validity for all men, and must do so apart from universality attached to objects, i.e., there must be coupled with it a claim to subjective universality.

04 SECOND MOMENT. Of the Judgment of Taste: Moment of Quantity. §7. Comparison of the beautiful with the agreeable and the good by means of the above characteristic. The goodThe agreeableThe beautiful represented as an object of universal delight by means of a concept restricted merely to himself personally; every one has his own taste (that of sense) as if it were a property of things; demands this agreement of all man

04 SECOND MOMENT. Of the Judgment of Taste: Moment of Quantity. §8. In a judgement of taste the universality of delight is only represented as subjective. The taste of sense The judgement of taste The taste of reflection laying down judgements merely private judgements ostensibly of general validity (public) a objective universal validity a subjective universal validity

04 SECOND MOMENT. Of the Judgment of Taste: Moment of Quantity. In their logical quantity, all judgements of taste are singular judgements Nothing is postulated in the judgement of taste but such a universal voice in respect of delight that it is not mediated by concepts; consequently, only the possibility of an aesthetic judgement capable of being at the same time deemed valid for everyone The judgement of taste itself does not postulate the agreement of everyone ;it only imputes this agreement to everyone, as an instance of the rule in respect of which it looks for confirmation, not from concepts, but from the concurrence of others

04 SECOND MOMENT. Of the Judgment of Taste: Moment of Quantity. §9. Investigation of the question of the relative priority in a judgement of taste of the feeling of pleasure and the estimating of the object. This purely subjective (aesthetic) estimating of the object, or of the representation through which it is given, is antecedent to the pleasure in it, and is the basis of this pleasure in the harmony of the cognitive faculties

04 SECOND MOMENT. Of the Judgment of Taste: Moment of Quantity. In a judgement of taste, of a reciprocal subjective common accord of the powers of cognition. Is it aesthetically by sensation and our mere internal sense? Or is it intellectually by consciousness of our intentional activity in bringing these powers into play?

04 SECOND MOMENT. Of the Judgment of Taste: Moment of Quantity. Definition of the Beautiful drawn from the Second Moment. The beautiful is that which, apart from a concept, pleases universally.

The end Thanks for your attention!