JAR OPS Noise Abatement Procedures

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AIRWORTHINESS ASPECTS OF AIRCRAFT LEASING
Advertisements

1 Introduction to Safety Management April Objective The objective of this presentation is to highlight some of the basic elements of Safety Management.
Module N° 3 – ICAO SARPs related to safety management
1 Welcome Safety Regulatory Function Handbook April 2006.
05 July 2007Cologne NPA WG66.009: Type and Group Ratings Juan Anton.
Flight Operations.
Performance Chapter 11.
Continuous Climb Operations ( CCO )
Safety Regulation Group Slide 1 INCAPACITATION AND REPLACEMENT OF SENIOR CABIN CREW MEMBERS 2 nd Presentation to OST 28 March 2006.
Click to edit Master text styles –Second level Third level –Fourth level »Fifth level 8/25/ A CO 2 versus noise trade-off study for the evaluation.
HEMS Mountain Operations TGL 43
Lecture 3: Take-off Performance
NPA 53b JAR OPS Noise Abatement Procedures
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
Flight Instructor Seminars August 2007
International Civil Aviation Organization European and North Atlantic Office 1 ICAO EUR HLSC Preparatory Seminar 9-11 February 2010 Baku, Azerbaijan Theme.
Slide 2 OST 07-1 Use of Headsets JAR-OPS 3 OST WP HSST WP-06/15.3.
OPSG 1 JAR OPS Noise Abatement Procedures Capt. Claude Godel OST 05-4.
Helicopter Hoist Operations JAR-OPS 3
Continuous Climb Operations ( CCO )
Protection Values for VOR-Defined ATS Routes
International Civil Aviation Organization Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) Saulo Da Silva Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology.
CAEP Working Group 3 Emissions Technical Issues Robert J. Shuter Rapporteur WG 3.
FAA ICAO ANNEX 6 PROPOSAL & OVERSIGHT ISSUES IN DISPATCH
Operation Specifications VFR.  Legal Basis  Concept  Regulations  Operation Specification Paragraphs W ESTWIND A IR S ERVICE.
Stabilized Constant Descent Angle NPA’s
13. Airworthiness of Aircraft-1 Certificate of Type Approval Certificate of Type Approval A Certificate of Type Approval approves the basic design and.
New Engine Thrust Calculation For Arrivals ICRAT 2004 Ivan de Lépinay, ENVISA, Paris (France) based on a dynamic equilibrium equation Welcome!
ICAO Aerodrome Safety Workshop Almaty, Kazakhstan – 18 to 22 November 2002  AERODROME MANUAL.
OPERATIONAL SUPPORT AIRLIFT AGENCY DEPARTURE & CONTINGENCY PROCEDURES CW3 MICHAEL R. JEWETT OSAA FLIGHT STANDARDS CW3 MICHAEL R. JEWETT OSAA FLIGHT STANDARDS.
Study Continuous Climb Operations
Section 03 - Altimetry (cont) Lesson 09
Lecture 5: Climb PERFORMANCE
Proposal to the MDM.032 Working Group Y Morier Meeting
Module N° 8 – SSP implementation plan. SSP – A structured approach Module 2 Basic safety management concepts Module 2 Basic safety management concepts.
SPUD TC (OCT 07) REVISION ACADEMICS. SPUD TASK 1114 PERFORM A ROLLING TAKEOFF.
MIT ICAT MIT ICAT 1October 17, 2002 Exploring the Envelope of a Modified 3° Decelerating Approach for Noise Abatement Liling Ren & John-Paul Clarke October.
Initial Ground Training
RECITE A PRAYER…(15 SECONDS). ATM TOPIC 1. INTRODUCTION TO AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT,TYPE OF CONTROL AREAS & FLIGHT PLAN 2. AERODROME CONTROL 3. AREA CONTROL.
SMS, Human Factors and FRMS – A Perspective Capt. Dan Maurino RAeS HF Group Conference on Building Fatigue into Safety Systems Crawley, 30 October 2012.
AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL.
Lecture 9: Ecological Factors & Aircraft Performance AIRCRAFT WEIGHT & PERFORMANCE.
Presented by: Roger Sultan, FAA, AFS-400 Date: August 8, 2012 Federal Aviation Administration FPAW Summer CFR Part 135 Automated Surface Weather.
IAOPA Regional Meeting Larnaca 22 September 2007 EASA OPS.001 Working Group.
U.S./Europe International Aviation Safety Conference By: James Ballough, FAA, and Claude Probst, EASA Date: June 4, 2008 “Global Safety Management: Revolution.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Noise 101: Federal Noise Laws and Regulations Town of Payson M.L. Chittick, Scottsdale FSDO January.
LECTURE 4: ICAO CHART requirements
AVAT11001: Course Outline 1.Aircraft and Terminology 2.Radio Communications 3.Structure, Propulsion, Fuel Systems 4.Electrical, Hydraulic Systems and Instruments.
Basic Indoctrination Operation Specifications
Lecture 4: Take-off Performance Speeds
Take-off and the circuit. Take-off  Take-off is the phase of flight in which an aircraft goes through a transition from moving along the ground (taxiing)
Module N° 6 – SMS regulation
8 June 2006Portland, Oregon, USAE. Sivel EASA Working Group on regulation of non-complex motor aircraft engaged in non-commercial operations E Sivel (EASA)
Approval Guidance for RNP Procedures with AR February 10, 2015 Federal Aviation Administration Approval Guidance for RNP Procedures with AR C-384 Presentation.
NOISE ABATEMENT PROCEDURE DESIGN
Flight Operations.
Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) Saulo Da Silva
AIR TRAFFIC ONTROL.
Допълнение 7 на PANS-ATM (ICAO Doc 4444)
A case study at Gothenburg Landvetter Airport
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
Oceanic and International Operations
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
Magesh Mani BSACIST.
Continuous Climb Operations ( CCO )
Balanced Approach to Noise Mitigation
Continuous Climb Operations ( CCO )
Balanced Approach to Noise Mitigation
CAEP Working Group 3 Emissions Technical Issues
USOAP Continuous Monitoring Approach (CMA) Workshop
Presentation transcript:

JAR OPS 1.235 Noise Abatement Procedures Capt. Claude Godel OST 05-3

A non satisfactory rule: JAR-OPS 1.235 Present text ( 1998) JAR-OPS 1.235 Noise abatement procedures (a) An operator shall establish operating procedures for noise abatement during instrument flight operations in compliance with ICAO PANS-OPS Volume 1 (Doc 8168-OPS/611). Take-off climb procedures for noise abatement specified by an operator for any one aeroplane type should be the same for all aerodromes. Tim Sindall proposal (2001)  (a) An operator shall establish noise abatement operating procedures that are in compliance with PANS-OPS (Doc 8168) Volume 1, Part V for use when determined necessary by the regulatory authority of the airspace in which the flight is being made.  (b) The effectiveness of noise abatement procedures employed to suit the requirements of the regulatory authorities shall be monitored by the Quality Manager. Firts OPSG proposal (2002) (a) An operator shall establish operating procedures that are in compliance with ICAO PANS OPS Volume 1 (Doc 8168-OPS/611) to comply with aerodrome noise abatement objectives. Departure procedures shall comprise a maximum of two procedures for each aeroplane type, one of which shall be identified as the normal procedure, and one as the noise abatement procedure.

ICAO PANS OPS Volume 1 (Doc 8168-OPS/611) Part V Chapter 3.2.3.c) c) To minimize the impact on training while maintaining some flexibility to address variations in the location of noise-sensitive areas, sufficient commonality shall exist between the departure procedures specified by the operator. There will be no more than two departure procedures to be used by one operator for an aeroplane type, one of which should be identified as the normal departure procedure and the other as the noise abatement departure procedure.  d) Normal departure procedures typically include general noise reduction measures that encompass one of the two examples shown in the appendix to this chapter – Noise Abatement Departure Climb Guidance. …. Noise abatement climb example of a procedure alleviating noise close to the aerodrome (NADP 1) 2.4 On reaching an altitude at or above 240 m (800 ft) above aerodrome elevation, adjust and maintain engine power/thrust in accordance with the noise abatement power/thrust schedule provided in the aircraft operating manual. Maintain a climb speed of V 2 plus 20 to 40 km/h (10 to 20 kt) with flaps and slats in the take-off configuration. 3. Noise abatement climb -Example of a procedure alleviating noise distant from the aerodrome (NADP 2) 3.4 On reaching an altitude equivalent to at least 240 m (800 ft) above aerodrome elevation, decrease aircraft body angle/angle of pitch whilst maintaining a positive rate of climb, accelerate towards V ZF and either: a) reduce power with the initiation of the first flap/slat retraction; or b) reduce power after flap/slat retraction.

ICAO PANS OPS Volume 1 (Doc 8168-OPS/611) Close in NADP 1 Thrust Red V2 + 10 Flap Retract Best climb Distant NADP 2 Flap Retract 1500ft 3000ft 800ft

Manufacturer State of the Art FMS TAKE OFF Page: Acceleration + Flap retraction BOEING AIRBUS Thrust Reduction

Manufacturer Projects Example of future development: “Airbus are developing a new FMS function that should be available next year and will have a function called NADP (Standard on A380) which will allow the use of multiple noise abatement procedures optimised for individual runways for a particular set of operating conditions. The power reduction altitude could be optimised as a function of the weight. It may be possible to uplink the noise abatement procedure to the FMS from the ACARS. There would be a planning tool, called ADAS Airbus Departure Analysis Software, to calculate best procedure. The FMS would have a noise page entered from the performance pages. The reduction altitude is the main parameter to optimise when designing Noise Abatement Procedure. If up-linked by ACARS, no additional workload for pilots. “

July 2005 OPSG draft JAR-OPS 1.235 Noise abatement procedures (a) When establishing noise abatement procedures, an operator shall ensure that they comply with ICAO PANS OPS Volume 1 (Doc 8168-OPS/611) in order to meet aerodrome noise abatement objectives. The departure noise abatement procedures shall comprise a maximum of two climb profiles for each aeroplane type, one of which shall meet the close-in noise abatement objective and the other the distant noise abatement objective as defined in PANS OPS Volume 1. Note: climb profile means sequence of actions. Example: first reduce thrust then accelerate.

OPSG comments The group examined the regulation proposed 2 years ago and thought it needs more work but then failed to produce an acceptable proposed text for the following reasons:  a) It was unclear if it is acceptable to introduce variable thrust reduction heights and acceleration heights with the advent of modern FMS/autoflight systems for each runway, or even aircraft weight on a particular day.  b) In adjacent paragraphs of PANS-OPS there appears to be conflicts between the two noise abatement procedures and the normal procedure.  e) Concerns over the difficulty of applying a simple solution that would apply equally well to older and newer types of aircraft.  

OPSG request OST advice before further action. OPSG conclusion The group concluded that:  a) The initial climb phase of flight is defined as critical and any changes must be assessed for their safety/workload impact.  b) We must limit the complexity and number of procedures. The procedures should always have the same philosophy and structure with identical sequence of actions.  c)  Noise abatement must always come second to safety considerations.                   OPSG request OST advice before further action.